Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini membahas tentang revitalisasi pasar tradisional di Kota Semarang dengan mengambil kasus revitalisasi Pasar Johar. Permasalahan dalam revitalisasi Pasar Johar ini adalah kebijakan pembangunan pasar yang berupaya memperbaiki kondisi pasar ternyata tidak menguntungkan bagi para pedagang. Ada berbagai kepentingan dari pemerintah, pedgaang dan kelompok kepentingan yang memunculkan kekacauan. Kepentingan dari berbagai pihak tersebut berusaha untuk bisa mempengaruhi proses implementasi kebijakan. Hal ini kemudian menyebabkan proses pembangunan pasar tersebut diwarnai dengan konflik kepentingan antarpihak. Peneliti menggunakan teori Urban Regime Stone dan teori implementasi kebijakan Van Metter dan Horn sebagai pisau analisis. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif dengan wawancara kepada sejumlah informan dari pemerintah dan pedagang Pasar Johar. Hasil dari penelitian adalah bahwa kepentingan pribadi dari berbagai pihak yang cukup kuat membuat koalisi antara pemerintah dengan pedagang tidak berjalan dengan baik. Sebagai urban regime, revitalisasi berhasil dalam pembangunan fisik gedung pasar, namun belum berhasil untuk mengembalikan perekonomian Pasar Johar. Keberhasilannya tampak pada penataan wilayah pasar menjadi lebih indah, rapi dan teratur. Akan tetapi hal yang belum berhasil dicapai dalam revitalisasi ini adalah kenaikan pedapatan pedagang di Pasar Johar. Selain itu, dalam implementasi kebijakan juga terjadi berbagai penyimpangan yang dilakukan oleh berbagai pihak.

---

This study discusses the revitalization of traditional markets in the city of Semarang by taking the case of Johar Market revitalization. The problem with revitalizing Johar Market is that market development policies that seek to improve market conditions turn out to be unprofitable for traders. There are various interests from the government, traders, and interest groups that cause chaos. The interests of these various parties seek to influence the policy implementation process. This then causes the market development process to be colored by conflicts of interest between parties. The researcher uses Urban Regime Stone theory and Van Metter and Horn's policy implementation theory as analysis tools. This study used a qualitative research method by interviewing a number of informants from the government and Johar Market traders. The results of the research are the personal interests of various parties that are strong enough to make disputes between the government and traders not go well. As an urban regime, the revitalization of the Johar market was successful in the physical construction of the market building, but it has not succeeded in restoring the Johar Market economy. Its success is seen in the arrangement of the market area to be more beautiful, neat and orderly. However, what has not been achieved in this revitalization is an increase in the income of traders at Pasar Johar. In addition, in the implementation of the policy, various irregularities were committed by various parties."

"[Penelitian ini membahas mengenai evaluasi implementasi kebijakan revitalisasi kawasan Kota Tua di Jakarta. Jakarta sebagai ibukota negara memiliki suatu kawasan Kota Tua seluas ± 334 ha yang dulunya merupakan pusat kegiatan ekonomi dan pemerintahan pada tiga masa kekuasaan, dimulai dari masa pemerintahan Pangeran Jayakarta, masa penjajahan Portugis, dan masa penjajahan Belanda. Tingginya nilaibudaya dan sejarah di kawasan tersebut merupakan potensi pariwisata yang baik, oleh karena itu pemerintah DKI Jakarta membuat kebijakan revitalisasi Kota Tua Jakarta yang dimulai sejak masa pemerintahan Gubernur Ali Sadikin pada tahun 1970. Namun proses revitalisasi kawasan tersebut dianggap masih belum memenuhi harapan. Pada tahun 2014 revitalisasi dicanangkan kembali dengan diterbitkannya Peraturan Gubernur no. 36 tahun 2014 tentang Rencana Induk Kota Tua Jakarta dandiselenggarakan kerjasama pemerintah-swasta melalui konsorsium JOTRC (Jakarta Old Town Revitalization Corp.). Tujuan dilaksanakannya penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi implementasi kebijakan revitalisasi kawasan Kota Tua Jakarta, dan menganalisis evaluasi implementasi kebijakan revitalisasi kawasan tersebut. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan post-positivis. Penelitian ini menghasilkan temuan yaitu implementasi kebijakan revitalisasi Kota Tua Jakarta masih belum efektif. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi belum efektifnya kebijakan revitalisasi Kota Tua Jakarta antara lain karena status kepemilikan bangunan-bangunan yang beragam antara pribadi, swasta/BUMN, dan Pemprov DKI Jakarta. Sedikitnya bangunan yang dimiliki Pemprov DKI Jakarta membuat proses revitalisasi terhambat, ditambah lagi belum adanya leading sector dan minimnya SDM maupun anggaran dari Unit Pengelola Kawasan (UPK) Kota Tua Jakarta sebagai pengelola kawasantersebut. Namun dilakukannya kerjasama pemerintah-swasta dengan keberadaan konsorsium JOTRC merupakan upaya yang baik dalam melakukan percepatan pembangunan di kawasan Kota Tua. Beberapa saran yang diajukan dalam penelitian antara lain implementasi badan otorita yang mengelola kawasan Kota Tua Jakarta secepatnya sebagaimana diamanatkan dalam Pergub DKI Jakarta no. 36 tahun 2014, pelibatan ahli cagar budaya dalam setiap pemugaran di kawasan Kota Tua sehingga tidak merusak atau menghilangkan nilai historis bangunan tersebut, serta pelibatan masyarakat lokal dalam pembangunan kawasan Kota Tua.

