Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan efektifitas, pemerataan, dan ketepatan insentif pajak yang diterapkan Indonesia atas industri bahan bakar nabati. Dengan pendekatan penelitian kualitatif dan metode pengumpulan data kualitatif, peneliti menemukan bahwa insentif Pajak Penghasilan yang diterapkan atas industri Bahan Bakar Nabati secara umum di Indonesia tidak efektif bagi perkembangan industri tersebut karena minimnya industri yang memanfaatkan insentif yang disediakan oleh pemerintah. Upaya yang perlu dilakukan adalah dengan melakukan sosialisasi yang ditujukan spesifik pada cakupan produk dan wilayah tertentu, sehingga dapat mengoptimalkan pemanfaatan insentif Pajak Penghasilan. Peneliti menemukan bahwa selain peningkatan kualitas sosialisasi insentif Pajak Penghasilan, kebijakan pajak lain yang tepat adalah insentif pajak untuk mendorong konsumsi, karena realisasi penanaman modal oleh industri pada umumnya mempertimbangkan adanya penawaran atau peluang pasar Bahan Bakar Nabati di Indonesia.

---

This research’s purpose is to describe the effectiveness, distribution, and accuracy of tax incentive for biofuel industries development in Indonesia. With qualitative research approach and qualitative data collection methods, researcher found that income tax incentive is ineffective for the development of biofuel industries, because of the lack of it's utilization by biofuel industries. Indonesia’s government have to do more focus and spesific socialization on certain industrial estate, criteria and type of product to optimize utilization of tax incentive.

Researcher found that in addition to the improvement of tax incentive socialization in Indonesia, the alternative tax policy is to encourage consumption on biofuel because, prior reason of realization on investment of biofuel industries is market or demand of biofuel in Indonesia."

"Dalam melaksanakan amanat UU PPh nomor 36 tahun 2008 tentang pemberian keringanan pajak penghasilan. Pemerintah membuat perarturan pelaksana yang tercantum pada PP nomor 52 tahun 2011. Salah satu industri yang mendapatkan insentif pajak penghasilan adalah Industri Panas Bumi. Namun sejak disahkannya peraturan ini belum ada industri panas bumi yang mengajukan fasilitas ini. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, peneliti ingin menganalisis dasar dan perkembangan pemberian insentif pajak penghasilan di Indonesia, menganalisis peran insentif pajak penghasilan atas industri panas bumi. Selain itu, menganalisis substansi kebijakan insentif pajak penghasilan dengan menggunakan teori evaluasi knoepfel terdiri dari extent of target group, effectiveness, dan relevance. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan penelitian kualitatif, tujuan penelitian deskriptif dan teknik pengumpulan data dengan wawancara dan studi literatur. Peneliti menemukan bahwa pemerintah tidak konsisten dalam pemberian insentif karena masih terdapat insentif pajak yang tidak ada peraturan pelaksananya, Insentif pajak penghasilan bukan menjadi satu-satunya faktor pertimbangan investasi panas bumi. Selain itu, insentif pajak penghasilan tidak dapat menarik investor karena tidak sesuai dengan karateristik industri panas bumi.

---

Government have made some regulation on Government Regulation about income tax incentive for investment in Indonesia. It was mandated by law of income tax. One of industries who get incentive is Geothermal Industries. But, about more than 5 years this regulation was implemented, no one geothermal industries proposed to get this incentive.

Based on this problem, researcher whats to analize about substantion policy of income tax incentive. Beside that, researcher whats to know what a based of geothermal regulation. The last aim for researching is evaluate the policy of income tax incentive with knoepfel's theory such as extent of target group, effectiveness, and relevance. With qualitative research approach, descriptive research purposes and interview and Library Research data collection methods.

Reacherher found that government unconsistent in make regulation of incentive. Because there was regulation didn’t have excecution regulation. Tax income incentive was not one of factor of investor consideration will investation or not. And than, tax incme incentive couldn’t make investor interest because geothermal industries have different characteristic with other."

"PT Nabisco Foods out for light food producer do increasing of sale of the product. For PT Nabisco Foods do promotion cooperation with a few retail company. This cooperation can be done by giving discount, giving of goods for free, year-end bonus if was abysmal of goals. Product placement in counter retail also one of form of promotion done by PT Nabisco Foods."

