Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Konsep nominee masuk ke Indonesia sebagai suatu perjanjian karena adanya asas kebebasan berkontrak dan sistem hukum perjanjian yang sifatnya terbuka. Berkaitan dengan nominee hak atas tanah bagi warga negara asing, pada Pasal 26 ayat (2) UUPA telah ditegaskan mengenai larangan bagi warga negara asing untuk memiliki hak atas tanah yang dilarang bagi warga negara asing baik secara langsung maupun tidak langsung. Walaupun demikian praktik nominee hak atas tanah bagi warga negara asing di Indonesia masih terjadi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan penjelasan mengenai kewenangan dan tanggung jawaban notaris berkaitan dengan pembentukan struktur nominee hak atas tanah bagi warga negara asing. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan bentuk penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan metode kualitatif untuk menganalisis data dan tipe penelitian deskriptif analitis. Dari peraturan yang ada diketahui bahwa dalam perjanjian yang membentuk struktur nominee hak atas tanah bagi warga negara asing adalah perjanjian yang batal demi hukum. Notaris tidak berwenang dalam praktik nominee hak atas tanah dan wajib memberikan penilaian terhadap isi akta serta memberikan penyuluhan hukum sehubungan dengan pembuatan akta. Praktik nominee hak atas tanah bagi warga negara asing dapat menimbulkan kerugian bagi para pihak sebagai akibat dari kebatalan demi hukum sehingga notaris harus bertanggung jawab dan dapat dikenai sanksi berupa sanksi perdata, administrasi dan kode etik jabatan notaris. Sehingga dalam menjalankan jabatannya notaris harus memahami betul hukum yang berlaku berkaitan dengan akta dan bagi notaris yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam menjalankan jabatannya, sebaiknya notaris dimintai pertanggungjawaban sesuai dengan peraturan.

---

The concept of nominees entered Indonesia as an agreement because of the principle of freedom of contract and an open legal agreement system. In connection with the nominee of land rights for foreign nationals, Article 26 paragraph (2) of the LoGA has emphasized the prohibition for foreign nationals to have rights to land which are prohibited for foreign citizens either directly or indirectly. However, the practice of nominating land rights for foreign nationals in Indonesia still occurs. This study aims to provide an explanation of the notaries' authority and responsibilities relating to the establishment of a nominee structure for land rights for foreign nationals. The writing of this thesis uses a form of normative juridical law research with qualitative methods to analyze data and types of analytical descriptive research. From the existing regulations it is known that in agreements that form a nominee structure for land rights for foreign citizens are agreements that are null and void. Notary is not authorized in the practice of nominee land rights and is obliged to provide an assessment of the contents of the deed and provide legal counseling in connection with the making of the deed. Nominee practice of land rights for foreign nationals can cause harm to the parties as a result of the cancellation by law so that the notary must be responsible and can be subject to sanctions in the form of civil sanctions, administration and notary position codes. So that in carrying out his position the notary must fully understand the applicable law relating to the deed and for the notary who commits an unlawful act in carrying out his position, the notary should be held accountable in accordance with the regulations."

"Konsep nominee masuk ke Indonesia sebagai suatu perjanjian karena adanya asas kebebasan berkontrak dan sistem hukum perjanjian yang sifatnya terbuka. Setelah diundangkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal, pada Pasal 33 telah ditegaskan mengenai larangan penggunaan struktur nominee pemegang saham dalam Perseroan dengan fasilitas penanaman modal. Walaupun demikian praktik nominee pemegang saham PT PMA di Indonesia masih terjadi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan penjelasan mengenai peran dan pertanggungjawaban notaris berkaitan dengan pembentukan struktur nominee pemegang saham PT PMA. Penulisan tesis ini menggunakan bentuk penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan metode kualitatif untuk menganalisis data dan tipe penelitian deskriptif analitis. Peran notaris dalam praktik nominee pemegang saham PT PMA adalah memberikan penilaian terhadap isi akta dan memberikan penyuluhan hukum sehubungan dengan pembuatan akta. Praktik nominee pemegang saham PT PMA dapat menimbulkan kerugian bagi para pihak sebagai akibat dari kebatalan demi hukum sehingga dapat membawa notaris ke dalam pertanggungjawaban berupa sanksi perdata, administrasi dan kode etik jabatan notaris. Sehingga dalam menjalankan jabatannya notaris harus memahami betul hukum yang berlaku berkaitan dengan akta dan bagi notaris yang melakukan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam menjalankan jabatannya, sebaiknya notaris dimintai pertanggungjawaban sesuai dengan peraturan.

