Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Sejak tahun 2008, PSAK 13 mengenai properti investasi sudah efektif diberlakukan. Perusahaan memiliki dua opsi untuk metode pengukuran properti investasi setelah pengakuan awal, yaitu metode biaya dan metode nilai wajar. Berdasarkan penelitian sebelumnya, metode nilai wajar dipercaya lebih relevan untuk investor. Oleh karena itu, penilitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji apakah metode nilai wajar untuk mengukur properti investasi meningkatkan relevansi nilai dari informasi akuntansi. Dengan menggunakan data perusahaan tercatat di Indonesia dalam periode 2008-2015, Penelitian ini mengimplementasikan model Ohlson untuk menguji hipotesis. Penelitian ini memberikan bukti terhadap nilai relevansi bahwa metode nilai wajar untuk properti investasi tidak meningkatkan relevansi informasi akuntansi dalam menilai harga pasar saham perusahaan Indonesia.

---

Since 2008, PSAK 13 about investment property had been effectively implemented. Companies have two options for their investment property measurement method after initial recognition, which are cost method and fair value method. According to previous research, fair value method is more relevant for investor. Therefore, this research is aimed to test whether fair value method used to measure investment property improve the value relevance of accounting information. Using the data of public listed companies in Indonesia for period 2008-2015, this research implemented Ohlson's model to test the hypothesis. The research provide evidences on value relevance that fair value method on investment does not increase the relevance of accounting information in valuing Indonesian companies' market share price."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji faktor faktor yang memotivasi perusahaan dalam pemilihan metode untuk mencatat investasi properti, setelah PSAK 13 2007 diterapkan. Penelitian ini dilakukan pada perusahaan yang tercatat di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada periode 2012-2016. Pengujian dari hipotesis penelitian ini menggunakan metode regresi logistik. Hasil dari penelitian ini mengindikasikan bahwa ukuran perusahaan yang semakin besar akan cenderung menggunakan model nilai wajar. Sedangkan tingkat utang, informasi asimetri dan kepemilikan saham oleh orang dalam tidak berpengaruh terhadap penentuan pemilihan model nilai wajar. Sebagai tambahan, penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa perusahaan yang termasuk dalam industri properti enggan menggunakan model nilai wajar sebagai pengukuran properti investasinya, sesuai dengan polytical cost hypothesis, bahwa perusahaan yang berada dalam industri properti menghindar dari kenaikan pajak yang dikarenakan kenaikan nilai wajar.

---

This study aims to examine factors that motivate companies in the selection of methods to record property investment, after PSAK 13 2007 is applied. This study was conducted on companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange in the period 2012-2016. Testing of this research hypothesis using logistic regression method. The results of this study indicate that the larger the size of the company will tend to use the fair value model. While the level of debt, information asymmetry and ownership of shares by insiders has no effect on the determination of fair value model selection. In addition, the study also found that companies belonging to the property industry are reluctant to use the fair value model as a measure of their investment properties, in accordance with the polytical cost hypothesis, that firms in the property industry avoid tax increases due to fair value increases."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi keputusan pemilihan metode nilai wajar untuk mengukur aset properti investasi setelah diimplementasikannya standar adopsian IAS 40 di negara Malaysia (2006), Singapura (2007), Indonesia (2008), dan Thailand (2011). Faktor-faktor yang diprediksi mempengaruhi keputusan penggunaan metode nilai wajar yaitu metode akuntansi yang diterapkan pada pra adopsi IFRS, ukuran perusahaan, leverage, praktik perataan laba, asimetri informasi, dan jenis auditor. Dengan menggunakan 356 sampel perusahaan, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa metode revaluasi yang diterapkan perusahaan pada pra adopsi IFRS memiliki pengaruh positif signifikan sedangkan praktik perataan laba berpengaruh negatif signifikan terhadap keputusan penggunaan metode nilai wajar.

