Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai lembaga penjamin pemegang polis asuransi sebagai perlindungan bagi nasabah perusahaan asuransi. dalam rangka perlindungan terhadap pemegang polis, lembaga penjamin pemegang polis berfungsi melindungi kepentingan pemegang polis apabila perusahaan asuransi mengalami kegagalan bayar, meskipun demikian, di Indonesia sampai sekarang belum dibentuk lembaga yang dimaksud meski sudah diamanatkan Undang-Undang Perasuransian. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, pertama-tama penulis akan meneliti bagaimanakah perbandingan ketentuan perlindungan terhadap tertanggung dan pemegang polis yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang No.2 Tahun 1992 tentang Usaha Perasuransian dengan Undang-Undang No 40 Tahun 2014 tentang perasuransian. kemudian juga bagaimanakah lembaga penjamin pemegang polis di Singapura yang telah menjalankan program penjaminan polis seperti yang diamanatkan oleh Pasal 53 UU No. 40 Tahun 2014 tentang Perasuransian. Penelitian skripsi ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis-nomatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konsep, dan analisis. Hasil penelitian yang didapatkan adalah mekanisme perlindungan pemegang polis antara UU No. 2 Tahun 1992 dengan UU No.40 Tahun 2014 tidak memiliki perbedaan jauh. Hanya terdapat perbedaan dalam hal nomenklatur dan persyaratan formil saja. Kemudian di Singapura lembaga penjamin pemegang polis terlembaga menyatu dengan lembaga penjamin simpanan dengan nama Singapore Deposit Insurance Corporation dengan membentuk PPF Life Fund dan PPF General Fund untuk melindungi pemegang polis.

---

This thesis discusses policyholder deposit insurance corporation for protection of insurance company customers. in regards to protect the policyholder, policyholder deposit insurance corporation serves to protect the interests of the policyholder if the insurance company fails to pay. however, Indonesia has not been establish institution that previously mentioned despite Insurance Law have already mandated. Based on this, first the author will examine how the comparison of provisions of protection against the insured and policyholders between which set in Law No.2 of 1992 with Law No. 40 of 2014. Second, how institution of policyholder protection in Singapore who has run the policy guarantee program just as mandated by Article 53 of Law no. 40 Year 2014.

This thesis research using juridical normative research method with approach of legislation, concept, and analysis. The result of this research is protection mechanism of policy holder between Law no. 2 of 1992 with Law No.40 of 2014 does not have much difference. The differences only in nomenclature and formal requirements. Then in Singapore the institutional policy guarantor institution integrates with the deposit insurance agency under the name Singapore Deposit Insurance Corporation by establishing PPF Life Fund and PPF General Fund to protect policyholders."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai Lembaga Penjaminan Polis Asuransi sebagai perlindungan hukum atas pemegang polis dalam kondisi gagal bayar perusahaan asuransi (mengacu pada Best Practice di Jepang Dan Inggris). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dimana data penelitian sebagian besar berasal dari studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini adalah 1) Lembaga Penjaminan polis Asuransi Jiwa di Jepang dan di Inggris dapat memberikan perlindungan hukum atas hak pemegang polis dalam kondisi gagal bayar perusahaan asuransi melalui lembaga masing-masing LIPPCJ dan FSCS. 2) Urgensi pembentukan Lembaga Penjaminan Polis Asuransi untuk memberikan kepastian hukum bilamana terjadi kondisi gagal bayar Perusahaan Asuransi. 3) Pembentukan Lembaga Penjaminan Polis di Indonesia sangat bermanfaat untuk melindungi Pemegang Polis dan akan meningkatkan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap industri perasuransian. Penulis memberikan saran Lembaga Penjaminan Polis di Indonesia sebagai Lembaga Independen yang mempunyai mekanisme kelembagaan tersendiri dan mengikutsertakan produk asuransi yang memiliki risiko gagal bayar paling utama yaitu Asuransi Umum dan Asuransi Jiwa.

---

This thesis discusses the Insurance Policy Guarantee Corporation as legal protection for policyholders in state of Insurance Company Default (referring to Best Practice in Japan and UK). This research uses the juridical-normative method, where the research data mostly comes from literature studies. The results of this study are 1) Life Insurance Policy Guarantee Corporations in Japan and the UK can provide legal protection for the rights of policyholders in the state of insurance company default through their respective institutions, LIPPCJ and FSCS. 2) The urgency of establishing an Insurance Policy Guarantee Corporation to provide legal certainty in state of Insurance Company Failure to pay. 3) The establishment of a Insurance Policy Guarantee Corporation in Indonesia is very beneficial to protect policyholders. It will increase public confidence in the insurance industry. The author suggests that the Policy Guarantee Corporation in Indonesia is possible as an independent institution which has independent institutional mechanism and includes all insurance products that have main risk of default namely General Insurance and Life Insurance.