"Penelitian ini membahas disain kebijakan insentif pajak atas industri Low Cost & Green Car (LCGC) di Indonesia. Penelitian ini mengangkat dua permasalahan, yaitu bentuk insentif yang dibutuhkan oleh industri LCGC dan manfaat yang akan diperoleh dengan diberikannya insentif pajak atas industri LCGC dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Insentif pajak yang dibutuhkan untuk mendorong industri LCGC berupa pembebasan PPnBM atas penyerahan LCGC di dalam negeri, serta pembebasan Bea Masuk dan PPN atas impor Incompletely Knocked Down komponen LCGC. Pemberian insentif pajak ini akan mengurangi konsumsi BBM dan emisi Gas Rumah Kaca sektor transportasi, serta memajukan industri komponen kendaraan bermotor dalam negeri.

---

This study discusses tax incentive policy design of Low Cost & Green Car (LCGC) Industry in Indonesia. This research raises two issues, namely tax incentive which is required by LCGC industry and the benefits to be derived by the tax incentives being given to LCGC industry, using qualitative approach. Tax incentives require to stimulate LCGC industry are Luxury Sales Tax exemption on transfer LCGC in the country, as well as exemption from Import Duty and VAT on imported Incompletely Knocked Down of components of LCGC. These tax incentives will reduce fuel consumption and emission of transportation sector, as well as advancing domestic automotive component industry."

