Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"In the recent era, the development of science and technology has been rapidly growing up, therefore, there is no more option for every organization either government's or non government's. As a consequences of this issue, the organization need to make an action to redevelop its human resources quality. The objective of these demand is to win the competitive services, articularly in serving the public due to the function of the government.Productivity is one main focus issue of the human resources because it has an efficiency, an effectiveness, and a quality inside it self, as the result of the human role as resource.To achieve an optimal and qualified work productivity, the organization must have a leader who have ability to encourage, giving direction, counselor, and influencing staff to carry out the work in leading to the main and work environment is the physics environment factor which containing with working room and working tools along with working relationship which also contained with attitude, work atmosphere, communication and good cooperation, have a high responsive power against the global challenge change in order to give an anticipation ability of the organization. In connection with that, this research is subjected to see the role of the leadership and work environment against the work productivity of the Directorate General of Correction Staffs.The population of the research is 505 person staffs of Directorate General of Correction entirely, using the prime data raising technique by question disseminate in form of inquiry papers of 101 respondents. The data analysis tools in this research is the SPSS (Statically Program for Social Science). Correlation tests is used for see the correlation between X and Y variable.Based on this result of the research by statistic analyzing, there is a relation between leadership with work productivity they are positive/ strong with correlation coefficient 0,755 therefore the coefficient interval is between 0,60 - 0,799 means that there is correlation between leadership variable with productivity variable that indicate the strong correlation level, positive and significant between those variable, as a result is the strengthen of the leadership values in the Directorate General of Correctional have a strong influences against the development of the staffs work productivity in it.The correlation between work environment with work productivity of staff is positive/strong with 0,669 coefficient therefore the coefficient interval is 0,60 - 0,799. This means there is correlation between work environment variable with work productivity of Directorate General of Correction which indicate the strong correlation, positive and significant between both variable, so that the work environment values in the Directorate General has a strong influence against the development of work productivity of Directorate General of Correction's Staffs.The con-elation between leadership and work environment together with work productivity is positive/ strong with correlation coefficient 0,819, therefore the interval coefficient is 0,80 - 1,000 is very strong categorized. This means that work productivity which indicate the very strong correlation, positive and significant between both variable as a result that the strengthening of the leadership and work environment values in Directorate General of Correction have a very strong influence against the development of work productivity of the Directorate General of Correction's Staffs.The leadership need to see the leadership style which has an ability to directing, an agent of change skill, a spokesman skill, a guider skill, a leader skill, making the right decision skill, a motivator skin, and the way of communication in achieving the strong leadership and work environment values, so that it can develop work productivity of Directorate General of Correction's Staffs.The work environment need to see the interior design, individual initiative, togetherness, management support, communication pattern and supervision from the leader, so that it can create a conducive and staff work productivity of Directorate General of Correction's Staffs."

