Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Skripsi ini membahas karakteristik penghasilan yang timbul atas transaksi melalui kabel optik bawah laut yang melintasi batas teritorial antar negara dan bagaimana analisis perpajakannya. Globalisasi secara tidak langsung mengakibatkan terjadinya pemajakan berganda secara yurisdis, dalam hal ini adalah dispute mengenai karakterisasi penghasilan yang muncul (royalti atau business profit) atas transaksi kabel optik antara negara sumber dan negara domisili. Hal ini menjadi isu yang krusial, mengingat karakterisasi tersebut menentukan negara mana yang berhak untuk memajaki penghasilan tersebut. Lebih lanjut, skripsi ini menggunakan metode studi pustaka dari berbagai macam jurnal, buku dan sumber lain yang terkait, serta wawancara dengan pihak-pihak yang kompeten. Kesimpulan yang didapatkan adalah royalti maupun business profit dapat digunakan untuk menjustifikasi jenis penghasilan yang muncul, tergantung nature dari transaksi dan treaty antara kedua negara yang bertransaksi.

---

This under-graduate thesis discusses the characteristics of revenue arising on a transaction through optical cable across the territorial boundaries between countries and how is the tax analysis. Globalization indirectly lead to the occurrence of juridical double taxation, in which case is a dispute about the characterization of income that arises (royalties or business profit) over optical cable deals between the source and domicile country. This has become a crucial issue, given the characterization of determining which country has the right to tax the earnings. Further, the methods used in this under-graduate thesis are library research and interview with competent experts. In the end, royalty and business profit can be used to justify the kind of earnings that appear; depending on the nature of the transactions and the treaty between the two countries engaged."

"Tax revenue is the biggest source of domestic fund resulted from national productivity for the self-financing of development, government programs, income distribution and indeed a boosting device of investment. Indonesian tax ratio of only 13,6% from GDP indicates a great deal of tax revenue potential. Income tax giving the largest tax contribution of IDR133.967 trillion or 49% of overall tax revenue shows the fact that taxing from taxpayers income is surely a great prospect and will keep on increasing. Taxing on capital income namely tax on interest, rent, dividend, and royalty, is flourishing nowadays due to the fact that lots of spare fund from the community are invested in financial instruments such as in money market, stock, property or direct investment. Self assessment system should be followed with a wide range of controlling function and tax audit to enhance taxpayers acknowledgment and awareness in calculating and reporting their owned tax return fairly and accurately. There is a drive in taxpayers' mind to undertake ways in the effort to reduce their tax compulsion or to avoid being taxable through such a way in the vein of related party transaction occurred in a unfair priced transaction conflicting the arm length transaction. in the end, tax is reduced and country's revenue is gone. The ultimate challenge is on how the tax officers would be able to detect, investigate and make corrections to such transactions supported by the regulating laws that cover the issue so that development fund can be saved and taxpayers become more compliant. Directorate General of Tax itself does have the standard for auditing related-party transaction, but in the field, failures happen to tax such transactions. Globally, the main issue of the thesis is that though taxpayers are given the trust to determine their owned tax obligation, still mistakes and fraud exist in the expense of country's revenue. The ongoing tax audit fails to detect and to put right capital income transactions in related-party scheme. There are triggering factors why such cases take place and the impacts are downbeat especially to the tax generating process. Theoretical framework of the thesis is the ground concept of controlling. Controlling is a process to observe and make sure that prior plan is achieved. Without a sound control, the national budget will hardly be fulfilled and overall tax system will not function as designed. The monitoring of taxpayer compliance is a part of national tax system. The foundation of tax audit is the prevailing conflict of interest between taxpayer and tax officer in calculating the tax payable and as a consequence of self-assessment model applied.Research methods include the research type namely analytical descriptive type using field data to be approached by theoretical and lawful comparability, and compiling data technique that covers library research and field research. Library research is conducted through the search of ground theory, literatures, and set of laws, as the field research covers the search of tax audit report, findings of related cases using purposive sampling method, and field interview with the tax auditors and supervisors in charge.The finding is that there is a tendency in tax audit to miss detecting and correcting capital income transaction involving related-party taxpayers. Such phenomenon has strong reasons and causes destructive impacts. The research conclusions are, firstly: there are triggering factors to those undetectable capital income transactions involving related-party taxpayers, namely: overlooking such transactions by tax officers, inadequate audit time allotment, no specified regulations ruling the issue, unfortunate use of jurisprudence, lack of convincing compatible data, downside of tax officers audit capability, lack of detailed supervision, and no vigorous commitment to implement harsh penalty to the delinquents. Secondly, undetectable capital income transactions involving related party taxpayers causes quite severe impacts, especially to the loss of tax potential revenue, else are the misuse of jurisprudence as referral, the spread of tax avoiding spirit in form of tax planning, and ungovernable tax law enforcement due to the lack of thorough control and harsh penalty.Suggested solution to the problem is by eliminating or .at least reducing the triggering factors of the undetectable capital income transactions involving related-party taxpayers, by: implementing the assessing technique of tax audit and the use of pre-analysis to detect such scheme, allotting much more effective time to the tax audit process, improving ruling regulations, compiling and providing strong compatible data, enhancing officers capability, performing much better control and review, and erecting harsher penalty."

