Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"This book contends that despite traditional doubts, practical limitations, and contemporary critiques, a rigorous social archaeology is indeed possible. The early chapters outline what a productive socialarchaeology might look like, covering such issues as the possibility andprospect of cross-cultural social inference, the central importance ofarchaeological theory and of social models, the nature of inequality, and the extraordinary effects rules for arranging statuses have on the character of life. The following section of the book offers a systematic review and critique of cross-cultural correlates of inequality. Forexample, the ways in which residential buildings can vary are summarized and examined for how they might yield insight into a former status system. In the final chapter these correlates are used tohelp answer the question, "Was catal Huyuk a ranked Neolithic townin Anatolia?""

"Social archaeology is concerned with how one might use the archaeological record of the present to elucidate how social interactions were ordered in a past society. This requires a meaningful model of society, considerable archaeological data, and a reliable connection between them. A major goal of this book is to improve our understanding of one aspect of social archaeology, the inference of status hierarchy. The first section covers what is involved in social inference, and presents ideas on how it may be done reliably. In them following section, the typological models of Elman Service and Morton Fried are used to clarify certain aspects of ranking. The final section draws together a number of insights concerning the recognition of status inequality. These approaches are given systematic arrangement and evaluated in light of the model of social inference. This arrangement clarifies how they relate to each other, making it easier to see how they may be applied in varied real contexts, and stimulates new ideas for more correlations of ranking."

"Priangan Tengah (Bandung Raya) merupakan salah satu arena ideal di Hindia Belanda untuk mempelajari perubahan sosial, khususnya pada paruh kedua abad ke-19 sampai awal abad ke-20. Nama Karel Albert Rudolf (Ru) Bosscha (1865–1928), atau sang “Raja Teh Priangan”, barangkali tidak asing lagi bagi masyarakat Priangan bersanding bersama perusahaan perkebunan miliknya di kaki Gunung Malabar yang mengalami kesuksesan besar selama bertahun-tahun lamanya. Penelitian ini berupaya memusatkan analisisnya pada individu, dalam hal ini Ru Bosscha, seraya menghubungkannya pada struktur sosial lebih besar yang mengikatnya demi menjelaskan strategi praktik sosial dan kuasa yang ia gunakan kala itu. Proses penelitian dilakukan melalui metode kualitatif dengan landasan teori praktik milik Pierre Bourdieu. Survei arkeologis menemukan sisa-sisa tinggalan materi berasal dari kehidupan yang dijalani oleh Ru Bosscha, dan ketika dihubungkan beserta data-data sejarah yang berkaitan dengan dirinya, semua itu memperlihatkan legitimasi dari posisi sosial tinggi Ru Bosscha sebagai pengusaha perkebunan sekaligus konglomerat di wilayah Priangan.

---

Central Priangan (Bandung Raya) is considered one of the ideal arenas in the Dutch East Indies to examine social changes, particularly during the second half of the 19th century until the early 20th century. Karel Albert Rudolf (Ru) Bosscha (1865–1928), the "Tea King of Priangan," is likely well-known among the people of Priangan as he owned highly successful private plantation companies at the foot of Mount Malabar for numerous years. This research aims to focus its analysis on the individual, specifically Ru Bosscha, while also connecting it to the broader social structure that bound him, in order to explain the strategies of social practice and power he utilized during that period. The research process uses a qualitative method based on Pierre Bourdieu's practice theory. Archaeological surveys have revealed material remnants derived from Ru Bosscha's life in Central Priangan, and when correlated with historical data related to him, these findings demonstrate the legitimacy of his elevated social position as both a plantation entrepreneur and a conglomerate in the Priangan region."

""The definition of "public archaeology" has expanded in recent years to include archaeologists' collaborations with and within communities and activities in support of education, civic renewal, peacebuilding, and social justice. Barbara Little and Paul Shackel, long-term leaders in the growth of a civically-engaged, relevant archaeology, outline a future trajectory for the field in this concise, thoughtful volume. Drawing from the archaeological study of race and labor, among other examples, the authors explore this crucial opportunity and responsibility, then point the way for the discipline to contribute to the contemporary public good"--"