Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh Corporate Governance (yang diukur dengan dengan insider ownership, institutional ownership, number of director, non executive director), dan Market Competition (yang diukur dengan Herfindahl Index) terhadap produktivitas perusahaan yang diukur dengan Total Factor Productivity (TFP). Sampel yang digunakan adalah perusahaan yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2009- 2010 kecuali sektor keuangan. Penelitian ini juga menggunakan beberapa variabel kontrol yang berpotensi mempengaruhi produktivitas, yaitu Return of Asset (ROA), Firm Size, Firm Age dan Leverage. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa produktivitas dipengaruhi oleh corporate governance, khususnya untuk pengukuran insider ownership dan institusional ownership yang berhubungan positif, dan non executive director yang berhubungan negatif. Bukti empiris menunjukkan bahwa market competition dan corporate governance yang diukur dengan number of director tidak signifikan mempengaruhi produktivitas perusahaan.

---

This study is aimed to see the effect of Corporate Governance (measured by the insider ownership, institutional ownership, number of directors, non executive director) and Market Competition (measured by the Herfindahl Index) on corporate performance (measured by Total Factor Productivity). The sample is a listed company of Stock Exchange during the period of 2009-2010 exclude of the financial sector. This study also used several control variables that potentially affect productivity, namely Return of Assets (ROA), Firm Size, Firm Age and Leverage. The empirical result suggest that generally CG associated with firm?s productivity, positively associated with insider ownership and institutional ownership, negatively associated with non- executive. The empirical result find that market competition and corporate governance measured by number of director does not affect productivity significantly."

"Corporate governance dan kualitas audit dipercaya dapat menekan tingkat informasi asimetri yang ada dengan memberikan suatu mekanisme pengawasan terhadap kinerja manajemen perusahaan. Rendahnya tingkat informasi asimetri akan berdampak pada penurunan cost of capital perusahaan sehingga akan membuka lebih banyak pilihan bagi perusahaan untuk menerbitkan sumber pendanaan yang lebih berisiko yaitu saham, dan menurunkan kemungkinan penerbitan instrumen utang, sehingga leverage-nya akan turun.Penelitian ini menggunakan data perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar pada BEI pada periode 2008 ? 2010. Pada penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa pada perusahaan yang memiliki kualitas corporate governance yang baik cenderung untuk memiliki tingkat leverage yang lebih rendah. Selain itu, ditemukan adanya pengaruh positif signifikan antara kualitas audit dengan leverage.

---

Corporate governance and audit quality are believed to suppress the existing level of information asymmetry by providing a mechanism for monitoring the performance of corporate management. The low level of information asymmetry will impact on the company's cost of capital so that it will open more options for companies to get the source of funding that is riskier, such as stocks and it will reduce the possibility of issuing debt instruments, which will make lower leverage.

This research uses data of manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2008 to 2010. The results obtained from testing the research hypotheses indicate that for a company which have good quality of governance will have lower leverage. However there is a significant positive effect between audit quality with leverage."

"Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menguji pengaruh mekanisme corporate governance (CG) terhadap pengungkapan PSAK 5 dan PSAK 7 pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2011. Mekanisme CG dalam penelitian ini menggunakan proksi efektifitas dewan komisaris dan efektifitas komite audit serta kualitas audit (ukuran KAP dan opini KAP). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa efektifitas dewan komisaris dan ukuran KAP berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap pengungkapan PSAK 5 dan PSAK 7. Sedangkan efektifitas komite audit dan opini audit tidak berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap pengungkapan PSAK 5 dan PSAK 7.