"Latar belakang masalah dari tesis ini adalah berkenaan dengan pemberian insentif perpajakan sebagai salah satu implementasi fungsi pajak untuk mengatur. Fungsi utama pajak adalah menghasilkan penerimaan negara sebagai penggerak roda pembangunan adapun fungsi lainya pajak adalah fungsi mengatur sebagai instrumen untuk mendorong atau memproteksi sektor - sektor tertentu yang diinginkan pemerintah. Pemberian insentif perpajakan harus dilakukan dengan hati - hati mengingat bila salah sasaran , akan dapat mengamputasi fungsi mengatur pajak itu sendiri . Adapun salah satu implementasi fungsi mengatur Pemerintah tersebut di realisasikan pada awal tahun 2007, melalui PP Nomor 7 /2007, dimana pemerintah memberikan insentif perpajakan dibidang PPN berupa pembebasan PPN untuk komodti primer hasil pertanian. Pada saat yang bersamaan terlihat bahwa tahun 2005 realisasi penerimaan pajak adalah sebesar Rp. 346,8 triliun dan lebih rendah Rp 5,2 triliun dari sasaran yang diharapkan sebesarRp.352 triliun. dan pada tahun 2006 shortfall antara 8,5 triliun hingga 17 triliun atau hanya mencapai 96 sampai dengan 98% dari target yang direncanakan. Keadaan diatas tentunya mengharuskan pemerintah menghitung secara cermat berapa potensial loss penerimaan apabila akan mengeluarkan suatu kebijakan.Pokok permasalahnya dari tesis ini adalah Berapa besar pengaruh pemberian insentif perpajakan berupa dibebaskan dari pengenaan PPN atas penyerahan dan impor produk pertanian yang bersifat strategis terhadap potensi penerimaan PPN dan Faktor - faktor apa yang mendorong sektor pertanian untuk meminta pemberian insentif PPN atas penyerahan dan impor produk pertanian.Metode penelitian dari tesis ini adalah menggunakan tipe penelitian deskriptif analitis. Metoda pengumpulan data terdiri dari studi kepustakaan , buku- buku karya ilmiah dan sumber - sumber lainnya seperti jurnal dan internet. Adapun penghitungan perkiraan potensi pajak yang hilang akibat pemberlakuan PP no. 7 tahun 2007 tersebut menggunakan metoda perhitungan yang pernah dilakukan oleh Stephen V Marks dengan menggunakan tabel - Input Output. Perhitungan besarnya potensi PPN yang hilang dilakukan dengan menghitung selisih antara perhitungan potensi PPN dengan menggunakan tabel input - output dengan kondisi sebelum PP Nomor 7 /2007 dan setelah diterapkan PP no. 7 tahun 2007.Argumentasi yang digunakan agar Produk pertanian mendapat perlakuan dikecualikan dari pengenaan PPN antara lain karena umumnya petani bergerak pada sektor informal dan kebanyakan dari mereka tidak menyelenggarakan pembukuan. Kalaupun mereka telah menyelenggarakan pembukuan pada umumya pembukuan mereka tidak teradministrasi dengan baik. Disamping itu ada persepsi pada masyarakat bahwa pengenaan PPN pada produk pertanian akan menyebabkan harga jual komoditi tersebut menjadi lebih mahal atau dari sisi produsen akan menyebabkan keuntungan menjadi lebih kecil. Disamping itu pengenaan PPN pada produk pertanian adalah suatu hal yang sensitif secara politik.Secara teori sesuai dengan legal character PPN, Pajak ini bersifat netral terhadap pilihan seseorang untuk mengkonsumsi suatu barang/jasa. Adapun permasalahan penyelenggarakan pembukuan yang tidak teradministrasi dengan baik bukan hanya dialami oleh petani tetapi adalah masalah pengusaha kecil pada umumnya. Memberikan fasilitas pembebasan pada produk pertanian pada akhirnya akan menambah beban biaya pada petani. Karena pajak masukan untuk menghasilkan produk tersebut seperti pupuk, petisida, mesin pertanian, makanan ternak, dan pajak masukan lainya tidak dapat dikreditkan dan dibebankan sebagai biaya. Pada akhirnya semua beban pajak masukan tersebut akan menjadi komponen biaya yang akan menaikan harga pokok produk final pertanian. Adapun untuk mengatasi masalah administratif pembukuan PPN kuncinya ada pada mengatur batasan pengusaha kena pajak yang pas yang pas buat penguasaha kecil.Mengingat peranan penerimaan pajak yang semakin dominan dan penting bagi kelangsungan hidup bangsa maka pemberian insentif perpajakan tersebut harus benar - benar dipertimbangkan dengan matang dan hati - hati karena pemberian insentif pajak yang tidak tepat hanya mengurangi penerimaan pajak tetapi saaran utamanya untuk meningkatkan daya saing produk pertanian tidak juga tercapai, penting pula untuk digarisbawahi bahwa potensial loss penerimaan pajak berarti juga akan hilangnya hak rakyat untuk memperoleh barang dan jasa publik yang seharusnya disediakan oleh negara Total potensi penerimaan PPN sebelum diberlakukanya PP No. 7 tahun 2007 adalah sebesar Rp 178,84 Triliun dan setelah diberlakukanya PP tersebut potensi penerimaan PPN menurun menjadi Rp 173,10 triliun atau perkiraan potensi PPN yang hilang karena pemberlakuan PP No. 7 tahun 2007 adalah sebesar Rp 5,74 triliun Angka sebesar ini merupakan 3,21% dari total potensi penerimaan PPN. atau kalau memperhitungkan coverage ratio PPN potensial loss adalah sebesar sebesar Rp 4,40 triliun

