Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Skripsi ini membahas sekuritisasi isu terorisme oleh National Security Council (NSC) Amerika Serikat pasca peristiwa 9/11 dalam periode Pemerintahan George W. Bush dengan menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dan teori sekuritisasi. Situasi yang terjadi pada masa itu adalah Amerika Serikat yang dikejutkan dengan terjadinya peristiwa 9/11. Peristiwa tersebut mendorong extraordinary measures dari pemerintah Amerika Serikat untuk mencegah peristiwa terorisme seperti 9/11 kembali terulang. Sekuritisasi yang dilakukan oleh Pemerintahan Bush terdiri dari speech act, pencanangan undang–undang, Global War on Terrorism hingga Perang Irak. Dalam proses speech act, terdapat pengaruh dari tokoh-tokoh dalam lingkaran NSC selain Presiden George W. Bush yang ikut berperan mensekuritisasi peristiwa 9/11 dan Global War on Terrorism. Dalam proses sekuritisasi yang terjadi, media memainkan peran yang besar sebagai alat yang berfungsi mengamplifikasi langkah–langkah sekuritisasi terorisme yang diambil oleh Pemerintahan George W. Bush. Media juga berperan dalam menjadikan respon publik terhadap tindakan–tindakan sekuritisasi yang diambil oleh pemerintah menjadi positif. Akhirnya, tulisan ini menyimpulkan bahwa langkah–langkah sekuritisasi yang diambil oleh Pemerintahan Amerika Serikat bersifat politis dan melibatkan aktor lain dalam lingkaran NSC Presiden Bush yang kemudian menggunakan isu terorisme untuk mendorong sekuritisasi terorisme yang bereskalasi menjadi Perang Irak

---

This undergraduate thesis discusses the securitization of terrorism carried out by the United States NSC after the events of 9/11 in the period of George W. Bush's administration by using qualitative research methods and securitization theory. The situation which occurred at that time portray how the United States was truly shocked by the events of 9/11. The event prompted extraordinary measures from the United States government to prevent terrorism events such as 9/11 to happen again. The securitization carried out by the Bush Administration consisted of a speech act, declaration of laws, Global War on Terrorism and the Iraq War. In the process of expressing speech acts, there were influences from figures within the NSC circle other than President George W. Bush who took part in securitizing the events of 9/11 and the Global War on Terrorism. In the process of securitization that occurred, the media played a large role as a tool that served to amplify the securitization steps of terrorism taken by the George W. Bush Administration. Finally, this paper conclude that the steps of securitization taken by the United States Government are essentially political and involve other actors in the NSC circle of President Bush who then use the issue of terrorism to encourage the securitization of terrorism which further essentially escalates into the Iraq War."

"The book identifies the main theories proposed in the field of terrorism studies as they relate to several issues: why and how individuals and organizations get involved in terrorism; the definition and concept of terrorism; state terrorism; leaving terrorism behind; counter-terrorism; manifestations of terrorism in time and space.Terrorism studies is a highly heterogeneous field with a broad range of theories and disciplines, marked by ample debates. Beyond individual contributions and unique perspectives, however, it is difficult for students and interested readers to have a broader and structured grasp of the theoretical landscape within and behind the study of terrorism. This textbook offers a valuable new teaching tool which aims to provide students with the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological toolbox necessary to understand and research terrorism.This book will be essential reading for students of terrorism studies, political violence, and counter-terrorism, and is highly recommended for students of security studies, criminology, politics, and international relations. "

"Serangan terrorisme yang terjadi pada tanggal 11 September 2001 secara fundamental mengubah pemahaman Amerika Serikat (AS) dan dunia mengenai bahaya yang ditimbulkan oleh terorisme. Pemahaman baru ini direalisasikan dalam berbagai kebijakan keamanan yang lebih ketat berupa, misalnya, peningkatan metode-metode pengumpulan informasi dan penggunaan instrumen intelijen untuk mencegah terjadinya tragedi terorisme di masa yang akan datang.Kebijakan kontra-terorisme dan legislasi anti-terorism baru di berbagai belahan dunia mengundang keprihatinan. Meskipun tindakan-tindakan kontra-terorisme didukung oleh Resolusi Perserikatan Bangsa-Bangsa (PBB) 1333/2000 dan 1373/2000, kontra-terorisme seharusnya tidak mengancam pemenuhan hak-hak asasi manusia. Dalam Piagam PBB dicantumkan tekad PBB untuk menjaga pemenuhan hak-hak asasi manusia: "...to reaffirm faith in fimrtdamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small." Keamanan kolektif sejatinya tercipta tidak dengan mengorbankan hak-hak dasar individu.Undang-Undang (UU) Anti-Terorisme Indonesia, disahkan oleh Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat (DPR) dengan syarat bahwa amandemen terhadap UU tersebut diajukan dalam jangka waktu satu bulan sejak tanggal pengesahan, mengundang kontroversi yang luas. UU Anti-Terorisme tersebut seharusnya memiliki fungsi sebagai komponen pendukung prinsip penegakan hukum dan memberikan dasar hukum yang adil, serta secara efektif mencegah terjadinya aksi terorisme.Tesis ini menguraikan tantangan-tantangan bagi hak-hak asasi manusia yang muncul akibat 'perang melawan teror' yang dikumandangkan sejak terjadinya serangan terorisme pada 11 September 2001 di AS dan peristiwa pengeboman 12 Oktober 2002 di Bali. Dengan UU Anti-Terorisme Indonesia sebagai fokusnya, tesis ini menganalisis bagaimana kontra-terorisme internasional berpengaruh besar terhadap pasal-pasal dalam UU Anti-Terorisme Indonesia, bagaimana hak-hak asasi harus berkompetisi dengan kontra-terorisme internasional untuk menjadi prioritas utama dalam pertimbangan pengambilan kebijakan, dan konstituen-konstituen apa saja yang hadir dalam pembuatan UU Anti-Terorisme Indonesia.

---

The attacks of 11 September 2001 fundamentally changed the understanding of the United States (US) and the world of the threat posed by terrorism. With this new comprehension has come the realization that significantly improved collection and use of intelligence will be required to prevent catastrophic terrorist attacks in the future.

Growing concerns over terrorism induce stricter counter-terrorism policies and anti-terrorism legislations in parts of the world. Albeit backed up by United Nations (UN) Resolutions 1333/2000 and 1373/2000, counter-terrorism should not degrade the fulfillment of basic human rights at all. UN has even stated their determination "to reaffirm faith in fundamental human rights, in the dignity and worth of the human person, in the equal rights of men and women and of nations large and small" in its charter. Collective security cannot be formed on the cost of individual rights.

The Indonesian Anti-Terrorism Law passed by the Parliament with one condition that the Government would put forward amendment within a month, generated controversy broadly. The Law should have been serving as an important building block in strengthening the rule of law and a fair legal basis, effectively prevented acts of terrorism.

The thesis would take into account the particular challenges raised for human rights by the 'war on terror' declared in the wake of the events of 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks in US and 12 October 2002 bombing blasts in Bali. Taking focus on Indonesian Anti-Terrorism Law, it would analyze on impact of the global wave of combating terrorism to Indonesian Anti-Terrorism Law, how human rights and combating terrorism are contending to claim top priority, and what constituents were present in the making of the Indonesian Anti Terrorism Law."