Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penjualan rumah susun baik dalam bentuk apartemen maupun kondominium hotel yang belum jadi dengan menggunakan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB), sekarang ini marak dilakukan oleh Pelaku Usaha dan pada dasarnya Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 tentang Rumah Susun memperbolehkan hal tersebut. PPJB merupakan upaya pengikatan para pihak, bahwa pada suatu waktu yang ditentukan akan diadakan jual beli sesungguhnya yang berdasarkan Akta Jual Beli (AJB). Masalah yang sering terjadi dari hal tersebut adalah konsumen selaku pembeli yang berdasarkan PPJB seringkali mengalami kerugian, dimana kewajiban pelunasan telah dilakukan oleh konsumen namun pelaku usaha tidak melaksanakan kewajibannya seperti tidak mengalihkan status kepemilikan unit kondominium hotel dari PPJB menjadi AJB dan diperparah dengan status pelaku usaha yang dinyatakan pailit. Konsumen banyak yang tidak memahami bagaimana kedudukannya secara hukum dan upaya hukum apa yang harus ditempuh. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian yurisdis-normatif yaitu penelitian yang menekankan dalam penggunaan norma-norma hukum secara tertulis. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian tersebut, diambil kesimpulan bahwa dalam situasi pailitnya pelaku usaha, para konsumen yang membeli unit kondominium hotel merupakan kreditor konkuren yang kemungkinan besar tidak mendapatkan ganti rugi yang cukup karena kurangnya harta debitor, oleh karena itu terdapat juga beberapa upaya hukum yang dapat ditempuh para konsumen salah satunya meminta Kurator melanjutkan PPJB ke tahap AJB. Untuk kedepannya Penulis menyarankan, pemerintah maupun seluruh pemangku kepentingan dalam pengembangan suatu properti, perlu terlibat dan mencarikan solusi nyata terhadap permasalahan serupa. Harapannya, pengembangan dan pembangunan properti di Indonesia dapat terus berlanjut dengan hak-hak para konsumen selaku pembeli tetap terlindungi.

---

Sales of unfinished flats in the form of apartments or hotel condominiums using a Sale and Purchase Agreement recently is in large quantity done by developer and fundamentally based on Law Number 20 Year 2011 about Strata Title it is allowed to do. The problem in question now a days is the apartment buyers who carry their legitimational action only based on Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement experience disadvantages. In which in one side, the buyers have paid the buying price totally, but in other hand, the sellers do not switching the ownership status and exacerbated by the status of bankrupt business actors. Many consumers do not understand what their legal position is and what legal remedies must be taken. The research method used is the juridical-normative research, a research that emphasizes the use of legal norms in writing. By using this research method, it is concluded that in the bankruptcy situation of business actors, consumers who buy condominium hotel units are unsecured creditors who are most likely not to receive adequate compensation due to the debtor's lack of assets. Therefore, there are also several legal remedies that consumers can take, one of which is asking the Curator to continue Sale and Purchase Agreement to the Sale and Purchase Deed stage. The author suggests that the government and all stakeholders in the development of a property need to be involved and find real solutions to similar problems. Hopefully the property development and construction in Indonesia can continue with the rights of consumers as buyers being protected.

"

"Seiring perkembangan zaman dan kebutuhan masyarakat, keberadaan rumah susun serta tujuan pembangunannya berkembang tidak hanya ditujukan untuk hunian, namun juga sebagai sarana investasi. Skripsi ini membahas mengenai kondominium hotel sebagai salah satu bentuk perkembangan konsep dari rumah susun yang akan terbagi dalam dua pembahasan. Pembahasan pertama adalah mengenai perjanjian pengikatan jual beli dari rumah susun dengan konsep kondominium hotel apakah memiliki perbedaan dengan perjanjian pengikatan jual beli rumah susun untuk hunian. Kedua, dibahas mengenai pengaturan perhimpunan penghuni rumah susun berkonsep kondominium hotel dan implikasinya terhadap pemilik unit kondominium hotel. Kedua bahasan tersebut akan ditinjau melalui Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Hotel Pullman Bali Legian Nirwana yang merupakan sebuah rumah susun dengan konsep kondominium hotel. Penelitian bertujuan untuk melihat bagaimanakah isi perjanjian pengikatan jual beli dari rumah susun yang memiliki konsep kondominium hotel sehingga dapat dikaji perbedaan apa saja yang terdapat dalam perjanjian pengikatan jual belinya dibandingkan dengan rumah susun hunian. Selain itu, penulisan ini juga bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimanakah pengaturan mengenai perhimpunan penghuni rumah susun dengan konsep kondominium hotel. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dimana data penelitian ini sebagian besar diperoleh dari studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa terdapat perbedaan antara perjanjian pengikatan jual beli untuk rumah susun dengan konsep kondominium hotel dengan rumah susun hunian dan pengaturan mengenai perhimpunan penghuni pun berbeda di dalam rumah susun berkonsep kondominium hotel dibandingkan dengan perhimpunan penghuni rumah susun hunian. Setiap pihak yang terlibat dalam jual beli unit kondominium hotel, dalam memasuki perjanjian pengikatan jual beli baiknya mengerti posisi masing-masing agar dapat tercipta perjanjian yang adil dan seimbang bagi kedua belah pihak.