"In this research, the formulation of such problems are to identify the correlation strength and to test the variable independent, namely the Leadership and Motivation on variable dependent, which is Employee's Productivity of the Cipinang Correctional Institution, Jakarta. In reviewing some of the factors mentioned above, we could see that the leadership plays an important role in pushing the organization productivity, the leader are challenged to powered the organizational strength in such correct and precise manner to face the future challenge, that would influence the organizational life.The universe from which the sample was selected included all the employees of the Cipinang Correctional Institution, of 480 officers, while intake sample were selected by using "Purposive Stratified Sampling" technique, in which the technique based on the current number of employees, the rank or faction of the officer from the total sample. 120 (one hundred and twenty) names were selected randomly.Method of analysis that was used in this research is the analysis method and its correlation. The descriptive analysis was used to depict the frequency of such data, and to obtain a picture of the research's result. While correlation analysis were used to analyze the relation of variables, such as, variable of leadership and variable of productivity and also variable of motivation and variable of productivity.The research was conducted by handing-over the closed enlist statements / questions for the respondents of officers. Reliabilities test was conducted to cover such topics, as how far the statement items have consistency with split half, that is, the instrument was grouped in the even and anomalous instruments. Then, score of each group were summed, and compared to its correlation coefficient by using SPSS 11,0 for windows, then by using the Spearman Brown's formula.The validity test, which conducted on each question of this research, was using the item analysis, by reviewing the correlation of each question. The total score on each variable is representing the number of each score in pertinent variable. The question considered to be valid, if having the minimum correlation value of 0,3.The result of the research, are:1. Only a few of head sections in the Cipinang Correctional Institution would clarify the department's job description to his staff or subordinates; he assumed that his staff and subordinate have already comprehend their work and duty. In contrary; most of the staff and subordinate do not know the duty of their work.Despitefully, the leader do not also explain whereof, what should be done and how to do it, most of the problems that occurred could not be solved properly, and the result are less optimal, because of the staff and subordinate do not know how. So, the purposes and objectives of the leader are not comprehensible by the staff and subordinate, and also there is no formal communications between the leader and the staff and subordinate. On the other hand, most of the Cipinang's leaders do not have knowledge and ability in the managerial field, so they can not lead the organization toward its target. In result, the officer's productivity is not optimal.2. The security guarantee should represents a fundamental requirement for the Cipinang officers, but practically, the security guarantee provided by the leader only represents a supplementary factor for the officers. Because, the leader does not always there to assist them. There is a time when the leader would delegate the authority of the Cipinang's security to his staffs and subordinates; this is because the leader has other duty outside the Cipinang, which also important to him.The job's duty and responsibility of the Cipinang security guards themselves are very risky, due to the occupancy of the offenders in the Cipinang, which much bigger than the officers on duty. In order to executing the duty and responsibility as the officer of the Cipinang, which are; to secure, to treat and to rehabilitate the inmate in pursuant to the treatment regulation, on the other hand, the Cipinang do not have high motivating human resources that qualified as a treatment officer, to meet the high work productivity.To meet the organization target, the good or obsolesce of such organization is determined by the authority and the efficiency of its leader, in executing his leadership and leading his subordinate. The authority and efficiency of the leader will motivate the enthusiasm, creativity, participation and loyalties of the staff and subordinate in performing their duty. So, in the end, the target of organization can soon be reached.Motivation leads the enthusiasm of all officers, so the officer will strive by performing their skill and ability to meet the organization target. Basically, the organizational is not only expecting the staff to be capable or to be reliable, but the most important is, how the officer would strive and willing to reach the optimal result.Ability, efficiency and skill of the officers don't mean anything if not followed by the officer's striving and by using their ability, efficiency and skill they required. Motivation has become more important due to the officer strive, enthusiastic and creative to reach the maximum work productivity."

"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui pengaruh kompetensi, kepemimpinan dan budaya organisasi terhadap kinerja pegawai di lingkungan Direktorat Jenderal Imigrasi. Dengan menggunakan pengukuran kompetensi dari Lyne Spencer dan Signe M Spencer (1993), kepemimpinan dari Chapman dan Etzione, serta budaya organisasi dari Stephen Robbins (2001). Metode yang digunakan adalah diskriptif analisis dengan responden sebanyak 100 orang. Data dikumpulkan melalui kuisioner dan dianalisis menggunakan SPSS 11,5 Windows.Dari hasil penelitian ini diketahui bahwa : 1. variabel kompetensi mempunyai pengaruh terhadap kinerja pegawai dimana dengan nilai 66,6%, 2. Variabel kepemimpinan mempunyai pengaruh yang signifikan dengan kinerja sebesar 66,5%, 3. Variabel budaya organisasi mempunyai pengaruh yang signifikan dengan kinerja sebesar 45,3% dan 4. Terdapat pengaruh antara Kompetensi, Kepemimpinan, dan Budaya Organisasi, terhadap Kinerja sebesar 60,8%. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa Kompetensi, Kepemimpinan, dan Budaya Organisasi dapat memberikan kontribusi sebesar 60,8% terhadap Kinerja sedangkan sisanya sebesar 39,2% merupakan pengaruh dari faktor lain.Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini diketahui bahwa kompetensi, kepemimpinan dan budaya organisasi baik sendiri-sendiri maupun secara bersama-sama mempunyai pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja pegawai namun disamping itu masih terdapat kelemahan-kelemahan.Saran yang dapat diberikan adalah dengan melakukan perbaikan dan peningkatkan guna mengoptimalisasi terhadap hal-hal yang dirasakan masih kurang baik dari variabel kompetensi, kepemimpinan, dan budaya organisasi dalam hubungan dengan kinerja pegawai maupun dari variabel kinerja pegawai itu sendiri.

