Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Perbedaan interpretasi mengenai aspek perpajakan Bentuk Usaha Tetap (BUT) perusahaan pelayaran, yang diatur dalam Keputusan Menteri Keuangan (KMK) nomor 417/KMK.04/1996 dan Perjanjian Penghindaran Pajak Berganda (P3B) Indonesia dengan negara mitra, sering terjadi bahkan terdapat sengketa yang telah memiliki putusan pengadilan pajak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis interpretasi Branch Profit Tax (BPT) dan penurunan tarif Pajak Penghasilan (PPh) berdasarkan P3B Indonesia dan Singapura menurut Direktorat Jenderal Pajak (DJP) dan BUT perusahaan pelayaran, serta memberikan masukan untuk menyelesaikan perbedaan interpretasi tersebut dengan membuat surat penegasan atau mengubah aturan (rule determination). Penelitian ini menggunakan The Theory of Legal Interpretation dan konsep penafsiran hukum. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan studi kasus. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah wawancara dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis menggunakan teknik descriptive, content, dan thematic analysis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa BUT perusahaan pelayaran menggunakan interpretasi sistematis atau logis dan menginterpretasikan tarif PPh sebesar 2,64% dalam KMK nomor 417/KMK.04/1996 sudah termasuk BPT, sedangkan DJP menggunakan interpretasi gramatikal dan menginterpretasikan tarif PPh sebesar 2,64% dalam KMK tersebut tidak termasuk BPT. Sedangkan terkait penurunan tarif PPh, baik BUT maupun DJP menggunakan interpretasi gramatikal. DJP menginterpretasikan bahwa BUT tidak mendapat penurunan tarif, sedangkan BUT menginterpretasikan sebaliknya. Masukan yang diberikan adalah mengubah KMK nomor 417/KMK.04/1996 dan membuat surat penegasan agar tidak terjadi perbedaan interpretasi pada masa yang akan datang dan KMK tersebut dapat dipergunakan untuk BUT perusahaan pelayaran asal seluruh negara mitra.

---

Differences in interpretation regarding the taxation aspects of permanent establishment (PE) of shipping company, which are regulated in Minister of Finance Degree (KMK) number 417.KMK.04/1996 and Agreement for The Avoidance of Double Taxation (P3B) between Indonesia and partner countries, often occur. There were even disputes that already have a tax court ruling. This study aims to analyze the interpretation of Branch Profit Tax (BPT) and the reduction in the rate of income tax (PPh) based on P3B Indonesia and Singapore according to Directorate General of Taxes (DJP) and PE of shipping company, as well as to provide input to settle this differences in interpretation by making confirmation letter or changing the regulation (rule determination). This study uses The Theory of Legal Interpretation and the concept of legal interpretation. The research approach used is qualitative with case study. Data collection techniques used are interviews and documentation. The analysis technique uses descriptive techniques, content, and thematic analysis. The results show that the PE of shipping company used a systematic or logical interpretation and interpreted the income tax rate of 2.64% in KMK number 417/KMK.04/1996 includes BPT, while DGP used grammatical interpretation and interpreted the income tax rate of 2.64 percent in the KMK does not include BPT. Meanwhile, regarding the reduction of income tax rates, both PE and DGT used grammatical interpretation. DGT interpreted that the PE does not get a tax reduction, while the BUT interpreted the opposite. The input given is to change the KMK number 417/KMK.04/1996 and make confirmation letter so that there are no differences in interpretation in the future and the KMK can be used for the PE of shipping companies from all partner countries."