---

With the constant changing of people needs, the development of condominium keep evolving it's concept and purpose. Not only for residential, condominium is also aim for investment. Condominium hotel is one of the concept of condominium that aiming for investment purpose. This thesis is discuss about condominium hotel, which divided into two main discussion; first, is about the preliminary sale of property agreement of condominium hotel, and secondly is about the resident's association in condominium hotel with Pullman Bali Legian Nirwana's Preliminary Sale of Property Agreement as it assessment.

The purposes of this thesis are to study the differences between a preliminary sale of property agreement of condominium hotel with the preliminary sale of property agreement of residential condominium. Also, to see how the resident?s association regulated in condominium hotel.

The outcomes of this thesis are there's a differences between a preliminary sale of property agreement of condominium hotel with residential condominium and they have a different regulation for resident's association in condominium hotel compared to regulation in residential condominium. To anticipate the loss from buyer's side, it's best for prospective buyers to read carefully and understand the a preliminary sale of property agreement before entering ones. Because there's might be clauses that will bring disadvantages for buyers."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen pembeli unit satuan rumah susun yang dioperasikan sebagai kondominium hotel yang dituangkan dalam suatu kontrak Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan kualitatif, sehingga penelitian ini dapat memberi analisa mengenai besarnya risiko konsumen yang melakukan perjanjian jual beli secara pesan lebih dahulu atas satuan unit rumah susun yang dioperasikan sebagai kondominium hotel yang tertuang dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli dan permasalahan yang dapat terjadi dalam penghunian dan pengelolaan rumah susun yang dioperasikan sebagai kondominium hotel tersebut.Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli yang ditandatangani oleh konsumen belum cukup memenuhi unsur perlindungan konsumen, dan terdapat permasalahan-permasalahan yang timbul di dalam penghunian dan pengelolaan kondominium hotel tersebut. Oleh karenanya, dalam hal tersebut telah terdapat penyimpangan terhadap Hukum Perjanjian dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen. Oleh karena itu, sebaiknya para pemilik dan/atau penghuni kondominium hotel sebaiknya segera membentuk Perhimpunan Penghuni Rumah Susun, agar timbul kesadaran mereka sebagai konsumen, dan dapat menuntut hak dan kewajiban mereka secara perdata kepada pihak developer apabila terjadi kerugian-kerugian yang bersifat materiil.

---

This thesis discussed about legal protection of consumer that apartment units that operated as a condominium hotel that set forth in a contract binding Sale and Purchase Agreement. This research is using normative research methods with qualitative approaches, so this research can provide an analysis of the magnitude of risk to consumers whose agree to purchase of an apartment units in advanced ordering that is operated as a condominium hotel as stipulated in the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement and the problems that can occur in residential and apartment management that operated as a condominium hotel.

The research concluded that the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement signed by the consumers protection, and there are problems that arise in the management of residential and hotel condominiums. Therefore, in this case has been found diviations of the Law of Treaty Contract and Law on Consumer Protection. Therefore, should the owners and/or residents of the occupant association, so that consumers awareness will arise, and they can demend their rights and obligations to the developer in the event of losses that are material."