---

This paper aims to examine factors that motivate companies in selecting fair value method to measure investment properties at the first time IAS 40 became effective in Malaysia (2006), Singapura (2007), Indonesia (2008), and Thailand (2011). The predicted factors are: accounting method chosen in the pre-IFRS adoption period, size, leverage, income smoothing, asymmetric information, and auditor. By using 356 sample companies, the results indicate that revaluation method used before IFRS adoption have significant positive influence toward the choice of fair value method for investment properties. In addition, this paper also gives evidence that companies with income smoothing practice are less likely to choose fair value method. "

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji apakah aset biologis yang diukur menggunakan metode nilai wajar lebih memiliki relevansi nilai dibandingkan dengan aset biologis yang diukur menggunakan metode biaya historis. Dalam pengujian hipotesis, penelitian ini menggunakan sampel data perusahaan perkebunan kelapa sawit di Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Singapura dengan periode observasi tahun 2012 ndash; 2015. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa aset biologis yang diukur dengan metode pengukuran nilai wajar lebih memiliki relevansi nilai dibandingkan dengan aset biologis yang diukur dengan metode pengukuran metode biaya historis.

---

This study aims to determine whether the biological assets measured using the fair value method is more value relevant compared to the biological assets measured using the historical cost method. In hypothesis testing, this study uses palm oil plantation companies in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore as sampling data with the observation period 2012 2015. The result of this study shows that the biological asset measured using fair value method is more value relevant than the biological asset measured using historical cost method."

"Studi ini menguji relevansi nilai atas pengakuan dan pengungkapan nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi. Relevansi nilai atas pengakuan diuji dengan membandingkan relevansi nilai atas nilai wajar properti investasi dengan aset tetap. Untuk aspek pengungkapan, selain menguji relevansi nilai pengungkapan nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi secara umum, juga menguji relevansi nilai atas pengungkapan nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi yang diukur oleh penilai independen dan manajemen. Selain itu, diuji pengaruh kualitas audit, praktik tata kelola perusahaan, dan karakteristik negara terhadap relevansi nilai atas pengakuan dan pengungkapan nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi. Kualitas audit menggukanakan proksi ukuran auditor (Big 10). Sampel penelitian terdiri dari 6.660 observasi firm years pada 18 negara dengan kapitalisasi pasar modal terbesar pada kurun waktu 2011-2014. Pengujian dilakukan dengan metode regresi panel data (balanced panel). Studi ini menemukan bukti bahwa secara umum nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi yang diukur oleh penilai independen memiliki relevansi nilai. Relevansi nilai atas nilai wajar properti investasi lebih tinggi dibandingkan aset tetap. Pada aspek pengakuan, kualitas audit, praktik tata kelola perusahaan, dan kualitas dan penegakan hukum terbukti meningkatkan relevansi nilai atas pengakuan nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi. Berdasarkan hasil uji sensitivitas ditemukan bukti bahwa pengaruh Big 4 dan Second tier tidak berbeda dalam meningkatkan relevansi nilai tersebut. Pada aspek pengungkapan, nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi tidak memiliki relevansi nilai, baik yang diukur oleh penilai independen maupun manajemen. Berdasarkan hasil uji sensitivitas, hanya pengungkapan nilai wajar aset tetap dan properti investasi yang diukur oleh penilai independen serta diaudit oleh Big 4 yang memiliki relevansi nilai.

---

This study examines the value relevance of the recognition and disclosure of the fair value of fixed assets and investment properties. The value relevance of recognition is examined by comparing the value relevance of fair value of investment properties values with fixed assets. For the disclosure aspect, this study examines the value relevance of the disclosure of fair value of fixed assets and investment properties in general, and also examines the value relevance of the disclosure of the fair value of fixed assets and investment properties as measured by independent appraisers and management. In addition, this study also examines the effect of audit quality, corporate governance, and country-specific characteristics on the relevance of values for both recognition and disclosure of the fair value of fixed assets and investment properties. This study uses auditor size (Big 10) as the proxy of audit quality. The sample consisted of 6,660 firm-years of observations in 18 countries with the largest capital market capitalization during 2011-2014. Using the panel data regression method (balanced panel), the findings of the study reveal that in general fair value of fixed assets and investment properties as measured by independent appraisers are value relevant. The value relevance of the fair value of investment properties is higher than that of fixed assets. In recognition aspect, audit quality, corporate governance, the combination of regulatory quality and rule of law increase the value relevance of fair value of fixed assets and investment properties. Based on sensitivity test, this study found that the effect of Big 4 and Second Tier is not different in increasing that value relevance. In disclosure aspect, the disclosure of the fair value of fixed assets and investment properties are not value relevant, whether measured by independent appraisers or management. Based on the sensitivity test, only disclosure of fair value of fixed assets and investment properties as measured by independent appraisers and audited by Big 4 which are proven to be value relevant."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menemukan bukti empiris mengenai relevansi nilai pengungkapan nilai wajar pinjaman yang diberikan pada bank yang terdaftar di bursa saham di negara-negara ASEAN. Negara yang menjadi sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah negara yang telah mengadopsi IAS 39 dan IAS 32 mengenai instrumen keuangan, seperti Filipina, Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Singapura. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa nilai wajar pinjaman yang diberikan, laba, dan nilai buku ekuitas bank memiliki relevansi nilai dalam memperjelas nilai pasar atau harga saham bank. Perlindungan hukum sebagai variabel moderasi memperlemah relevansi nilai pengungkapan nilai wajar pinajaman yang diberikan.

