Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Imunitas kelompok lewat vaksinasi menjadi upaya utama dalam menangani Covid-19, namun survey menemukan bahwa beberapa anggota masyarakat masih ragu untuk divaksin. Penelitian ini berfokus kepada latar belakang psikologis terhadap perilaku vaksinasi dewasa muda (18-25 tahun) di Jabodetabek. Analisis regresi linear berganda dilakukan untuk menganalisis 214 kuesioner daring dan ditemukan bahwa terdapat pengaruh signifikan dari 5C Psychological Antecedents of Vaccination terhadap perilaku vaksinasi Covid-19, F(5, 208) = 19,571, p < 0,01, R² = 0,320, dimana confidence dan collective responsibility menjadi prediktor signifikan. Hasil penelitian mengimplikasikan pentingnya mengomunikasikan keterpercayaan vaksin dan tanggung jawab sosial dalam rangka meningkatkan penerimaan vaksin pada dewasa muda.

---

Herd immunity through vaccination has become the main effort on responding to the Covid-19 pandemic; however surveys found that several people are still vaccine hesitant. This research focuses on the psychological antecedents of the vaccination behavior of young adults (18-25 years old) in Jabodetabek. Multiple linear regression analysis was conducted to analyze 214 online questionnaires and the result indicates that 5C Psychological Antecedents of Vaccination has a significant effect on vaccination behavior, F(5, 208) = 19,571, p < 0,01, R² = 0,320, with confidence and collective responsibility as the significant predictor. The result implies the importance of communicating about the trustworthiness of vaccines and public social responsibility in order to increase young adults’ willingness to be vaccinated."

"Perilaku vaksinasi seseorang dapat dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor, diantaranya dapat berupa faktor psikologis yang beruhubungan dengan sikap dan pandangan seseorang terkait vaksin maupun penyakit yang dicegah oleh vaksin tersebut. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian kuantitatif, korelasional yang bertujuan untuk melihat pengaruh sikap terhadap vaksin dan persepsi risiko Covid-19 terhadap intensi untuk divaksin. Sebanyak 214 partisipan berusia 18-25 tahun berdomisili di Jabodetabek mengisi kuesioner penelitian. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa sebanyak 18,6% dari varians intensi untuk divaksin dapat dijelaskan oleh sikap terhadap vaksin dan persepsi risiko Covid-19. Sikap terhadap vaksin ditemukan memberikan pengaruh negatif yang signifikan dan persepsi risiko Covid-19 khususnya dimensi perceived likelihood of infection ditemukan memberikan pengaruh positif yang signifikan terhadap intensi untuk mendapatkan vaksin.

---

A person's vaccination behavior can be influenced by various factors, including psychological factors related to a person's attitudes and perceptions related to vaccines and the diseases that prevented by the vaccine. This research is a quantitative, correlational study that aims to see the influence of attitudes towards vaccines and perceived risk of Covid-19 on vaccination intention. A total of 214 participants aged 18-25 years domiciled in Jabodetabek filled out the research questionnaire. Results showed that 18.6% of the vaccination intention variance can be explained by attitudes towards vaccines and perceived risk of Covid-19. Attitudes towards vaccines and perceived risk of Covid-19, especially the perceived likelihood of infection dimension, were found to be a significant predctors of vaccination intention."