"Kebijakan penggabungan Undang-Undang mengenai Perimbangan Keuangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Pemerintahan Daerah (UU Nomor 33 Tahun 2004) dan Undang-Undang mengenai Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah (UU Nomor 28 Tahun 2009) merupakan penguatan pelaksanaan otonomi daerah yang mulai berkembang, sejalan dengan penyusunan peraturan perundang-undangan yang saat ini cenderung sifatnya simplifikasi. Melalui penyederhanaan regulasi ini terdapat satu kesatuan pengaturan mengenai keuangan daerah baik yang berasal dari perpajakan daerah ataupun dari Transfer ke Daerah. Pengaturan penguatan ini memfokuskan pada signifikannya revenue dan expenditure assignment antar level pemerintahan, yang diharapkan dapat mewujudkan pemerataan layanan publik dan kesejahteraan masyarakat di daerah untuk peningkatan kualitas pelaksanaan desentralisasi fiskal di Indonesia, melalui penguatan belanja daerah, dengan diaturnya batasan-batasan penggunaan belanja daerah, selain itu juga dengan pemutakhiran kebijakan Transfer ke Daerah berbasis kinerja, pengembangan sistem pajak daerah yang efisien, perluasan skema pembiayaan daerah, dan harmonisasi belanja pusat dan daerah

---

The policy of merging the Law on Fiscal Balance between the Central Government and Regional Governments (Law Number 33 of 2004) and the Law on Regional Taxes and Levies (Law Number 28 of 2009) is a strengthening of the implementation of regional autonomy which is starting to develop, in line with the preparation of legislation that currently tends to be simplistic in nature. Through this simplification, there is a unified arrangement of regional finances, either from regional taxation or from transfers to regions. This strengthening arrangement focuses on the significance of revenue and expenditure assignments between levels of government, which is expected to realize equitable distribution of public services and community welfare in the regions to improve the quality of the implementation of fiscal decentralization in Indonesia, through strengthening regional expenditures, by setting limits on the use of regional expenditures, in addition to It also includes updating the performance-based Transfer to Regions policy, developing an efficient regional tax system, expanding regional financing schemes, and harmonizing central and regional expenditures."

"In order to improving awareness and compliance of taxpayers about their rights and obligations, the understanding about justice from a rule of law and regulation looked into to play an important part in improving awareness and taxpayer compliance. Comprehended level of justice of a rule is hence expected by a taxpayer earn more own awareness and compliance about their obligation of taxation. The target of this research is to analyze the level of justice from an imposition of Tax, which is Income Recognition of bank interest payable write-off, evaluated from principle of taxation justice. In this research, a descriptive analysis method was used by through study of bibliography comparing opinion among experts according to their definition, with rule of law and regulation about Recognition of Income for Bank Interest Payable Write-Off. The evaluation use Model System which assessing a policy by comparing input, Process, and Output of law and regulation policy.

From the analyze result, pulled conclusion that rule of legislation of Income Tax about Recognition of Income for Bank Interest Payable Write-Off Do Not reflect principle of justice either through Horizontal and also Vertical, because Income Recognition [of] according to rule of legislation do not in line with taxpayer ability, if compared to Income Recognition from business transaction besides Interest Payable Write-Off.

