Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Giving the authority of law income tax to thegovernment for decided kind of service as income tax object article23, evoke extend income tax object article23, that is not only as a passive income but also as a business income.There is two analytical questions in this research, the first is how to implications of extend income tax object article 23 for the government, with holder and income tax receiver. The second, what the suitable of taxobject that can change to be a saw with holding income tax article 23 base on with holding income tax conception and international best practice.This research used qualitative approach with a descriptive researc htype to describe an objective with facts that revealed. The collecting data technique itself is done by a literature study from various sources like an article, book, internet and in¬depth interview with some informants whoa rerelated with this research.The result of this research shown that development income tax object article 23 has an implication to the government such as increase tax acceptance, decrease cost collection, and have opportunity cost. For with holder have burden. Moreover, for implication to income tax receiver is the cash flow tax receiver can be decrease, time of money lose, and increase compliance cost. Base donw it hholding income tax conception and international best practice, the suitable object as income tax object article 23 is inpassive income.This research recommended, the administration tax system in thegovernment need tobe fix, giving reward to with holder, apply proper income tariff that cannot disturbed the cashflow, clarify the object of income taxarticle 23 with giving definition and sample from theobject, streamline income tax article 25."

"Direktorat Jenderal Pajak menggunakan withholding system sebagai salah satu cara yang efektif untuk memungut pajak, sebab system ini memastikan realisasi penerimaan pajak lebih. Withholding system juga dapat meminimalisir kebocoran pajak yang dilakukan melalui praktek tax avoidance dan tax evasion. Tetapi sistem ini memberikan beban yang cukup berat bagi Wajib Pajak yang dipotong dan pihak pemotong pajak karena mengganggu likuiditasnya dan menimbulkan beban administrasi. Langkah Direktorat Jenderal Pajak mengeluarkan Peraturan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Nomor : PER-70/PJ./2007 Tanggal 9 April 2007 Tentang Jenis Jasa Lain Dan Perkiraan Penghasilan Neto Sebagaimana Dimaksud Dalam Pasal 23 Ayat (1) Huruf C Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1983 Tentang Pajak Penghasilan Sebagaimana Telah Beberapa Kali Diubah Terakhir Dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2000, yang merupakan perubahan dari PER-178/PJ/2007 dan KEP-170/PJ./2002 yang menurunkan beberapa tarif efektif pemotongan PPh Pasal 23 yang merupakan salah satu jenis withholding tax merupakan jawaban Direktorat Jenderal Pajak atas berbagai kritik yang diterima berkaitan dengan tingginya tarif dan jenis penghasilan yang dikenakan pemotongan pajak. Pokok permasalahan dalam penelitian ini pertama, bagaimana implementasi penurunan pemotongan tarif PPh Pasal 23 khususnya atas jasa teknik, jasa manajemen dan jasa konsultasi terhadap kinerja keuangan Wajib Pajak yang mempunyai usaha dibidang tersebut di KPP PMA Lima? Kedua, faktor-faktor