---

This research discusses the evaluation of policy implementation of the revitalization of the Old Town area in Jakarta. Jakarta as the capital of the country has an Old Town area of ± 334 ha which was once the center of economic activity and government for three reigns, starting from the reign of Prince Jayakarta, the Portuguese colonial period, and the Dutch colonial period. The high value of the culture and history of the region is a potential for tourism, therefore, the local government make the revitalization of Jakarta old town area, which began during the reign of Governor Ali Sadikin in 1970. However, the process of revitalization of the area still has not met expectations. In 2014 revitalization proclaimed back with the issuance of the Peraturan Gubernur no. 36 tahun 2014 tentang Rencana Induk Kota Tua and held public-private partnership through a consortium called JOTRC (Jakarta Old Town Revitalization Corp.). The objective of this research is to analyze the factors that influence policy implementation of revitalization of the old city area, and analyzing the evaluation of policy implementation of revitalization of the region. The method used in this research is qualitative method with post-positivist approach. Results of this of this research is that the implementation of the Jakarta Old Town revitalization policies is still ineffective. Factors that influence the implementation of the policy is because of the ownership status of the buildings which vary between personal, private/state-owned enterprise, and local government plus the absence of leading sector and the lack of human resources and the budget of the Unit Pengelola Kawasan (UPK) Kota Tua as the area manager. But the establishment of JOTRC as a form of publicprivate partnership for revitalization of Jakarta old town is a good effort to accelerate the development in that area. Some suggestions from this research are immediate implementation of autonomous body that manages the old city area as mandated in Pergub no. 36 tahun 2014, the involvement of cultural heritage experts in development of the Old City area so as not to damage the historical value of the building, and empowerment of local communities. This research discusses the evaluation of policy implementation of the revitalization of the Old Town area in Jakarta. Jakarta as the capital of the country has an Old Town area of ± 334 ha which was once the center of economic activity and government for three reigns, starting from the reign of Prince Jayakarta, the Portuguese colonial period, and the Dutch colonial period. The high value of the culture and history of the region is a potential for tourism, therefore, the local government make the revitalization of Jakarta old town area, which began during the reign of Governor Ali

Sadikin in 1970. However, the process of revitalization of the area still has not met expectations. In 2014 revitalization proclaimed back with the issuance of the