---

The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of corporate governance (CG) mechanism on disclosure required in PSAK 5 dan PSAK 7 of listed manufacture firms in Indonesian Stock Exchange year 2011. CG mechanism is measured by the effectiveness of board of commissioners and the effectiveness of audit committee. The effectiveness of board of commissioners and auditor size have significant impact on disclosure of PSAK 5 dan PSAK 7. But audit committee and auditor opinion have no significant impact on disclosure of PSAK 5 dan PSAK 7."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh tata kelola perusahaan (kepemilikan pemerintah, kepemilikan institusional, proporsi komisaris independen, direksi keluarga, direksi asing) dan kualitas audit terhadap tingkat transparansi perusahaan. Penelitian menggunakan sampel 127 perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang industri manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada tahun 2012-2014. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa proporsi komisaris independen, adanya direksi keluarga dan kualitas audit berpengaruh positif signifikan terhadap transparansi perusahaan. Sedangkan kepemilikan pemerintah, kepemilikan institusional, dan direksi asing tidak berpengaruh terhadap transparansi perusahaan.

---

The aim of this research is to examine the impact of corporate governance (government ownership, institutional ownership, proportion of independent commissioner, family director, foreign director) and audit quality on level of corporate transparency. This research used 127 companies listed in manufacture industry on Indonesian Stock Exchange on 2012 until 2014. The result of the test show that proportion of independent commissioner, family director, and audit quality has positive significant impact on corporate transparency. On the other hand, government ownership, institutional ownership, and foreign director does not have significant impact on corporate transparency."

"Skripsi ini membahas pengaruh kepemilikan keluarga dan corporate governance terhadap risiko idiosyncratic perusahaan dengan menggunakan total observasi sebanyak 183 atas perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI. Dengan menggunakan metode Pooled Least Square didapatkan hasil bahwa kepemilikan keluarga ternyata tidak berpengaruh terhadap risiko idiosyncratic. Kemudian penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa perusahaan dengan kualitas corporate governance yang tinggi akan memiliki risiko idiosyncratic yang rendah. Selain itu, peneliti juga menguji pengaruh moderasi corporate governance atas hubungan perusahaan keluarga dengan risiko idiosyncratic risk, dan menemukan bahwa variabel corporate governance tidak memiliki efek moderasi terhadap hubungan perusahaan keluarga dengan risiko idiosyncratic risk.

---

This thesis studied about the relationship of family firm and corporate governance on firm?s idiosyncratic risk, by using 183 observations data of manufacturing company which is listed in BEI. By using Pooled Least Square Method, this research found that family ownership did not have significant effect on idiosyncratic risk. Furthermore, this research also found that firm with high quality of corporate governance will have lower level of idiosyncratic risk. Besides, the authors also test the moderating role of corporate governance to the relationship of family firms with the idiosyncratic risk, and found that corporate governance do not have a moderating role on the effect family firms to the idiosyncratic risk."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pengaruh Corporate Governance, kepemilikan keluarga dan umur perusahaan terhadap Corporate Social Performance baik dimensi environment, dimensi product quality maupun dimensi community relations. Penelitian ini juga ingin menguji pengaruh Financial Performance terhadap asosiasi Corporate Governance dengan Corporate Social Performance. Corporate Governance dinilai berdasarkan indeks yang dikeluarkan oleh Indonesian Institute for Corporate Directorship (IICD), sedangkan untuk Corporate Social Performance menggunakan kriteria pernilaian yang digunakan oleh Greening dan Turban (2000) dimana pengukuranny berdasarkan dimensi yang digunakan lembaga KLD (Kinder,Lydenberg and Domini). Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan model regresi logistik dan sampel sebanyak 239 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama tahun 2008. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa corporate governance memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap probabilita high corporate social performance baik dimensi environment, dimensi product quality maupun dimensi community relations. Kepemilikan keluarga memiliki pengaruh positif walaupun lemah terhadap probabilita high corporate social performance dimensi product quality sedangkan umur perusahaan memiliki pengaruh positif walaupun lemah terhadap probabilita high corporate social performance dimensi environment dan dimensi product quality. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa financial performance tidak memperkuat hubungan corporate governance dengan probabilita sebuah perusahaan memiliki high corporate social performance baik dimensi environment, dimensi product quality maupun dimensi community relations.