---

The nominee concept enters Indonesia as a treaty because of the principle of freedom of contract and an open system of contractual law. After the enactment of Law Number 25 Year 2007 on Capital Investment, Article 33 has stipulated the prohibition on the use of nominee structure of shareholders in the Company with investment facilities. Nevertheless, the nominee practice of shareholders of PT PMA in Indonesia is still happening. This study aims to provide an explanation of the roles and responsibilities of notaries relating to the formation of nominee structure of shareholders of PT PMA. The writing of this thesis uses the form of normative juridical legal research with qualitative method to analyze data and type of descriptive analytical research. Notary's role in the nominee practice of shareholders of PT PMA is to provide an assessment of the contents of the deed and to provide legal counseling in relation to the making of the deed. The practice of nominee of shareholders of PT PMA may cause harm to the parties as a result of the legal negligence so as to bring the notary into account in the form of civil sanction, administration and code of ethics of notary. Thus, in the performance of his / her position, the notary must fully understand the applicable law relating to the deed and for the notary who commits the act unlawfully in carrying out his / her position, the notary should be held accountable in accordance with the rules."

"Menjalankan jabatannya sebagai pejabat umum, notaris bertugas menuangkan keterangan para pihak ke dalam akta autentik. Menjalankan kewenangannya tersebut notaris dituntut untuk secara seksama menelaah dengan cermat setiap keterangan para pihak yang didukung dengan data yang ada dan disesuaikan dengan peraturan yang ada. Berkaitan dengan hal tersebut, maka dianggap perlu peran lebih dan batasan kewenangan notaris dalam menuangkan keterangan para pihak ke dalam akta pelepasan hak serta implikasi hukum dan pertanggungjawaban notaris berkaitan dengan pembuatan akta autentik yang mana dalam pembuatannya terdapat keterangan palsu. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian hukum yuridis normatif melalui studi kepustakaan dan menganalisis data sekunder melalui metode kualitatif serta tipe penelitian deskriptif analitis.Kesimpulan dari penulis dalam penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa implikasi hukum dari adanya keterangan palsu dalam pembuatan akta autentik adalah dapat terjadinya kebatalan atau pembatalan atas akta tersebut. Sedangkan berkaitan dengan adanya keterangan palsu tersebut maka notaris tidak bertanggung jawab atas kebenaran materil keterangan para pihak. Sepanjang akta yang dibuat oleh notaris telah memenuhi kebenaran formil dan apa yang dituangkan dalam akta tidak bertentangan dengan peraturan yang ada, maka notaris tidak perlu bertanggungjawab atas pembatalan atau kebatalan akta tersebut yang dalam hal ini mengenai akta pelepasan hak atas tanah.

---

In carrying out his position as a public official, the notary is tasked with pouring information from the parties into the authentic deed. In carrying out its authority, the notary is required to carefully examine carefully the statements of the parties supported by existing data and adapted to existing regulations. In this regard, it is deemed necessary to further the role and limitations of the notary's authority in pouring information from the parties into the deed of rights release and legal implications and notary responsibility relating to the making of authentic deeds in which there is false information. By using normative juridical legal research methods through library research and analyzing secondary data through qualitative methods and descriptive analytical research types.

The conclusions of the authors in this study indicate that the legal implications of the existence of false information in the manufacture of authentic deeds are the possibility of cancellation or cancellation of the deed. while relating to the existence of the false statement, the notary is not responsible for the material truth of the statements of the parties. As long as the deed made by the notary has fulfilled formal truth and what is stated in the deed does not conflict with existing regulations, the notary does not need to be responsible for the cancellation or cancellation of the deed which in this case concerning the deed of land rights."

