Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Perkembangan teknologi Artificial Intelligence Deepfake, menimbulkan ancaman terhadap sistem peradilan pidana, khususnya dalam pembuktian. Kemampuan Deepfake memanipulasi gambar atau video dapat mengelabui kemampuan manusia untuk mengenali bentuk yang asli ataupun yang telah dimanipulasi. Meskipun Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik telah mengalami perubahan kedua pada tahun 2024, regulasi ini belum secara spesifik mengatur tentang Deepfake. Di lain sisi European Union telah membentuk regulasi terkait Artificial Intelligence dan pencegahan penyalahgunaan Deepfake dalam Artificial Intelligence Act. Penelitian ini menganalisis (1) perlindungan hukum terhadap penyalahgunaan Deepfake di Indonesia menurut UU ITE, dan (2) ancaman penyalahgunaan Deepfake dalam proses pembuktian di sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Penelitian ini membandingkan UU ITE dan AIA untuk menemukan bentuk perlindungan yang efektif terhadap ancaman tersebut. Melalui penelitian doktrinal dan pendekatan kualitatif, ditemukan bahwa: Pertama, UU ITE memberikan perlindungan hukum secara represif terhadap penyalahgunaan Deepfake. Kedua, diperlukan perlindungan hukum preventif seperti yang diatur dalam AIA. Ketiga, ketidakjelasan definisi Deepfake menyebabkan ketidakpastian hukum sehingga manipulasi Deepfake masih dapat dianggap sebagai alat bukti elektronik yang sah menurut UU ITE. Keempat, ancaman penyalahgunaan Deepfake dalam pembuktian mencakup perlunya validasi otentisitas bukti digital dan penanganan tuduhan bukti palsu di pengadilan.

---

The development of Artificial Intelligence Deepfake technology poses a threat to the criminal justice system, particularly in the area of evidence. Deepfake's ability to manipulate images or videos can deceive humans into believing altered content is genuine. Although the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (UU ITE) was amended for the second time in 2024, it does not specifically address Deepfake technology. In contrast, the European Union has established regulations on Artificial Intelligence and the prevention of Deepfake misuse in the Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA). This study analyzes (1) the legal protection against Deepfake misuse in Indonesia according to UU ITE, and (2) the threat of Deepfake misuse in the evidence process within the Indonesian criminal justice system. This study compares UU ITE and AIA to identify effective protective measures against these threats. Through doctrinal research and a qualitative approach, the findings are as follows: First, UU ITE provides repressive legal protection against Deepfake misuse. Second, preventive legal protection, as outlined in the AIA, is necessary. Third, the lack of a clear definition of Deepfake results in legal uncertainty, allowing Deepfake manipulations to be considered valid electronic evidence under UU ITE. Fourth, the threat of Deepfake misuse in evidence includes the need for authenticity validation of digital evidence and handling allegations of falsified digital evidence in court."

"Terdapat tiga obyek yang ditelaah dalam kajian ini, yaitu: pertama, konvergensi antara hukum dan Teknologi Informasi, ketiga, implikasi Teknologi lnformasi terhadap hukum kontrak dan respon hukum terhadap lmplikasi tersebut, dan, ketiga, pembentukan Undang-Undang lnformasi dan Transaksi Elektronik Indonesia. Ketiga obyek kajian tersebut dikelompokkan dalam dua wilayah besar kajian, yaitu: pertama, wilayah kajian Sosiologi Hukum, yang mempersenyawakan antara hukum, perubahan sosial dan Teknologi lnformasi; dan, kedua, wilayah kajian hukum normatif yang mengkaji pembentukan peraturan perundang-undang dan masalah kontraktual casa kontrak elektronik.Unluk mengkaji kedua wilayah kajian tersebut secara komprehensif digunakan pendekatan interdisipliner yaitu mengharmonisasikan antara metode penelitian Sosiologi Hukum (socio-legal research) dan hukum normatif. Perspektif sosiologi Hukum yang diterapkan adalah teori Sosiologi Hukum yang mencoba mengkonvergensikan antara hukum dan parubahan sosial antara lain bid bidang perkembangan teknologi (Rose dm Ogbum), Teori Soft Technological Dterminism (Kenichi Ohmae), Teori Konstruksi Sosial (Thomas Kuhn dan Jeremy Bentham) dan Cibernetics teory (Wiener dan Bigallow). Sedangkan perspeklif ilmu hukum yang digunakan adalah Teori perundang-undangan, Teori Jenjang Norma Hukum, Teori Politik Hukum dan wacana teoretis tentang kontrak. Selain itu, masalah yang dikaji juga didekati melalui tiga pendekatan, yaitu statutory approach, conseptual approach dan comparative approach."

"Banking crime phenomenon recently occurs by vreaking the Automatic Teller Machine as conducted by the criminal has created unsafe feeling amongst community specially for bank's customer. There are some typical methods used in the crime operation such as using skimmer, cloning credit card, cloning ATM card and stealing Personal Identification Number by hidden-camera and card reader installing on the machine. This type of electronic transaction crimes (e-banking) has been technically improved along with the highly development of technology in electronic banking transaction. The Act No. 11 year of 2008 regarding Information and Electronic Transaction has been attempted to cover and anticipate the accurrence of electronic crime. In practice, however, there is sort of constraint in implementing the law since such articles have called as grey are or having different meaning in perception of legal institution, so there requirement for another legal remedy in form of legal interpretation. In case the Judge unwilling to search for another legal interpretation but prefers to apply streams of legism then sociologically the law would not catch the highly e-banking crime. "