apa yang menentukan keberhasilan/kegagalan penerapan kebijakan pemerintah menurunkan tarif PPh Pasal 23 khususnya atas jasa teknik, jasa manajemen dan jasa konsultasi Ketiga, Apakah besaran penurunan tarif PPh Pasal 23 atas jasa teknik, jasa manajemen dan jasa konsultasi sudah tepat untuk memacu perkembangan usaha Wajib Pajak Kerangka teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah bahwa withholding system adalah suatu sistem pemungutan pajak yang memberi wewenang kepada pihak ketiga untuk memotong/memungut besarnya pajak yang terutang, pihak ketiga yang telah ditentukan tersebut selanjutnya menyetorkan dan melaporkannya kepada fiskus. Sistem withholding tax ini dirancang untuk menghasilkan penerimaan pajak dengan jumlah yang besar secara lebih efisien dan tidak memerlukan biaya yang besar, sangat efektif untuk memungut pajak penghasilan. Kelemahan dari pemotongan pajak ini dapat menimbulkan kesulitan yang cukup besar pada Wajib Pajak tertentu sebagai akibat dari kelebihan potong serta munculnya biaya administrasi untuk memotong pajak bagi pihak yang membayarkan penghasilan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif. Analisa penelitian didasarkan pada data kinerja keuangan dan laporan SPT Tahunan PPh Badan Wajib Pajak sampel serta hasil wawancara mendalam dengan Kepala Kantor Pelayanan Pajak PMA Lima, konsultan pajak dan pakar masalah withholding tax serta Account Representative yang mengawasi kewajiban perpajakan Wajib Pajak.Hasil penelitian terhadap data kinerja keuangan Wajib Pajak sampel menunjukkan bahwa semua Wajib Pajak sampel mengalami peningkatan kinerja keuangan setelah diterapkannya kebijakan penurunan tarif pemotongan PPh Pasal 23. Kenaikan kinerja keuangan Wajib Pajak karena peningkatan omzet penjualan dan efisiensi biaya operasional sehingga Wajib Pajak memperoleh laba yang jauh lebih baik dibanding tahun sebelumnya. Analisia terhadap hasil wawancara mendalam memberi gambaran bahwa faktor-faktor utama yang menentukan kenaikan omzet penjualan Wajib Pajak adalah adanya ekspansi usaha, dan meningkatnya order dan perolehan order baru. Penurunan tarif PPh Pasal 23 hanya faktor pendukung yang kontribusinya tidak signifikan. Wajib Pajak menyambut biasa saja penurunan tarif PPh Pasal 23 ini dan lebih mempertanyakan tentang kepastian hukum mengenai jenis penghasilan yang dikenakan pemotongan pajak. Dapat diberikan beberapa saran, pertama, sebelum menentukan tarif pemotongan pemerintah seharusnya Direktorat Jenderal Pajak mengadakan kajian terlebih dahulu untuk mengetahui berapa laba rata-rata per industri supaya didapatkan tarif yang tepat yang tidak memberatkan Wajib Pajak dan tidak menyebabkan kelebihan potong dengan melibatkan semua pihak terkait. Kedua, perlu dilakukan penelitian secara kuantitatif dengan jumlah populasi dan sampel yang lebih besar untuk mengetahui pengaruh penurunan tarif pemotongan PPh Pasal 23 terhadap kinerja keuangan Wajib Pajak agar bisa diambil kesimpulan secara umum. Ketiga, perlu dilakukan penelitian lebih mendalam untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan turunnya prosentase biaya operasional Wajib Pajak. Keempat, perlu dilakukan penelitian lebih lanjut bagaimana hubungan antara faktor kepercayaan Wajib Pajak kepada Account Representative dengan meningkatnya kepatuhan Wajib Pajak dalam menyajikan laporan keuangannya.

