"[
ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas pengaruh kuasa wacana terhadap pilihan bebas tokoh Sasana
dalam proses pembentukan eksistensi diri. Dengan menggunakan teori kuasa
wacana Foucault, analisis menunjukkan bahwa kehidupan Sasana tidak pernah
lepas dari kuasa wacana yang mengonstruksi pemikiran dan tindakannya. Ia
mendefinisikan diri berhadapan dengan wacana yang mengharuskannya membuat
pilihan dalam menentukan jalan hidupnya. Dengan menggunakan teori
eksistensialisme Sartre, analisis menunjukkan bahwa dalam proses pendefinisian
tersebut, ia memperjuangkan pilihan bebasnya dengan cara bernegosiasi dengan
wacana. Ia dapat memilih untuk patuh terhadap kekuasaan tersebut atau tidak
patuh dan melakukan hal yang berlawanan dengan wacana kuasa. Kesadaran
Sasana sendiri yang memutuskan untuk memberikan atau tidak memberikan
otoritas kepada wacana untuk menguasai dirinya, karena proses pendefinisian diri
sepenuhnya adalah keputusan dari pilihan bebas Sasana. Hasil analisis
menunjukkan bahwa kuasa wacana yang terrepresentasikan dalam pandangan
orang lain memberi pengaruh dalam pembentukan eksistensi diri Sasana ketika ia
tidak setia pada pilihan bebasnya dan menolak untuk bertanggungjawab atas
pilihan tersebut. Sebaliknya, Sasana terbebas dari pengaruh wacana ketika ia setia
pada eksistensi diri yang telah ditetapkannya dan bertanggungjawab terhadap
segala konsekuensi dari pilihan bebas tersebut.
ABSTRACTThis Thesis analysis the influence of discourse toward the free will of Sasana in
constructing self Existence process. By using Foucault?s theory of the power of
discourse, the analysis shows that Sasana?s life is never liberated from the power
of discourse that constructing his way of think and his way of act. He defines
himself toward the discourse that requires him to make choice in determining his
way. By using Sartre?s theory of existentialism, the analysis shows that in that
process, he struggle for his free will in the manner of negotiating with the
discourse. He can chooses to be obedient to the power or not and does the thing
that is opposite with the discourse. It is Sasana?s consciousness which eventually
decides to give or not to give the discourse an authority to take control of himself,
because the total self-defining process is the decision of such free will. It can be
concluded that the power of discourse which is represented by the look of other
influences Sasana?s way of constructing his self existence, when he is not faithful
to his free will and refuses to be responsible for it. On the contrary, Sasana is freed
from the discourse?s influence when he is faithful to his determined self existence
and responsible for all consequences from those free will.;This Thesis analysis the influence of discourse toward the free will of Sasana in
constructing self Existence process. By using Foucault?s theory of the power of
discourse, the analysis shows that Sasana?s life is never liberated from the power
of discourse that constructing his way of think and his way of act. He defines
himself toward the discourse that requires him to make choice in determining his
way. By using Sartre?s theory of existentialism, the analysis shows that in that
process, he struggle for his free will in the manner of negotiating with the
discourse. He can chooses to be obedient to the power or not and does the thing
that is opposite with the discourse. It is Sasana?s consciousness which eventually
decides to give or not to give the discourse an authority to take control of himself,
because the total self-defining process is the decision of such free will. It can be
concluded that the power of discourse which is represented by the look of other
influences Sasana?s way of constructing his self existence, when he is not faithful
to his free will and refuses to be responsible for it. On the contrary, Sasana is freed
from the discourse?s influence when he is faithful to his determined self existence
and responsible for all consequences from those free will.;This Thesis analysis the influence of discourse toward the free will of Sasana in
constructing self Existence process. By using Foucault?s theory of the power of
discourse, the analysis shows that Sasana?s life is never liberated from the power
of discourse that constructing his way of think and his way of act. He defines
himself toward the discourse that requires him to make choice in determining his
way. By using Sartre?s theory of existentialism, the analysis shows that in that
process, he struggle for his free will in the manner of negotiating with the
discourse. He can chooses to be obedient to the power or not and does the thing
that is opposite with the discourse. It is Sasana?s consciousness which eventually
decides to give or not to give the discourse an authority to take control of himself,
because the total self-defining process is the decision of such free will. It can be
concluded that the power of discourse which is represented by the look of other
influences Sasana?s way of constructing his self existence, when he is not faithful
to his free will and refuses to be responsible for it. On the contrary, Sasana is freed
from the discourse?s influence when he is faithful to his determined self existence
and responsible for all consequences from those free will., This Thesis analysis the influence of discourse toward the free will of Sasana in
constructing self Existence process. By using Foucault’s theory of the power of
discourse, the analysis shows that Sasana’s life is never liberated from the power
of discourse that constructing his way of think and his way of act. He defines
himself toward the discourse that requires him to make choice in determining his
way. By using Sartre’s theory of existentialism, the analysis shows that in that
process, he struggle for his free will in the manner of negotiating with the
discourse. He can chooses to be obedient to the power or not and does the thing
that is opposite with the discourse. It is Sasana’s consciousness which eventually
decides to give or not to give the discourse an authority to take control of himself,
because the total self-defining process is the decision of such free will. It can be
concluded that the power of discourse which is represented by the look of other
influences Sasana’s way of constructing his self existence, when he is not faithful
to his free will and refuses to be responsible for it. On the contrary, Sasana is freed
from the discourse’s influence when he is faithful to his determined self existence
and responsible for all consequences from those free will.]"