---

This research is conducted to know how far the influence of competence, leadership and organizational culture factors to the staff?s performance at Directorate General of Immigration. The research is utilising the competence measurement from Lyne Spencer and Signe M Spencer (1993), leadership from Chapman and Etzione, and organizational culture from Stephen Robbins (2001). The method that had been used is the descriptive analytical accompanied with 100 samples. The data was collected through questioners and the analysis was processed by SPSS 11, 5 Windows.From the research results, it could be concluded that: 1. Competence variable has the influence to the staff?s performance for 66, 6%, 2. Leadership variant has a strong correlation to the staff?s performance is up to 66, 5%. 3. The organisational culture variant also has a strong and positive correlation with the performance is up to 45, 3% from the respondents. 4. From this research it could be concluded that competence, leadership and organisational culture factors may influence up to 60,8% to the staff?s working performance and the other 39,2% is merely another factors.This research concludes that competence, leadership and organisational culture whether as an independent or a combination factors clearly has a significant contribution to the staff?s performance although they also has a number of limitations.The research suggests therefore that the organization should increase the element that could support the development of competence, leadership and organizational culture variable within the context of its relation with the staff?s performance and the variable of staff?s performance itself."

"Tesis ini membahas tentang pengaruh budaya kerja dan kepemimpinan terhadap kinerja pegawai di lingkungan Mahkamah Konstitusi. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian assosiatif dengan data kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian menyarankan bahwa pimpinan hendaknya melakukan kegiatan sosialisasi secara terus menerus kepada para pegawai untuk meningkatkan pemahaman terhadap budaya kerja dan terus berupaya menerapkan budaya kerja dalam setiap aktifitas organisasi, serta memberikan sanksi yang tegas terhadap pelanggaran-pelanggarannya. Disisi lain, pimpinan perlu menekankan kembali peranan kepemimpinannya secara tegas dan jelas untuk membimbing dan membina bawahannya serta perlu terus mengembangkan potensi kepemimpinannya dalam organisasi.

---

This research is explaining the influence of work culture and leadership to employee performance in Constitutional Court of Republic of Indonesia. Designing of the research is assossiatif through the kuantitative data. The results of the research suggest that the leader necessarily to increase understanding of the work culture through disseminate to the employees. Applying the work culture to whole activities and sanction to the violator. In other, the leader is necessarily to focus on his leadership to assist and to develop of employees, and keep developing his potential leadership inorganization."

"This research is intended to know the effect of leadership, environment work and motivation to the performance of employee at Akademi Ilmu Pemasyarakatan. The background of this research is many problems that connected with the performance of employee. By this indication, there are many problem that unbalance.The researcher use Nash?s theory, Gary Yulk?s theory and John D. Miller?s theory to illustrate about leadership, Alex S.Nitisemito?s theory to illustrate about environment work, Abraham Maslow?s theory to illustrate about motivation and Miner?s theory to illustrate about performance. This research method in used is a survey method. The writer use primary and secondary data. Approach which used in this research is the quantitative research an spread closed questioner to 37 respondents.Before conducting the analysis, a validity test was conducted on all instruments and reliability test. Verified and reliable data then was analyzed further by using correlation test of t test to determine the relation between leadership-performance, environment work-performance, and motivation-performance. As to determine the relation between leadership, environment work and motivation on performance, F test analysis is used.From the analysis, it can be concluded that between motivation, there is a high coefficient correlation with correlation 0,380. Between environment work and performace, there is a second coefficient correlation with correlation 0,360. Between motivation and performance there is a third coefficient correlation with correlation 0,253."

"Leadership effectiveness influenced by a lot of factors. Factor perceived in (his research is: leader characteristics, job description, leader caring to employees, leader ability and skill, leader and employee relations, human resource and management support, leader behavior, employee?s effort, position power and external coordination. Objectives of the study are identifying factors which influence leadership effectivity, analyzing employee productivity, and factors which influence employee productivity at PT Bridgestone Tire Indonesia. Base oii research there are three primary factor that form leadership effectivemiess at Production division of PT. Bridgestone Tire of Indonesia that is: leader factor, work condition factor and the emnployee factor. From the three factor that form effectiveness of the leadership, the most factor that have an effect in improving productivity of the employees is the emuployees factor."