"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui praktik edukasi perpajakan yang dilakukan terhadap Wajib Pajak badan asing yang terdaftar di KPP Badan dan Orang Asing dan kesesuaiannya dengan pedoman dan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan pengumpulan data melalui wawancara dan kajian pedoman dan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan sehingga penelitian dapat memberikan gambaran terkait praktik edukasi perpajakan terhadap Wajib Pajak badan asing yang terdaftar di KPP Badan dan Orang Asing. Objek penelitian adalah praktik edukasi perpajakan di KPP Badan dan Orang Asing yangdilakukan selama tahun 2019. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa praktik edukasi perpajakan terhadap Wajib Pajak Kantor Perwakilan Perusahaan Asing danBentuk Usaha Tetap, baik dari segi metode edukasi, teknik edukasi, materi edukasi, pemberi materi edukasi, maupun sarana pendukung, secara umum telah sesuai dengan pedoman dan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Sedikit perbedaan yang ditemukan pada praktik edukasi perpajakan adalah bentuk upaya penyesuaian yangdilakukan KPP Badan dan Orang Asing dalam menghadapi tantangan berupa uniknya karakteristik Wajib Pajak badan asing yang merupakan Subjek Pajak Luar Negeri yang perlakuan perpajakannya dipersamakan dengan subjek pajak badan serta beban kerja tambahan dalam bentuk penyelesaian administrasi pembebasan dan restitusi PPNdan/atau PPnBM bagi Perwakilan Negara Asing dan Organisasi Internasional.

---

This study was conducted to determine the practice of tax education implemented on

foreign corporate taxpayers registered in Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service

Office and their compliance with the rules and regulations. This study uses a qualitative

approach by collecting data through interviews and reviewing the guidelines and

provisions of the laws and regulations so that the research can provide an overview

related to the practice of tax education for foreign corporate taxpayers who are

registered in Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service Office. The object of the

research is the practice of taxation education in Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service Office conducted during 2019. The results of this study indicate that the practice of taxation education for Taxpayers of Representative Office of Foreign Companies and Permanent Establishments, whether in terms of educational methods, educational techniques, educational materials, providers of educational material, and supporting facilities, are generally in accordance with the guidelines and provisions of the legislation. The slight difference found in the practice of taxation education is a form of adjustment efforts made by Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service Office for overcoming challenges faced in the form of the matchless characteristics of foreign

corporate taxpayers who are Foreign Tax Subjects whose tax treatment is equivalent to corporate tax subject and additional workload in the form of settling the administration of exemption and refund of VAT and/or Sales Tax on Luxury Goods which are granted

for Representatives of Foreign Countries and determined International Organizations."

"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui praktik edukasi perpajakan yang dilakukan terhadap Wajib Pajak badan asing yang terdaftar di KPP Badan dan Orang Asing dan kesesuaiannya dengan pedoman dan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan pengumpulan data melalui wawancara dan kajian pedoman dan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan sehingga penelitian dapat memberikan gambaran terkait praktik edukasi perpajakan terhadap Wajib Pajak badan asing yang terdaftar di KPP Badan dan Orang Asing. Objek penelitian adalah praktik edukasi perpajakan di KPP Badan dan Orang Asing yang dilakukan selama tahun 2019. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa praktik edukasi perpajakan terhadap Wajib Pajak Kantor Perwakilan Perusahaan Asing dan Bentuk Usaha Tetap, baik dari segi metode edukasi, teknik edukasi, materi edukasi, pemberi materi edukasi, maupun sarana pendukung, secara umum telah sesuai dengan pedoman dan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan. Sedikit perbedaan yang ditemukan pada praktik edukasi perpajakan adalah bentuk upaya penyesuaian yang dilakukan KPP Badan dan Orang Asing dalam menghadapi tantangan berupa uniknya karakteristik Wajib Pajak badan asing yang merupakan Subjek Pajak Luar Negeri yang perlakuan perpajakannya dipersamakan dengan subjek pajak badan serta beban kerja tambahan dalam bentuk penyelesaian administrasi pembebasan dan restitusi PPN dan/atau PPnBM bagi Perwakilan Negara Asing dan Organisasi Internasional.

---

This study was conducted to determine the practice of tax education implemented on foreign corporate taxpayers registered in Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service Office and their compliance with the rules and regulations. This study uses a qualitative approach by collecting data through interviews and reviewing the guidelines and provisions of the laws and regulations so that the research can provide an overview related to the practice of tax education for foreign corporate taxpayers who are registered in Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service Office. The object of the research is the practice of taxation education in Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service Office conducted during 2019. The results of this study indicate that the practice of taxation education for Taxpayers of Representative Office of Foreign Companies and Permanent Establishments, whether in terms of educational methods, educational techniques, educational materials, providers of educational material, and supporting facilities, are generally in accordance with the guidelines and provisions of the legislation. The slight difference found in the practice of taxation education is a form of adjustment efforts made by Foreign Corporate and Individual Tax Service Office for overcoming challenges faced in the form of the matchless characteristics of foreign corporate taxpayers who are Foreign Tax Subjects whose tax treatment is equivalent to corporate tax subject and additional workload in the form of settling the administration of exemption and refund of VAT and/or Sales Tax on Luxury Goods which are granted for Representatives of Foreign Countries and determined International Organizations."