"Vaksinasi dan penggunaan antivirus remdesivir dan favipiravir merupakan strategi yang dapat digunakan untuk menekan pertumbuhan COVID-19. Namun penelitian tentang pengaruh vaksinasi terhadap efektivitas terapi antivirus pada pasien COVID-19 secara klinis masih terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh vaksinasi terhadap efektivitas terapi remdesivir dan favipiravir pada pasien terkonfirmasi COVID-19. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian observasional dengan desain kohort retrospektif dilakukan di rumah sakit Universitas Indonesia, Depok. Data diambil dari rekam medis RS periode Januari 2021 hingga Agustus 2022. Efektivitas terapi ditentukan dengan menilai kelompok sudah vaksin dan belum vaksin berdasarkan perbaikan kondisi klinis pasien, lama rawat inap, dan kematian pada pasien COVID-19. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa vaksinasi memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap perbaikan kondisi klinis, lama rawat inap, dan kematian (p < 0,05) pada pasien yang diberi terapi remdesivir dan telah divaksin dibandingkan dengan pasien yang belum divaksin. Pada pasien yang diberi terapi favipiravir vaksinasi tidak menunjukkan pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap perbaikan kondisi klinis, lama rawat inap, dan kematian pada pasien yang telah divaksin dibandingkan dengan pasien yang belum vaksin. Vaksinasi memiliki pengaruh yang baik terhadap efektivitas terapi remdesivir pada pasien COVID-19, yaitu dapat meningkatkan perbaikan kondisi klinis pasien kearah yang lebih baik, mengurangi lama rawat inap dan kematian. Namun tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap efektivitas terapi favipiravir.

---

Vaccination and the use of the antivirals remdesivir and favipiravir are strategies that can be used to suppress the growth of COVID-19. However, clinical research on the effect of vaccination on the effectiveness of antiviral therapy in COVID-19 patients is still limited. This study aims to analyze the effect of vaccination on the effectiveness of remdesivir and favipiravir therapy in patients with confirmed COVID-19. This study was an observational study with a retrospective cohort design conducted at Universitas Indonesia Hospital, Depok. Data were taken from medical records for the period from January 2021 to August 2022. The effectiveness of therapy was determined by assessing the vaccine and non-vaccine groups based on improvement in the patient's clinical condition, length of stay, and mortality in COVID-19 patients. The results of the analysis showed that vaccination had a significant effect on improving clinical condition, length of stay, and mortality (p <0.05) in patients who were given remdesivir therapy and vaccinated compared to patients who not vaccinated. In patients who were given favipiravir, the vaccination did not show a significant effect on improving clinical conditions, length of stay, and death in patients who had been vaccinated compared to patients who not vaccinated. Vaccination has a positive effect on the effectiveness of remdesivir therapy in COVID-19 patients, which can improve the patient's clinical condition, reducing length of stay and mortality. However, it does not have a significant effect on the effectiveness of favipiravir therapy."

"Beberapa upaya sudah dilakukan untuk memperlambat penularan COVID-19, dan menetap di rumah sudah terbukti merupakan salah satu tindakan pencegahan yang efektif. Akan tetapi masih banyak masyarakat Indonesia terutama dewasa muda yang tidak melakukan perilaku tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan theory of reasoned action untuk melihat bagaimana peran sikap dan norma subjektif terhadap intensi menetap di rumah selama pandemi COVID-19. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian korelasional pada mahasiswa dan karyawan berusia 18-25 tahun (M = 21,3, SD = 1,65) yang sedang melakukan pembelajaran jarak jauh atau work from home (N = 308). Mayoritas partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah perempuan yaitu sebanyak 53,2%. Penelitian ini memilih populasi dewasa muda karena memiliki kepatuhan akan tindakan preventif yang paling rendah dibandingkan kelompok usia lain (Jørgensen & Petersen, 2020). Hasil analisis multiple regression menemukan bahwa sikap (β = 0,49, p < 0,01) dan norma subjektif (β = 0,22, p < 0,01) berkorelasi secara positif dengan intensi menetap di rumah. Edukasi mengenai pentingnya menetap di rumah tidak hanya penting dilakukan kepada dewasa muda saja, tetapi juga kepada tokoh agama, orang tua, serta tokoh berpengaruh lainnya.