---

The back ground of this thesis is concerning the tax incentives as one implementation of the tax regulated function. The main function of tax is to generate the state revenue as the wheel turning energy for development, while the other function is the regulated function as an instrument to push or to protect certain sectors the government wanted. The tax incentives must be given with careful thoughts, other wise it will miss its target and eventually will amputate the regulated function of tax it self. One of the implementation of the regulated function of tax is started on the beginning of 2007 through PP No 7/2007, in which the government gave the VAT tax incentives in the form of VAT Exemptions for primer commodity of farming goods. In the same time it was shown that the 2005 tax revenue realization is 346,8 trillion rupiah which is 5,2 trillion lower than the target expected as much as 352 trillion rupiah. In the year 2006 the short fall continued between 8,5 trillion to 17 trillion or only 96 to 98% of the target planned. This condition should make the government carefully count how much is the revenue potential loss when releasing a regulation.The main problem of this thesis is how much the impact of tax incentive in the form of VAT exemption on of strategic farming goods to the VAT potential revenue and what are the factors that supported and blocked the implementation of it.This thesis uses a descriptive analytic method. The data collection consists of the library study, scientific literatures, and other resources such as journals from the internet. The estimation of the lost revenue potential due to the implementation of PP No 7 is calculated using the Stephen V. Marks model based on the Input - Output Table. The estimation of the lost VAT potential is calculated by the different between the VAT potential before and after the implementation of the PP No. 7 /2007.The Argument used to exempt the farming goods from VAT are because most farmers are in informal sectors and they do not used book keeping. Even if they used book keeping, they are usually not administered well enough. Another Argument is that it's the people perspective that the VAT on farming goods will raise the selling price of that commodity and from the producer's side it will lower their profit. Addition to that, the VAT on farming goods is indeed a very sensitive political issue.Theoretically, based on the legal character of the VAT, it is neutral to a person's choice whether to consume a good or service. In the case of good book keeping it does not only happen to farmers but also to other small business in general. The exemptions of farming products will in the end add more burden for farmers. It is because the input tax from fertilizer, pesticides, farming machines, and livestock's foods, and other input tax used for productions are not creditable and will become a cost. In the end all the inputs tax will become cost that will increase the price of the final farming products. The way to overcome the problem of VAT administrative book keeping is on the right setting threshold for small business.Considering the more dominant role of the tax revenue for this country well being, the implementation of tax incentives must be considered in a very mature and careful way because the wrong tax incentives will not only decrease the tax revenue but will also miss its main target, it is very important to note that revenue potential loss will also mean the lost of people's right for the public goods and services that this country's suppose to provide.Total Revenue potential estimation before the implementation of PP No 7 /2007 is178,84 trillion Rupiahs and after the implementation that number is decreased to 173,10trillion or the total potential loss estimation due to the implementation of PP no 7 /2007 is 5,74 trillion rupiahs. It is about 3,21% of the total VAT revenue potential estimation, or considering the VAT coverage ratio, the potential loss is 4,40 trillion rupiahs."

"In order to increased voluntary disclosure from the tax payer, the Indonesian government trough Directorate General of Tax making a tax reforms and the policy that the government choose is by using tax amnesty policy. At the year 1984 the government has been issued a tax amnesty policy, but this policy failed in implementation and the government never evaluated the failure. At 2008 the government issuing the same tax amnesty policy and it called sunset policy.

This research will explain about government comparison when issuing tax amnesty policy at the year 1984 and the year 2008, what exactly becomes the major obstacle on the implementation of the tax amnesty policy at the year 1984, and what are the differences between tax amnesties that were used at 1984 with tax amnesty that used in 2008. The approach used in this research is qualitative approach. The goal is to find an understanding about tax amnesty policy that implemented in Indonesia since 1984 until 2008. The research type is descriptive because the researcher tries to give a detailed description about tax amnesty policy that implemented in Indonesia since 1984 until 2008. Data collected in this research is by trough in depth interview with Directorate General of Tax, academic, tax payer, and tax expert. Beside that the data was also collected trough study literature, books, magazine, journals, and the tax regulation which are related to tax amnesty at the year 1984 and 2008.

The result from this research found that the government rationale issuing tax amnesty policy at the year 1984 because of the change of tax system in Indonesia from official assessment system to self assessment system. The change of tax system needs honesty and voluntary disclosure from every tax payer. Based on that reason, the government issuing tax amnesty policy. At the year 2008 the government tries to collect taxation data from Indonesian citizen who already registered as tax payer and the citizen who are not registered as tax payer. In order to make the tax payer willing to declare the taxation data that they have, government issuing tax amnesty policy. The obstacle on the implementation of tax amnesty at the year 1984 are because the limitation of taxation data, information technology, tax authorities who are not ready with this policy, and public perception of unfairness in tax amnesty. The main differences between tax amnesty at the year 1984 and 2008 is what the government forgiven. At the year 1984 the government forgives all the tax liabilities including interest, penalties, and other prosecution, whereas tax amnesty at the year 2008 only forgive the interest."