Peraturan Gubernur no. 36 tahun 2014 tentang Rencana Induk Kota Tua and held public-private partnership through a consortium called JOTRC (Jakarta Old Town Revitalization Corp.). The objective of this research is to analyze the factors that influence policy implementation of revitalization of the old city area, and analyzing

the evaluation of policy implementation of revitalization of the region. The method used in this research is qualitative method with post-positivist approach. Results of this of this research is that the implementation of the Jakarta Old Town revitalization policies is still ineffective. Factors that influence the implementation of the policy is because of the ownership status of the buildings which vary between personal, private/state-owned enterprise, and local government; plus the absence of leading sector and the lack of human resources and the budget of the Unit Pengelola Kawasan (UPK) Kota Tua as the area manager. But the establishment of JOTRC as a form of publicprivate partnership for revitalization of Jakarta old town is a good effort to accelerate the development in that area. Some suggestions from this research are immediate implementation of autonomous body that manages the old city area as mandated in Pergub no. 36 tahun 2014, the involvement of cultural heritage experts in development of the Old City area so as not to damage the historical value of the building, and empowerment of local communities.;This research discusses the evaluation of policy implementation of the revitalization

of the Old Town area in Jakarta. Jakarta as the capital of the country has an Old Town

area of ± 334 ha which was once the center of economic activity and government for

three reigns, starting from the reign of Prince Jayakarta, the Portuguese colonial

period, and the Dutch colonial period. The high value of the culture and history of the

region is a potential for tourism, therefore, the local government make the

revitalization of Jakarta old town area, which began during the reign of Governor Ali

Sadikin in 1970. However, the process of revitalization of the area still has not met

expectations. In 2014 revitalization proclaimed back with the issuance of the

Peraturan Gubernur no. 36 tahun 2014 tentang Rencana Induk Kota Tua and held

public-private partnership through a consortium called JOTRC (Jakarta Old Town

Revitalization Corp.). The objective of this research is to analyze the factors that

influence policy implementation of revitalization of the old city area, and analyzing

the evaluation of policy implementation of revitalization of the region. The method

used in this research is qualitative method with post-positivist approach. Results of

this of this research is that the implementation of the Jakarta Old Town revitalization

policies is still ineffective. Factors that influence the implementation of the policy is

because of the ownership status of the buildings which vary between personal, private

/state-owned enterprise, and local government; plus the absence of leading sector and

the lack of human resources and the budget of the Unit Pengelola Kawasan (UPK)

Kota Tua as the area manager. But the establishment of JOTRC as a form of publicprivate

partnership for revitalization of Jakarta old town is a good effort to accelerate

the development in that area. Some suggestions from this research are immediate

implementation of autonomous body that manages the old city area as mandated in

Pergub no. 36 tahun 2014, the involvement of cultural heritage experts in

development of the Old City area so as not to damage the historical value of the

building, and empowerment of local communities., This research discusses the evaluation of policy implementation of the revitalization

of the Old Town area in Jakarta. Jakarta as the capital of the country has an Old Town

area of ± 334 ha which was once the center of economic activity and government for

three reigns, starting from the reign of Prince Jayakarta, the Portuguese colonial

period, and the Dutch colonial period. The high value of the culture and history of the

region is a potential for tourism, therefore, the local government make the

revitalization of Jakarta old town area, which began during the reign of Governor Ali

Sadikin in 1970. However, the process of revitalization of the area still has not met

expectations. In 2014 revitalization proclaimed back with the issuance of the

Peraturan Gubernur no. 36 tahun 2014 tentang Rencana Induk Kota Tua and held

public-private partnership through a consortium called JOTRC (Jakarta Old Town

Revitalization Corp.). The objective of this research is to analyze the factors that

influence policy implementation of revitalization of the old city area, and analyzing

the evaluation of policy implementation of revitalization of the region. The method

used in this research is qualitative method with post-positivist approach. Results of

this of this research is that the implementation of the Jakarta Old Town revitalization

policies is still ineffective. Factors that influence the implementation of the policy is

because of the ownership status of the buildings which vary between personal, private

/state-owned enterprise, and local government; plus the absence of leading sector and

the lack of human resources and the budget of the Unit Pengelola Kawasan (UPK)

Kota Tua as the area manager. But the establishment of JOTRC as a form of publicprivate

partnership for revitalization of Jakarta old town is a good effort to accelerate

the development in that area. Some suggestions from this research are immediate

implementation of autonomous body that manages the old city area as mandated in

Pergub no. 36 tahun 2014, the involvement of cultural heritage experts in

development of the Old City area so as not to damage the historical value of the

building, and empowerment of local communities.]"