"Skripsi ini membahas tentang Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli menurut UU No.20 Tahun 2011 tentang Rumah Susun khususnya Pasal 43 ayat (2) huruf c, dimana dalam pasal ini lebih menekankan secara jelas dan tegas akibat hukum yang akan dihadapi oleh pihak pengembang atau developer bila dalam melakukan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan yang ada dalam pasal tersebut diatas maka dikenakan sanksi pidana dan admistratif bagi pihak yang melanggar ketentuan tersebut. Walaupun dalam PPJB tersebut pihak pengembang (developer) membuat suatu klausula atau pasal pengabaian untuk menghindarkan pasal 43 ayat (2) huruf c maka Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli tersebut melanggar UU Rumah Susun No. 20 Tahun 2011 karena UU ini bersifat Imperatif atau bersifat memaksa sehingga akibat hukum yang timbul adalah perjanjian yang dibuat oleh para pihak dalam hal ini pihak developer dengan pembeli satuan rumah susun batal demi hukum yang memiliki akibat tidak adanya hak dan kewajiban yang timbul dari para pihak yang membuat perjanjian tersebut. Sehingga secara otomatis para pihak yang merasa dirugikan tidak dapat mengajukan tuntutan ke pengadilan. Selain itu dalam Pasal 18 ayat (3) UU No. 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen memberikan akibat hukum yang sama dengan UU No. 20 Tahun 2011 Tentang Rumah Susun apabila klausula baku yang melanggar Pasal 18 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) dinyatakan batal demi hukum.

---

This paper discusses about Conditional Sale and Purchase Agreement as defined by Law No. 20 of 2011 on Apartment specifically Article 43 paragraph (2) letter c, upon which it focuses clearly and strictly on the legal consequences to the developer which may arise from non-compliance with the provisions of the article which include criminal and administrative penalty against the defaulting party. Although Conditional Sale and Purchase Agreement allows the developer to make a clause or article on waiver of Article 43 paragraph (2) letter c, the Conditional Sale and Purchase Agreement is contrary to the Apartmen Law No. 20 of 2011 as it is imperative or coercive, thus, as a legal consequence, agreement entered into by the parties, the developer and purchaser of apartment unit, will be rendered null and void, thus depriving the rights and obligations of the parties to the agreement. The affected parties may consequently institute claims to the court. In addition, Article 18 paragraph (3) UU No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection provides the same legal consequence as those imposed by Law No. 20 of 2011 on Apartmen Law if the standard clause which is in conflict with Article 18 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) is rendered null and void."

"Pembangunan rumah susun di perkotaan faktanya memunculkan persoalan-persoalan serius. Berbagai regulasi mengatur pengawasan pembangunan dan penyelesaian transaksi rumah susun, belum menjangkau tujuan ideal suatu pembangunan. Disintegrasi regulasi rumah susun, menunjukkan penyelenggaraan urusan perumahan sebagai salah satu kebutuhan dasar manusia, belum komprehensif dilaksanakan. Permasalahan jual beli rumah susun lebih banyak merugikan pihak konsumen. Berdasarkan fakta tersebut, relevan untuk menganalisa kesesuaian jangkauan prinsip keseimbangan dengan dimensi kontekstual dinamika terkini masyarakat modern dan dimensi normatif peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yuridis normatif dan perbandingan hukum digunakan menganalisa (1) Prinsip keseimbangan dalam suatu perjanjian pengikatan jual beli di Indonesia; (2) Implementasi Perlindungan Hukum dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Satuan Rumah Susun (PPJB Sarusun); (3) Rekonstruksi Prinsip Keseimbangan antara pelaku usaha dan konsumen rumah susun sebagai pembaharuan hukum PPJB Sarusun. Hasil penelitian adalah asas Keseimbangan dalam perjanjian pengikatan jual beli di Indonesia berlaku mulai dari proses pembuatan kontrak sampai pelaksanaan kontrak. Hal ini dimaksudkan untuk menjamin proses negosiasi yang adil/setara, terjamin distribusi pertukaran hak dan kewajiban sesuai proporsinya. Prinsip keseimbangan menunjukkan adanya kebutuhan kesetaraan sebagai syarat utama terciptanya perjanjian. Selanjutnya, peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada belum dapat memenuhi prinsip keseimbangan kepentingan bagi para pihak dalam suatu perjanjian pengikatan jual beli satuan rumah susun, meskipun UU No. 8/1999 dan UU No. 20/2011 beserta peraturan turunannya telah berupaya mencapainya. PPJB Sarusun tetap dilaksanakan meskipun syarat 20% keterbangunan belum terpenuhi sebagaimana ketentuan Pasal 43 ayat (2) UURS, Kepmenpera No.11/1994 yang mengatur pedoman PPJB. Terdapat ketidakseimbangan kedudukan antara pelaku usaha dan konsumen rumah susun, sehingga penerapan prinsip kesetaraan para pihak berdasarkan asas keseimbangan pada PPJB rumah susun tidak terwujud, pelaku usaha lebih superior dari konsumennya. Terbukti dari hasil penelitian terhadap 18 PPJB Sarusun baik yang komersial maupun umum. Bentuk pembaharuan hukum PPJB Sarusun antara pelaku usaha dan konsumen rumah susun adalah dengan melakukan rekonstruksi prinsip keseimbangan dalam PPJB Sarusun. Asas keseimbangan yang menjadi sintesa antara asas kebebasan, asas konsensus dan asas kekuatan mengikat, hakikatnya hanya dapat terpenuhi melalui ketiga prinsip tersebut berdasarkan hirarki leksikal. Pembaharuan hukum PPJB Sarusun berdasarkan Kepmenpera No. 11 Tahun 1994 dengan penyesuaian 11 gagasan materi dalam perubahan UURS yang sejalan dengan asas keseimbangan agar pembagian hak dan kewajiban dapat terwujud di seluruh tahapan hubungan kontraktual.