"

"ABSTRAKTwisting merupakan tindakan terlarang yang di lakukan oleh agen asuransi jiwa dalam hal membujuk pemegang polis untuk memindahkan suatu polis dari satu perusahaan asuransi ke suatu perusahaan asuransi lainnya. Yang mana tindakan Twisting yang di lakukan agen asuransi tersebut merugikan bagi perusahaan asuransi dan juga pemegang polis asuransi. Dalam hal ini perlindungan yang ada yang di tujukan untuk melindungi pemegang polis dari praktek twisting yang di lakukan oleh agen asuransi bertumpu pada pengawasan yang ada di internal perusahaan asuransi dan juga pengawasan eksternal dari organisasi profesi dan pemerintah.

---

ABSTRACTTwisting the prohibited acts done by life insurance agents in terms of persuading policyholders to move a policy from one insurance company to an insurance company to another. Which acts of Twisting undertaken is detrimental to the insurance companies and policy holders . In this case the existing protection that aimed to protecting policyholders from twisting practices undertaken by insurance agents is rely on internal oversight in the insurance company and also external supervision from professional organizations and governments ."

"Perusahaan asuransi merupakan Lembaga Jasa Keuangan Non Bank yang memiliki dampak yang cukup besar bagi perekonomian negara. Disamping itu, perusahaan asuransi juga merupakan lembaga penghimpun dana dari masyarakat pemegang polis melalui pengalihan resiko yang dibuat dalam suatu kontrak, yang disebut dengan polis. Pemegang polis sebagai pihak yang memiliki kedudukan penting, perlu diberikan perlindungan secara hukum dalam hal perusahaan asuransi dimohonkan pailit oleh Badan Pengawas Perasuransian. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, Penulis mengajukan pokok permasalahan yaitu: 1.Bagaimanakah undang-undang perasuransian memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang polis dari perusahaan asuransi yang dimohonkan pailit? 2. Apakah pertimbangan hukum dari hakim yang menjadi dasar putusan pailit PT Bumi Asih Jaya sudah sesuai dengan hukum asuransi? Bentuk penelitian ini bersifat yuridis normatif dengan tipologi penelitian deskriptif. Pada akhirnya, Peneliti memperoleh kesimpulan bahwa undang-undang perasuransian memberikan perlindungan terhadap pemegang polis berupa hak utama atas pembayaran piutang dan putusan Majelis Hakim di tingkat pertama belum sesuai dengan hukum asuransi sedangkan putusan Mahkamah Agung telah sesuai dengan hukum asuransi. Penulis menyarankan agar segera dibentuk peraturan pelaksana Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2014 dan Lembaga Penjaminan Polis.

---

Insurance company is a Nonbank Financial Institution which has a considerable impact for the national economy. In addition, the insurance company is also a collecting funds institution from public policyholder through the risks coverage which is made in the contract, called the policy. Policyholder as a party that have a significant interest, need to be given a legal protection in terms of the insurance company petitioned for Bankruptcy by The Insurance Supervisory Agency. Hence, the author formulated and discussed the following problems 1.How the insurance regulation providing legal protection for policyholder of the insurance company which is petitioned for Bankruptcy 2. Are the legal considerations of the judicial panel in court award of PT Bumi Asih Jaya rsquo s case compatible with insurance law This research uses the normative juridical approach with a descriptive typology.

At the conclusion, insurance regulations provides legal protection for the policyholder a priority right and the legal considerations of judicial panel in the first chamber is irrelevant with the insurance law, furthermore in Supreme Court, the legal consideration of judicial panel is already relevant to the insurance law. The author suggests that the implementing regulation of Law No. 40 of 2014 and also The Guarantee Institution Policy need to be established immediately."