Revising rule Article 4 sentence (1) Law of Number 7 Year 1983 about Income Tax as have been altered last with Law of Number 17 Year 2000 related with Recognition of Income for Bank Interest Payable Write-Off would be able to bring constructive benefit, in the effort to improve level of its justice."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai pelaksanaan sosialisasi peraturan perpajakan dan kinerja Account Representative dalam membantu Wajib Pajak memenuhi kewajiban perpajakannya di salah satu kantor pajak di Jakarta Utara, yaitu KPP Pratama Jakarta Pademangan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk memaparkan cara-cara dan kendala sosialisasi yang dihadapi oleh KPP Pratama Jakarta Pademangan serta menggambarkan peran Account Representative dalam meningkatkan kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif. Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini kebanyakan dilakukan melalui wawancara terstruktur dengan enam petugas pajak (Account Representative dan Kepala Seksi Pengawasan dan Konsultasi) serta sepuluh orang Wajib Pajak efektif yang terdaftar di KPP Pratama Jakarta Pademangan yang juga menjadi fokus dalam pembahasan penelitian ini. Data lainnya yang berupa hasil tabulasi dianalisis secara deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan masih kurangnya kesadaran dan penolakan Wajib Pajak untuk memahami perpajakan dan memenuhi kewajiban perpajakannya. Dengan demikian diharapkan adanya peran aktif Account Representative dan sosialisasi yang masih harus terus dilakukan dan ditingkatkan, baik dari segi media/cara sosialisasi, materi, dan frekuensi sosialisasi.

---

This research discusses the implementation of socialization of laws and regulations on taxation and Account Representative's performance in helping taxpayers meet the obligations of taxation in one of the tax offices in North Jakarta, KPP Pratama Jakarta Pademangan. The purposes of this study are to describe the ways of socialization and constraints faced by the KPP Pratama Jakarta Pademangan and to describe the roles of Account Representative in improving taxpayers? compliance. This study is a descriptive qualitative research design. The approach used in this research is mostly conducted through structured interviews with six officers taxes (Account Representative and Head of Supervision and Consultation), and ten effective taxpayers listed on KPP Pratama Jakarta Pademangan who also became a focus in the discussion of this research. Other data in the form of tabulated results were analyzed descriptively. The results show that there is still a lack of awareness and denial of the taxpayers to understand about taxation and to fulfill taxation obligations. It is expected that the active role of Account Representative and socialization still need to be done and improved continuously, in terms of media /socialization methods , material, and frequency of socialization."

"Upaya hukum dalam Sengketa Pajak dengan Peninjauan Kembali adalah merupakan hak yang diberikan oleh peraturan perundang-undangan di bidang perpajakan apabila kemudian salah satu pihak tidak puas terhadap putusan Pengadilan Pajak terhadap suatu Sengketa Pajak. Terhadap putusan Pengadilan Pajak yang memenangkan Banding Wajib Pajak dan membebankan kewajiban Imbalan Bunga sebesar 2% (dua persen) kepada Fiskus diatur dalam Pasal 27A ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2007 tentang Ketentuan Umum dan Tata Cara Perpajakan. Fiskus dapat mengajukan upaya hukum Peninjauan Kembali, sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 27 Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2007. Namun dalam Kententuan Pasal 43 ayat (6) huruf b dan huruf c Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 74 Tahun 2011 tentang Tata Cara Pelaksanaan Hak dan Pemenuhan Kewajiban Perpajakan mengamanatkan bahwa dalam hal Wajib Pajak mengajukan permohonan Banding, imbalan bunga diberikan apabila terhadap Putusan Banding tidak diajukan Permohonan Peninjauan Kembali ke Mahkamah Agung, dan dalam hal Putusan Banding diajukan permohonan Peninjauan Kembali, imbalan bunga diberikan apabila Putusan Peninjauan Kembali telah diterima oleh Direktur Jenderal Pajak dari Mahkamah Agung. Maka apabila Pemerintah berlindung pada ketentuan Pasal 43 ayat (6) huruf b dan huruf c Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 74 Tahun 2011 akan mempunyai akibat hukum yakni tertundanya pembayaran imbalan bunga yang merupakan amanat putusan Pengadilan Pajak, penundaan tersebut adalah bertentangan dengan ilmu hukum terkait dengan putusan yang berkekuatan hukum tetap sebagaimana diamanatkan Undang-Undang Nomor 14 Tahun 2002 tentang Pengadilan Pajak Pasal 33 ayat (1) Pasal 86, Pasal 77 ayat (1) dan Pasal 89 ayat (2) bahwa Putusan Pengadilan Pajak langsung dapat dilaksanakan dengan tidak memerlukan lagi keputusan pejabat yang berwenang dan Putusan Pengadilan Pajak merupakan putusan akhir dan mempunyai kekuatan hukum yang tetap serta Permohonan Peninjauan Kembali tidak menangguhkan atau menghentikan pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan Pajak. Dari uraian d atas, bahwa imbalan bunga yang dibebankan kepada Fiskus terhadap amanat putusan Pengadilan Pajak yang memenangkan Banding Wajib Pajak yang merupakan putusan tingkat pertama dan terakhir dapat menimbulkan multi tafsir dalam hal penyelesaian kewajiban perpajakan dan dapat pula menimbulkan ketidakpastian penerapan hukum dalam bidang perpajakan serta dapat merugikan Wajib Pajak.