---

The purpose of this research is to provide empirical evidence about the value relevance of the fair value of loans of listed bank in ASEAN. This research was conducted by using regression analysis with sample of ASEAN countries (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippine, and Singapore) that have adopted IAS 39 and IAS 32 about financial instrument.

The result of this research indicates that fair value of loans, net income, and book value of equity has value relevance to explain market value of bank. Legal protection as moderating variable weaken value relevance of the fair value of loans."

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini menguji relevansi risiko atas tiga model pengukuran laba yaitu net income, comprehensive income dan full fair value income bank-bank di Indonesia tahun 2010-2013. Relevansi diukur melalui hubungan antara volatilitas net income, volatilitas incremental pada laba komprehensif serta volatilitas incremental pada laba nilai wajar (full fair value income) terhadap harga saham, tingkat return harga saham dan volatilitas harga saham. Hasil penelitian menemukan bahwa volatilitas incremental pada laba komprehensif serta volatilitas incremental pada laba nilai wajar (full fair value income) berhubungan signifikan terhadap harga saham, tingkat return harga saham serta volatilitas harga saham.Hal ini mengimplikasikan bahwa pengungkapan nilai wajar atas aset dan liabilitaskeuangan dipakai oleh investor dalam rangka mengambil keputusan bisnis sehingga sebaiknya informasi atas nilai wajar aset dan liabilitas keuangan dimasukan menjadi komponen dalam laporan laba rugi tidak hanya dicantumkan dalam catatan atas laporan keuangan.

---

ABSTRACTThe objective of this study is to examine the risk relevance of three models of income measurement: net income, comprehensive income and the full fair value income on banks in Indonesia for 2010-2013. Relevance is measured by the relationship between the volatility of net income, incremental volatility of comprehensive income and incremental volatility of full fair value of income to stock prices, stock prices return and stock price volatility. The results of this research explains that incremental volatility of comprehensive income and incremental volatility of full fair value income are significant to stock prices, stock prices return and the stock price volatility. It is implied that the fair value disclosure of financial assets and liabilities is used by investors in their business analysis, therefore the information of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities should be made into income statement and not be disclosed only innotes to the financial statements.;The objective of this study is to examine the risk relevance of three models ofincome measurement: net income, comprehensive income and the full fair valueincome on banks in Indonesia for 2010-2013. Relevance is measured by therelationship between the volatility of net income, incremental volatility ofcomprehensive income and incremental volatility of full fair value of income tostock prices, stock prices return and stock price volatility. The results of thisresearch explains that incremental volatility of comprehensive income andincremental volatility of full fair value income are significant to stock prices,stock prices return and the stock price volatility. It is implied that the fair valuedisclosure of financial assets and liabilities is used by investors in their businessanalysis, therefore the information of the fair value of financial assets andliabilities should be made into income statement and not be disclosed only innotes to the financial statements., The objective of this study is to examine the risk relevance of three models ofincome measurement: net income, comprehensive income and the full fair valueincome on banks in Indonesia for 2010-2013. Relevance is measured by therelationship between the volatility of net income, incremental volatility ofcomprehensive income and incremental volatility of full fair value of income tostock prices, stock prices return and stock price volatility. The results of thisresearch explains that incremental volatility of comprehensive income andincremental volatility of full fair value income are significant to stock prices,stock prices return and the stock price volatility. It is implied that the fair valuedisclosure of financial assets and liabilities is used by investors in their businessanalysis, therefore the information of the fair value of financial assets andliabilities should be made into income statement and not be disclosed only innotes to the financial statements.]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan bukti empiris mengenai relevansi nilai pengungkapan segmen operasi terhadap harga saham 90 hari setelah tanggal pelaporan. Pengujian hipotesis dilakukan dengan model fixed effect untuk data panel dengan sampel 64 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2005-2016. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pengungkapan segmen operasi berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap harga saham. Relevansi nilai atas pengungkapan segmen operasi meningkat pasca penerapan PSAK 5 revisi 2009.