"Latar belakang pemilihan judul diatas didasarkan pada adanya penurunan kinerja petugas di RUTAN Klas I Jakarta Pusat yang diindikasikan diakibatkan oleh gaya kepemimpinan dan budaya organisasi yang kurang kondusif. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan(X1) dan Budaya Organisasi (X2) terhadap Kinerja Petugas (Y) di Rumah Tahanan Negara Klas I Jakarta Pusat. Dalam penelitian ini penulis menguji tiga hipotesis yaitu tentang pengaruh positif antara gaya kepemimpinan terhadap kinerja petugas, Pengaruh Budaya Organisasi terhadap Kinerja dan Pengaruh antara Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi terhadap Kinerja Petugas. Populasi yang diteliti adalah petugas Rumah Tahanan Klas I Jakarta Pusat sebanyak 336 orang, dan sampel yang diteliti adalah 78 orang. Instrumen penelitian dalam bentuk kuesioner dengan menggunakan skala likert 1-5. Dari hasil penelitian ini didapatkan data bahwa Gaya Kepemimpinan dan Budaya Organisasi mempunyai pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap kinerja petugas di Rumah Tahanan Klas I Jakarta Pusat.

---

The background of the title above was based on the existence degredation of staff performance at First Detention Centre of Central Jakarta, which is indentified caused by the reseach lack ondusiveness of leadership form and organizational culture. The Purpose of this reseach is to find out the effect leadership form (X1) and organization culture (X2) on staff performance (Y) at First Detention Centre of Central Jakarta. Three hypotheses analyzed by the reseach in this reseach, those are the positive effect of Leadership Form on Staff?s Performance, the effect of Organizational Culture on Performance and the effect Leadership Form and Organizational Culture on Staff?s Performance. As population of this reseach were staffs of First Detention Centre of Central Jakarta sum as 336 person, and of sample were 78 person. The instrument used was queshioner with scale of 1-5. The result that Leadership Form and Organizational Behavior have significant effect on staff performance at First Detention Centre of Central Jakarta, gained from the result of this reseach."

"Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan sebagai salah satu organisasi publik yang bergerak dibidang hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia, juga mempunyai tugas yang cukup berat yaitu merumuskan dan melaksanakan kebijakan dan standarisasi teknis di bidang Pemasyarakatan, yang membawahi Lembaga Pemasyarakatan seluruh Indonesia. Untuk dapat menjalankan tugas dengan baik dan mencapai basil yang maksimal maka diperlukan sumber daya manusia yang berkualitas. Dengan adanya sumber daya manusia yang berkualitas diharapkan mereka mampu menghasilkan kinerja yang baik, sehingga berpengaruh terhadap keberhasilan organisasi.Gibson (1997:52) menyatakan bahwa kinerja atau prestasi kerja dan perilaku atau behavior (B) seseorang pegawai adalah fungsi dari individu (I), organisasi (O) dan psikologi (P). Variabel individu terdiri atas kemampuan dan ketrampilan, latar belakang keluarga maupun tingkat sosial, dan demografis. Variabel psikologi terdiri alas persepsi, sikap, kepribadian, belajar dan motivasi. Motivasi sangat berpengaruh dalam menentukan tinggi atau rendahnya kinerja seorang pegawai. Variabel organisasi terdiri atas sumber daya, kepemimpinan, struktur dan desain pekerjaan. Menurut Teori Motivasi "Expectancy Theory" yang dikembangkan Victor Vroom (1973) yang menjelaskan bahwa kebutuhan dirasakan akan mendorong tingkah laku dan tindakan akan Iebih terdorong meningkat lagi apabila seseorang merasakan ada hubungan positif antara upaya dan hasil. Sebaliknya apabila tidak ada hubungan upaya dengan hasil maka dorongan untuk melakukan tindakan akan berkurang. Dengan kata lain motivasi pegawai akan meningkat apabila semua usaha / tindakan yang telah mereka lakukan seimbang dengan basil berupa kompensasi yang mereka akan terima.Populasi yang diambil untuk penelitian ini adalah Pegawai Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan yang berjumlah 505 orang, terdiri dari 7 unit Organisasi, yang di setiap unit organisasi terdapat berbagai jabatan struktural dan golongan ruang gaji. Menurut Arikunto daiam Riduwan (2004:276) besar sampel dikatakan representatif atau dapat mewakili populasinya, apabila jumlah subyeknya besar, dapat diambil antara 10% sampai 15% atau 20% sampai 25% atau Iebih. Mengingal jumlah populasi yang menjadi obyek penelitian ini cukup banyak maka sampel yang digunakan 20% dari jumlah papuiasi, yaitu sebanyak 101orang pegawai, Sampei diambil dengan menggunakan metode proportional ,stratified random sampling. Teknik berstrata dilakukan karena didalam populasi terdapat tingkatan jabatanlesselon, juga terdapat tingkatan golongan ruang gaji, Teknik Proporsional dilakukan karena didalam populasi terdapat beberapa unit organisasi yang jumlah pegawainya masing-masing unit tidak sama. Teknik acak atau random dilakukan karena daiam pengambilan sampelnya dilakukan dengan mencampur subyek-subyek yang, ada didalam populasi, sehingga semua subyek dianggap mempunyai hak yang sama untuk memperoleh kesempatan dipilih menjadi sampel.Pengolahan data hasil penelitian menggunakan program Sofiware SPSS ( Statistical Package for Social Science ) for Window Release 11.5. Hasil perhitungan dengan metode Analisa Regresi Linear menunjukkan bahwa besarnya pengaruh dari variabel kepemimpinan terhadap kinerja pegawai adalah sebesar 42,9%., besarnya pengaruh dari variabel kompensasi terhadap kinerja pegawai adalah sebesar 45,43%. Sedangkan Analisis Regresi Berganda menunjukkan besarnya pengaruh antara variabel kepemimpinan dan kompensasi secara bersama-sama terhadap kinerja pegawai adalah sebesar 65,6%. Nilai Signifikansi Koefisien Regresi yang dihasilkan sebesar 0.000, yang artinya Pengaruh antara Kepemimpinan Dan Kompensasi Terhadap Kinerja Pegawai adalah Signifikan secara statistik.Implementasi dari temuan penelitian ini adalah perlu ditingkalkan lagi partisipatif antara pimpinan dan bawahan sebagai anggota organisasi, sehingga bawahan merasa menjadi bagian dari organisasi. Pemberian kompensasi hendaknya berasaskan equity (keadilan), yaitu memberikan kompensasi baik itu finansial dan non finansial berdasarkan pada prestasi kcrja pegawai. Apabila hal tersebut dapat terealisasi dengan baik maka kinerja pegawai akan meni ngkat, sehingga diharapkan akan dapat mewujudkan pegawai Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan yang profesional, handal dan mempunyai dedikasi yang tinggi.

