Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKTugas Karya Akhir ini membahas tentang pengaruh sumber daya yangdimiliki oleh kelompok kepentingan American Israel Public Affairs Committee(AIPAC) terhadap kapabilitasnya untuk melobi pemerintah Amerika Serikat (AS).Khususnya dalam mewujudkan kebijakan luar negeri yang pro terhadap Israel,salah satunya kebijakan Syria Accountability and Lebanese SovereigntyRestoration Act (SALSRA) tahun 2003. Sumber daya kelompok kepentinganAIPAC tersebut meliputi sumber daya finansial, sumber daya anggota danlobbyist. Untuk menjelaskan hal tersebut, penelitian ini menggunakan konsepkelompok kepentingan dan lobi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa sumberdaya anggota dan sumber daya finansial yang dimiliki AIPAC lebih dominandalam menentukan kapabilitas AIPAC dalam melobi pemerintah AS untukmenghasilkan kebijakan SALSRA tahun 2003.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis discusses how influential the resources of the interestgroup American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) towards its capabilityto lobby the United States government in achieving the foreign policy of pro-Israel, one of which policies include Syria Accountability and LebaneseSovereignty Restoration Act ( SALSRA ) in 2003. The resources of the interestgroup AIPAC includes financial resources, members and lobbyists. To explain theabove statement, this study uses the concept of interest group and lobbying. Theresult of this study shows that AIPAC?s members and financial resources is more dominant in terms of AIPAC's capability in lobbying U.S. Government togenerate the SALSRA policy in 2003. ;This thesis discusses how influential the resources of the interestgroup?American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)? towards its capabilityto lobby the United States government in achieving the foreign policy of pro-Israel, one of which policies include Syria Accountability and LebaneseSovereignty Restoration Act ( SALSRA ) in 2003. The resources of the interestgroup AIPAC includes financial resources, members and lobbyists. To explain theabove statement, this study uses the concept of interest group and lobbying. Theresult of this study shows that AIPAC?s members and financial resources is moredominant in terms of AIPAC?s capability in lobbying U.S. Government togenerate the SALSRA policy in 2003. , This thesis discusses how influential the resources of the interestgroup“American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC)” towards its capabilityto lobby the United States government in achieving the foreign policy of pro-Israel, one of which policies include Syria Accountability and LebaneseSovereignty Restoration Act ( SALSRA ) in 2003. The resources of the interestgroup AIPAC includes financial resources, members and lobbyists. To explain theabove statement, this study uses the concept of interest group and lobbying. Theresult of this study shows that AIPAC’s members and financial resources is moredominant in terms of AIPAC’s capability in lobbying U.S. Government togenerate the SALSRA policy in 2003. ]"

"This book consists of two sections. The first section focused on the rise of Hamas as the most important and popular group in Palestine especially after the general elections of 2006. Using social movement theories as the framework for analysis, this section seeks to investigate the causes and consequences of the rise of Hamas. It is examined the causes of the continuing rise of Hamas by looking especially at the views and strategies of the Muslim Brotherhood as a mother organization of Hamas in Palestine that has been involved in the Arab - Israeli conflict since 1936. The second section examines Indonesian foreign policy on the Arab - Israeli conflict. This conflict has been concerned by the Government of Indonesia since Indonesian independence because of two reasons: firstly, a domestic sentiment especially coming from Indonesian Muslim; and secondly, the involvement of the major powers in the world in this conflict. The government response to the conflict is based on the views that Israel has occupied Palestinian territory illegally. Indonesia also has supported Palestinian independence state. However, how the regimes have realized this policy in the history of Indonesian foreign policy on this conflict is not similar. The differences are shaped by domestic politics and international considerations."

"ABSTRAKSkripsi ini membahas tentang usaha-usaha perubahan sikap yang dilakukan oleh Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) serta dampak yang ditimbulkannya baik itu positif maupun negatifnya. Pada awalnya PLO setelah terbentuk tahun 1964, berjuang seoara radikal, tak mau berkompromi, sebagai akibat dari kekecewaan orang-orang Palestina atas dirampasnya tanah-tanah mereka oleh orang-orang Israel yang ditunggangi oleh Zionisme. Setelah berjuang melalui gerakan bersenjata dan aksi-aksi teror yang dilakukan PLO sebelum tahun 1974, ternyata PLO tidak membuahkan hasil yang menggembirakan. Akan tetapi sebaliknya bahkan kehancuran dan citra buruk yang mereka dapatkan kemudian. Kehadiran PLO ternyata tidak disenangi oleh para penguasa Arab, karena mereka tak menginginkan berdirinya negara Palestina yang dimotori oleh PLO, yang mereka anggap sebagai organisasi teroris. Selain itu jika negara Palestina berdiri dan menggunakan sistem demokrasi murni, dikhawatirkan akan mengganggu status quo mereka yang mayoritas monarki. Sadar akan sulitnya berjuang melalui aksi-aksi bersenjata dan teror, PLO mencoba untuk merubah sikap yang dimulai pada awal tahun 1973 yaitu dengan berjuang menggunakan cara-cara politik, sekalipun menimbulkan perpecahan dalam tubuh PLO. Akhirnya pada tahun 1974 perjuangan PLO mendapatkan hasil yang memuaskan yaitu dengan diakuinya oleh Liga Arab sebagai satu-satunya wakil sah bangsa Palestina, lalu pada tahun yang sama pula PLO mendapat pengakuan dari PBB dan memberinya status peninjau dalam sidang-sidang yang diadakan oleh badan tersebut.

---

"