---

The Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) using withholding system as one of the effective ways to collect taxes because this system makes tax collected earlier. Although in the other side, this system gives taxpayer and withholder load administratively. Inappropriate tax rate can disturb taxpayer liquidity and company operational. Based on these condition, DGT released the regulation number : PER-70/PJ./2007 about other services and net income estimation that decreased some effective rate of withholding income tax article 23 (PPh Pasal 23). The research aim to analyze, first, how does the decreasing in income tax article 23 for technical, management and consultant services implementation and the effect to tax payer financial performance in Foreign Investment Five Tax Office (KPP PMA Lima). Second, what does the success factor that determine policy implementation. Third, how the effectiveness of decreasing rate can stimulate tax payer business growth? The theory which support research is withholding at source is method of collecting income tax whereby the party paying income to a taxpayer (e.g., an employer) is required to deduct the tax due from the taxpayer's paycheck. Countries that levy relatively successful income taxes collect most of the tax through withholding or 'third party' techniques that in effect charge a third party with the tasks of deducting the tax form some payment being made to the taxpayer and then remitting the proceeds to the government. Unfortunately this system can make difficulties to the taxpayer as effect of over withheld and arising administrative cost to withheld tax for the party that making payment. To answer the research aim, the researcher used the qualitative method. Research was analysis base on taxpayer financial performance data and corporate income tax return that reported to KPP PMA Lima. These data will be cross check with the result of interviews with head office of KPP PMA Lima, tax consultant and account representative who control taxpayer's obligations.The result of these research shows that taxpayer samples financial performance increase after decreasing in income tax article 23 implementation. But in fact, this condition more caused by increased in sales and operational cost efficiency, so that taxpayer made higher profit. From analyzing in depth interview describes that taxpayer sales increased determined factor was business expand, contract extension and obtain new contract. So, decreasing in income tax article 23 implementation was just supporting factor that didn't significance to taxpayer business growth. Although it didn't significance, but, too high rate and followed by inefficiency and didn't comply taxpayer can made over withheld that caused compliance cost by tax audit refund. The other significance factor that increased taxpayer financial performance was complying in financial report. In the other side, researcher found that taxpayer concern to law certainty about object of income withheld more than rate. Therefore researcher suggested, first, DGT should make research to know average profit per industry so can find appropriate rate that make taxpayer burden and over withheld. Second, quantitative research with bigger population and sample to take general conclusion is needed to know the impact of decreasing in tax rate to taxpayer financial performance. Third, the deepen research is needed to know the factors that caused decreasing in percentage of operational cost. Forth, further research is needed to know relationship between trust factor among fiscus and taxpayer with taxpayer complying in financial report."

"Starting on April 2007, The Directorate General of Taxes has imposed Income Tax Article 23 of advertisement installing services at printed media by withholding tax system. Since the 2006 tax revenue did not reach its target, this policy is established as one of way to fulfill tax revenue in 2007 and years after it. The industry itself is in the financial unstable condition. This research begins with the fact that income from advertisement installing service is categorized as business income, which net income is difficult to determine before end of tax year because there are no exact amount of both revenues and expenses yet. It causes the difficulty in determining the accurate tax rate of Article 23 that is collected by withholding tax system. The inaccurate tax rate of Article 23 itself may affect the company?s cash flow.

The research has two purposes: (1) to find out the policy?s backgrounds in imposing Income Tax Article 23 on advertisement installing services at printed media by withholding tax system; and (2) to explain the problems occur during the accomplishment of the impositions of Income Tax Article 23 on advertisement installing services at printed media. In order to accomplish the purposes mentioned above, this research done by qualitative approach using depth interview as qualitative data collection technique. This research can be also classified into descriptive, pure, and cross-sectional research.

The results show that the reasons in imposing Income Tax Article 23 on advertisement installing services at printed media are: (1) to input advertisement installing services at printed media to taxation system in order to save its tax potential; (2) to explore a potential tax revenue from advertisement installing services transactions at printed media; (3) to help increasing the government?s revenue during the year. This research also proves that this Article 23 imposition causes several problems: (1) lack of proper socialization from tax officer causing less awareness of tax withholder in withholding printed media?s taxes; (2) dispute between user and advertisement agents in determining the party that obliged to withhold the Article 23 taxes of printed media as a result of bias procedure; (3) decreased daily budget of printed media; (4) increased administrative burden for both user, printed media, and tax officer."

"Fokus dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui justifikasi pemerintah dalam menetapkan kebijakan Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 22 atas Barang Sangat Mewah. berikutnya juga membahas mengenai dasar pemikiran dalam penetapan objek dari pajak ini dan juga meninjau Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 22 atas Barang Sangat Mewah ini apabila dilihat dari konsepsi penggolongan pajak. Penelitian ini menggunakan kualitatif pada pertanyaan pertama dan kedua, sedangkan untuk pertanyaan ketiga menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Pengumpulan data yang dilakukan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan studi literatur, penelitian lapangan dan juga dengan wawancara mendalam.Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah justifikasi pemerintah dalam kebijakan ini adalah didasari karena rendahnya kesadaran Wajib Pajak dalam memenuhi kewajiban perpajakannya. Dalam penentuan objek pajaknya yang menjadi pertimbangan pemerintah adalah efek barang tersebut terhadap pasar apabila barang tersebut dijadikan objeknya dan juga beberapa pertimbangan dari sifat barang-barang yang akan dikenakan seperti harga, konsumen barang tersebut, keberadaan barang tersebut di pasaran dan sebagainya. Sedangkan dalam pengujiannya terhadap konsepsi penggolongan pajak kebijakan ini tidak memenuhi karakteristik Pajak Langsung yang merupakan dasar dari Pajak Penghasilan dan Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 22 atas Barang Sangat Mewah ini lebih cocok dan memenuhi kriteria dari cukai (Excise).