"Penelitian ini memfokuskan pada peristiwa hukum agraria yang berhubungan dengan kepemilikan Hak atas Tanah oleh Warga Negara Asing melalui Perjanjian Nominee, penekanan pada aspek keabsahan perjanjian tersebut dengan UU Pokok Agraria, Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah doktrinal untuk menganalisis Putusan dalam penelusuran hukum, menggunakan studi kepustakaan melalui peraturan perundang-undangan, dengan asas-asas dalam norma hukum di negara Indonesia, serta bahan hukum sekunder untuk mendukung penelitian ini. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang terlupakan dalam pertimbangan Majelis Hakim dalam proses penyelesaian sengketa pada Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar Nomor 215/Pdt.G/2019/PN DPS, sebagaimana Putusan Majelis Hakim hanya menilai keabsahan Perjanjian Nominee yang dibuat oleh kedua belah pihak, dari pemenuhan syarat sah perjanjian dan saling mengikatnya perjanjian berdasarkan KUHPerdata saja. Perjanjian Nominee melibatkan pihak asing sebagai penguasa kepemilikan hak tanah yang de facto yaitu faktanya, sementara pihak Warga Negara Indonesia hanya berperan sebagai de jure pihak formal, akibat hukum dari perjanjian tersebut yang bertentangan dengan UU Pokok Agraria, maka tidak terpenuhinya syarat sah perjanjian pada 1320 KUHPerdata yakni kausa yang halal. Penelitian ini memfokuskan pada isu signifikan yang terlupakan oleh Majelis Hakim dalam menyelesaikan perkara ini, yaitu relevansi asas nasionalitas dalam konteks Hukum Agraria, dalam penerapannya asas nasionalitas sebagaimana diatur dalam UU Pokok Agraria menyatakan bahwa hak kepemilikan tanah di wilayah Indonesia secara keseluruhan hanya dapat dimiliki oleh individu yang memiliki kewarganegaraan Indonesia, maka implikasi dari keabsahan Perjanjian Nominee mengenai kepemilikan Hak atas Tanah dapat memberikan kerentanan terhadap pengambilalihan hak milik atas tanah oleh warga negara asing, yang dapat merugikan kepentingan nasional dan masyarakat setempat wilayah Indonesia.

---

This research focuses on agrarian law events related to the ownership of land rights by foreign citizens through Nominee Agreements, emphasizing the aspects of the validity of these agreements with the Basic Agrarian Law. The method used in this research is doctrinal to analyze decisions in legal investigations, using studies literature through statutory regulations with principles in legal norms in Indonesia, as well as secondary legal materials to support this research. This research aims to identify forgotten factors in the consideration of the Panel of Judges in the dispute resolution process in the Denpasar District Court Decision Number 215/Pdt.G/2019/PN DPS, as the Panel of Judges decision only assesses the validity of the Nominee Agreement made by both parties, from fulfilling the legal requirements of the agreement and mutually binding agreements based on the Civil Code only. The Nominee Agreement involves a foreign party as the de facto owner of land rights namely in fact, while the Indonesian citizen only acts as a de jure formal party, the legal consequences of the agreement are against the Basic Agrarian Law, meaning that the legal conditions of the agreement in 1320 of the Civil Code (KUHPerdata) are not fulfilled, namely a legitimate cause. This research focuses on a significant issue that was forgotten by the Panel of Judges in resolving this case, namely the relevance of the principle of nationality in the context of Agrarian Law, in its application the principle of nationality as regulated in the Basic Agrarian Law states that land ownership rights in the territory of Indonesia as a whole can only be owned by individuals who have Indonesian citizenship, the implications of the validity of the Nominee Agreement regarding ownership of land rights may provide vulnerability to the takeover of land ownership rights by foreign nationals, which could be detrimental to national interests and local communities in Indonesia."

