Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The infrastructure of the transportation system plays an important and strategic part in the development of a country and serves to support economic progress by enabling the mobility of citizens and the distribution of goods from one region to another. However, communities have unequal access to the system and there are gaps in the regional infrastructure in Indonesia, leading to the requirement for a mapping of all 33 provincial capitals. In this study, we reviewed provisions for road, sea, air, and rail travel. The mapping result is expected to determine the pattern and the prioritization needed for future infrastructure development. A literature review was performed to establish assessment indicators for the mapping. The weighting of each indicator was based on a survey of stakeholders in transportation sectors, which was then analyzed using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. After weighting was completed, the infrastructure of each provincial capital was assessed to determine ratings from the highest to the lowest rank. Jakarta, Medan, Bandung, Surabaya, and Semarang obtained the highest rankings, while Manokwari, Serang, Mamuju, Ternate, and Palangkaraya were at the bottom. This result shows that provincial capitals in western Indonesia had better assessment results than those in the east. Therefore, improvements to the transportation infrastructure of the latter cities should be prioritized."

"The infrastructure of the transportation system plays an important and strategic part in the development of a country and serves to support economic progress by enabling the mobility of citizens and the distribution of goods from one region to another. However, communities have unequal access to the system and there are gaps in the regional infrastructure in Indonesia, leading to the requirement for a mapping of all 33 provincial capitals. In this study, we reviewed provisions for road, sea, air, and rail travel. The mapping result is expected to determine the pattern and the prioritization needed for future infrastructure development. A literature review was performed to establish assessment indicators for the mapping. The weighting of each indicator was based on a survey of stakeholders in transportation sectors, which was then analyzed using the Analytical Hierarchy Process. After weighting was completed, the infrastructure of each provincial capital was assessed to determine ratings from the highest to the lowest rank. Jakarta, Medan, Bandung, Surabaya, and Semarang obtained the highest rankings, while Manokwari, Serang, Mamuju, Ternate, and Palangkaraya were at the bottom. This result shows that provincial capitals in western Indonesia had better assessment results than those in the east. Therefore, improvements to the transportation infrastructure of the latter cities should be prioritized."

"Indonesia sangat berpotensi untuk memimpin pasar ASEAN. Namun hal tersebut terhambat oleh kondisi infrastruktur yang belum memadai terutama pada sektor transportasi. Untuk mengatasi kendala infrastruktur tersebut, CSID bekerja sama dengan Saatnyadidengar.org, melakukan survey online yang disebar ke seluruh wilayah Indonesia. Survey tersebut berisi pendapat masyarakat mengenai sektor infrastruktur mana yang menjadi prioritas pembangunan, serta permasalahan dan usulan solusinya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi permasalahan infrastruktur transportasi dan solusinya berdasarkan hasil survey online tersebut. Penelitian dilakukan dengan metode analisis konten terhadap jawaban masyarakat. Hasilnya, kemacetan masih menjadi permasalahan utama, disusul dengan kurangnya tingkat keamanan transportasi, dan kurangnya akses penghubung antar daerah.

---

Indonesia has a huge potential to lead ASEAN market. But it is constrained by inadequate infrastructure condition, especially in transport sector. To overcome the infrastructure constraints, CSID cooperate with Saatnyadidengar.org, conduct an online survey that was distributed to all region of Indonesia. The survey shows public opinion about the infrastructure development priorities, as well as the problems and the proposed solutions. This research aims to identify the problems of transport infrastructure and solutions based on the results of the online survey. This study uses content analysis method to determine the problems of transport infrastructure and solutions. The result is traffic congestion remains a major issue, followed by the lack of transport safety level, and lack of access to the inter-regional."

"Pembangunan infrastruktur sangat penting dalam pembangunan negara. Di Indonesia, kemajuan pesat tekanan urbanisasi untuk peningkatan jumlah transportasi untuk memenuhi kebutuhan masyarakat. Namun, transportasi modern harus dikembangkan secara berkelanjutan untuk memastikan kesejahteraan dalam jangka panjang. Penelitian ini ditulis untuk menyelidiki skema pendanaan alternatif yang dapat diimplementasikan di Karawang, mengidentifikasi permintaan dan kondisi kritis mdash, untuk indikator transportasi berkelanjutan mdash; diminta oleh warga Karawang, serta pengukuran keberlanjutan perkotaan di Karawang sesudahnya. Metode survei kuesioner digunakan di mana ia diproses menggunakan kuantifikasi, di mana ia diproses menggunakan metode penilaian Skala Likert dan tes Mann-Whitney U untuk analisis lebih lanjut. Dari analisis, ditarik kesimpulan. Skema pendanaan alternatif dengan pembiayaan kreatif melalui pengembangan infrastruktur berbasis masyarakat dapat digunakan, di mana ia dapat mengakomodasi proyek infrastruktur skala kecil berkelanjutan yang bermanfaat. Selain itu, empat mata pelajaran utama mdash; Keselamatan, Keamanan, Kenyamanan, dan Layanan Handal mdash, adalah tuntutan dan kebutuhan kritis untuk pengembangan transportasi di Karawang. Selain itu, Karawang hanya menggaruk permukaan pada subjek metrik keberlanjutan perkotaan untuk tindakan berkelanjutan, oleh karena itu elaborasi lebih lanjut dari set metrik untuk kontrol dan pengawasan pembangunan berkelanjutan di bawah lembaga yang sah perlu dikembangkan sesuai.