---

The focus of this research is to know the justification of government in the Income Tax Policy Article 22 on Very Luxurious Goods. The next focus is to know the government consideration in determining an object of the Income Tax Article 22, and to observe this policy toward the conception of classifying tax. These researches use a qualitative approach for the first and second questions, whereas the third questions use a quantitative approach. The collecting data method which is used in this research is study literature, field research and indepth interview. Base at it?s purposive, this research includes in descriptive research.

The result from this research is, in this policy the justification of government based on the low of consciousness taxpayer to complete their tax duty. In determining the tax object which becomes the government consideration is the effect of those goods toward a market if those goods become an object and also some consideration from the goods characteristic which imposition like price, the consumer, the existence of goods in market and etc. While, the test toward classifying tax conception policy is unqualified to the direct tax which become the basic from Income Tax and Income Tax Policy Article 22 about very luxurious goods is more suitable and qualify the criteria from excise."

"Pajak bersifat memaksa dan dapat dipaksakan. Disamping kewajiban, Wajib Pajak juga diberikan hak-hak. Wajib Pajak mempunyai hak yang mendasar yaitu mengajukan Keberatan, Banding dan Gugatan. Gugatan diatur dalam pasal 23 Undang-Undang tentang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan. Untuk petunjuk pelaksanaan diatur dalam Pasal 37 Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 74 tahun 2011. Hal-hal yang dapat diajukan sebagai Gugatan diatur pada pasal 23 Undang- Undang tentang Ketentuan Umum Perpajakan yang memberikan secara luas kepada Wajib Pajak mengenai hal-hal yang dapat diajukan Gugatan. Sementara dalam PP No. 74 tahun 2011 sebagai Petunjuk Pelaksanaan dari Undang-Undang KUP tersebut dalam Pasal 37 menyebutkan tentang Gugatan yang tidak dapat diajukan atau adanya pembatasan mengenai hal-hal yang bisa diajukan Gugatan. Dengan demikian Undang-Undang sendiri memberikan rumusan yang lebih luas mengenai apa saja yang diajukan sebagai gugatan, tetapi di Peraturan Pemerintah dibatasi hal-hal yang tidak bisa diajukan sebagai Gugatan.

---

Taxation is coercive and can be enforced. Besides liability, the taxpayer is also granted rights. Taxpayers have a right fundamental objection is filed, Appeal and Lawsuit. The lawsuit provided for in article 23 of the Law on General Provisions and Tax Procedures. For guidelines set out in Article 37 of Government Regulation No. 74 of 2011. The things that can be submitted as stipulated in Article 23, Claims Act on General Rules of Taxation which gives broadly to taxpayers on matters that may be filed lawsuit. While the PP. 74 in 2011 as the directive implementation in Article 37 mentions the lawsuit can not be filed or the restriction of the things that can be filed lawsuit. Thus the Law itself provides a broadly defined as to what is proposed as a lawsuit, but in limited government regulation of things that can not be filed as a lawsuit. "

"EPC project meaning that a construction company will handle whole work, from designing activity, procurement and implementation construction. Base imposition withholding tax article 23 and Value Added Tax (VAT) on EPC project are from their service value. However, in fact EPC project have same treatment equal with construction services in general. This difference is happen because there are no specific regulation about the EPC project. The regulation that exist for now, just only controls about the taxation charge for the construction company in general.