"emerintah menerapkan pembatasan terhadap kepemilikan tanah di Indonesia. Pembatasan tersebut dikenakan kepada Warga Negara Asing yang berkaitan dengan hak atas tanah yang dapat dimiliki. Untuk dapat menghindari pembatasan itu, Warga Negara Asing biasanya meminjam nama Warga Negara Indonesia untuk melakukan perbuatan hukum atas tanah. Pinjam nama ini biasa dituangkan dalam suatu perjanjian dengan nama perjanjian nominee. Untuk lebih menguatkan perjanjian nominee, maka dilibatkanlah Notaris dalam pembuatannya. Berdasarkan ketentuan pada buku III KUHPerdata, perjanjian nominee dimungkinkan sepanjang memenuhi syarat-syarat sahnya suatu perjanjian. Berhubung pengaturan mengenai perjanjian nominee ini belum ada di Indonesia, perjanjian jenis ini cenderung digunakan dengan maksud untuk menyeludupkan hukum. Yang menjadi pertanyaan kemudian bagaimanakah keberadaan perjanjian nominee ini ditinjau dari peraturan-peraturan yang berlaku di Indonesia, serta bagaimana pertanggung-jawaban Notaris yang terkait dalam pembuatan perjanjian nominee. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif, bersifat deskriptif analitis dan data yang digunakan merupakan data sekunder. Perjanjian nominee yang dibuat oleh Notaris, selain melanggar ketentuan yang mengatur diri Notaris itu sendiri (UUJN dan Kode Etik Notaris) juga sangat mungkin melanggar ketentuan hukum lainnya yang berlaku di Indonesia (ketentuan hukum pertanahan, ketentuan hukum perdata, ketentuan hukum pidana dan ketentuan hukum administrasi), sehingga Notaris dapat dijatuhi sanksi sesuai dengan ketentuan-ketentuan tersebut.

---

The government applies restrictions on land ownership in Indonesia. These restrictions are imposed to foreign nationals regarding interest in land that can be owned. To avoid such restrictions, foreign nationals are normally borrowing the names of an Indonesian citizen to carry out legal acts on land. These names borrow are normally poured into an agreement termed as the Nominee agreement. To further affirm the Nominee agreement, a Notary would be involved on its arrangements. Based upon the provisions in the Book III of the Indonesian Civil Code, the Nominee agreement is allowed as long as it complies with the legal requirements of an agreement. Since no regulation over this Nominee agreements have yet been issued in Indonesia, at many times this kind of agreement tend to be used with intent to deviate the law. The question afterwards is on how then this Nominee agreement should be viewed from any other applied regulations in Indonesia, and how is the accountability of the Notary in regards to the arrangement of the Nominee agreement. This research is a normative juridical research, are analytically descriptive and the data being used is a secondary data. The Nominee agreement of which commissioned by Notaries, besides violating the rules which govern the Notary itself (UUJN and Notary Ethics Code) are also very likely to violates other legal provisions applied in Indonesia (land law provisions, civil law provisions, criminal law provisions and administrative law provisions), thereby the Notary could be sanctioned according to those provisions.

"