---

Infrastructure development is essential in a country rsquo s development. In Indonesia, the rapid progress of urbanization pressures for increased amount of transportation to fulfill society rsquo s needs. However, modern transportation must be developed sustainably to ensure wellbeing in the long term. This research is written to investigate alternative funding schemes that can be implemented in Karawang, identify critical demands and conditions mdash to sustainable transportation indicators mdash requested by the Karawang citizens, as well as the measurement of urban sustainability in Karawang afterwards. A questionnaire survey method was employed in which it was processed using quantification, where it was processed using Likert Scale scoring method and Mann Whitney U test for further analysis.

From the analysis, a conclusion was drawn. An alternative funding scheme by creative financing through a community based infrastructure development can be used, where it can accommodate useful sustainable small scaled infrastructure projects. Furthermore, four main subjects mdash Safety, Security, Comfort, and Reliable Service mdash were the critical demands and needs for transportation development in Karawang. Additionally, Karawang has only scratched the surface upon the subject of urban sustainability metrics for sustainable measures, therefore further elaboration of the set of metrics for sustainable development control and supervision under a lawful institution needs to be developed accordingly."

"Infrastruktur adalah salah satu sarana penunjang pembangunan. Sistem transportasi merupakan bagian penting dan stategis bagi pembangunan suatu negara dan merupakan sarana penunjang kemajuan ekonomi karena akan mendukung mobilitas penduduk dan mendistribusikan barang dari satu daerah ke daerah lain. Namun, adanya ketidakmerataan akses masyarakat dan kesenjangan pengembangan wilayah dalam bidang infrastruktur transportasi di Indonesia. Maka perlunya pemetaan infrastruktur transportasi pada Ibukota Provinsi di Indonesia diharapkan dapat menentukan pola pembangunan dan pembenahan infastruktur transportasi pada pembangunan masa mendatang. Metode penelitian yang dilakukan pada penelitian ini adalah studi literatur untuk menetapkan indikator penilaian pada pemetaan infrastruktur transportasi di Indonesia dan penyebaran 30 kuesioner pada stakeholder terkait untuk melakukan pembobotan pada setiap indikator dengan AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process) dengan perhitungan manual. Setelah mendapatkan pembobotan pada setiap indikator, dilakukan scoring atau penilaian pada setiap infrastruktur pada 33 Ibukota Provinsi di Indonesia dan didapatkan pemetaan infrastruktur transportasi pada 33 Ibukota Provinsi di Indonesiadari nilai tertinggi sampai terendah. Hasil yang didapatkan adalah pada kuadran I yaitu Kota Jakarta di posisi pertama, disusul oleh Kota Medan, Bandung, Surabaya, Semarang, Padang, Palembang dan Makassar. Pada kuadran II, Kota Yogyakarta berada pada posisi kesembilan diikuti oleh Kota Ambon, Pontianak, Denpasar, Banjarmasin, Mataram, Banda Aceh dan Samarinda. Pada kuadran III, Kota Jambi pada posisi ke-17 diikuti oleh Manado, Kendari, Bengkulu, Pangkal Pinang, Kupang, Pekanbaru dan Bandar Lampung. Pada kuadran IV, Kota Gorontalo berada pada posisi ke-25 diikuti oleh Jayapura, Tanjung Pinang, Palu, Manokwari, Serang, Mamuju, Ternate, Palangka Raya. Dibuktikan dari pemetaan infrastruktur transportasi ini sebagian besar kota-kota pada bagian barat Indonesia memperoleh penilaian yang lebih baik dari kota-kota di bagian timur Indonesia. Maka perlu adanya pembenahan infrastruktur transportasi pada kota-kota dengan nilai rendah yaitu sebagian besar berada pada kota-kota di bagian timur Indonesia.

---

Infrastructure is one of the definitions of supporting development. The transportation system is an important and strategic part of the development of economic progress of a country because it will support the mobility of people and to distribute goods from one place to another. However, There are the existence of inequality in access and gap in the sector of transportation infrastructure in Indonesia. Hence, the need for mapping of transportation infrastructure in the Capital of Provinces in Indonesia is expected to determine the pattern of development and improvement of future transportation infrastructure?s development.