"Memori kolektif dapat dipertahankan melalui pelestarian bangunan cagar budaya, karena sebenarnya memori kolektif dapat terekam pada objek arsitektural. Pelestarian sejarah, bentuk arsitektur, dan kenangan yang terkait dengan bangunan dan masyarakat dianggap perlu, agar semua aspek tersebut dapat diwariskan kepada generasi berikutnya. Ketika sebuah bangunan cagar budaya mengalami kerusakan fisik, maka akan muncul fenomena hilangnya keterkaitan antara bangunan tersebut dengan ingatan kolektif masyarakat terhadap bangunan tersebut. Fenomena ini merupakan contoh teror terhadap sebuah bangunan. Tulisan ini membahas teror dalam konteks yang sedikit berbeda, terutama ketika sebuah bangunan bersejarah dihancurkan secara fisik dan memori bangunan tersebut diserang. Tujuan dari tulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui apakah ada hubungan antara perusakan bangunan cagar budaya dengan memori kolektif masyarakat.Studi kasus yang dikaji dalam tugas akhir ini adalah Pasar Johar Semarang. Sebagai bangunan cagar budaya, Pasar Johar Semarang merupakan salah satu bangunan yang mengalami beberapa kali perubahan dan bencana, seperti peristiwa kebakaran yang terjadi pada tahun 2015. Teori yang digunakan sebagai dasar adalah teori yang berkaitan dengan memori kolektif dan teror dalam arsitektur. Pasar Johar mengalami fenomena teror terhadap keberlangsungan bangunan bersejarah di Indonesia, karena memori pasar ini perlahan terhapus melalui perubahan fisik dan mengalami peristiwa kebakaran, sehingga menyebabkan hilang ingatan kolektif masyarakat Pasar Johar.Collective memory can be maintained through the preservation of cultural heritage buildings, because actually collective memory can be recorded on architectural objects. Preservation of history, architectural forms, and memories associated with buildings and society is considered necessary, so that all these aspects can be passed on to the next generation. When a cultural heritage building is physically damaged, there will be a phenomenon of loss of connection between the building and the collective memory of the community towards the building. This phenomenon is an example of terror against a building. This paper discusses terror in a slightly different context, especially when a historic building is physically destroyed and the memory of the building is attacked. The purpose of this paper is to find out whether there is a relationship between the destruction of cultural heritage buildings and the collective memory of the community.The case study studied in this final project is Pasar Johar Semarang. As a cultural heritage building, Pasar Johar Semarang is one of the buildings that has experienced several changes and disasters, such as the fire incident that occurred in 2015. The theory used as the basis is a theory related to collective memory and terror in architecture. Pasar Johar is experiencing a terror phenomenon against the sustainability of historical buildings in Indonesia, because the memory of this market is slowly being erased through physical changes and experiencing fire events, causing the collective memory of the Pasar Johar community to be lost."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat hubungan antara pelaksanaan program revitalisasi pasar dengan stabilisasi harga komoditas pangan. Tahun 2015, pemerintah memulai program Revitalisasi/Pembangunan Baru Pasar Rakyat. Salah satu prinsip revitalisasi dalam hal ekonomi sebagai instrumen menstabilkan harga bahan kebutuhan pokok (pangan) yang beredar di masyarakat. Pelaksanaan revitalisasi pasar rakyat berbeda-beda di tiap daerah di Indonesia. Oleh karena itu, perlu melihat berapa anggaran yang dikeluarkan di daerah tersebut, kepadatan penduduk, total pasar serta pasar yang direvitalisasi dan juga pendapatan per kapita. Penelitian ini menggunakan data harga 10 komoditas dari Pusat Informasi Harga Pangan Strategis (PIHPS) Nasional dan anggaran revitalisasi pasar yang diperoleh dari Kementerian Perdagangan. Menggunakan metode data panel dari pertumbuhan perubahan harga, koefisien variasi harga, dan rata-rata harga pada tingkat level dari 10 komoditi pangan per bulan dari tahun 2016-2019 dari 95 kabupaten/kota di Indonesia. Di estimasi dengan model Random Effect. Studi ini membuktikan bahwa pelaksanaan revitalisasi/pembangunan baru pasar rakyat berkorelasi dengan stabilitas harga komoditas pangan, namun di sisi lain juga meningkatkan harga rata-rata di tingkat level.