"Perjanjian pengikatan jual beli adalah perjanjian yang mengikat para pihak untuk melakukan jual beli dikemudian hari manakala terdapat kondisi yang menghalangi terlaksananya jual beli secara seketika. Perjanjian jual beli seyogyanya dibuat secara notaril untuk dapat lebih menjamin kepastian hukum dan kepastian pembuktian diantara para pihak. Namun pembuatan perjanjian pengikatan jual beli secara notaril menjadi tidak bermanfaat manakala notaris tidak melaksanakan jabatannya dengan seksama dan tidak memenuhi syarat verlijden dalam pembuatan akta. Dari situ maka perlu ditelaah lebih lanjut perihal akibat hukum dan pertanggungjawaban notaris berkaitan dengan autentisitas akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli yang tidak dibacakan yang selanjutnya dikaitkan dengan kesesuaian putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 351 Pk/Pdt/2018 terhadap pertanggungjawaban notaris atas akta yang tidak dibacakan sesuai dengan dengan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris dan perundang-undangan. Penulisan tesis ini berbentuk penelitian hukum yuridis normatif yakni dengan metode kualitatif untuk menganalisis data dan tipe penelitian deskriptif analitis. Dari penelitian yang telah dilakukan maka diketahui bahwa perjanjian jual beli tetap berlaku sah dan mengikat bagi para sepanjang perjanjian tersebut ditandatangani oleh para pihak yang membuatnya. Dengan tidak dipenuhinya syarat formil suatu akta autentik, maka hal tersebut akan menyebabkan akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli menjadi akta dibawah tangan dan kehilangan kekuatan pembuktian sempurna suatu akta autentik. Dalam hal terjadi pelanggaran oleh notaris dalam proses pembuatan akta autentik, maka para pihak dapat mengajukan gugatan kepada notaris untuk meminta pertanggungjawaban secara perdata dan secara adminsitratif. Gugatan kepada notaris sebaiknya dilaksanakan setelah adanya putusan yang menyatakan batalnya akta notaris yang disebabkan karena ketidak telitian notaris didalam pembuatan akta.

---

A pre-sale agreement is an agreement that binds the parties to make a sale later on while there are conditions that prevent the execution of the sale and purchase for a while. The sale and purchase agreement should be made notarized to be able to better guarantee legal certainty and certainty of proof between the parties. However, the making of a notarial advance purchase agreement becomes useless while the notary does not perform his department properly and does not meet the verlijden conditions in the making of the act. From there, it is necessary to study further on the legal consequences and liability of the notary in relation to the authenticity of the act of sale and purchase agreement, which is further related to the suitability of the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 351 Pk / Pdt / 2018 on the notary's liability with with the Laws of the Notary Department and legislation. The writing of this thesis is in the form of normative juridical law research with qualitative methods to analyze data and types of analytical descriptive research. From the research that has been done, it is known that the sale and purchase agreement remains valid and binding for those as long as the agreement is signed by the parties who made it. By not fulfilling the formal requirements of an authentic act, then it will cause the deed of sale and purchase agreement to be an act under hand and lose the power of perfect proof of an authentic act. In the event of a breach by a notary in the process of making an authentic deed, then the parties may file a lawsuit against the notary to seek civil and administrative responsibility. A lawsuit against a notary should be carried out after a decision stating the annulment of a notary deed caused due to notary scrutiny in the making of the deed"

"Penelitian ini membahas mengenai akibat hukum dari perjanjian nominee yang dilakukan oleh warga negara asing sebelum terjadinya peralihan hak atas tanah dimana mempengaruhi mengenai keabsahan dari perjanjian nominee yang dibuat berikut hal hal terkait perlindungan terhadap para pihak yang melakukan perjanjian nominee. Perjanjian ini jugacmembahas mengenai analisis keputusan hakim atas kepemilikan tanah yang beralaskan perjanjian nominee dengan studi Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Manado Nomor 91/PDT/2019/PT MND. Selain itu dari penelitian ini juga bermanfaat bagi penerapan hukum yang dapat berlaku untuk mengatasi jika adanya masalah dalam sengketa jual beli yang diakukan dengan perjanjian nominee terutama pihak yang meminjam nama adalah warga negara asing. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis-normartif yang bersifat deskriptif analistis dengan menggunakan data primer data sekunder yang di analisis dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa halnya perjanjian nominee ini mengikat kedua belah pihak yang membuat perjanjian tersebut. Adapun kekuatan pembuktian dari kepemilikan tanah yang beralaskan perjanjian nominee ini hanya mengikat kepada kedua belah pihak tersebut dan ahli waris dari pihak tersebut dan tidak mengikat ke pihak ketiga.

