Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Skripsi ini mengkaji permasalahan hukum dalam pengisian jabatan hakim agung dan hakim konstitusi di Indonesia, dengan tujuan mengusulkan mekanisme pengisian yang bebas dari intervensi politik. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian doktrinal dengan pendekatan analitis serta pendekatan perbandingan hukum. Pengisian jabatan hakim di Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi merupakan hal krusial dalam menentukan independensi kehakiman. Berdasarkan temuan, terdapat intervensi politik yang dilakukan oleh DPR dalam pemilihan hakim agung yang ditunjukkan dalam pengambilan keputusan subjektif dan ketidakpatuhan DPR terhadap aturan dalam pengisian hakim agung. Sedangkan dalam pengisian hakim konstitusi, intervensi politik terjadi karena ketiadaan peraturan baku yang memungkinkan penyelundupan hukum oleh Pemerintah dan DPR. Solusi yang diajukan melibatkan penambahan syarat masa tenggang bagi anggota partai politik yang mendaftar sebagai calon hakim agung, penguatan sistem nonrenewable term dan penambahan syarat masa tenggang bagi calon hakim konstitusi. Pemerintah juga disarankan untuk mengatur penambahan ketentuan dalam UU tentang MK yang memaksa lembaga pengusul membentuk mekanisme baku yang transparan, profesional, dan memprioritaskan independensi kekuasaan kehakiman.

---

This thesis examines legal issues in the appointment of Supreme Court and Constitutional Court judges in Indonesia, aiming to propose a mechanism free from political intervention. The research employs a doctrinal approach with analytical and comparative legal methods. The appointment of judges in the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court is crucial in determining judicial independence. Findings indicate political intervention by the DPR (People's Consultative Assembly) in the selection of Supreme Court judges, evidenced by subjective decision-making and non-compliance with appointment regulations. In the case of Constitutional Court judges, political intervention arises due to the absence of standardized regulations, allowing legal smuggling by the Government and DPR. Proposed solutions involve adding a cooling-off period for political party members applying for the position of Supreme Court judge, strengthening the nonrenewable term system, and introducing a cooling-off period requirement for Constitutional Court candidates. Additionally, it is recommended to amend the Constitutional Court Law to compel proposing institutions to establish standardized mechanisms that are transparent, professional, and prioritize judicial independence."

"Penelitian ini didasarkan pada wewenang Komisi Yudisial untuk mengusulkan pengangkatan hakim agung. Penulis ingin melihat hubungan Komisi Yudisial dengan Mahkamah Agung dalam rekrutmen hakim agung. Penelitian ini membahas dua permasalahan. Pertama, kedudukan dan peran Komisi Yudisial dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Kedua, hubungan Komisi Yudisial dengan Mahkamah Agung dalam rekrutmen hakim agung. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Komisi Yudisial adalah state auxiliary organ (lembaga negara bantu) yang menunjang Mahkamah Agung. Hubungan Komisi Yudisial dengan Mahkamah Agung dalam rekrutmen hakim agung tidak berjalan dengan baik karena permasalahan hukum berupa ketidakjelasan pengaturan dan ketiadaan pengaturan mengenai beberapa hal krusial dalam rekrutmen hakim agung.

---

The thesis is based on the Judicial Commission?s authority to propose the appointment of supreme court justices. Author would like to see the relationship between Judicial Commision and Supreme Court in the recruitment of the Supreme Court justices. This research focus on two main problems. First, the position and role of the Judicial Commission in the state system of Indonesia. Secondly, relationship between Judicial Commision and Supreme Court in the recruitment of the Supreme Court justices. Method used in this research is juridical-normative.

The result of this research shows that the Judicial Commission is an state auxiliary organ to support the Supreme Court. Relationship between Judicial Commision and Supreme Court in the recruitment of the Supreme Court justices does not work well in reality because of legal problems of vagueness and lack of regulation some crucial matters in the justices recruitment."

"This book presents a quantitative history of constitutional law in the United States and brings together humanistic and social-scientific approaches to studying law. Using theoretical models of adjudication, Tom S. Clark presents a statistical model of law and uses the model to document the historical development of constitutional law. Using sophisticated statistical methods and historical analysis of court decisions, the author documents how social and political forces shape the path of law. Spanning the history of constitutional law since Reconstruction, this book illustrates the way in which the law evolves with American life and argues that a social-scientific approach to the history of law illuminates connections across disparate areas of the law, connected by the social context in which the Constitution has been interpreted."