---

General Directorate of Social Rehabilitation is one of public institutions in Law and Human Rights. It has strategic responsibility in formulation and implementation of policy and technical standardization in social rehabilitation all over Indonesia. To implement and obtain maximum achievement of those objectives, good quality human resources are needed. With good quality human resources, they are expected to perform well and support the objective of the organization.

Gibson (1997:52) said that performance and behavior of an employee are the function of individual (I), organization (O), and psychology (P). Variable of individual consists of capacity and skill, family background or social stratification, and demography. Variable of psychology consists of perception, attitude, personality learning and motivation. Motivation is very influential to determine the level of an employee's performance. Variable of organization consists of resource, leadership structure and design of work. According to Expectancy Theory developed by Victor Vroom (1973), necessity will urge behavior and it will increase if someone can acquire positive relation between effort and outcome. If there is no relation between effort and outcome, hence an impulse to behave will decline. In other word, motivation of employee will increase if all of their effort and action equal with received compensation.

The population of the research is all of the employees in the General Directorate of Social Rehabilitation which are 505 employees. They come from seven different units of organization with its structural position and different payment scheme. According to Arikunto in Riduwan (2004: 276) the sample will be representative or represented the population if the amount of the subject is between 10% to 15% or 20% to 25% or more. Because the population is large, hence the proportion of the sample is 20% or 101 employees. The sample is collected by proportional stratified random sampling method.

It is used because in the population there are stratification in echelon and remuneration system and also different units. Random sampling is used to give an equal chance for every employment to be selected as a respondent.

Data analysis uses SPSS for Windows release 11.5. The result of the analysis using linear regression analysis is 0.000 that shows the influence of the variable leadership on employee's performance is 42.9%, the influence of the variable of compensation on performance is 45.43. Meanwhile, the double regression analysis shows the influence of variables of leadership and compensation concurrently is 65.6%. The relation between leadership and compensation with employee's performance is significant statistically."

"Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan lntelektual adalah salah satu lembaga pemerintah yang mempunyai peran strategis dalam menjalankan fungsi sebagai salah satu unsur pelayanan pemerintah kepada masyarakat. Mengingat pelayanan yang diberikan adalah perlindungan hukum dibidang Hak Kekayaan lntelektual maka sudah barang tentu akan terkait pula dengan bidang ekonomi nasional bahkan hubungan dan kepercayaan dunia usaha internasional.Dengan tugas dan fungsi yang sangat penting baik bagi masyarakat maupun bagi pemerintah sendiri sudah barang tentu harus didukung oleh ketersediaan sumber daya manusia yang mempunyai kinerja yang mampu memberikan kontribusi positif bagi organisasi dan pada akhimya bagi pembangunan nasional.Untuk menyiapkan sumber daya manusia yang kinerjanya baik, sebagai organisasi Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan lntelektual sudah barang tentu membuat kebijakan dibidang pendidikan dan latihan serta pengembangan karir yang bertujuan agar dapat meningkatkan kinerja pegawai dan pada akhirnya dapat meningkatkan kinerja organisasi.Pendidikan dan pelatihan menurut Walker (1992:112) adalah sarana untuk meningkatkan kemampuan dan ketrampilan pegawai dalam meningkatkan kinerja dan melaksanakan tugas, dan juga menupakan sarana yang penting bagi pihak manajemen dalam menerapkan strategi organisasi. sedangkan Pengembangan karir mempunyai arti usaha secara formal, teroganisir serta terencana untuk mencapai keseimbangan antara kepentingan karir individu dengan organisasi secara keseluruhan (Gutteridge & Ote dalam Gilley and Aggland :1998) Kinerja itu sendiri mempunyai arti adalah hasil yang dicapai seseorang menurut ukuran yang berlaku untuk pekerjaan yang bersangkutan (Lawler and Porter dalam As'ad, 1995:47).Penelitian tentang hubungan pendidikan dan latihan serta pengembangan karir terhadap kinerja pegawai Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dilatarbelakangi oleh pentingnya kinerja pegawai bagi kinerja organisasi. Hubungan antara Pendidikan dan Latihan didasarkan bahwa kinerja tidak terjadi dengan sendirinya melainkan terbentuk karena faktor kemampuan dan motivasi. Faktor Kemampuan dapat dicapai melalui suatu proses pendidikan dan latihan, Flippo dalam Hasibuan (1994: 76-77). Kemudian Wether Jr dan Davis (1996 :311) menyatakan bahwa Pengembangan Karir adalah alat yang penting yang mana para pimpinan dapat meningkatkan produktifitas, meningkatkan perilaku pegawai kedepan dan membangun kepuasan kerja. Pengembangan karir juga mengurangi masalah kinerja bagi pimpinan dan bawahan (Gilley dan Aggland (1989:48).Sehubungan dengan kinerja yang harus dicapai, maka rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana pengaruh antara Pendidikan dan Latihan dengan Kinerja, bagaimana pengaruh antara Pengembangan Karir dengan Kinerja dan bagaimana pengaruh Pendidikan dan Latihan serta Pengembangan Karir dengan Kinerja.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskritif analisis kuantitatif korelasional, yakni suatu metode untuk mengambarkan keadaan pada saat penelitian berlangsung, dengan cara mengumpulkan data, mengolahnya dan menganalisis besarnya kekeatan hubungan melalui metode statistik nonparametric dengan skala ordinal untuk menuntukan skor nilai variabel. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah pegawai Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan Intelektual dengan jumlah sampel sebanyak 111 orang, yand diambil dengan teknik purposive sampling. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian, distribusi frekuensi dan prosentase responden hitting korelasi dengan Spearman rho dan hitung determinasi variabel independen terhadap variabel dependen, yang kesemuanya menggunakan Program SPSS 11.0 for Windows.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ada hubungan yang signifikan dengan arah positif pada tingkat sedang antara pendidikan dan latihan serta pengembangan karir terhadap kinerja, artinya pendidikan dan latihan serta pengembangan karir mempunyai dampak pada tingkat sedang kepada kinerja pegawai Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan lntelektual. Sedangkan pada kinerja diketahui terdapat masalah pada disiplin, kuantitas dan kualitas hasil pekerjaan yang tidak memenuhi harapan dan jelas akan mempengaruhi mutu pelayanan hukum kepada masyarakat.Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini ada beberapa saran kebijakan yang sangat mungkin diambil pada Direktorat Jenderal Hak Kekayaan lntelektual yakni peserta pendidikan dan latihan harus jelas kriterianya dan berdasarkan hasil evaluasi kinerja. Pengembangan karir harus dikelola dan dilaksanakan dengan sebaik mungkin dan jelas. Selain memperhatikan latar belakang pendidikan dan senioritas dalam pengembangan karir harus pula memperhatikan kinerja dari pegawai yang bersangkutan. Pendisiplinan pegawai harus dilakukan dengan memperbesar tanggung jawab atasan langsung pegawai, menggunakan cara yang progressive serta adanya toleransi pada batas-batas tertentu.