---

This study discusses the legal consequences ofagreements entered into nominee by foreign nationals before the transfer of land rights, which affects the validity of theagreement nominee made and matters related to the protection of parties who enter into aagreement nominee. This agreement also discusses the analysis of the judge's decision on land ownership based on aagreement nominee with the study of the Manado High Court Decision Number 91 / PDT / 2019 / PT MND. Apart from that, this research is also useful for the application of laws that can apply to overcome if there is a problem in a sale and purchase dispute that is confirmed by aagreement, nominee especially the party borrowing the name is a foreign citizen. This study uses juridical-normartive research methods that are descriptive and analytical using primary data and secondary data which are analyzed using a qualitative approach. The result of this research is that theagreement nominee is binding on both parties making the agreement. The power of proof of land ownership based onagreement nominee thisis only binding on both parties and the heirs of the party and not binding to a third party"

"Pasal 20-27 Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria mengatur tentang kepemilikan tanah hak milik di Indonesia termasuk didalamnya telah ditetapkan subjek hak milik dan akibat-akibat hukum jika hak milik jatuh ketangan pihak asing. Bentuk penyelundupan hukum yang umum dilakukan adalah dengan mengadakan perjanjian nominee. Praktek nominee agreement dapat menjadi bumerang bagi pihak asing karena sertipikat atas nama beneficiary maka secara jurudis mereka adalah pemilik sah tanah hak milik tersebut. Penulis berusaha menjelaskan resiko yang akan ditanggung oleh orang asing serta penulis berharap dapat memberikan saran bagi orang asing maupun kepada Pemerintah Indonesia sehubungan dengan praktek nominee agreement.

---

The Indonesia Agrarian Law (Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria) article 20-27 regulate land ownership in Indonesia, including the owner and legal implications in the case that land ownership falls to the hand of foreign national. The normal practice to circumvent this obstacle is in the form of signing a Nominee Agreement. This practice may well be a boomerang for foreign national involved, due to the fact that the land ownership certificate is under the name of the nominee (beneficiary) thus legally they are the rightful owner of the land. The author attempts to discuss the risk towards the foreign national involved and in the same time wishes to convey suggestion to the Indonesian government in relation to the utilization of Nominee Agreement."

"Pada saat ini kepemilikan hak atas tanah di Indonesia bukan hanya bertujuan untuk keperluan rumah tinggal dan tempat usaha saja, melainkan untuk keperluan investasi bagi para investor baik investor lokal maupun investor asing. Pengaturan mengenai kepemilikan hak atas tanah di Indonesia sudah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria Nomor 5 Tahun 1960, baik kepemilikan oleh perorangan, badan, maupun kepemilikan oleh pihak asing. Namun dengan alasan ingin mempermudah mendapat keuntungan lebih, dan hal lainnya yang bersifat menguntungkan dalam proses kepemilikan hak atas tanah di Indonesia, ada saja celah yang digunakan oleh para pihak, dalam hal ini pihak asing, untuk memiliki hak atas tanah yang tidak sesuai dengan yang seharusnya ada di dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria Nomor 5 Tahun 1960. Salah satunya dengan perjanjian Nominee. Singkatnya, perjanjian Nominee adalah perjanjian yang biasa dilakukan oleh para pihak asing dengan pihak Nominee, pihak Nominee itu sendiri yaitu orang berkewarganegaraan Indonesia yang dipinjam namanya untuk memiliki suatu hak atas tanah. Perlindungan notaris dalam hal ini menjadi sangat penting untuk dikaji lebih dalam terutama adanya kemungkinan pihak asing dan pihak Nominee membuat perjanjian Nominee dalam bentuk akta-akta otentik berupa akta pengakuan hutang, surat kuasa menjual, perjanjian pengikatan jual beli, surat pernyataan, dan lainnya. Perjanjian –perjanjian tersebut secara formil bisa saja terlihat benar menurut hukum seperti tidak melanggar aturan, namun secara materiil tidak dapat dibenarkan, kemudian pada prakteknya notaris bisa saja tidak mengetahui adanya pemindahan kempemilikan hak atas tanah secara terselubung kepada pihak asing yang jelas merupakan penyelundupan hukum .

