Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tesis ini membahas Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) dan penerapannya pada sektor pertanian Rumania. Rumania merupakan negara produsen pertanian kedua terbesar di Eropa Tengah dan Timur dan membuat sektor pertanian menjadi komponen penting dalam ekonomi domestik Rumania, terutama di wilayah pedesaan. Integrasi Rumania dalam Uni Eropa (UE) memberikan kesempatan untuk dapat bergabung ke dalam pasar bersama UE dan bantuan finansial pada sektor pertanian melalui CAP, yang diharapkan dapat memberikan manfaat bagi sektor pertanian negara tersebut. Pada satu sisi melalui perspektif Rumania, adanya dikotomi struktur pertanian yang didominasi pertanian subsistence dan skala kecil, sebagai hasil kebijakan pada masa transisi, serta rendahnya kinerja dan daya saing merupakan beberapa tantangan yang dihadapi sektor pertanian Rumania. Di sisi lain melalui perspektif CAP, penerapan kebijakan masih menekankan pada subsidi langsung Pilar I dan adanya kesenjangan distribusi anggaran antara Pilar I dengan Pilar II yang menekankan pada pembangunan pedesaan. Rumania, dan sebagian besar negara anggota baru UE, mengharapkan lebih banyak distribusi anggaran untuk pembangunan pedesaan Pilar II. Pada interaksi level UE tersebut, hal ini tentu membawa dikotomi antara negara anggota terkait reformasi terhadap CAP.

---

The focus of this thesis is common agricultural policy (CAP) and its implementation to Romanian agriculture. Romania stands as the second largest country for agricultural producers in Central and Eastern Europe which makes agricultural sector to be an important element of Romanian domestic economy, particularly in its rural area. Romanian integration into European Union (EU) brings opportunities to enter EU?s common market and financial support to agricultural sector through CAP that is expected to give benefit for the country. In one side from Romanian perspective, the dichotomies existed and dominated by subsistence farming, as a result from transition period, and the lack of performance and competitiveness are some challenges facing Romanian agriculture. In other side from CAP perspective, implementation of policy remain focusing on direct payments of Pillar I and the gap on distribution of budget between Pillar I and Pillar II with focus on rural development. Romania, and most of EU?s new members, look for more budget on rural development of Pillar II. In EU level, this has led to disparities between EU member countries for their interactions in relation with CAP reform."

"ABSTRAKIn the Treaty of Rome 1957, agriculture sector has been recognized as an important feature regarding its strategic values, such as the natural factor with its major role, food endurance and its susceptibility toward competitive pressures although its contributions on economics declined.On 30 July 1962, Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) was introduced after three years of negotiations in line with the mechanism settlement and its organizations as a whole. Various agricultural problems in member states were the causes of the difficulties in achieving agreements on CAP mechanism.Protectionism through market mechanism (price intervention and subsidies) which tried improving the welfare of farmers was the central focus of CAP. But as time goes, this mechanism burdens the European Union's budget. The EU's budget allocation to CAP in 1990 was almost 60% which lead to debates between France and United Kingdom on Budgeting 2007-2013. The EU's enlargement in 2004 was also a cause that burdens the budget. Other factors are the demand from the international trade regulations in GATT, then WTO which tried to establish international trade liberalization through reducing protectionism such as reducing tariffs and subsidies. Various requests on environment conservations, rural development and biotechnology improvement were backgrounds of Mac Sharry Reformations, Agenda 2000 and Reformation 2003.Pros and Cons on CAP within the European Unions didn't affect the EU's integration because of the common perspectives on uniting Europe as a whole. Less debates within the CAP would shift the focus on external issues therefore strengthen the international positions of EU. But even though EU is powerful enough, deadlock against United States would still remain.These days international trade is already relative free where barriers in trade are declined. Therefore CAP is no longer a relevant issue. It can block the international trade liberalization because the protectionism still exists. It will be a difficult task for the European Union to completely remove CAP because of its importance for the member states. Currently the European Union is only able to reduce its protection value in phase."

"Tesis ini membahas tentang pegaruh peran Charles de Gaulle dalam proses pembentukan kebijakan Politique Agricole Commune menurut tinjauan sejarah hubungan internasional. Teori yang digunakan untuk meneliti tesis ini adalah teori sejarah hubungan internasional yang dikemukakan oleh Jean-Baptiste Duroselle dan Pierre Renouvin. Dua (2) variabel sejarah hubungan internasional, kekuatan fundamental (les forces profondes) dan negarawan (l'homme d'État) digunakan untuk menganalisis pengaruh hubungan para aktor dalam proses pembentukan kebijakan Politique Agricole Commune. Penelitian ini menggunakan analisis sequential explatory mixed-methods. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Charles de Gaulle berperan sangat kuat dalam proses pembentukan kebijakan Politique Agricole Commune. Charles de Gaulle memengaruhi seluruh variabel pembentuk sejarah hubungan internasional (histoire des relations internationales). Selain itu, hasil penelitian turut menunjukkan bahwa pembentukan kebijakan Politique Agricole Commune pun dipengaruhi oleh kehadiran indikator-indikator penyusun variabel sejarah hubungan internasional.

---

This thesis discusses about the influences of Charles de Gaulle during the formation of the European regional's agricultural policy, Common Agricultural Policy. The research uses the theory of the history of international relations presented by Jean- Baptiste Duroselle and Pierre Renouvin. Two (2) main variables, fundamental forces (les forces profondes) and the statesman (l'homme d'État) used to analyze the influences of the actors who contribute in the formation of the Common Agricultural Policy. This research uses explatory sequential mixed methods design. The result of this research found that Charles de Gaulle has a strong significance during the process of the formation of Common Agricultural Policy as an European regional's agricultural policy. The presence of Charles de Gaulle influences the existence of two (2) main variables of the history of international relations. Moreover, the result of this research shows that each indicators, which is composing the theory of international relation, affects the process of the formation of European regional's agricultural policy, Common Agricultural Policy."

"Sektor pertanian Indonesia mengalami ancaman yang diakibatkan oleh alih fungsi lahan untuk berbagai kebutuhan dan aktivitas sektor lain. Salah satu upaya untuk mengatasi hal ini adalah penerapan kebijakan perlindungan lahan pertanian pangan berkelanjutan (LP2B). Tesis ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dampak kebijakan perlindungan lahan pertanian pangan berkelanjutan (LP2B) terhadap sektor pertanian, apakah berpengaruh terhadap pengurangan alih fungsi lahan pertanian atau tidak. Hasil penelitian dengan metode kuantitatif ini menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan LP2B berpengaruh positif terhadap persentase luas lahan sawah. Faktor lain yang mempengaruhi luas lahan sawah adalah kepadatan penduduk, PDRB ADHB sektor pertanian, dan PDRB ADHB sektor real estate.

---

The agricultural sector in Indonesia is facing threats caused by land conversion for various needs and activities in other sectors. One of the efforts to overcome this case is by implementing the sustainable food agricultural land protection policies (LP2B). This thesis aimed to analyze the impact of the policy on protecting agricultural land for sustainable food (LP2B) on the agricultural sector, whether it has an effect on reducing the agricultural land conversion or not. The results of this quantitative research show that the LP2B policy has a positive effect on paddy land area’s percentage. Other factors that affect the paddy land area’s percentage are population density, Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) of the agricultural sector, and Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRDP) of the real estate sector."