---

This study aims to provide empirical evidence on the value relevance of operating segment disclosure to stock price 90 days after the reporting date. Hypothesis testing used fixed effect method for panel data with sample of 64 companies listed on Indonesia Stock Exchange in 2005 2016. The result of this study shows that operating segment disclosure has a positive and significant influence on stock price. The value relevance of operating segment disclosure increased after the adoption of PSAK 5 revised 2009."

"Penelitian ini merupakan studi empiris pada perusahaan perkebunan di Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Singapura, mengenai pengaruh positif nilai buku aset biologis terhadap harga saham yang menggambarkan value relevance aset biologis dalam laporan keuangan. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga membandingkan pengaruh pendekatan pengukuran nilai wajar dan nilai historis atas aset biologis berdasar value relevance-nya dalam laporan keuangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat pengaruh positif tidak signifikan nilai buku aset biologis terhadap harga saham. Akan tetapi, informasi pendekatan pengukuran atas aset biologis yang berdasar hasil penelitian memiliki pengaruh terkait pengambilan keputusan investasi investor, tidak terbukti memiliki value relevance lebih tinggi untuk nilai wajar jika dibandingkan dengan nilai historis. Hal tersebut didasari pengaruh negatif signifikan yang berarti, semakin tinggi nilai buku aset biologis dengan pendekatan pengukuran nilai wajar, semakin rendah harga saham jika dibandingkan dengan pendekatan pengukuran nilai historis.

---

This study is an empirical study on plantation companies in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Singapore, about the positive effect of book value of biological assets against stock prices which descibes the value relevance of biological assets in financial statements. In addition, this study also compared the effect of fair value and historical cost measurement approach on biological assets due its value relevance in financial statements.

The results showed that there were no significant positive effect between book value of biological assets against stock prices. However, the information of the biological assets measurement approach which based on the results have effect due its investment value to investors, not proved have higher value relevance for fair value when it compared with historical cost. That results were based on significant negative effect which means, the higher the book value of biological assets with fair value measurement approach, the lower the stock prices when it compared with historical cost measurement approach."

"Properti investasi merupakan satu hal yang berbeda dengan aset tetap. PSAK 13 (Revisi 2011) mengatur properti investasi dalam klasifikasi, pengakuan, pengukuran, dan pengungkapan. Terdapat dua aspek yang memengaruhi pengklasifikasian Properti Investasi dan Aset Tetap, independensi arus kas dan signifikansi tambahan jasa. PT M berencana mengubah model pengukuran Properti Investasi dari model biaya ke model nilai wajar. Laporan magang ini berisi penerapan PSAK 13 (Revisi 2011) dalam pengklasifikasiannya dan dampak perubahan model perhitungan pada laporan keuangan PT M. Properti yang dimiliki PT M lebih tepat diklasifikasikan sebagai Aset Tetap karena terdapat syarat dalam PSAK 13 yang tidak terpenuhi. Sekalipun syarat tersebut dapat dipenuhi, PT M perlu mempertimbangkan dampak atas perubahan model pengukuran Properti Investasi.

---

Investment Property is different from Fixed Assets. PSAK 13 (Revised 2011) discusses Investment Property related to its classification, recognition, measurement, and disclosure. There are two aspects that differentiate the classification of Investment Property and Fixed Assets, cash flow independencies and ancillary service significances. In 2013, PT M plans to change their measurement model of investment property from cost model to fair value model. This report discusses the application of PSAK 13 (Revised 2011) in the classification and the effect of change in measurement model in PT M's financial statements. Properties owned by PT M are more accurately classified as fixed assets because one of the requirements under PSAK 13 is not met. Nevertheless, if the property can be classified as Investment Property, PT M still needs to consider the effect of change of measurement model to its financial statements."