---

Nowadays, the land rights ownership in Indonesia is not only aiming for the purposes of residential or business premises only, but rather for an investment purposes owned by both local and foreign investor. The regulation of land rights ownership in Indonesia has already set in the Law Number 5 of 1960 regarding Land, either the individual, corporate entities, or foreign party ownership. However, with an aim for getting more profit easier, or getting anything more profitable on the process of land rights ownership in indonesia, there's always been some loopholes used by the parties, in this case the foreign parties, to get a land rights ownership which is not in accordance with the Law Number 5 of 1960 regarding Land. One of them is called the nominee agreement. Given this, nominee agreement is an agreement entered by a foreign party with a nominee, an indonesian citizen whose name being used to hold a land rights ownership. The protection for public notaries becoming very important to be studied profoundly then, primarily with a possibility of a nominee agreement made by the foreign and nominee party in a form of authentic deeds as debt acknowledgement, turn over procuration, sale and purchace agreement, statement letter, and others. Those agreements could be seen as formally right without any violation under such laws, but is materially unjustified indeed, and in practice the notary may not be aware of any land rights ownership substitution to a foreign party which is shrouded and actually an act of smuggling laws."

"[ABSTRAKPropinsi Bali merupakan wilayah Indonesia yang jumlah wisatawan yang datangke kian mengingkat setiap tahunnya. Hal ini menyebabkan banyak orang baik warganegara Indonesia dan orang asing tertarik untuk tinggal atau membuka usaha di Bali.Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria menyatakan bahwa hanya warga negara Indonesia yangberhak untuk memiliki tanah. Sementara itu, orang asing diberi hak untuk menempatilahan di Indonesia dengan hak pakai dan hak sewa atas bangunan. Tetapi padakenyataannya banyak orang asing menggunakan perjanjian pinjam nama untukmenempati lahan di Bali dalam jangka waktu yang mereka inginkan. Perjanjian sewamenyewa digunakan sebagai upaya untuk menutupi keberadaan perjanjian dapat dianggapsebagai perjanjian pinjam nama sehingga perjanjian sewa menyewa merupakan suatuupaya penyelundupan hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif,untuk memperoleh data yang dikehendaki penelitian ini dengan melakukan telaah bahanpustaka atau data sekunder. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa rangkaian perjanjianpinjam nama antara lain surat pernyataan, perjanjian sewa menyewa, surat kuasamengelola, surat kuasa menjual dan perjanjian perpanjangan sewa. Pada saat orang asingdatang kepada notaris untuk dibuatkan akta otentik sebaiknya notaris lebih teliti danseksama sehingga apabila terdapat indikasi pembuatan akta otentik dapat menyalahiaturan hukum maka notaris dapat memberi penyuluhan hukum. Dalam menjalankannyajabatannya seorang notaris itu harus bertindak amanah, jujur dan seksama karena notariswajib menjaga kepercayaan masyarakat dan negara dengan baik.