---

The construction of flats in urban areas in fact raises serious problems. Various regulations governing the supervision of the construction and settlement of flats, have not yet reached the ideal goal of development. Disintegration of flats regulations, showing the implementation of housing affairs as one of the basic human needs, has not been comprehensively implemented. The problem of buying and selling flats is more detrimental to the consumer. Based on these facts, its relevant to analyze the suitability of the balance principle with the contextual dimensions of the current dynamics of modern society and the normative dimensions of legislation in Indonesia. Normative legal research methods and legal comparisons are used in this dissertation, by analyzing (1) The Balance Principle in the Conditional Sale and Puchase Agreement in Indonesia; (2) Implementation of Legal Protection in the Conditional Sale and Purchase Agreement of Flats (CSPA Flats); (3) Reconstruction of the Balance Principle between business actors and consumers of flats as a legal renewal of the CSPA of Flats. The results of the study show that the balance principle in the CSPA of Flats in Indonesia is valid from the process of making the contract to the implementation of the contract. This is intended to guarantee a fair/ equal negotiation process, guaranteed distribution of the exchange of rights and obligations in proportion. The balance principle shows the need for balance and equality of position as the main conditions for the creation of agreements. Furthermore, the existing laws and regulations have not been able to fulfill the balance principle of parties interests in the CSPA of Flats, even though Law No. 8/1999 and Law No. 20/2011 along with derivative regulations have attempted to achieve it. CSPA of Flats is still implemented even though the condition of 20 persen development has not been fulfilled as stipulated in Article 43 paragraph (2) UURS, Kepmenpera No.11/ 1994 which regulates CSPA guidelines. There is an imbalance between the position of business actors and consumers of flats, so that the application of the principle of equality of parties based on the principle of balance in the CSPA of Flats does not materialize, business actors are superior to consumers. Evident from the results of research on 18 CSPA of Flats, both commercial and public. The form of legal reform of the CSPA of Flats between business actors and consumers of flats is to carry out a balance principles reconstruction in the CSPA of Flats. The balance principle becomes a synthesis between the principle of freedom, the principle of consensus and the principle of binding power, its essence can only be fulfilled through the three principles based on the lexical hierarchy. Legal renewal of the CSPA of Flats based on Kepmenpera No. 11/1994 by adjusting eleven content material ideas in the amendment to the Law on Flats that is in line with the principle of balance so that the distribution of rights and obligations can be realized at all stages of contractual relations"

