Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini menguji pengaruh mekanisme corporate governance terhadap peringkat surat utang yang diterbitkan oleh perusahaan di Indonesia yang bergerak pada sektor industri perbankan dan keuangan. Tata kelola perusahaan dilihat dari segi efektivitas peran organ dewan komisaris dan komite audit yang dinilai menggunakan checklist scoring. Komponen yang dinilai terdiri atas segi independensi, aktivitas, ukuran, dan kompetensi. Penelitian ini menggunakan peringkat surat utang yang dikeluarkan PT Pefindo sebagai lembaga pemeringkat. Berdasarkan sampel perusahaan tahun 2010-2015 sebanyak 130 observasi, hasil pengujian dari model ordererd logit menunjukkan terdapat hubungan positif signifikan peringkat surat utang dengan tata kelola perusahaan.

---

This research examined the effect of corporate governance mechanism on the firms bond rating in Indonesia, specifically on banking and financial industries. The corporate governance viewed in terms of board of commissioners and audit committee's effectiveness then assessment based on questions checklist scoring. Scoring components consisted of independence, activity, size, and competence.

This study used bond rating issued by PT Pefindo as a rating agency. Based on sample of 130 firm-year during 2010-2015, the results of ordered logit model showed strong evidence for a positive relationship between bond rating and corporate governance."

"Penelitian ini menginvestigasi efek dari mekanisme corporate governance terhadap rating sukuk. Proksi dari mekanisme corporate governance adalah blockholders, kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan insider, kualitas audit, komite audit, jumlah dewan komisaris dan persentase dewan komisaris independen. Proksi tersebut merupakan variable independen dimana variable dependen nya merupakan rating sukuk. Model ordered logistic regression (logit) digunakan untuk menguji hipotesis. Sampel penelitian adalah sukuk yang dikeluarkan perusahaan pada periode 2005 - 2012, dan data diambil dari Bursa Efek Indonesia dan PT Pefindo. Hasil penelitian empiris menemukan bahwa komite audit mempengaruhi secara signifikan pada rating sukuk perusahaan. Untuk meningkatkan rating dari sukuk, penelitian ini merekomendasikan bahwa keberadaan dari komite audit menjadi perhatian serius bagi perusahaan yang mengeluarkan sukuk dalam meningkat kan rating sukuk

---

This study investigated the effect of corporate governance mechanism to sukuk ratings. The proxies of corporate governance are blockholders, institutional ownership, insider ownership, quality of audit external, audit committees, number of commissioner, and percentage of independent commissioners. Those proxies are independent variables, and the dependent variables are sukuk rating. Ordered Logistic regression (logit) is used to examine the hipothesis. The samples are sukuk that issued on period 2005-2012, and data are collected from Indonesia Stock Exchange and PT Pefindo.

The results of empirical studies have found that the audit committee as an indicator of corporate governance mechanisms affect the rating of corporate sukuk significantly. To be able to increase the rating of the sukuk is the study recommends that the existence of audit committees must be a serious concern for companies that issue a sukuk in improving the rating of the sukuk."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah mekanisme corporate governance mempengaruhi peringkat surat utang perusahaan di Indonesia. Secara lebih khusus, penelitian ini menguji apakah komponen corporate governance yaitu struktur dan pengaruh kepemilikan, transparansi dan pengungkapan laporan keuangan serta struktur dewan komisaris berpengaruh terhadap peringkat surat utang penasahaan di Indonesia.Penelitian ini menggunakan beberapa mekanisme corporate governance yang dikembangkan oleh BEJ dan klasifikasi peringkat surat utang yang dikeluarkan oleh Pefindo dan Kasnic. Sedangkan pengujian permasalahan penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan model ordered logit.Dengan menggunakan karakteristik perusahaan sebagai variabel kontrol, penelitian ini menemukan bahwa peringkat surat utang perusahaan: (1) berhubungan negatif dengan jumlah block holders dengan kepemilikan paling sedikit 5%; (2) berhubungan positif dengan persentase kepemilikan institusional dalam perusahaan; (3) berhubungan positif dengan ukuran kantor akuntan publik, dan (4) berhubungan positif dengan keberadaan komite audit. Data dalam penelitian ini tidak mendukung hubungan yang signifikan antara persentase kepemilikan saham oleh orang dalam, ukuran dewan komisaris dan persentase dewan komisaris independen dengan peringkat surat utang perusahaan.

---

This research investigated whether corporate governance mechanism affects the firm's bond rating in Indonesia. Specifically, investigation on whether corporate governance components, which are represented by ownership structure and influence, financial transparency and disclosure and board structure, affect the firm's bond rating.