---

This study aims to look at the relationship between the implementation of the market revitalization program and the stabilization of food commodity prices. In 2015, the government started a Revitalization/New Market Development program for the Peoples Market. One of the principles of revitalization in terms of the economy as an instrument is to stabilize the prices of basic needs (food) circulating in the community. The revitalization of peoples markets varies in each region in Indonesia. Therefore, it is necessary to look at how much the budget is spent in the area, population density, total market and revitalized market and income per capita. This study uses 10 commodity price data from the National Strategic Food Price Information Center (PIHPS) and market revitalization budget obtained from the Ministry of Trade. Using the panel data method of growth in price changes, coefficient of price variation, and average prices at the level of 10 food commodities per month from 2016-2019 from 95 districts/cities in Indonesia. Estimated by the Random Effect model. This study proves that the implementation of revitalization/new development of peoples markets correlated with the stability of food commodity prices, but on the other hand also increased average prices at the level."

"ABSTRAKKota Lama Semarang adalah kawasan historis yang penuh dengan nilai sejarah, arsitektur, budaya dengan bangunan-banagunan era kolonial yang masih berdiri seja era kolonial. Dalam perkembangannya, kawasan ini telah mengalami perubahan citra dari kota yang terkesan hidup menjadi kota yang terksesan mati pada era setelah kemerdekaan. Lalu kawasan ini mulai terasa mulai hidup lagi sejak sekitar tahun 2010. Perubahan citra disebabkan terjadinya kekosongan serta kurangnya kesadaran masyarakat dan pemerintah untuk mengonservasikannya. Namun pada tahun 2010 kawasan ini mulai diperhatikan dengan dipugarnya beberapa bangunan seperti Gereja Blenduk. Langkah selanjutnya yang dibutuhkan yaitu adalah untuk melestarikan kawasan ini dari aspek nonfisiknya. Salah satu pendekatannya yaitu melalui studi simbolisme ruang urban. Beberapa cara untuk menganalisis simbolisme ruang urban yaitu dengan menganalisis perkembangan kota lama semarang melalui aspek sejarah, lalu menganalisis karakteristik aspek-aspek fisik ruang urbannya, dan menganalisis kedua poin tersebut dengan cara menganalisis tingkatan pemaknaan yang terjadi di sana. Diharapkan, pada akhirnya masyarakat dan pemerintah semarang dapat mengetahui bahwa dengan mengetahui urban simbolisme kota lama semarang dapat menjadikan kota lama semarang sebagai kawasan dengan yang dapat disadari dan mudah diterima oleh manusianya sehingga tidak terkesan mati lagi dan dapat bersaing dengan kawasan lainnya.

---

ABSTRACT<>br>The Old City of Semarang is a historical area full of historical, architectural, cultural values with colonial era buildings still standing there until nowadays. In its development, the district has undergone a change of image from a city that impressed live into a deadly city in the post independence era. Then the district began to feel started to live again since around the year 2010. Image changes due to the vacancy of the buildings and lack of public awareness and the government to conserve it. But in 2010 this area began to be noticed by conserving some buildings such as Blenduk Church. The next step required is to preserve this area from its nonphysical aspect. One approach is through the study of urban space symbolism. Some ways to analyze the symbolism of urban space is to analyze the development of the old city through the aspect of history, then analyze the characteristics of the physical aspects of urban space and analyze those two points by analyzing the level of meaning that occurred there. Hopefully, by understanding the urban symbolism, Old City Semarang will be conserved better and can be a district which can be perceived, remembered and accepted by people so that does not seem dead again and can compete with anther region. "

"Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism addresses major questions in distributive politics. Why is it acceptable for parties to try to win elections by promising to make certain groups of people better off, but unacceptable - and illegal - to pay people for their votes? Why do parties often lavish benefits on loyal voters, whose support they can count on anyway, rather than on responsive swing voters? Why is vote buying and machine politics common in today's developing democracies but a thing of the past in most of today's advanced democracies? This book develops a theory of broker-mediated distribution to answer these questions, testing the theory with research from four developing democracies, and reviews a rich secondary literature on countries in all world regions. The authors deploy normative theory to evaluate whether clientelism, pork-barrel politics, and other non-programmatic distributive strategies can be justified on the grounds that they promote efficiency, redistribution, or voter participation."