"[Tesis ini membahas mengenai kewajiban serah terima unit satuan rumah susun yang dikategorikan sebagai utang menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 37 tahun 2004 dan upaya yang dilakukan pembeli terhadap tanggung jawab hukum pengembang yang telah dipailitkan terhadap pemenuhan serah terima unit satuan rumah susun. Tesis ini merupakan penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan tipologi penelitian deskriptif-analitis yang menggunakan data sekunder. Bahwa penyerahan satuan unit merupakan salah satu kewajiban dari pengembang dan keterlambatan penyerahan merupakan salah bentuk wanprestasi sehingga mewajibkan PT. PPS (dalam pailit) membayar pembatalan dan denda keterlambatan kepada Pihak Pembeli. Pembatalan dan denda keterlambatan tersebut masuk ke dalam pengertian Utang dalam secara luas sebagaimana yang dimaksud dalam Pasal 1 angka (6) Undang-Undang Kepailitan dan upaya hukum pembeli terhadap tanggung jawab hukum pengembang atas pemenuhan serah terima unit tersebut adalah dengan mengajukan gugatan pailit yang telah dikabulkan oleh Pengadilan Niaga No. 073/Pailit/2009/PN/NIAGA.JKT.PST dan dikuatkan dengan putusan Mahakamah Agung No. 236/k/Pdt.Sus/2010. Proses penyelesaian selanjutnya diserahkan kepada Tim Kurator. Menurut kesepakatan para kreditor dan berdasarkan Pasal 185 (3) Undang-Undang Kepailitan, Hakim Pengawas memberikan izin untuk melanjutkan pembangunan apartemen yang pailit tersebut.;This thesis discusses the obligation handover unit apartment were categorized as debt according to Law No. 37 of 2004 and the efforts made by the buyer to the developer legal responsibility which units have been bankrupte for compliance with the handover unit apartment. This thesis is a juridical-normative research typology descriptive-analytic study using secondary data. That the delivery unit is one of the developer?s obligations and delay?s delivery is one form of default requiring PT. PPS (on bankruptcy) to pay the cancellation and late penalties to the Purchaser. Cancellation and late penalties that go into debt in a wide sense as referred to in Article 1 paragraph (6) of the Bankruptcy Act andlegal action against the buyer's legal responsibility for compliance with the handover of the developer of the unit is to file for bankruptcy which has been granted by the Commercial Court No. 073/Pailit/2009/PN/NIAGA.JKT.PST and confirmed by the Supreme Court decision No. 236/K/ Pdt.Sus/2010. Completion of the process will be transferred to Team Curator. According to the agreement of the creditors and under Article 185 (3) of the Bankruptcy Act, Supervisory Judge gives permission to resume the construction of apartments insolvent.;This thesis discusses the obligation handover unit apartment were categorized as debt according to Law No. 37 of 2004 and the efforts made by the buyer to the developer legal responsibility which units have been bankrupte for compliance with the handover unit apartment. This thesis is a juridical-normative research typology descriptive-analytic study using secondary data. That the delivery unit is one of the developer?s obligations and delay?s delivery is one form of default requiring PT. PPS (on bankruptcy) to pay the cancellation and late penalties to the Purchaser. Cancellation and late penalties that go into debt in a wide sense as referred to in Article 1 paragraph (6) of the Bankruptcy Act andlegal action against the buyer's legal responsibility for compliance with the handover of the developer of the unit is to file for bankruptcy which has been granted by the Commercial Court No. 073/Pailit/2009/PN/NIAGA.JKT.PST and confirmed by the Supreme Court decision No. 236/K/ Pdt.Sus/2010. Completion of the process will be transferred to Team Curator. According to the agreement of the creditors and under Article 185 (3) of the Bankruptcy Act, Supervisory Judge gives permission to resume the construction of apartments insolvent.;This thesis discusses the obligation handover unit apartment were categorized as debt according to Law No. 37 of 2004 and the efforts made by the buyer to the developer legal responsibility which units have been bankrupte for compliance with the handover unit apartment. This thesis is a juridical-normative research typology descriptive-analytic study using secondary data. That the delivery unit is one of the developer?s obligations and delay?s delivery is one form of default requiring PT. PPS (on bankruptcy) to pay the cancellation and late penalties to the Purchaser. Cancellation and late penalties that go into debt in a wide sense as referred to in Article 1 paragraph (6) of the Bankruptcy Act andlegal action against the buyer's legal responsibility for compliance with the handover of the developer of the unit is to file for bankruptcy which has been granted by the Commercial Court No. 073/Pailit/2009/PN/NIAGA.JKT.PST and confirmed by the Supreme Court decision No. 236/K/ Pdt.Sus/2010. Completion of the process will be transferred to Team Curator. According to the agreement of the creditors and under Article 185 (3) of the Bankruptcy Act, Supervisory Judge gives permission to resume the construction of apartments insolvent.;This thesis discusses the obligation handover unit apartment were categorized as debt according to Law No. 37 of 2004 and the efforts made by the buyer to the developer legal responsibility which units have been bankrupte for compliance with the handover unit apartment. This thesis is a juridical-normative research typology descriptive-analytic study using secondary data. That the delivery unit is one of the developer?s obligations and delay?s delivery is one form of default requiring PT. PPS (on bankruptcy) to pay the cancellation and late penalties to the Purchaser. Cancellation and late penalties that go into debt in a wide sense as referred to in Article 1 paragraph (6) of the Bankruptcy Act andlegal action against the buyer's legal responsibility for compliance with the handover of the developer of the unit is to file for bankruptcy which has been granted by the Commercial Court No. 073/Pailit/2009/PN/NIAGA.JKT.PST and confirmed by the Supreme Court decision No. 236/K/ Pdt.Sus/2010. Completion of the process will be transferred to Team Curator. According to the agreement of the creditors and under Article 185 (3) of the Bankruptcy Act, Supervisory Judge gives permission to resume the construction of apartments insolvent.;This thesis discusses the obligation handover unit apartment were categorized as debt according to Law No. 37 of 2004 and the efforts made by the buyer to the developer legal responsibility which units have been bankrupte for compliance with the handover unit apartment. This thesis is a juridical-normative research typology descriptive-analytic study using secondary data. That the delivery unit is one of the developer?s obligations and delay?s delivery is one form of default requiring PT. PPS (on bankruptcy) to pay the cancellation and late penalties to the Purchaser. Cancellation and late penalties that go into debt in a wide sense as referred to in Article 1 paragraph (6) of the Bankruptcy Act andlegal action against the buyer's legal responsibility for compliance with the handover of the developer of the unit is to file for bankruptcy which has been granted by the Commercial Court No. 073/Pailit/2009/PN/NIAGA.JKT.PST and confirmed by the Supreme Court decision No. 236/K/ Pdt.Sus/2010. Completion of the process will be transferred to Team Curator. According to the agreement of the creditors and under Article 185 (3) of the Bankruptcy Act, Supervisory Judge gives permission to resume the construction of apartments insolvent., This thesis discusses the obligation handover unit apartment were categorized as debt according to Law No. 37 of 2004 and the efforts made by the buyer to the developer legal responsibility which units have been bankrupte for compliance with the handover unit apartment. This thesis is a juridical-normative research typology descriptive-analytic study using secondary data. That the delivery unit is one of the developer’s obligations and delay’s delivery is one form of default requiring PT. PPS (on bankruptcy) to pay the cancellation and late penalties to the Purchaser. Cancellation and late penalties that go into debt in a wide sense as referred to in Article 1 paragraph (6) of the Bankruptcy Act andlegal action against the buyer's legal responsibility for compliance with the handover of the developer of the unit is to file for bankruptcy which has been granted by the Commercial Court No. 073/Pailit/2009/PN/NIAGA.JKT.PST and confirmed by the Supreme Court decision No. 236/K/ Pdt.Sus/2010. Completion of the process will be transferred to Team Curator. According to the agreement of the creditors and under Article 185 (3) of the Bankruptcy Act, Supervisory Judge gives permission to resume the construction of apartments insolvent.]"

