Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Risk management and contingency planning has really come to the fore since the first edition of this book was originally published. Computer failure, fire, fraud, robbery, accident, environmental damage, new regulations - business is constantly under threat. But how do you determine which are the most important dangers for your business? What can you do to lessen the chances of their happening - and minimize the impact if they do happen? In this comprehensive volume Kit Sadgrove shows how you can identify - and control - the relevant threats and ensure that your company will survive. He begins by asking 'What is risk?', 'How do we assess it?' and 'How can it be managed?' He goes on to examine in detail the key danger areas including finance, product quality, health and safety, security and the environment. With case studies, self-assessment exercises and checklists, each chapter looks systematically at what is involved and enables you to draw up action plans that could, for example, provide a defence in law or reduce your insurance premium. The new edition reflects the changes in the global environment, the new risks that have emerged and the effect of macroeconomic factors on business profitability and success. The author has also included a set of case studies to illustrate his ideas in practice."

"Fenemona terjadi akibat Covid-19 menimbulkan risiko bisnis menjadi tantangan tersendiri bagi berbagai sektor. Perencanaan kelangsungan bisnis dan pengendalian risiko perlu disiapkan khususnya dalam menghadapi krisis termasuk bagi PT. TPA XYZ, sebuah Perusahaan Pihak Ketiga Penyedia Jasa Administrasi yang memiliki peran sebagai pihak perantara Asuransi dan Penyedia Layanan Kesehatan. Namun langkah yang diambil perusahaan dalam menyikapi pandemi dengan mengeluarkan kebijakan operasional menimbulkan berbagai respon dan mengindikasi adanya ketidakselarasan penerapan Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) & Business Continuity Management (BCM) yang mempengaruhi pencapaian tujuan. Penulis termotivasi melakukan penelitian ini dengan tujuan memberikan evaluasi penerapan ERM dan BCM dengan mengevaluasi maturitas untuk menetukan kondisi existing ERM dan BCM di perusahaan dan memberikan rekomendasi untuk membangun kompatibilitas ERM dan BCM yang mendukung pencapaian tujuan. Penelitian studi kasus dengan pendekatan kuantitatif–kualitatif, menggunakan data primer & sekunder dari observasi, telaah dokumentasi, kuesioner, dan wawancara dengan metode triangulasi data sebagai validasi. Manfaat bagi perusahaan adalah memperoleh usulan tindakan korektif untuk mengoptimalkan praktik penerapan ERM & BCM berbasis pendekatan kolaboratif (Model GRC) untuk membantu identifikasi area proses bisnis yang belum optimal dan alokasi sumber daya. Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa implementasi ERM & BCM belum selaras dan terintegrasi. Penulis menyarankan upaya prioritas perbaikan pada aspek proses dan kapabilitas.

---

A phenomenon due to Covid-19 becomes challenge to several sectors. Business continuity plan, risk mitigation and control should to be prepared, including for PT. TPA XYZ which is a Third-Party Health Administration Service Provider. However, the steps taken by the company in responding pandemic by issuing operational policies led to various responses and indicates the misaligned of Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) & Business Continuity Management (BCM) which affected the goals achievement. The author is motivated to conduct this research with the aim of providing an evaluation of maturity level to determine existing condition of ERM and BCM in the company and provides recommendation to build compatibility between ERM and BCM that supports the goals achievement. Case study research with quantitative-qualitative approaches, using primary & secondary data from observation, review of documentations, questionnaires, and interviews with data triangulation method as validation. The benefit for the company is to obtain corrective action suggestion to optimize the ERM & BCM implementation based on a collaborative approach (GRC Model) to identification of weak areas and resource allocation. The results found that the ERM & BCM implementation is at the early-stage and not integrated. The author suggests to prioritize improvement in process and capability aspects."

"ContentsForeword -- Preface -- Acknowledgments -- Introduction -- Institutional background -- Operational risk -- Financial disasters -- The systemic disaster of 2007-2008 -- Managing financial risk -- VaR and stress testing -- Model risk -- Managing spot risk -- Managing forward risk -- Managing vanilla options risk -- Managing exotic options risk -- Credit risk -- Counterparty credit risk -- Bibliography -- About the companion website -- Index."