"Saat ini belum terdapat lembaga tersendiri yang menjamin perlindungan bagi para pemegang polis di Indonesia. Dalam skripsi ini, menganalisis skema serta mekanisme yang sesuai dalam pembentukan Lembaga Penjamin Polis di Indonesia. Dalam skripsi ini terdapat 3 (tiga) permasalahan yaitu: 1. Perlindungan pemegang polis di Indonesia pada saat perusahaan asuransi mengalami gagal bayar yang diatur oleh peraturan perundang-undangan; 2. Pengaturan Lembaga Penjamin Polis di Jepang; 3. Regulasi dan mekanisme yang tepat dalam pembentukan Lembaga Penjamin Polis di Indonesia. Metode penilitian dalam penilitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dan menggunakan data sekunder. Berdasarakan penilitian yang dilakukan maka perlindungan pemegang polis pada saat terjadi peristiwa gagal bayar diatur dalam Pasal 20 ayat (2) Undang-Undang Usaha Perasuransian dan Pasal 52 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Perasuransian. Negara Jepang memiliki lembaga tersendiri yang difungsikan sebagai Lembaga Penjamin Polis, diatur dalam ketentuan Insurance Business Act 1995. Dalam pembentukan Lembaga Penjamin Polis di Indonesia harus memiliki regulasi tersendiri yang mengatur mengenai ketentuan Lembaga Penjamin Polis, selanjutnya skema yang tepat dalam pembentukan Lembaga Penjamin Polis di Indonesia adalah memberikan penjaminan kepada para anggota Lembaga Penjamin Polis yang mengalami gagal bayar dengan memberikan bantuan keuangan kepada Perusahaan Asuransi Penyelamat, mengalihkan kontrak asuransi ke Perusahaan Asuransi Jembatan, dan mengambil alih kontrak asuransi.

---

Currently, there is no separate institution that guarantees protection for policyholders in Indonesia. In this thesis, we analyze the appropriate scheme and mechanism in the formation of a Policyholder Protection Institution in Indonesia. In this thesis there are 3 (three) problems, namely: 1. Protection of policyholders in Indonesia when an insurance company experiences a default which is regulated by laws and regulations; 2. Regulation of the Policyholder Protection Institution in Japan; 3. Appropriate regulations and mechanisms in the establishment of a Policyholder Protection Institution in Indonesia. The research method in this research is normative juridical and uses secondary data. Based on the research conducted, the protection of the policyholder in the event of a default is regulated in Article 20 paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Law and Article 52 paragraph (1) of the Insurance Act. The State of Japan has its own institution that functions as a Policyholder Protection Institution, regulated in the provisions of the Insurance Business Act 1995. In the establishment of a Policyholder Protection Institution in Indonesia, it must have its own regulation that regulates the provisions of the Policyholder Protection Institution n, then the appropriate scheme in establishing a Policyholder Protection Institution in Indonesia is to provide guarantees to Policyholder Protection Institution members who have defaulted by providing financial assistance to the Rescue Insurance Company, transferring the insurance contract to the Bridge Insurance Company, and taking over the insurance contract."

"[ABSTRAKAsuransi merupakan salah satu lembaga keuangan yang terus berkembang seiringdengan membaiknya perkembangan ekonomi di Indonesia. Dengan pesatnyaperkembangan perekonomian dan bisnis yang terjadi, kebutuhan masyarakat akanperlindungan terhadap resiko kerugian semakin meningkat. Namun asuransidalam kenyataannya seringkali tidak dipercaya oleh masyarakat karena praktikasuransi dianggap lebih merugikan daripada menguntungkan. Hal ini diakibatkankarena minimnya perlindungan hukum dalam melakukan perjanjian asuransi.Tulisan ini difokuskan kepada pengaturan aspek kebebasan berkontrak,kecermatan berkontrak serta urgensi pembuatan kontrak berbentuk akta otentikdalam pembuatan polis asuransi. Dalam Undang-Undang, perjanjian asuransisedikit banyak diatur dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagang sedangkanperaturan Undang-Undang dan peraturan pendukung lainnya hanya mengaturaspek asuransi dari segi tata usahanya saja. Penulisan ini menggunakan metodekepustakaan serta wawancara kepada pihak-pihak terkait. Jenis data yangdigunakan adalah data sekunder. Metode analisis yang digunakan adalah metodekualitatif guna mendapatkan data yang bersifat evaluatif analitis. Dasarpembuatan polis asuransi terdapat dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagangpasal 255. Otentifikasi Polis asuransi ditujukan untuk meminimalisir kerugianyang akan muncul dan sebagai bentuk kepastian hukum bagi para pihak.Otentifikasi polis asuransi diharapkan dapat memberikan kepastian lebih terhadapasas kebebasan berkontrak dan unsur kecermatan berkontrak yang merupakansalah satu aspek penting dalam melakukan perjanjian.