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai tiga hal utama yakni: pemikiran perihal kesesuaian konsep jual beli satuan rumah susun menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 Tentang Rumah Susun dengan ketentuan hukum tanah nasional, keabsahan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Satuan Rumah Susun yang dibuat sebelum ketentuan Pasal 43 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 Tentang Rumah Susun terpenuhi (studi pada Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Unit Apartemen XYZ), dan perlindungan hukum terhadap calon pembeli apabila Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Satuan Rumah Susun adalah batal demi hukum. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan menggunakan analisis kualitatif atas data sekunder. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah: (1) Konsep jual beli satuan rumah susun dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 Tentang Rumah Susun tidak sesuai dengan konsep jual beli menurut ketentuan hukum tanah nasional. Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 Tentang Rumah Susun menyiratkan adanya dua macam jual beli satuan rumah susun: jual beli sebelum pembangunan rumah susun selesai dan jual beli setelah pembangunan rumah susun selesai. Dalam ketentuan hukum tanah nasional hanya dikenal jual beli setelah pembangunan rumah susun selesai; (2) Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Unit Apartemen XYZ adalah batal demi hukum karena melanggar syarat obyektif perjanjian yakni sebab yang halal; (3) Doktrin quasi-contract dapat berperan sebagai mekanisme atas tindakan unjust enrichment sebagai sebuah penyebab yang dilakukan oleh pelaku pembangunan dan memberikan restitusi kepada pihak calon pembeli sebagai bentuk pemulihan keadaan dalam hal Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli Satuan Rumah Susun batal demi hukum.