This research used several corporate governance mechanisms developed by Bursa Efek Jakarta and bond rating classification developed by Pefindo and Kasnic. Ordered logit model is selected to test the research problem.

Using firm's characteristic as controlling variable, this research found that the firm's bond rating is: (1) negatively associated with the number of block holders that own at least 5% ownership on the firm; (2) positively associated with percentage of institutional ownerships; (3) positively associated with the size of public accounting firm, and (4) positively associated with existence of audit committee. The relationship between percentage of insider, board size and percentage of independent board with bond rating is not supported by empirical data."

"This research investigated whether corporate governance mechanism affects the firm's bond rating in Indonesia. Specifically, investigation on whether corporate governance components, which are represented by ownership structure and influence, financial transparency and disclosure and board structure, affect the firm's bond rating.This research used several corporate governance mechanisms developed by Bursa Efek Jakarta and bond rating classification developed by Pefindo andKasnic. Ordered logit model is selected to test the research problem.Using firm s characteristic as controlling variable, this research found that the firm s bond rating is: (1) negatively associated with the number of block holders that own at least 5% ownership on the firm; (2) positively associated with percentage of institutional ownerships- (3) positively associated with the size of public accounting firm, and (4) positively associated with existence of audit committee. The relationship between percentage of insider, board size and percentage of independent board with bond rating is not supported by empirical data."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh mekanisme corporate governance yang diproksikan dengan kepemilikan institusional, kepemilikan block (lebih dari 5%), dewan komisaris independen, kepemilikan manajerial, ukuran dewan komisaris, komite audit, dan kualitas audit berpengaruh terhadap peringkat obligasi korporasi pada perusahaan yang terdaftar di bursa efek indonesia periode 2007 - 2011. Penelitian ini menggunakan data panel sejumlah 70 observasi dengan pengujian model menggunakan ordered probit. Penelitian ini membuktikan bahwa blockholder (dengan kepemilikan saham minimal 5%), ukuran dewan komisaris, ukuran perusahaan, dan return on asset berpengaruh signifikan terhadap peringkat obligasi. Penelitian tidak membuktikan adanya pengaruh signifikan di antara kepemilikan saham institusional, kepemilikan saham manajerial, persentase dewan komisaris independen, ukuran komite audit, kualitas audit, dan leverage terhadap peringkat obligasi.

---

This study analyzes the effect of corporate governance mechanisms are proxied by institutional ownership, block ownership (more than 5%), independent board, managerial ownership, board size, audit committee, and audit quality effect on corporate bond ratings of companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Exchange in 2007-2011 period. This study uses panel data to test a number of 70 observations using an ordered probit models.

This study proves that blockholder (own at least 5% of shares), board size, firm size, and return on assets have significant effect on bond ratings. This study does not prove the existence of significant effect among institutional ownership, managerial ownership, the percentage of independent board, audit committee size, audit quality, and leveraged on bond rating."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat apakah penerpan corporate governance berpengaruh terhadap peringkat kredit perusahaan Dengan sampel 168 perusahaan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia selama periode 2009 2013 penelitian ini membuktikan penerapan corporate governance berpengaruh terhadap peringkat Kredit dan komponen yang berpengaruh positif adalah jumlah direksi proporsi komisaris independen kepemilikan instirusional komite audit dan audit eksternal Sementara itu jumlah blockholders berpengaruh negatif terhadap peringkat kredit perusahaan Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa jumlah komisaris tidak berpengaruh terhadap peringkat kredit perusahaan.

---

This study aims to examine whether implemented in corporate governance affect firm rsquo s credit rating With a sample of 168 firms listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange IDX during 2009 2013 this study finds that implemented in corporate governance affect on firm rsquo s credit rating and the components positively affect are board size institutional ownership audit committee and external auditor While proportion of outside director and size of blockholders negatively affect firm rsquo s credit rating This study also finds that independent commissioner insignificantly associated with firm rsquo s credit rating."

"[Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh peringkat corporate governance terhadap kinerja keuangan periode 2008-2012. Pengujian ini dilakukan menggunakan metode regresi data panel, dimana variabel dependen adalah kinerja keuangan yang diproksikan oleh earning per share, Return on Assets, dan Return on Equity sedangkan peringkat corporate governance sebagai variabel independen. Terdapat tiga model dalam penelitian ini, yaitu menggunakan nilai dari masing-masing variabel dependen. Hasil penelitian pada model pertama menunjukkan bahwa peringkat corporate governance tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan perusahaan. Model kedua dan ketiga memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja keuangan.