---

This research aims to determine whether corporate governance, family ownership, and firm age influence corporate social performance in environment dimension, product quality dimension, and community relations. In addition, this research also would like to know the effect of financial performance on the association between corporate governance and corporate social performance. Corporate governance viewed by an index issued by Indonesian Institute for Corporate Directorship (IICD), while corporate social performance is measured by KLD?s criteria that used by Greening and Turban (2000).

Hypothesis testing used logistic regression with sample of 239 companies that are listed at Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2008. These result indicate that companies with good corporate governance will have bigger probability getting high corporate social erformance in those dimensions. Family ownership has weak influence on corporate social performance in product quality dimension and firm age also has weak influence on corporate social performance in product quality dimension and community relations dimension. Yet, financial performance is proven that there is no influence of financial performance to the association between corporate governance and corporate social performance."

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh corporate governance terhadap kinerja pasar emiten industri manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia Penelitian ini mengacu pada penelitian Bebchuck et al 2009 Dalam penelitian ini corporate governance dinilai menggunakan governance index berupa indeks hasil asesmen penerapan corporate governance yang dilakukan oleh Indonesian Institute of Corporate Directorship IICD sedangkan kinerja pasar dinilai dengan Tobin rsquo s Q Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan regresi panel data dampak tetap terhadap 180 observasi firm year perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dari tahun 2010 sampai 2012 Hasil penelitian memberikan bukti empiris bahwa penerapan corporate governance berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja pasar emiten Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh corporate governance terhadap kinerja pasar emiten industri manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia Penelitian ini mengacu pada penelitian Bebchuck et al 2009 Dalam penelitian ini corporate governance dinilai menggunakan governance index berupa indeks hasil asesmen penerapan corporate governance yang dilakukan oleh Indonesian Institute of Corporate Directorship IICD sedangkan kinerja pasar dinilai dengan Tobin rsquo s Q Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan regresi panel data dampak tetap terhadap 180 observasi firm year perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia dari tahun 2010 sampai 2012 Hasil penelitian memberikan bukti empiris bahwa penerapan corporate governance berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja pasar emiten

---

ABSTRACTThe objective of this research is to examine the impact of corporate governance to market perfomance of manufacturing listed companies in Indonesian Stock Exchange This research refers to previous research conducted by Bebchuck et al 2009 In this research corporate governance is measured with corporate governance index assessed by the Indonesian Institute of Corporate Directorship IICD meanwhile market performance is measure with Tobin rsquo s Q Hypotheses testing conducted by fixed effect data panel regression to 180 firm year observation of listed manufacturing companies in Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2010 until 2012 The empirical result shows that implementation of corporate governance has positive significant impact to market performance of listed companies "

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti pengaruh book-tax differences terhadap biaya audit di Indonesia. Penelitian ini juga menguji pengaruh tata kelola perusahaan sebagai variabel pemoderasi dampak book-tax differences terhadap biaya audit di Indonesia. Book-tax differences adalah selisih laba akuntansi dengan laba fiskal. Sampel yang digunakan adalah perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada tahun 2012 hingga 2016. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa book-tax differences tidak berpengaruh secara signifikan terhadap biaya audit. Tata kelola perusahaan juga tidak terbukti dapat memperlemah pengaruh book-tax differences terhadap biaya audit.

---

The purpose of this study is to provide empirical evidence on the effect of book tax differences on audit fees in Indonesia. This research also examines the influence of corporate governance as the moderator effect of book tax differences on audit fee di Indonesia. Book tax differences is value of the spread between pretax book income and taxable income. The sample in this study is listed firms on Indonesia Stock Exchange on 2012 to 2016. The results showed that book tax differences does not have significant impact on the determination of audit fee in Indonesia. There is also no evidence that corporate governance have a moderating effect on the association between book tax differences on audit fees."