---

This Thesis reviews three main things: a thought on compatibility about the concept of condominium unit's sale and purchase in Law Number 20 Year 2011 regarding Condominium with the national land law, the validity of Condominium Unit's Preliminary Sale and Purchase Agreement which is made before the requirements in Article 43 (1) Law Number 20 Year 2011 regarding Condominium are fulfilled (study in XYZ Apartment Unit's Preliminary Sale and Purchase Agreement), and the legal protection towards the buyer if the Condominium Unit's Preliminary Sale and Purchase Agreement is null and void. This research is a normative legal research with qualitative analysis on secondary data.

The results of this research are: (1) the concept of condominium unit's sale and purchase in Law Number 20 Year 2011 regarding Condominium is not compatible with the concept of sale and purchase in the national land law. Law Number 20 Year 2011 regarding Condominium implies two types of condominium unit's sale and purchase: sale and purchase before the condominium's development is done and sale and purchase after the condominium's development is done.

In the national land law, only the sale and purchase after the condominium's development is done that is known; (2) The XYZ Apartment Unit's Preliminary Sale and Purchase Agreement is null and void because it breaks an agreement's objective requirement: a legal purpose; (3) Quasi-contract doctrine can take part as the mechanism on unjust enrichment as a cause of action which is done by the developer and gives restitution towards the buyer as a form of remedy if Condominium Unit's Sale and Purchase Agreement is null and void."

"Perjanjian pengikatan jual beli bawah tangan satuan unit Apartemen Pancoran Riverside Nomor 03018/PR-GRTP/PPJB/II/2020, tidak mengikuti ketetntuan perundang-undangan yang berlaku yaitu Pasal 43 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Rumah Susun dan Pasal 12 ayat (2) Permen Sistem Perjanjian Pendahuluan Jual Beli Rumah, sehingga tidak memberikan perlindungan maksimal kepada pembeli selaku konsumen. Penelitian ini membahas mengenai kepastian hukum berdasarkan asas konsensualisme, dan perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli berdasarkan atas PPJB satuan unit Apartemen Pancoran Riverside Nomor 03018/PR-GRTP/PPJB/II/2020. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yang berbentuk yuridisnormatif dimana penelitian mengacu pada norma hukum yang terdapat dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Kesimpulan penelitian menyatakan PPJB Apartemen Pancoran Riverside Nomor 03018/PR-GRTP/PPJB/II/2020 batal demi hukum, hal mana yang mengacu pada pengecualian asas konsensualisme sebagai salah satu dasar perjanjian, namun selama selama perjanjian baru belum dibuat, berdasarkan asas Pacta Sunt Servanda, maka PPJB bawah tangan tersebut hanya memiliki kekuatan akta di bawah tangan. Perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli dijamin oleh peraturan perundang-undangan yang ada, namun tidak ada sanksi yang tegas bagi pengembang yang membuat PPJB bawah tangan. Oleh karena itu dharapkan pemerintah dan pembuat undang-undang dapat menerapkan sanksi yang tegas terhadap PPJB bawah tangan agar tercipta perlindungan yang maksimal bagi para pihak dalam perjanjian.

---

The agreement for sale and purchase under the hands of the Pancoran Riverside Apartment unit number 03018/PR-GRTP/ PPJB/II/2020, does not follow the provisions of the applicable laws, namely Article 43 paragraph (1) of the Law on Flats and Article 12 paragraph (2) Regulation of the Preliminary Sale and Purchase Agreement System, so as not to provide maximum protection to buyers as consumers. This research discusses legal certainty based on the principle of consensualism, and legal protection for buyers based on the PPJB unit of the Pancoran Riverside Apartment unit Number 03018/PRGRTP/ PPJB/II/2020. This research is a juridical-normative research where the research refers to the legal norms contained in statutory regulations. The research conclusion states that PPJB Pancoran Riverside Apartment Number 03018/PR-GRTP/ PPJB/II/2020 is null and void, which refers to the exclusion of the principle of consensualism as one of the basis for the agreement, but as long as a new agreement has not been made, it is based on the principle of Pacta Sunt Servanda , then the underhand PPJB only has the power of the underhand deed. Legal protection for buyers is guaranteed by existing laws and regulations, but there are no clear sanctions for developers who make PPJB under their hands. Therefore, it is hoped that the government and legislators can apply strict sanctions against under-handed PPJB in order to create maximum protection for the parties to the agreement."