---

The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation

method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance, which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator, while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm

performance.;The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on

firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation

method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance,

which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator,

while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three

models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results

of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not

have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models

indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm

performance., The aim of this study is to analyze the effect of the corporate governance rating on

firm performance in 2008-2012. Hypotheses were tested using the estimation

method of panel data whereby the dependent variable is the firm performance,

which uses earning per share, return on assets, and return on equity as indicator,

while the corporate governance rating as the independent variable. There are three

models in this study, which uses the value of each variable dependent. The results

of the study on the first model indicate that the corporate governance rating do not

have an influence on the firm performance while on the second and third models

indicate that the corporate governance rating have an influence on the firm

performance.]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaruh corporate governance terhadap cash holdings dan firm value. Penelitian ini menggunakan uji analisis Fixed Effect Model (FEM). Variabel independen pada penelitian ini adalah ukuran dewan direksi, komisaris independen, dan kepemilikan manajerial, sedangkan variabel dependennya adalah cash holdings yang diproksikan dengan logaritma natural dari total kas pada penutupan akhir tahun dan firm value yang diproksikan dengan perhitungan Tobin's Q. Penelitian ini menggunakan data panel sejumlah 1314 observasi dari sampel perusahaan non keuangan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia periode 2007-2012.Hasil peneltian ini menunjukkan bahwa: (1) ukuran dewan direksi memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap cash holdings, (2) komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap cash holdings, (3) ukuran dewan direksi tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap firm value, (4) komisaris independen dan kepemilikan manajerial memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap firm value.

---

The main objective of this research is to analyze the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on cash holdings and firm value. This research is analyze with Fixed Effect Model (FEM). The Independence variables in this research are the board size, board independence, and insider ownership, for the dependent variables are cash holdings that proxied by log of year end total cash and firm value that proxied by Tobin's Q. This study use a panel data sample of 1314 observations listed non financial firms in the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the periode 2007-2012.

The results showed that: (1) board size have significant effect on cash holdings, (2) board independence and insider ownership doesn't have significant effect on cash holdings, (3) board size doesn't have significant effect on firm value, (4) board independence and insider ownership have significant effect on firm value."

"Studi ini bertujuan untuk meneliti pengaruh corporate governance dan financial performance terhadap pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility pada perusahaan sektor perbankan di Indonesia pada periode 2014 hingga 2021. Sampel terdiri atas 15 perusahaan perbankan yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah regresi data panel dengan metode estimasi fixed effect. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa corporate governance berupa foreign director dan government ownership serta financial performance berupa liquidity memengaruhi pengungkapan CSR perusahaan perbankan di Indonesia secara signifikan. Selain itu, corporate governance berupa board size dan female director serta financial performance berupa Return on Equity (ROE) tidak memiliki kemampuan dalam memengaruhi pengungkapan CSR perusahaan perbankan di Indonesia.

---

This study aims to analyze the effect of corporate governance and financial performance on Corporate Social Responsibility disclosure of banking companies in Indonesia for the period of 2014 to 2021. The sample used in this study includes 15 banking companies that are listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This study uses panel data which is processed using fixed effect panel data regression. The results imply that corporate governance as foreign directors and government ownership and also financial performance as liquidity is significant towards CSR disclosure. Moreover, the results indicate that corporate governance, such as board size and female directors and also financial performance, such as Return on Equity (ROE) does not have the ability to affect CSR disclosure of banking companies in Indonesia."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji hubungan antara corporate governance, managerial incentives, dan corporate tax avoidance. Untuk melihat kesimpulan yang berbeda di sepanjang distribusi tax avoidance, penelitian ini menggunakan quantile regression untuk menunjukkan hubungan antara corporate governance dengan tax avoidance. Penelitian ini menemukan hubungan positif antara corporate governance dan tax avoidance pada tingkat yang rendah, tetapi ditemukan hubungan sebaliknya pada tingkat tax avoidance yang tinggi. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang lebih kuat antara corporate governance dengan tax avoidance pada tingkat yang ekstrim. Selain itu penelitian ini juga menemukan hubungan negatif antara managerial incentives dan tax avoidance.

---

The aim of the research is examine the link between corporate governance, managerial incentives, and corporate tax avoidance. Agency problems may lead managers to make difference decisions regarding tax compliance. Manager may see tax avoidance as an investment like other similar opportunity. To see a broaden view along the level of tax avoidance, this research use quantile regression to exhibit link between corporate governance and tax avoidance. This research find a positive relation between corporate governance mechanism for low level of tax avoidance, but a negative relation for high levels of tax avoidance. These results indicate that these governance mechanism have a stronger relation with more extreme levels of tax avoidance. Meanwhile this research find a negative influence between managerial incentives and tax avoidance."