"Penelitian ini membahas permasalahan mengenai pengenaan pajak penghasilan terhadap badan asing pada bentuk usaha tetap (BUT) melalui penerapan persetujuan penghindaran pajak berganda (P3B) di Indonesia. Undang-undang pajak penghasilan memberlakukan pembedaan tarif antara badan usaha asing berbentuk BUT dan badan usaha asing yang tidak berbentuk BUT. Pada umumnya kegiatan atau usaha yang dijalankan oleh subjek pajak luar negeri di Indonesia sering memicu terjadinya pengenaan pajak berganda oleh negara sumber maupun negara domisili subjek pajak luar negeri. Oleh karena itu penulis hendak menganalisis mengenai keberadaan BUT dalam peraturan perpajakan di Indonesia serta penerapan P3B di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis-normatif, yakni penelitian kepustakaan yang dilakukan terhadap aturan-aturan hukum tertulis maupun tidak tertulis dengan tipe penelitian deskriptif. Simpulan yang diperoleh dari penelitian ini adalah pemajakan terhadap BUT menurut UU PPh bisa didasarkan pada tarif tertentu sebagaimana yang telah diatur dalam Keputusan Menteri Keuangan dan tarif umum Pasal 17 dan 23 UU PPh. Namun terhadap kegiatan usaha yang belum memenuhi syarat BUT maka pemajakannya mengacu kepada Pasal 26 UU PPh serta kewajiban perpajakannya menjadi tanggung jawab subjek pajak dalam negeri yang membayarkan penghasilan kepada subjek pajak luar negeri. Selanjutnya melalui keberadaan P3B bertujuan untuk memitigasi pajak berganda dengan menyelaraskan definisi pajak, menetapkan basis pajak, menetapkan hak pemajakan, dan mengatur mekanisme yang akan digunakan untuk menghilangkan pajak berganda dengan melalui metode unilateral dan multilateral. P3B yang disepakati mengacu pada aturan perjanjian yang berkembang didunia saat ini yakni UN Model dan OECD Model.

---

This research discusses issues regarding to the imposition of income tax on foreign entities in the permanent establishment (PE) through the application of the double taxation avoidance agreement (tax treaty). The law of tax income applies a tariff distinction between foreign business entities in the form of PE and foreign business entities that are not in the form of PE. In general, activities or businesses carried out by foreign tax subjects in Indonesia often trigger the occurrence of double taxation by the source country or the domicile country of the foreign tax subject. Therefore, the author wants to analyze the existence of PE in tax regulations in Indonesia and the application of tax treaty in Indonesia. This research uses a juridical-normative research method, named library research conducted on written and unwritten legal rules with descriptive research type. The conclusions obtained from this research are taxation of permanent establishment according to the Income Tax Law in Indonesia can be based on certain tariffs as stipulated in the Decree of the Minister of Finance and general tariffs Article 17 and 23 of the Income Tax Law. However, for business activities that do not meet the PE requirements, the taxation refers to Article 26 of the Income Tax Law and the tax obligations are the responsibility of domestic tax subjects who pay income to foreign tax subjects. Furthermore, the existence of the tax treaty aims to mitigate double taxation by harmonizing the tax definition, establishing a tax base, determining taxation rights, and regulating the mechanism that will be used to eliminate double taxation through unilateral and multilateral methods. The agreement of tax treaty refers to the agreement rules that are developing in the world today, namely the UN Model and OECD Model."

"Thirty-six ago President Soeharto assigned me to chair the Indonesia Delegation to the United Nations on the human environment in stockholm, Sweden, June 1972..."