Reasearch methodology for this research are study of literature to establish the indicators of mapping transport infrastructure in Indonesia and spread of 30 quetioners on the related stakeholders to get weight for each indicator with manual counting of AHP (Analytical Hierarchy Process). After weighting of each indicator, the next step is scoring the transport infrastructure components at 33 Capital of Provinces in Indonesia to get the results of mapping transportation infrastructure from the highest to lowest score.

The results on this reaseach are in quadrant I, the city of Jakarta in the first position, followed by the city of Medan, Bandung, Surabaya, Semarang, Padang, Palembang dan Makassar. In quadrant II, the city of Yogyakarta is at ninth position followed by the city of Ambon, Pontianak, Denpasar, Banjarmasin, Mataram, Banda Aceh dan Samarinda. In quadrant III, City of Jambi in the 17th position followed by Manado, Kendari, Bengkulu, Pangkal Pinang, Kupang, Pekanbaru dan Bandar Lampung. In quadrant IV, Kota Gorontalo are at the 25th position followed by Jayapura, Tanjung Pinang, Palu, Manokwari, Serang, Mamuju, Ternate, Palangka Raya.

Evidenced from the result of mapping of transport infrastructure is mostly cities in the western part of Indonesia get better scores than the cities in the eastern part of Indonesia. Hence the improvement of transport infrastructure is needed for the cities with low scores that are mostly located in the eastern part of Indonesia."

"This book presents selected papers from the International Symposium on Geotechnics for Transportation Infrastructure (ISGTI 2018). The research papers cover geotechnical interventions for the diverse fields of policy formulation, design, implementation, operation and management of the different modes of travel, namely road, air, rail and waterways. This book will be of interest to academic and industry researchers working in transportation geotechnics, as also to practicing engineers, policy makers, and civil agencies."

"[ABSTRAKSektor transportasi di Kota Kasongan saat ini menyumbangkan 53,33% dari total emisi CO2 yang dihasilkan. Pembangunan infrastruktur jalan yang terus berkembang justru berbanding terbalik dengan pengembangan transportasi sungai. Kondisi ini memperlihatkan strategi pengembangan sistem transportasi yang ada belum berkelanjutan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kriteria dan pilihan alternatif yang tepat dan tidak menimbulkan kerugian di masa yang akan datang bagi pengembangan sistem transportasi di Kota Kasongan. Metode analisis yang digunakan pada penelitian ini adalah metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) berdasarkan persepsi masyarakat, akademisi, dan pemerintah sebagai pemangku kepentingan. Penelitian ini memperlihatkan alternatif yang paling tepat adalah optimalisasi sistem transportasi yang terpadu antara transportasi darat dan sungai dengan tingkat keamanan dan kenyamanan sebagai kriteria yang paling penting. Implementasi alternatif tersebut diwujudkan melalui program pengembangan lokasi transit di Kota Kasongan. Program ini memberikan rasa aman dan nyaman sebagai keuntungan sosial, memberikan aksesibilitas dan mobilitas yang lebih baik sebagai keuntungan ekonomi, dan memberikan keuntungan dari aspek lingkungan karena dapat mereduksi emisi CO2.

---

ABSTRACTTransportation sector in Kasongan City currently contributes about 53.33% of the total CO2 emissions produced per year. Construction of road infrastructure is continues to grow but there is no activities to improve river transportation. This situation shows that transport systems development strategy not linked each other and far from there environmentally friendly and unsustainable. This study aimed to analyze the criteria and choose the appropriate alternatives for the transportation systems development in the Kasongan City. The analytical method used Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) based on the community, academia, and government perception. This research shows that the most appropriate alternatives is to optimize the integrated transport systems between land and river transport modes with safety and amenities as the most important criteria. Implementation of the strategy is realized through integrated transit locations program development surrounding pier territories in Kasongan City, because it can increase the use of public transport. This program ensure safety and comfortability as social advantage, providing better accessibility and mobility as economic benefit, and this program could reduce CO2 emission., Transportation sector in Kasongan City currently contributes about 53.33% of the total CO2 emissions produced per year. Construction of road infrastructure is continues to grow but there is no activities to improve river transportation. This situation shows that transport systems development strategy not linked each other and far from there environmentally friendly and unsustainable. This study aimed to analyze the criteria and choose the appropriate alternatives for the transportation systems development in the Kasongan City. The analytical method used Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) based on the community, academia, and government perception. This research shows that the most appropriate alternatives is to optimize the integrated transport systems between land and river transport modes with safety and amenities as the most important criteria. Implementation of the strategy is realized through integrated transit locations program development surrounding pier territories in Kasongan City, because it can increase the use of public transport. This program ensure safety and comfortability as social advantage, providing better accessibility and mobility as economic benefit, and this program could reduce CO2 emission.]"