---

Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights (1PR) is one of the government institutions which holds strategic roles to function as one of government services to the society Due to the service it gives in the protection of law on intellectual Property Rights, it also related to the national economy, even further to the relationship and trust of international trade.

The important duties and functions of Directorate General of IPR obviously need to be supported by the availability of sufficient human resources capable to give positive contribution to the organization and ultimately to the national development. In order to prepare human resources with excellent performance, the Directorate General of IPR makes policy in education and training and career development aimed to improve the performance of employees in return to improve the performance of the organization.

According to Walker (1992:112) education and training are means to increase the skills and capability of employees with the purpose of improving their performances and to conduct their job, also as an important means for the management to implement the strategy of the organization. Whereas career development means a formal organized and well-planned effort to reach the sense of balance between individually career interest and organization, as a whole (Gutteridge & Ote in Gilley and Aggland: 1998). Performance itself means a result which is gained in accordance with the standard applied to related work (Lawler and Porter in As ?ad, 1995:47).

This research of correlation between education and training and career development towards the performance of employees in Directorate General of IPR is set out by the importance of employees' performance for the performance of the organization. The connection of Education and Training is based on the belief that performance does not occur on its own but it is established because of capability and motivation factors.

Capability is derived from the process of education and training, Edwin B. Flippo in Hasibuan (1994:76-7). Wether Jr and Davis (1996:311) also state that Career Development is an important device for the manager to increase productivity, improve employees' behaviors and build work satisfaction. Career Development also reduces the problem of performance for the employer and employees (Gilley and Aggland, 1989:48). Therefore, it needs to find out how is the correlation between Career Development and Performance and the correlation between Education and Training and Career Development and Performance.

This research used correlation quantitative descriptive analytical method, which is a method to describe the condition occurred during the research conducted by collecting, processing the data and analyze the strength of the correlation using nonparametric statistic method with ordinal scale to determine the variable score. The population of the research is the employees of Directorate General of IPR with sampling of lit employees $en by using purposive sampling technique. The analysis technique used is validity test and reliability of research instrument, frequency distribution, and respondent correlation percentage with Spearmen who and independent variable determination towards dependent variable. All of those used Program of SPSS 11.0 for Windows.

The result of the research shows that there is a positively significant correlation on medium level between education and training and career development towards performance. It means that education and training and career development affect the performance of employees in Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights on medium level. Whereas in the performance there are problems in discipline, insufficient quantity and quality of work result which obviously affects the quality of legal service given to the society.

Based on this result there are some suggestions related to policy which is likely taken by Directorate General of Intellectual Property Rights. First, setting up clear criteria in choosing the participants of education and training in reference to the evaluation of performance. Second, career development should be administered and conducted in clear and well manner. Third, career development also be attentive to the performance of employees besides their educational background and seniority. Finally, putting more responsibility to the employees' direct superior to discipline them using progressive way and certain tolerable limitation."

"Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui sejauh mana pengaruh kompetensi komunikasi terhadap kinerja pegawai Direktorat Infokom dan untuk mengetahui dimensi komunikasi apakah yang paling berpengaruh terhadap kinerja pegawai Direktorat Infokom. Penelitian dilaksanakan di Direktorat Infokom pada bulan Mei-Juli 2013. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kuantitatif eksplanasi. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kompetensi komunikasi memiliki pengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja pegawai. Penelitian juga menunjukkan bahwa pengetahuan komunikasi menjadi dimensi yang paling kuat hubungannya terhadap kinerja pegawai. Untuk menghasilkan kinerja yang baik diperlukan adanya sistem perekrutan dan pelatihan untuk mendapatkan SDM yang memiliki kompetensi unggul.

---

This study was conducted to determine the extent of the effect of communication competence on employee performance and to determine whether the communication dimensions that most affect the performance of the officials at the Directorate Information and Communication. Research conducted in May-July 2013. The method used in this study is a quantitative explanation. The results of this study indicate that communication competence has positive and significant influence to performance. Research also shows that the dimension of communication knowledge have the strongest relationship to employee performance. To get good performance required a recruitment and training system to ensure human resources have superior competence."