---

Remedies in Tax Dispute with judicial review is a right granted by legislation in the field of taxation if the later one is not satisfied with the decision of the Tax Court for a Tax Dispute. The decision of the Appeal Tax Court that taxpayer wins and imposes a duty of 2% interest expense (two percent) to the tax authorities provided for in Article 27A paragraph (1) of Law Number 28 Year 2007 regarding General Provisions and Tax Procedures. Tax authorities may file judicial review remedies, as provided for in Article 27 of Law No. 28 of 2007. But in these Terms of Article 43 paragraph (6) letter b and c of Government Regulation Number 74 Year 2011 Concerning the Implementation of the Rights and Obligations Tax Compliance, which mandates that the Taxpayer Appeals to apply, if the interest expense given to the Appeal Decision has not been filed Revision Petition to the Supreme Court, and Appeal Decision in the case of judicial review petition filed, if the exchange rate ruling granted judicial review upon receipt by the Director General of Taxes of the Supreme Court. when the Government took refuge to the provisions of Article 43 paragraph (6) letter b and c of Government Regulation Number 74 Year 2011 has caused the delay in payment of interest expense in return is a mandate Tax Court's decision, the delay is contrary to the law relating to the decision of legally binding as stated in law No. 14 of 2002 concerning the Tax Court, Article 33 paragraph (1), Article 86, Article 77 paragraph (1) and Article 89 paragraph (2) that the Tax Court decision can be implemented immediately with no need for the competent authority's decision and the Tax Court Decision final decision and have the force of the permanent and judicial review application does not suspend or stop the implementation of the Tax Court Decision. From the description above, that the interest expense charged to the tax authorities against the decision of the Tax Court's mandate that won the Taxpayer Appeals is the first and final decision can lead to multiple interpretations in terms of settlement of tax liabilities and may also cause uncertainty in the application of taxation law and can detrimental to the taxpayer."