---

ABSTRACTInsurance is a financial institution that continues to grow in line with theimproving economic development in Indonesia . With the rapid development ofeconomy and business that happens, public needs protection against the risk ofloss is increasing. But in reality, insurance is often not trusted by the publicbecause of insurance practices are considered more detrimental than beneficial.This is caused by the lack of legal protection in the conduct of insuranceagreement. This paper focuses on the aspect of freedom of contract arrangements,the precision of contract as well as the urgency of making the contract in the formof an authentic act of making an insurance policy. In reality, the insuranceagreement more or less regulated in the Law on Commercial Law Act regulationswhile and other supporting regulations only regulate the insurance aspects of theirbusiness in terms of grammar only. This study, using literature as well asinterviews to the relevant parties . The type of data used are secondary data andprimary data . The analytical method used is a qualitative method to obtainanalytical data that is evaluative . Manufacture of basic insurance policy containedin the Book of the Commercial Law Article 255 . Authentication insurance policyintended to minimize the losses that will arise and as a form of legal certainty forthe parties . Authentication insurance policy is expected to provide more certaintyto the principle of freedom of contract and precision element of contract , which isone important aspect in making agreements.;Insurance is a financial institution that continues to grow in line with theimproving economic development in Indonesia . With the rapid development ofeconomy and business that happens, public needs protection against the risk ofloss is increasing. But in reality, insurance is often not trusted by the publicbecause of insurance practices are considered more detrimental than beneficial.This is caused by the lack of legal protection in the conduct of insuranceagreement. This paper focuses on the aspect of freedom of contract arrangements,the precision of contract as well as the urgency of making the contract in the formof an authentic act of making an insurance policy. In reality, the insuranceagreement more or less regulated in the Law on Commercial Law Act regulationswhile and other supporting regulations only regulate the insurance aspects of theirbusiness in terms of grammar only. This study, using literature as well asinterviews to the relevant parties . The type of data used are secondary data andprimary data . The analytical method used is a qualitative method to obtainanalytical data that is evaluative . Manufacture of basic insurance policy containedin the Book of the Commercial Law Article 255 . Authentication insurance policyintended to minimize the losses that will arise and as a form of legal certainty forthe parties . Authentication insurance policy is expected to provide more certaintyto the principle of freedom of contract and precision element of contract , which isone important aspect in making agreements.;Insurance is a financial institution that continues to grow in line with theimproving economic development in Indonesia . With the rapid development ofeconomy and business that happens, public needs protection against the risk ofloss is increasing. But in reality, insurance is often not trusted by the publicbecause of insurance practices are considered more detrimental than beneficial.This is caused by the lack of legal protection in the conduct of insuranceagreement. This paper focuses on the aspect of freedom of contract arrangements,the precision of contract as well as the urgency of making the contract in the formof an authentic act of making an insurance policy. In reality, the insuranceagreement more or less regulated in the Law on Commercial Law Act regulationswhile and other supporting regulations only regulate the insurance aspects of theirbusiness in terms of grammar only. This study, using literature as well asinterviews to the relevant parties . The type of data used are secondary data andprimary data . The analytical method used is a qualitative method to obtainanalytical data that is evaluative . Manufacture of basic insurance policy containedin the Book of the Commercial Law Article 255 . Authentication insurance policyintended to minimize the losses that will arise and as a form of legal certainty forthe parties . Authentication insurance policy is expected to provide more certaintyto the principle of freedom of contract and precision element of contract , which isone important aspect in making agreements., Insurance is a financial institution that continues to grow in line with theimproving economic development in Indonesia . With the rapid development ofeconomy and business that happens, public needs protection against the risk ofloss is increasing. But in reality, insurance is often not trusted by the publicbecause of insurance practices are considered more detrimental than beneficial.This is caused by the lack of legal protection in the conduct of insuranceagreement. This paper focuses on the aspect of freedom of contract arrangements,the precision of contract as well as the urgency of making the contract in the formof an authentic act of making an insurance policy. In reality, the insuranceagreement more or less regulated in the Law on Commercial Law Act regulationswhile and other supporting regulations only regulate the insurance aspects of theirbusiness in terms of grammar only. This study, using literature as well asinterviews to the relevant parties . The type of data used are secondary data andprimary data . The analytical method used is a qualitative method to obtainanalytical data that is evaluative . Manufacture of basic insurance policy containedin the Book of the Commercial Law Article 255 . Authentication insurance policyintended to minimize the losses that will arise and as a form of legal certainty forthe parties . Authentication insurance policy is expected to provide more certaintyto the principle of freedom of contract and precision element of contract , which isone important aspect in making agreements.]"

