Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tesis ini membahas tentang sistem pemilu yang berkembang saat ini termasuk di Indonesia. Pemilu merupakan pelaksanaan kehendak rakyat sebagai perwujudan dari demokrasi. Anggota legislatif yang terpilih adalah wakil rakyat yang diharapkan dapat mengemban amanat rakyat. Indonesia pada dasarnya menganut sistem pemilu proporsional dengan daftar calon yang disusun oleh partai pada daerah dengan perwakilan jamak. Pada awalnya sistem pemilu Indonesia menerapkan daftar tertutup (proporsional tertutup) tetapi sejak diberlakukannya UU Nomor 10 Tahun 2008, daftar calon bersifat terbuka (proporsional terbuka) sehingga calon yang memperoleh suara terbanyak ditetapkan menjadi calon terpilih. Penetapan calon yang terpilih ternyata tidak semudah yang dibayangkan karena terdapat sistem yang mengatur tentang penghitungan dan pembagian kursi legislatif bagi partai dan calon. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian Yuridis Normatif, pendekatan dilakukan dengan teori pemilu, teori aturan pemilu serta konsep tentang pemilihan sistem pemilu, perbandingan sistem pemilu, desain aturan pemilu, mekanisme pemilu, partisipasi pemilih, dan proporsionalitas. Untuk memperoleh kesimpulan dari tujuan penelitian, maka hal-hal yang disampaikan adalah meliputi sistem pemilu, perbandingan sistem penghitungan perolehan kursi DPR dalam UU pemilu, dan penerapan sistem penghitungan perolehan kursi dalam Pemilu Tahun 2009. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh hasil bahwa sistem penghitungan perolehan kursi DPR pada Pemilu Tahun 2009 dan yang akan diterapkan dalam Pemilu Tahun 2014 ternyata sangat rumit dan tidak mudah untuk dipahami bagi penyelenggara pemilu, partai dan calon legislatif, apalagi rumusan yang dibuat oleh pembentuk UU ternyata tidak sederhana dan berbelit-belit. Akibatnya, terdapat berbagai penafsiran atas sistem penghitungan perolehan kursi DPR baik oleh KPU, partai maupun calon legislatif, sehingga pada Pemilu Tahun 2009, Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi mengeluarkan putusan judicial review dan pengujian undang-undang yang saling bertentangan tentang sistem penghitungan perolehan kursi DPR. Kerumitan rumusan sistem penghitungan perolehan kursi DPR tersebut dapat mengakibatkan disproporsionalitas pembagian kursi DPR yang pada akhirnya banyak suara pemilih yang terbuang sia-sia.

---

This thesis discusses the development of electoral system developed, including in Indonesia . Election is the implementation of the will of the people as the embodiment of democracy . Legislators are representatives of the people, who are expected to carry out the mandate of the Indonesian people, basically adhere to the proportional representatives system with a list of candidates drawn up by the party in the multi member district. At first, Indonesian electoral system implements a closed list but since the enactment of Act No. 10/2008, electoral system implements an open list so that the candidate who gets the ost votes is elected . Determination of the elected candidate was not as easy as one might imagine because there is a complex system for calculation and distribution of legislative seats for parties and candidates . By using normative juridical research methods, the approach made by the theory of elections, electoral rules theory and the concept of electoral system choice, comparative electoral systems, the design of electoral rules, electoral mechanisms, voter participation, and proportionality. To obtain the conclusion of the study objectives were presented with the electoral system, the comparative of the legislative distribution seats system in the Indonesia election law, and the application of the distribution seats system in the general election at the 2009.

Based on the results of the research is that the distribution seats system at the election in 2009 and which will be implemented in the 2014 election are complicated and not easy to understand for the organizers of the election, prty and the candidates, especially the formulation made by the law maker was not a simple and complicated. As a result, there are different interpretations of distribution seats system, either by the electoral Commission, parties and candidates, so that the election of 2009, the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court made an opposing judicial review about the distribution seats system. The complexity formula of distribution seats system could result in disproportionality distribution of legislative seats and at the end, many voters are wasted."

"It is a must that the process of general election needs law enforcement in every step of electoral process and all the process of election should be done in democratic principles such as direct,free and fair,accountable and accesseble...."

"Tesis ini membahas tentang penanganan perkara tindak pidana Pemilu khususnya menyangkut koordinasi antara Panwaslu, Kepolisian dan Kejaksaan yang tergabung dalam Sentra Gakkumdu dengan titik beratnya adalah peran kejaksaan dalam penanganan perkara tindak pidana Pemilu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tesis ini adalah yuridis normatif yang ditunjang dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konsep. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan dan selanjutnya diolah secara deduktif. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa dalam penanganan perkara tindak pidana Pemilu Legislatif 2009 yang dilakukan oleh Panwaslu, Kepolisian dan Kejaksaan adalah membuat Kesepahaman Bersama tentang Pola Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Pemilu dan Pembentukan Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu sebagai usaha untuk mengefektifkan penanganan perkara tindak pidana Pemilu. Dalam penanganan perkara tindak pidana Pemilu, Kejaksaan yang mempunyai peran sebagai bagian dari sistem peradilan pidana terpadu dan sebagai bagian Sentra Gakkumdu mempunyai berbagai permasalahan dalam melaksanakan fungsinya. Namun yang dapat digarisbawahi dalam penanganan perkara tindak pidana Pemilu Legislatif 2009 adalah adanya reposisi peran kejaksaan sebagai upaya untuk percepatan penanganan perkara pidana dan sebagai usaha rekonstruksi Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemilu.