The research is using quantitative approach in intention to have better understanding and interpretation about a social phenomenon through observation. This research is among descriptive research to describe research object based on the fact notice or as it is. Primary data gathering is acquired by doing in-depth interview to discover information from informant who is directly involve in EPC project especially with taxation division, the government who is making the policy, tax consultant, academician and association of constructions. Secondary data is acquired by literature study to optimize theoretical framework in deciding the purpose and goal of the research also the concepts and other theoretical material in conjunction with research problem. Data analyses are using qualitative data analysis based on field discovery, both primary and secondary data.

From the analysis that are conducted, it is found that the basic differences about the charge between withholding tax article 23 and basic charge of VAT on EPC project. The reason is there are differences of understanding the regulation that exist, this thing is practically cause some problems, whether it is between the EPC industrialist with the owner of the project, or between the EPC industrialist with the taxation checkers side. So, it is necessary for making the constitution regarding the tax object of EPC project . Next, specific taxation regulation about the EPC project needs to be created, to think of there are non similar understandings of the regulation that exist. With the existence of the specific special regulation about the EPC project, It is doubtfully will not cause the difference of understandings between the EPC industrialist and the owner of the project."

"Salah satu badan yang ditunjuk menjadi pemungut pajak penghasilan pasal 22 adalah bank BUMN. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memaparkan pertimbangan pemerintah dalam menentukan kebijakan pemungutan PPh pasal 22 oleh bank BUMN, proses formulasi kebijakan, serta implikasi yang timbul atas kebijakan tersebut terkait prinsip netralitas dan biaya ekonomi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif yang menggunakan teknik wawancara mendalam dengan jenis penelitian deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pertimbangan utama penunjukkan bank BUMN menjadi pemungut adalah performa bank BUMN yang baik dalam perekonomian. Proses formulasi secara umum telah berjalan sesuai dengan proses formulasi yang ideal namun terdapat beberapa aktor kebijakan yang belum terlibat secara mendalam dalam proses formulasi. Implikasi yang timbul atas kebijakan ini adalah terkait biaya ekonomi yang menambah biaya yang signifikan bagi bank BUMN.

---

State Owned Bank is one of the entity appointed as Article 22 Income Tax Withholding agent in Indonesia. This research describes the consideration of that policy, the process of policy formulation, and the implication arise by that policy related neutrality and cost of economy principal. This research is a qualitativedescriptive research with in-depth interview and literature review as data collection techniques. The result of this research shows that the main consideration of this policy is the good state owned bank performance in the economy sector. Formulation process is running with ideal process, but there are some actors of policy that has not deeply involved in the formulation. Implication of this policy is about economical cost that add some significant cost for State Owned Bank."

"Laporan magang ini membahas tentang kepatuhan PT MOP dalam memenuhi kewajiban Pajak Penghasilan Pasal 25. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa PT MOP sudah melakukan perhitungan, pembayaran, dan pelaporan PPh pasal 25 dengan tepat waktu pada tahun 2016. Namun di tahun 2017, PT MOP tidak dapat membayar PPh pasal 25 hingga tanggal jatuh tempo pembayaran. Oleh karena itu, Direktorat Jenderal Pajak mengeluarkan surat tagihan pajak atas PPh pasal 25 yang tidak atau kurang dibayar. Hasil analisis juga menunjukkan bahwa manajemen perpajakan perusahaan kurang baik karena perusahaan tidak mempunyai usaha analisis mengenai perencanaan pajak hingga pengendalian pajak setiap tahunnya. Oleh karena itu, PT MOP harus mengintegrasikan manajemen perpajakannya ke seluruh fungsi manajemen agar implementasinya dapat berjalan dengan efektif. Lalu, terkait dengan pelunasan semua kewajiban pajaknya berdasarkan yang terdapat pada surat tagihan pajak, PT MOP membuat keputusan untuk membayar pokok dan sanksi administrasi sekaligus dengan pertimbangan biaya dan manfaat dibandingkan dengan pilihan untuk mengangsur dengan bank garansi.