"Dalam Putusan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Nomor: 439/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Jkt. Pst tertanggal 09 Februari 2021 (Putusan PKPU), melalui dalil Tanggapan dari Termohon PT. Asuransi Jiwa Adisarana Wanaartha (Wanaartha Life) yang menyatakan bahwa terjadi kondisi force majeure akibat penyitaan yang dilakukan oleh pihak Kejaksaan Agung sehingga menimbulkan konflik yang terkesan tidak acuh terhadap kewajibannya sebagai perusahaan asuransi yang menanggung pertanggungan asuransi kepada nasabahnya dengan alasan adanya keadaan memaksa atau force majeure akibat penyitaan SRE milik Wanaartha Life oleh Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia untuk pembuktian dalam perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Nomor: 29/Pid.Sus-TPK/ 2020/PN.Jkt.Pst tertanggal 23 Oktober 2020 dengan Terdakwa Benny Tjokrosaputro (Putusan Tipikor). Diketahui hal tersebut diawali dengan permasalahan hukum antara Wanaartha Life dengan Benny Tjokrosaputro sebagai pemilik PT. Hanson International Tbk (Hanson), yang dimana Wanaartha Life melakukan transaksi jual-beli saham Hanson sebesar Rp45.000.000.000.- (Empat Puluh Lima Miliar Rupiah) sebanyak 2.277.221.900 lembar saham atau sekitar 2 % (dua persen) komposisi kepemilikan saham Hanson. Transaksi jual-beli saham tersebut dilakukan menggunakan dana polis asuransi nasabahnya, hal ini dilakukan untuk mencari return kepada nasabahnya sebagaimana fungsi dan tujuan dari produk asuransi Unit Link. Dalam Putusan Tipikor, sebelum adanya transaksi jual-beli saham telah dilakukan Nominee Arrangement antara Benny Tjokrosaputro dan menunjuk Wanaartha Life sebagai pembeli saham, praktik tersebut dilarang untuk dilakukan dalam hukum positif Indonesia, dikarenakan pembelian saham hanya mengenal praktik jual-beli saham atas nama (aan opname) bukanlah saham atas tunjuk (aan toonder). Sehingga dalam thesis ini, dapat disimpulkan bahwa tindakan Wanaartha Life telah diawali dengan itikad buruk (bad faith) yang mengakibatkan gagal bayarnya Wanaartha Life terhadap nasabahnya.

---

The court’s decision Number: 439 .Sus-PKPU/2020/PN Niaga Jkt. Pst dated 09 February 2021 (PKPU Decision) has been used to delay a legal obligation to pay consumers by PT. Adisarana Wanaartha Life Insurance (Wanaartha Life) by arguing that the confiscation of its securities sub-accounts ("SRE") as the subject of the Corruption Crime case Number: 29/Pid.Sus-TPK/ 2020/PN.Jkt.Pst dated October 23, 2020 with the Defendant Benny Tjokrosaputro (Corruption Verdict) creates compelling circumstances namely force majeures. The case began with legal dispute between Wanaartha Life and Benny Tjokrosaputro as the owner of PT. Hanson International Tbk (Hanson), in which Wanaartha Life made transactions for buying and selling Hanson shares of Rp45,000,000,000.- (Forty Five Billion Rupiah) totaling 2,277,221,900 shares or approximately 2% (two percent) of the composition of Hanson's share ownership. The share buying and selling transactions are carried out using the customer's insurance policy funds, this is to seek returns to the customers according to the function and purpose of the Unit Link insurance product. In the Corruption Judgment as concerned, prior to the sale and purchase of shares, there was an agreement on a share upon appointment between a Nominee Arrangement between Benny Tjokrosaputro and appointed Wanaartha Life as the purchaser of shares. This practice is prohibited under the Indonesian positive law, because the purchase of shares only recognizes the practice of buying and selling shares on behalf (aanopname) is not a share upon appointment (aan toonder). Hence, this thesis argued that Wanaartha Life's actions started with bad faith which resulted in Wanaartha Life's failure to pay its customers."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai tata kelola dana jaminan perusahaan asuransi milik PT. Asuransi Jiwa Namura Tata Life sebagai jaminan terakhir untuk perlindungan kepentingan pemegang polis dimana dalam hal ini PT. Asuransi Jiwa Namura Tata Life telah mencairkan dana jaminan perusahaannya bahkan sebelum diputuskan pailit oleh Pengadilan Niaga. Penelitian ini berbentuk yuridisnormatif dengan tipologi penelitian deskriptif analitis. Kemudian berdasarkan hasil analisis, penulis memperoleh kesimpulan bahwa dana jaminan tidak serta merta menjadi jaminan pasti dalam rangka melindungi kepentingan pemegang polis dalam suatu perusahaan asuransi jika suatu perusahaan asuransi tersebut dipailitkan/dilikuidasi.