"Task and responsibility tax representative and tax authority in fulfilling tax obligation is sometimes alike with tax representative which is represented or the one that authorized. The main problem of research in interrogative sentence form, namely, is : How big is the influence of responsibility between representative and tax authority in fulfilling lax obligation? The objective is to know main problem of research hypothesis, namely : First : Is it predicted that responsibility of representative and tax authority has positive influence in fulfilling tax obligation of tax payer? Second : ls it predicted that there is a significant correlation between representative responsibility and tax authority in fulfilling tax obligation of tax payer?Tax law or fiscal law is formulated as : A whole of rules that covering government authority to withdraw someone?s wealth and return to public through government cash office, so that, it becomes a part of public law that regulates connection of law between country (government) and people (public) and institutions (of law) that has obligation to pay tax. Obligation is a must to take a certain steps, pay tax, lbr example, and obey the rules to respect other people. Personal responsibility and in-line of tax obedience is able to be meant as an individual obligation in-line on behalf of him/herself in fulfilling the tax obligation according to tax rules and regulation, as a consequency of rights? got to that person individually of subject and object of tax.Appearance of representative is might be born by an agreement and might be born by regulation Giving authority can be made specific as one purpose only or more and giving authority in general as an arrangement activity only. The representative meant here is covering representative based on regulation as parents or relative according to regulation representing children under their authority.The research used qualitative method. Qualitative method with analysis descriptive approach covering theoretical analysis and bibliography study. Research population are PT. Jasprim Dinamika Global and Indonesia tax consultant. Research variable are tax representative and tax consultant as independent variable. Tax obligation fulfilling of tax payer as dependent variable. Data collecting technique to test hypothesis by simple regression formula and correlation coefficient and determinant coefficient.Calculation result of correlation coefficient is 07338. This correlation coefficient calculation value means the responsibility of representative and tax authority in doing tax obligation of tax payer has a strong positive correlation in fulfilling tax obligation of tax payer. Mentioning of having a strong correlation is because of correlation coefficient value is in coefficient interval of 0.60 to 0.1799. Determinant coefficient of this correlation coefficient is KD = r2 x 100 or 53,85%. The size of representative responsibility and tax authority in fulfilling tax obligation of tax payer which is represented and authorized is 53,85%. The rest is influenced by other factors except the responsibility of representative and tax authority. This case is authomatically as a prove of first hypothesis.Fcounting8 is actually more, if compared with Ftable therefore a whole variable influence is significant. The second hypothesis of this research can be accepted, in another words that there is a significant correlation between representative and tax authority in fulfilling tax obligation of tax payer. This research globally proves that representative and tax authority has a positive influence in fulfilling tax obligation through the using methods.Tax authority in doing its working always refers to valid tax regulation. Letter of statement from tax consultant which should be sent/reported at every time accepting tax authority from tax payer, should not be per tax item enclosure, but just enough in once enclosing of copied enclosure at the time of accepting authority from tax payer of each tax service office."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai analisis masalah perpajakan sebuah perusahaan multinasional dengan jenis usaha toll manufacturing business model, yakni PT XYZ yang berkedudukan di Indonesia. PT XYZ mengadapi dua risiko perpajakan yang merupakan bagian dari masalah perpajakan, yang diantaranya adalah transfer pricing dan perlakuan pajak pertambahan nilai. Risiko dari transfer pricing diakibatkan oleh transaksi kepada pihak afiliasi dan risiko dari pajak pertambahan nilai diakibatkan oleh apakah fasilitas PPN berupa kawasan berikat telah secara efektif digunakan oleh PT XYZ. Penelitian ini merupakan analisis lebih lanjut atas permasalahan perpajakan yang dimiliki oleh PT XYZ. Manajemen perpajakan semestinya dapat menjadi jawaban untuk memitigasi permasalahan pajak di PT XYZ sebagaimana yang telah dikemukakan dalam SPHP. Manajemen perpajakan secara khusus memiliki peranan dalam memitigasi risiko pajak ketika menghadapi proses pemeriksaan pajak. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan PT XYZ untuk mengoptimalkan fungsi dari manajemen perpajakan yang dimilikinya sehingga dapat meminimalisir jumlah pajak yang harus dibayarkan karena koreksi fiskal saat proses pemeriksaan pajak.

---

This undergraduate thesis is about the analysis of the taxation problems in one of the multinational companies, named PT XYZ that implements toll manufacturing model as its business type. PT XYZ faces two taxation risks, which are related to transfer pricing and value added tax (VAT). The risk in transfer pricing is arised by the affiliated party transaction while the risk in value added tax arised by how effective the company using the facility of VAT in the bonded zone. This study is the further analysis of taxation problems of PT XYZ. Taxation management should be the answer to mitigate all taxation problems in PT XYZ as depicted in the notifaction of tax audit findings. Taxation management is specifically being conducted in mitigate the taxation risks when facing the tax audit. This research recommends PT XYZ to optimize the function of their taxation management so that minimize the amount of tax paid to fiscal correction in tax audit process."