---

This internship report explains about PT MOP`s compliance of income tax obligation article 25. The result of the analysis shows that PT MOP has done the calculation, payment, and reporting of income tax article 25 on time in 2016. However, in 2017, PT MOP can not pay income tax article 25 until the due date of payment. Therefore, Directorate General of Taxes issues the notice of tax collection on taxes are not or less paid. The result of analysis also explains that the company`s tax management is not good because the company has no business analysis of tax planning until tax control for every year. Therefore, PT MOP must integrate its tax management to all management functions so that its implementation can proceed effectively. Then, related to the settlement of all outstanding tax liability based on notice of tax collection, PT MOP made the decision to pay off the principal and the administrative sanctions at the same time with consideration of costs and benefits compared to the repayment option by attaching a bank guarantee."

"Berlakunya Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) No. 46 Tahun 2013 membuat Norma Penghitungan Penghasilan Neto yang diatur di Pasal 14 Undang ? Undang Pajak Penghasilan (UU PPh) tidak lagi berlaku bagi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi yang menjalankan kegiatan usaha dengan peredaran bruto dibawah Rp. 4,8 miliar setahun. Kebijakan tersebut dalam rangka penyederhanaan pelaksanaan kewajiban perpajakan bagi WP Orang Pribadi. Penelitian kuantitatif, dengan survey dan wawancara mendalam bertujuan membandingkan penggunaan Norma Penghitungan Penghasilan Neto dan Pajak Penghasilan Final 1% dalam pemenuhan kewajiban Pajak Penghasilan Orang Pribadi ditinjau dari asas simplicity. Ketentuan Norma Penghitungan Penghasilan Neto dan Pajak Penghasilan Final 1% bagi Wajib Pajak Orang Pribadi telah memenuhi asas simplicity.

---

Government Regulation No. 46 Year 2013 made Deemed Profit which is regulated in Article 14 of Income Tax Act is no longer applied to the Individual Taxpayer who is carrying on business activities with a gross turnover of less than Rp. 4.8 billion a year. This quantitative approach used survey and in-depth interview as collection data technique. The research focused to compare the use of Deemed Profit and Final Income Tax 1% in the fulfillment of Personal Income Tax liability in terms of simplicity. As a result, simplicity has been felt by Individual Taxpayer who used Deemed Profit and Final Income Tax 1%."

"Penelitian ini mengangkat permasalahan yaitu alasan pemerintah menerapkan tax holiday, proses formulasi tax holiday, dan tanggapan pelaku industri yang sudah existing terhadap tax holiday. Pendekatan penelitian kualitatif dengan jenis penelitian deskriptif. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa alasan pemerintah menerapkan kebijakan tax holiday karena amanat dari undang-undang, tax competition, dan dampak positif dari tax holiday. Proses formulasi kebijakan tax holiday telah mengikuti Peraturan Menteri Negara Pendayagunaan Aparatur negara Nomor: PER/04/M.PAN/4/2007, model rasional sederhana Patton dan Savicky, dan aspek-aspek insentif pajak menurut Easson. Akan tetapi, formulasi kebijakan tax holiday tersebut belum mengikutsertkan secara langsung pihak swasta, asosiasi, dan pemerintah daerah sehingga kurang aspiratif. Tanggapan pelaku industri yang sudah existing terhadap tax holiday adalah positif. Akan tetapi, ketentuan tax holiday kurang jelas dan rumit, serta diskriminasi antara investor baru dengan investor lama.

---

The issues of this underthesis are the reason of the government implemented tax holiday, formulation process of tax holiday, respone of industry players who already existing about tax holiday. The research approach is qualitative to the type of descriptive research. The result showed that the reason of the government implemented tax holiday because of the mandate of law, tax competition, and positive effect of tax holiday. The formulation process has followed the stages of the Minister of Administrative Reform Number: PER/04/M.PAN/4/2007, according to a simple rational model of Patton and Savicky, and importance aspects of Easson. Nevertheless, the formulation is not directly involve private sector, association, and local government, so that less aspiration. Responses of existing industry to tax holiday is a positive. However, the provision of tax holiday is less clear and complex, as well as discrimination between new and old investors."