"Sistem pengawasan terhadap hakim konstitusi di Indonesia berdasarkan UUD 1945 dan UU No. 24 Tahun 2003 secara implisit melibatkan dua bentuk pengawasan, yaitu pengawasan internal oleh Majelis Kehormatan dan pengawasan eksternal oleh Komisi Yudisial. Sistem pengawasan tersebut akhirnya berubah setelah adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 005/PUU-IV/2006. Pasca putusan a quo, sistem pengawasan hakim konstitusi di Indonesia mengalami perubahan substansial terkait bentuk pengawasannya yang meniadakan pengawasan eksternal. Sistem pengawasan internal yang ada pun sering mengalami perubahan sesuai dengan rezim undang-undang dan peraturan pelaksana yang berlaku. Perubahan terkait sistem pengawasan internal yang ada merupakan reaksi guna mengoptimalkan penegakan sistem pengawasan terkait dugaan pelanggaran etik yang dilakukan oleh hakim konstitusi. Dengan demikian, mekanisme penegakan atas pelanggaran etik hakim konstitusi juga memiliki peran yang tidak kalah penting dalam sistem pengawasan hakim konstitusi yang ada saat ini. Oleh karenanya, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan sistem pengawasan hakim konstitusi sesuai peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Indonesia dan memberikan analisis dari pelaksanaan sistem pengawasan yang diterapkan terhadap hakim konstitusi di Indonesia selama berdirinya lembaga Mahkamah Konstitusi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif yang menggunakan metode kualitatif melalui studi perundang-undangan, studi kasus, dan studi perbandingan. Berdasarkan analisis yang dilakukan maka diperoleh kesimpulan bahwa sistem pengawasan terhadap hakim konstitusi yang diterapkan di Indonesia adalah sistem pengawasan internal yang ditegakkan oleh Dewan Etik dan Majelis Kehormatan sebagaimana diatur dalam undang-undang dan peraturan mahkamah konstitusi. Kemudian, terkait pelaksanaan dari sistem pengawasan internal tersebut maka penegakan atas pelanggaran etik yang dilakukan oleh hakim konstitusi dapat dibagi menjadi tiga periode dengan lembaga pengawas dan mekanisme penegakan sesuai peraturan mahkamah konstitusi yang berlaku. Meskipun demikian, terkait dengan sistem pengawasan hakim konstitusi dan penegakannya masih dapat dioptimalkan mengingat kurang efektif dan tidak kuatnya lembaga pengawas dari sisi kelembagaan maupun kewenangan.

---

The supervision system for constitutional judges in Indonesia is based on the 1945 Constitution and Law No. 24/2003 implicitly involves two forms of supervision, namely internal supervision by the Honorary Council and external supervision by the Judicial Commission. The monitoring system finally changed after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 005/PUU-IV/2006. After the decision ruling, the supervision system for constitutional judges in Indonesia underwent a substantial change in the form of supervision that eliminated external supervision. The existing internal control system often changes in accordance with the current statutory regime and implementing regulations. Changes related to the existing internal supervision system are a reaction in order to optimize the enforcement of the supervisory system related to suspected ethical violations committed by constitutional judges. Thus, the enforcement mechanism for ethical violations of constitutional judges also has an equally important role in the current constitutional justice supervision system. Therefore, this study aims to explain the supervision system of constitutional judges in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations in Indonesia and provide an analysis of the implementation of the supervision system applied to constitutional judges in Indonesia during the establishment of the Constitutional Court. This research is a normative juridical research using qualitative methods through statutory studies, case studies, and comparative studies. Based on the analysis conducted, it is concluded that the supervisory system for constitutional judges applied in Indonesia is an internal control system enforced by the Ethics Council and the Honorary Council as regulated in the laws and regulations of the constitutional court. Then, regarding the implementation of the internal control system, the enforcement of ethical violations committed by constitutional judges can be divided into three periods with the supervisory agency and the enforcement mechanism in accordance with the applicable constitutional court regulations. However, in relation to the supervision system for constitutional judges and its enforcement, it can still be optimized considering the ineffective and insufficient strength of the supervisory agency from the institutional and authority sides."