---

ABSTRACTBali Province is a major area of Indonesia tourism so that the number of touristswho come to Bali is increasingly every year. This leads to a lot of people both Indonesiancitizens and foreigners keen to stay or open a business in Bali. Basic Agrarian Law statesthat only Indonesian citizens who have the right to own land. Meanwhile, foreigners weregiven the right to occupy land in Indonesia with the right to use and leases on buildings.But in fact many foreigners use nominee agreement and loan agreement to occupy land inBali in the time period they want. The content of Indonesian citizen who appointed to bea nominee states that the true owner of the land is the foreigner because the money sheused for the purchase of land was belongs to the foreigner. Lease agreement is used as anattempt to cover up the existence of the agreement can be considered as a loan agreementso that the name of the lease agreement is a legal smuggling attempt. This study usesnormative juridical, to obtain the desired data of this study by conducting research librarymaterials or secondary data. The analysis showed that a series of loan agreements includea statement of the name, lease agreement, power of attorney to manage, power of attorneyto sell and lease extension agreement. By the time a foreigner came to the notary for thenotary should be made authentic act more carefully and thoroughly so that if there areindications of an authentic deed may violate the rule of law, the notary can provide legalcounseling. A notary should act trustworthy, honest and thorough, as notaries are requiredto maintain public confidence and the country well.;Bali Province is a major area of Indonesia tourism so that the number of touristswho come to Bali is increasingly every year. This leads to a lot of people both Indonesiancitizens and foreigners keen to stay or open a business in Bali. Basic Agrarian Law statesthat only Indonesian citizens who have the right to own land. Meanwhile, foreigners weregiven the right to occupy land in Indonesia with the right to use and leases on buildings.But in fact many foreigners use nominee agreement and loan agreement to occupy land inBali in the time period they want. The content of Indonesian citizen who appointed to bea nominee states that the true owner of the land is the foreigner because the money sheused for the purchase of land was belongs to the foreigner. Lease agreement is used as anattempt to cover up the existence of the agreement can be considered as a loan agreementso that the name of the lease agreement is a legal smuggling attempt. This study usesnormative juridical, to obtain the desired data of this study by conducting research librarymaterials or secondary data. The analysis showed that a series of loan agreements includea statement of the name, lease agreement, power of attorney to manage, power of attorneyto sell and lease extension agreement. By the time a foreigner came to the notary for thenotary should be made authentic act more carefully and thoroughly so that if there areindications of an authentic deed may violate the rule of law, the notary can provide legalcounseling. A notary should act trustworthy, honest and thorough, as notaries are requiredto maintain public confidence and the country well.;Bali Province is a major area of Indonesia tourism so that the number of touristswho come to Bali is increasingly every year. This leads to a lot of people both Indonesiancitizens and foreigners keen to stay or open a business in Bali. Basic Agrarian Law statesthat only Indonesian citizens who have the right to own land. Meanwhile, foreigners weregiven the right to occupy land in Indonesia with the right to use and leases on buildings.But in fact many foreigners use nominee agreement and loan agreement to occupy land inBali in the time period they want. The content of Indonesian citizen who appointed to bea nominee states that the true owner of the land is the foreigner because the money sheused for the purchase of land was belongs to the foreigner. Lease agreement is used as anattempt to cover up the existence of the agreement can be considered as a loan agreementso that the name of the lease agreement is a legal smuggling attempt. This study usesnormative juridical, to obtain the desired data of this study by conducting research librarymaterials or secondary data. The analysis showed that a series of loan agreements includea statement of the name, lease agreement, power of attorney to manage, power of attorneyto sell and lease extension agreement. By the time a foreigner came to the notary for thenotary should be made authentic act more carefully and thoroughly so that if there areindications of an authentic deed may violate the rule of law, the notary can provide legalcounseling. A notary should act trustworthy, honest and thorough, as notaries are requiredto maintain public confidence and the country well., Bali Province is a major area of Indonesia tourism so that the number of touristswho come to Bali is increasingly every year. This leads to a lot of people both Indonesiancitizens and foreigners keen to stay or open a business in Bali. Basic Agrarian Law statesthat only Indonesian citizens who have the right to own land. Meanwhile, foreigners weregiven the right to occupy land in Indonesia with the right to use and leases on buildings.But in fact many foreigners use nominee agreement and loan agreement to occupy land inBali in the time period they want. The content of Indonesian citizen who appointed to bea nominee states that the true owner of the land is the foreigner because the money sheused for the purchase of land was belongs to the foreigner. Lease agreement is used as anattempt to cover up the existence of the agreement can be considered as a loan agreementso that the name of the lease agreement is a legal smuggling attempt. This study usesnormative juridical, to obtain the desired data of this study by conducting research librarymaterials or secondary data. The analysis showed that a series of loan agreements includea statement of the name, lease agreement, power of attorney to manage, power of attorneyto sell and lease extension agreement. By the time a foreigner came to the notary for thenotary should be made authentic act more carefully and thoroughly so that if there areindications of an authentic deed may violate the rule of law, the notary can provide legalcounseling. A notary should act trustworthy, honest and thorough, as notaries are requiredto maintain public confidence and the country well.]"