"Studi ini menguji relevansi nilai atas pengakuan dan pengungkapan nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi. Relevansi nilai atas pengakuan diuji dengan membandingkan relevansi nilai atas nilai wajar properti investasi dengan aset tetap. Untuk aspek pengungkapan, selain menguji relevansi nilai pengungkapan nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi secara umum, juga menguji relevansi nilai atas pengungkapan nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi yang diukur oleh penilai independen dan manajemen. Selain itu, diuji pengaruh kualitas audit, praktik tata kelola perusahaan, dan karakteristik negara terhadap relevansi nilai atas pengakuan dan pengungkapan nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi. Kualitas audit menggukanakan proksi ukuran auditor (Big 10). Sampel penelitian terdiri dari 6.660 observasi firm years pada 18 negara dengan kapitalisasi pasar modal terbesar pada kurun waktu 2011-2014. Pengujian dilakukan dengan metode regresi panel data (balanced panel). Studi ini menemukan bukti bahwa secara umum nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi yang diukur oleh penilai independen memiliki relevansi nilai. Relevansi nilai atas nilai wajar properti investasi lebih tinggi dibandingkan aset tetap. Pada aspek pengakuan, kualitas audit, praktik tata kelola perusahaan, dan kualitas dan penegakan hukum terbukti meningkatkan relevansi nilai atas pengakuan nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi. Berdasarkan hasil uji sensitivitas ditemukan bukti bahwa pengaruh Big 4 dan Second tier tidak berbeda dalam meningkatkan relevansi nilai tersebut. Pada aspek pengungkapan, nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi tidak memiliki relevansi nilai, baik yang diukur oleh penilai independen maupun manajemen. Berdasarkan hasil uji sensitivitas, hanya pengungkapan nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi yang diukur oleh penilai independen serta diaudit oleh Big 4 yang memiliki relevansi nilai.

---

This study examines the value relevance of the recognition and disclosure of the fair value of fixed assets and investment properties. The value relevance of recognition is examined by comparing the value relevance of fair value of investment properties values with fixed assets. For the disclosure aspect, this study examines the value relevance of the disclosure of fair value of fixed assets and investment properties in general, and also examines the value relevance of the disclosure of the fair value of fixed assets and investment properties as measured by independent appraisers and management. In addition, this study also examines the effect of audit quality, corporate governance, and country-specific characteristics on the relevance of values for both recognition and disclosure of the fair value of fixed assets and investment properties. This study uses auditor size (Big 10) as the proxy of audit quality. The sample consisted of 6,660 firm-years of observations in 18 countries with the largest capital market capitalization during 2011-2014. Using the panel data regression method (balanced panel), the findings of the study reveal that in general fair value of fixed assets and investment properties as measured by independent appraisers are value relevant. The value relevance of the fair value of investment properties is higher than that of fixed assets. In recognition aspect, audit quality, corporate governance, the combination of regulatory quality and rule of law increase the value relevance of fair value of fixed assets and investment properties. Based on sensitivity test, this study found that the effect of Big 4 and Second Tier is not different in increasing that value relevance. In disclosure aspect, the disclosure of the fair value of fixed assets and investment properties are not value relevant, whether measured by independent appraisers or management. Based on the sensitivity test, only disclosure of fair value of fixed assets and investment properties as measured by independent appraisers and audited by Big 4 which are proven to be value relevant."

"[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh peringkat corporate governance terhadap kinerja keuangan periode 2008-2012. Pengujian ini dilakukan menggunakan metode regresi data panel, dimana variabel dependen adalah kinerja keuangan yang diproksikan oleh earning per share, Return on Assets, dan Return on Equity sedangkan peringkat corporate governance sebagai variabel independen. Terdapat tiga model dalam penelitian ini, yaitu menggunakan nilai dari masing-masing variabel dependen. Hasil penelitian pada model pertama menunjukkan bahwa peringkat corporate governance tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan. Model kedua dan ketiga memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan.

---

The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation

method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance, which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator, while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm

performance.;The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on

firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation

method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance,

which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator,

while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three

models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results

of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not

have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models

indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm

performance., The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on

firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation

method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance,

which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator,

while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three

models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results

of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not

have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models

indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm

performance.]"