---

The thesis discusses the administration of criminal offenses associated to the General Election specifically in aspects related to the coordination between coordination of the Election Supervision Committee (Panwaslu), the National Police and the District Attorney Office as part of the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Sentra Gakkumdu), wherein the emphasis is on the role of the district attorney office in managing election related offenses. The method used in this study is judicial normative augmented by laws and conceptual approaches. Data gathering is done through literature review then deductively processed.

This study reveals that for the purpose of managing criminal offenses committed during the 2009 Legislative Election, the Election Supervision Committee (Panwaslu), the National Police and the District Attorney Office have set up a Memorandum of Understanding on the Pattern for Managing Election Related Criminal Offenses as well as establishing the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Sentra Gakkumdu) in the effort to effectively manage election related criminal offenses. In managing election related criminal offenses, the district attorney office in its role as part of the judiciary system and the Sentra Gakkumdu had to content with a number of obstacles to execute its function properly. Furthermore, throughout the management of election related criminal offenses committed during the 2009 Legislative Election, there was a repositioning of the district attorney office's in the effort to accelerate the management of criminal cases and in the attempt to reform the Criminal Court System."

"Election system is a main factor which will influence women representation in legislative bodies. In relation with this, law No. 10/2008 on elections of DPR, DPD, DPRD members has stipulated 30 % quota for women representatives in its various chapters, which made it more comprehensive compared to law No. 12/2003....."

"Skripsi ini mengkaji dan membahas topik fenomena peran fraksi DPR RI, sebagai isu yang tengah mengemuka, yaitu adanya upaya pembubaran fraksi oleh Gerakan Nasional Pemberantasan Korupsi (GNPK) karena fraksi dinilai banyak berperan di dalam pelaksanaan fungsi, tugas dan wewenang DPR dan dinilai bertentangan dengan UUD 1945. Sehubungan dengan itu, maka penelitian ini difokuskan pada salah satu pelaksanaan fungsi DPR, yaitu fungsi legislasi dalam penentuan ambang batas parlemen dalam pembahasan RUU tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 10 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilu Anggota DPR, DPD, dan DPRD. Hal ini diangkat karena dalam penentuan ambang batas parlemen terjadi perdebatan alot di antara fraksi-fraksi DPR. Di satu pihak, fraksi kecil (FPPP) yang khawatir gagal meraih suara signifikan, bersikeras mempertahankan besaran ambang batas parlemen 2,5%, sedangkan fraksi menengah (FPKS) menginginkan besaran ambang batas parlemen 3%-5%. Di pihak lain, fraksi besar (FPG), dengan hasrat meraih kursi lebih banyak, bersikukuh menaikkan besaran ambang batas parlemen 5%. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif analitis. Data diperoleh melalui tinjauan pustaka dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peran fraksi DPR kuat dan mendominasi dalam pelaksanaan fungsi legislasi DPR, yaitu dalam penentuan ambang batas parlemen dalam pembahasan RUU tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 10 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilu Anggota DPR, DPD, dan DPRD. Hal ini sebagaimana terlihat, baik dari aspek pengorganisasian anggota fraksi, aspek substansi kebijakan fraksi maupun aspek sistem pengawasan fraksi. Sementara, jika ditinjau dari teori perwakilan politik maka termasuk dalam teori kebebasan dengan tipe hubungan yang partisan.

---

This study examined and discussed the phenomenon topic on the role of the House of Representatives’ factions, as the central issue raised during the discussion, namely the dissolution of factions by the National Anti-Corruption Movement (GNPK) since factions were being assessed as playing a significant role in the execution of the functions, duties, and powers of the House of Representatives which were against the 1945 Constitution. Accordingly, this study focused on the exercise of one of the functions of the House, that is the legislation function in deciding parliamentary threshold during discussion on Bill on the Amendments to Law No. 10 of 2008 on the Election of Members of DPR, DPD and DPRD. The issue was raised because there were tough discussions among factions before the floor made any decisions on parliamentary threshold. On the one hand, faction with small number of MPs (PPP Faction) that was concerned on the failure to reach significant number of vote insisted on maintaining massive parliamentary threshold of 2.5%, while faction with not to large number of MPs (PKS Faction) wanted a massive parliamentary threshold of 3%-5%. On the other hand, faction with larger number of MPs (PG Faction), with an enthusiasm of getting more seats on the next election, insisted in raising thkeye percentage to 5% of parliamentary threshold. This study used a qualitative research design with descriptive analysis. Data were obtained through literature reviews and interviews.

The results showed that the ruling faction played significant role and dominated the legislation functions of the House, especially during the discussion on parliamentary threshold decision on Bill on the Amendments to Law No. 10 of 2008 on Election of Members DPR, DPD and DPRD. That conclusion was clearly manifested both in organizational aspect of faction members, faction's policy substance aspect as well as faction’s supervision system aspect. While, based on the review of the theory of political representation, it can be concluded that there was a theory of freedom with a partisan type of relationship that worked within."