---

This thesis mainly focused on the governance of the guarantee fund owned by the insurance company PT. Namura Tata Life Indoensia as last guarantee for the protection of interests of policyholders which in this case PT. Namura Tata Life Insurance has withdraw its guarantee fund even before it was decided bankrupt by the Commercial Court. This research form is juridical-normative research with descriptive analytical typology form. Then based on the analysis, the authors came to the conclusion that the guarantee fund does not necessarily become a firm guarantee in order to protect the interests of policyholders in an insurance company if an insurance company bankrupt/liquidated."

"Maraknya masalah terkait dengan gagal bayar dalam industri asuransi menjadi hal yang patut untuk diperhatikan, terutama terkait dengan transaksi produk asuransi yang menjanjikan proteksi terhadap jiwa dan mendapat manfaat investasi, yakni Produk Asuransi Yang Dikaitkan Dengan Investasi (PAYDI). Skripsi ini membahas tentang bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap perusahaan asuransi gagal bayar PT Asuransi Jiwa Kresna serta akibat dari gagal bayar yang terjadi. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian berbentuk yuridis-normatif dengan menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan. Hasil dari penelitian mengemukakan bahwa peraturan terkait perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang polis asuransi gagal bayar PT Asuransi Jiwa Kresna dapat ditinjau dari sudut pandang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Dagang, UU Perasuransian, dan Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, sedangkan akibat hukumnya adalah nasabah berhak menyelesaikan sengketa baik didalam maupun diluar pengadilan, mengajukan permohonan pailit kepada OJK untuk selanjutnya dimohonkan kepada Pengadilan Niaga yang berwenang, dan meminta pelaksanaan sanksi administratif terhadap perusahaan oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan.

---

The rise of problems related to default in the insurance industry is something that requires attention, especially in transactions related to insurance products that offer life protection and investment benefits, for instance Investment-Linked Insurance Products (PAYDI). This thesis discusses the form of legal protection for policyholders of insurance company in default, namely what occured in PT Asuransi Jiwa Kresna, and the consequences of the defaults that occur. The research method used is a juridical-normative research by analyzing the laws and regulations. The results of the study show that regulations related to legal protection for  for policyholders of insurance company in default PT Asuransi Jiwa Kresna can be viewed from the point of view of the Civil Code, Commercial Law, Insurance Law, and Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Regulations, while the legal consequences is the policyholders has the right to settle disputes both inside and outside the court, submit a bankruptcy application to the OJK for further application to the competent Commercial Court, and request the implementation of administrative sanctions against the company by the OJK. "

"Tesis ini membahas tentang perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang polis asuransi tunjangan dan jaminan hari tua oleh perusahaan asuransi yang gagal bayar serta bentuk tanggung jawab jiwasraya kepada para pemegang polis akibat gagal nya jiwasraya memenuhi kewajiban nya dalam polis. Tesis ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan bahan penelitian berupa bahan kepustakaan dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang terkait. Pada penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa belum ada pengaturan maupun mekanisme khusus terkait perlindungan dan jaminan yang diberikan kepada para pemegang polis ketika perusahaan penanggung mengalami kegagalan bayar. Jiwasraya sebagai penanggung bersama dengan telah memberikan perlindungan hukum represif berupa melakukan restrukturisasi polis dengan mengalihkan polis kepada perusahaan asuransi lainnya sebagai upaya penyelamatan manfaat polis. Perlu ada pengaturan khusus terkait adanya lembaga penjamin polis demi memberikan kepastian dan perlindugan bagi para pemegang polis.

---

This thesis discusses legal protection for insurance Policy Holders, Allowance and Old Days Guarantee by insurance companies that fail to pay and Jiwasraya’s form of responsibility to policyholders due to Jiwasraya’s failure to fulfill his obligations. This thesis uses normative juridical research methods that use research materials in the form of literature and related laws and regulations. In this research, there are no specific laws and regulations which giving protection for policy holders when insurance companies fail to pay his obligations. Jiwasraya as an insurer with government has giving repressive legal protection with policy restructurisations to save the benefits of the police. There is a need for special regulations about policy guarantee institution to provide legal certainty and also protection for policy holders."