"Pemanasan global adalah masalah dunia, sudah banyak negara membuat kebijakan untuk mengurangi penyebab pemanasan global. Pembuangan gas dari hasil pembakaran bahan bakar fosil yang digunakan kendaraan bermotor adalah salah satu penyebab pemanasan global. Saat ini telah ditemukan mobil yang berteknologi hibrida, mobil yang ramah lingkungan dan hemat bahan bakar. Para pengusaha mengeluhkan pengenaan tarif pajak yang tinggi, PPnBM dan Bea Masuk, menyebabkan harga mobil hibrida menjadi lebih mahal.Penelitian ini menjelaskan perlunya insentif pajak diberikan untuk mobil berteknologi hibrida, kebijakan negara lain terhadap mobil hibrida dan manfaat-manfaat yang akan dirasakan jika mobil ini sudah banyak digunakan oleh masyarakat.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif eksploratif. Tipe penelitian adalah deep interview. Mobil hibrida adalah salah satu solusi untuk mengurangi polusi udara. Pemerintah seharusnya mempertimbangkan untuk memberikan insentif pajak untuk mobil hybrid. Mobil hibrida dapat mengurangi produksi emisi dan juga hemat dalam pemakaian bahan bakar. Jika pemerintah, memberikan insentif pajak untuk mobil hibrida, pembeli mobil hibrida akan meningkat. Jadi, akan mengurangi polusi udara dan hemat dalam pemakaian bahan bakar.

---

Global warming is become the world?s problem, therefore many countries make policies to reduce the cause of global warming. Gas uptake from the ignition of fossil fuel that been used for vehicle is one of the caused global warming. In this days, already invented car with hybrid technology, car that have less air pollution and thrifty fuel. The industrialists complain about the high tax rate, luxury tax and customs, which caused the price of hybrid car, become expensive. This research aim is to explain how important tax incentive that have to give for the car with hybrid technology, about the policies in other countries with the hybrid car, and benefits if this car is use by many people.This research uses the explorative qualitative method. Type of this research is deep interview. Hybrid car is one of the solutions to reduce air pollution. Government should consider giving incentive tax for hybrid car. If government give tax incentive for hybrid car, people that want to buy hybrid car will increase. So it will reduce air pollution and thrift consumption fuel."

"Vehicle tax is one of a truly potential local income to local Government in this case local income department. Based on the dynamic growth of the vehicle it self every year that increase rapidly, vehicle tax is becoming more potential ever year. It can be shown from the intensity of the vehicle which cause traffic jam. Vehicle tax base is collect from the ownership of the vehicle it self, which is allocate for the development of the public facilities, but Indonesia doesn't implemented it.The concept of vehicle tax is a collaboration between local income department, police department, insurance department. So if the local government wanted to implement those regulation a coordination should be happen between those department. The result is the local government can't implement the collection of vehicle tax on specific road such as airport area, because the regulation of collecting those tax is related to not only one department, but involving the other department to coordinate about the policy."

"Newspapers have important function like information, education, entertainment, economic and other function. Because those functions, associate of newspaper ask tax exemption to Government. Beside that, in Indonesia, newspapers penetration is still low and tax incentives expected can increase this penetration. Until this time, Indonesia Government sets newspaper as VAT object. Study about effectively exemption tax on newspaper must be done in order to get incentive tax usefull. Exemption tax is revenue cost by government. The observer calculated tax exemption on newspaper to know how it can influence cost of structure in Penerbit X and cost of production in Penerbit Y.This research used qualitative approach, by means of literature study, which emphasize books as an object and field study with collecting data by interviewing and also using secondary data. The field study is being executed by interviewing finance and tax accounting at daily newspapers publisher company. The research object limited only on sources data in two newspapers publisher company in DKI Jakarta region.The objective of this research is to describe policy of VAT on newspaper in past time and the implementation policy of VAT on newspaper today. This research is also to suggest about policy on taxation for seen as contribution for Directorate General of Taxation (Direktorat Jenderal Pajak).The result of this research show that between 1986 until 1990 newspapers got tax incentives, VAT Accounted on Government (PPN Ditanggung Pemerintah). Regulation are used President?s Decision (Keputusan Presiden). Because of that time Taxation Act of Value Added Tax did?nt regulated about tax incentives. That policy had no influence with selling price of newspaper and on March 1990 this policy stopped with consideration more and more stable of live press publisher commonly. Implementation of VAT appropriate with regulation.The final conclusion of this research is tax exemption on newspapers have no significant influence on cost production of newspapers."