"Pada suatu pembangunan rumah susun kadang kala terdapat perusahaan pembangunan rumah susun yang tidak dapat menyerahkan unit satuan rumah susun sebagaimana diperjanjikan dalam Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli kepada pembeli satuan rumah susun. Dalam konteks Hukum Kepailitan, salah satu cara penyelesaiannya bisa dilakukan melalui proses Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang sebagaimana terdapat dalam Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004. Proses ini bertujuan menghindarkan debitor dari kepailitan dengan memberikan kesempatan kepada debitor dan para kreditornya untuk mencapai perdamaian diantara mereka sehingga kepentingan kreditor terlindungi. Pada kasus PT. Mitra Safir Sejahtera, Pengadilan Niaga menolak mengesahkan rencana perdamaian sehingga secara otomatis PT. Mitra Safir Sejahtera dinyatakan pailit. Permasalahannya dengan putusan ini belum tercapai tujuan hukum kepailitan dalam melindungi kepentingan dari kreditor pemegang Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli. Berdasarkan permasalahan tersebut dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif, Skripsi ini ditujukan untuk mengidentifikasi pertimbangan hukum Hakim Pengadilan Niaga dalam memberikan putusan pada kasus PT. Mitra Safir Sejahtera dikaitkan dengan Undang-Undang No. 37 Tahun 2004 dan dampak dari putusan tersebut kepada kreditor pemegang Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli.

---

In developing an apartment building sometimes the condominium developer company cannot turn over apartment units as agreed in Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement to the condominium unit buyers. In Bankruptcy Law, one of the options to solve this problem is by way of Debt Restructuring as stipulated in the Law No. 37 of 2004. This process aims to prevent the debtor from bankruptcy by providing opportunities for debtor and creditors to gain reconciliation to protect the interest of all creditors involved. In PT. Mitra Safir Sejahtera`s case, Commercial Court refused to endorse the draft of reconciliation thus PT. Mitra Safir Sejahtera was declared bankrupt. The problem with this declaration of bankruptcy, it does not provide the main purpose of the bankruptcy law to protect the interests of creditors that hold the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement. Using normative methods and in regards to this issue, this thesis is aimed to identify the legal considerations of the Council of Judges of the Commercial Court in declaring bankruptcy to PT. Mitra Safir Sejahtera`s case in relation to the Law No. 37 of 2004 and the impact of such declaration to the holders of the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement."

"Seiring dengan perkembangan kebutuhan akan tempat tinggal, membuat masyarakat lebih memilih untuk mendapatkan tempat tinggal dengan membelinya dari pelaku usaha perusahaan pembangunan perumahan (developer). Untuk membuat suatu perumahan, dibutuhkan dana yang sangat besar, hal ini memaksa para developer untuk meminjam dana kredit fasilitas untuk pembangunan perumahan kepada kreditor yang pada umumnya adalah lembaga keuangan bank. Pada umumnya pula, developer menjaminkan sertifikat dari bangunan yang sedang dibangunnya sebagai jaminan dari pinjaman. Hal ini lah yang terkadang tidak diinformasikan dengan terbuka kepada para calon konsumen. Tesis ini membahas mengenai perlindungan hukum terhadap konsumen pemegang akta perjanjian pengikatan jual beli (PPJB) terkait pengembang (developer) yang dinyatakan pailit.Tesis ini membahas hak-hak konsumen yang telah melunasi sebagian atau seluruh kewajibannya berdasarkan akta PPJB dan penyelesaian sengketa terkait unit/bangunan yang menjadi boedoel pailit. Tesis ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan data sekunder sebagai sumber utama yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan. Penulisan Tesis ini bertujuan untuk memberikan informasi mengenai hak-hak konsumen pemegang akta PPJB dan penyelesaian sengketa terkait objek bangunan yang menjadi boedoel pailit.

---

In accordance with the growth of the needs of residences, that makes people would prefer buying it from developer. To build residences, developer needs a major funding, it forces developer to borrow some money from financial institutions such as Bank. Bank will lend money with some requirements as if collateral. Mostly, developer gives building certificates as a collateral and this matter is not informed well to consumer.

This Thesis is discussing about legal protection towards consuments as the holder of the deed of the sales and purchase agreement in connection with the bankruptcy of such developer. This Thesis is discussing about consumer rights, which have paid partly, or entirely his obligations according to Sales and Purchase Agreement and dispute resolution related to the building that has been become the object of bankruptcy. This Thesis is using normative research method with the secondary data as a main source. This Thesis objectives are giving information regarding consumer rights and dispute resolution which can be done with consumer."