"Skripsi disusun dengan tujuan untuk menganalisis dampak infrastruktur transportasi jalan, kereta, dan udara terhadap output regional serta dampak infrastruktur transportasi jalan dan kereta terhadap migrasi permanen di Pulau Jawa dengan menggunakan data panel 2001 – 2017. Metode penelitian menggunakan alat analisis ekonometrika yaitu: model pertama untuk mengetahui dampak infrastruktur transportasi jalan, kereta, dan udara terhadap output regional dan model kedua untuk mengetahui dampak infrastruktur transportasi jalan dan kereta terhadap migrasi permanen. Dari hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa density road dan jumlah penumpang yang bermobilisasi menggunakan kereta dan pesawat memiliki korelasi positif terhadap PDRB per kapita. Signifikansi pengaruh density road dan jumlah penumpang kereta terhadap PDRB per kapita bahkan tergolong kuat. Untuk variabel pendukung, yang memiliki korelasi positif dengan tingkat signifikansi pengaruh yang kuat terhadap PDRB per kapita adalah rasio pekerja yang memiliki pendidikan tinggi. Sebaliknya jumlah kargo kereta dan pesawat dalam penelitian ini justru memiliki korelasi negatif terhadap besaran PDRB per kapita dengan signifikansi yang lemah. Nampaknya pergerakan barang via pesawat maupun kereta tidak terlalu berdampak terhadap pengembangan perekonomian. Selain itu, pada model kedua ditemukan fakta bahwa rasio pengembangan infrastruktur jalan daerah asal dengan daerah tujuan memiliki korelasi positif terhadap jumlah migrasi. Hal ini bisa terjadi karena pengembangan jalan di suatu daerah bisa saja mendorong masyarakat untuk bepergian ke daerah lain.

---

The thesis was prepared with the aim of analyzing the impact of road, rail and air transport infrastructure on regional output and the impact of road and rail transportation infrastructure on permanent migration in Java region using the 2001 - 2017 panel data. The research method constructs two models: the first model wants to determine the impact of road, rail and air transport infrastructure on regional output and the second model wants to know the impact of road and rail transportation infrastructure on permanent migration. This research shows that the density road rate, total airline passangers, and total train passangers have positive correlation on GDRP per capita where the strong level of significance are found on the correlation between density road on GDRP per capita and train passangers on GDRP per capita. Moreover, the compliment variable, such as highschooled labour rate also playing a significance role in enhancing the GDRP per capita growth. In other way, this research also found that the amount of train or plane cargo are not having any good significance on boosting the regional output. Maybe the people movement are more impactful than the goods movement in order to increasing the productivity on regional level. Moreover, the second model in this research also found out that the road infrastructure ratio between the origin and destination area is having a positive correlation to increase the number of migration. This can happen because road development in one area can encourage people to travel to other areas."

"ABSTRACTInfrastruktur transportasi baik transportasi darat, laut maupun udara merupakan sarana yang sangat berperan dalam mendukung pertumbuhan ekonomi dan wilayah. Dalam dinamika perkembangan infrastruktur transportasi, Indonesia masih harus belajar dari negara lain di dunia dalam penataan infrastruktur transportasi performa terbaik. Dalam penelitian ini, penulis menggunakan model analisis komparatif sebagai bentuk identifikasi indikator dan parameter benchmark infrastruktur transportasi brpengaruh terhadap kemajuan Kota Jakarta, Kota Bangkok dan Kota Wina. Dengan metode AHP, kemudian dilakukan scoring pada setiap sektor infrastruktur dan didapatkan poin penilaian tertinggi dari indikator pelayanan dan parameter kondisi jalan performa baik, Transit Oriented Development, infrastruktur prasarana bandara dan infrastruktur prasarana pelabuhan.Kata Kunci : benchmark, infrastruktur transportasi, pelayanan, mobilitas, berkelanjutan.

---

ABSTRACTTransport infrastructure by land, sea and air is a tool in supporting economic and region growth. In the dynamic development of transport infrastructure, Indonesia still has to learn from other countries for the best performance of the transport infrastructure. In this study, the author used a comparative analysis as a form of identifying best benchmark indicator and parameters of the transport infrastructure in Jakarta, Bangkok dan Vienna. Weighting of each infrastructure sectors with AHP methodology results in the highest score for indicators of performance with the parameters of good condition road, Transit Oriented Development, airport infrastructure and port infrastructure.Keywords benchmark, transport infrastructure, service, mobility, sustainability."