---

Several attempts have been made to slow the transmission of COVID-19, and staying at home has proven to be an effective preventive measure. However, there are still many Indonesian people especially young adults who do not practice this behavior. This study uses the theory of reasoned action to see how the role of attitude and subjective norm on the intention to stay at home during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study is a correlational study on students and employees aged 18-25 years (M = 21,3, SD = 1,65) who are doing distance learning or work from home (N = 308). The majority of participants in this study were women (53,2%). This study selected a population of young adults because they have the lowest obedience to preventive measures compared to other age groups (Jørgensen & Petersen, 2020). The results of multiple regression analysis found that attitude (β = 0,49, p < 0,01) and subjective norms (β = 0,22, p < 0,01) were positively correlated with the intention to stay at home. Education about the importance of staying at home is not only important for young adults, but also for religious leaders, parents, and other influential figures."

"Situasi yang penuh tekanan seperti COVID-19 memiliki dampak yang signifikan pada khususnya dewasa muda. Salah satu dampak peristiwa tersebut misal berupa meningkatnya psychological distress, yaitu keadaan subjektif nonklinis yang menimbulkan perasaan depresi dan kecemasan. Individu dengan strategi coping yang kurang baik lantas mengembangkan perilaku makan berlebihan yang disebabkan karena keadaan emosi negatifnya (emotional eating). Salah satu faktor yang dapat mengurangi perilaku emotional eating individu adalah mindfulness. Penelitian ini kemudian mengukur hubungan antara psychological distress dan emotional eating dengan menggunakan desain korelasional Pearson. Sementara itu, efek mindfulness terhadap hubungan antara psychological distress dan emotional eating diukur menggunakan analisis moderasi. Sampel didapatkan dengan menggunakan teknik convenience sampling pada dewasa muda di seluruh Indonesia. Alat ukur self-report digunakan pada masing-masing variabel yaitu psychological distress, emotional eating, dan mindfulness. Sebanyak 225 orang partisipan berpartisipasi pada penelitian berbasis daring dengan sukarela, dengan rentang usia partisipan terbanyak adalah 19-24 tahun (M = 22.75, SD = 3.739). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa psychological distress memiliki hubungan positif yang signifikan dengan emotional eating, meskipun tidak ditemukan peran moderasi mindfulness pada hubungan tersebut.

---

Stressful events such as the COVID-19 pandemic has significantly brought serious impact for young adults, one of them including the increasing psychological distress. Psychological distress is a non-clinical subjective state that causes feelings of depression and anxiety. Furthermore, individuals with poor coping strategies develop overating due to their negative emotional state (emotional eating). One of the factors that may reduce the emotional eating behavior is mindfulness. This study measures the relationship between psychological distress and emotional eating using the Pearson correlational design. On the other hand, the effect of mindfulness in the relationship between psychological distress and emotional eating is measured using moderation analysis. Samples are obtained from young adults in Indonesia using the convenience sampling technique. The data is then collected using a self-report method for each variable (e.g. psychological distress, emotional eating, mindfulness). A total of 225 participants have taken part in this online-based study voluntarily, mostly aged 19-24 year old (M = 22.75, SD = 3.739). The results show that psychological distress has a significant positive relationship with emotional eating, although it is discovered that there is no moderating effect of mindfulness in the said association."

"Penelitian ini meneliti hubungan antara adverse childhood experiences (ACE) dan perilaku promosi kesehatan pada mahasiswa Jabodetabek di masa pandemi Covid-19. Perilaku promosi kesehatan adalah berbagai tindakan yang secara sadar dilakukan individu untuk meningkatkan kondisi fisik dan mental serta terhindar dari penyakit. Perilaku ini terdiri dari 6 dimensi yaitu aktivitas fisik, nutrisi, tanggung jawab kesehatan, hubungan interpersonal, manajemen stres, dan pertumbuhan spiritual. Adverse childhood experiences (ACE) adalah pengalaman tidak menguntungkan di bawah usia 18 tahun yang berpotensi traumatis. ACE terdiri dari 3 tipe, yaitu kekerasan, pengabaian, dan tantangan rumah tangga. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kuantitatif dengan metode korelasional. Perilaku promosi kesehatan dan ACE mahasiswa Jabodetabek (N = 170) diukur menggunakan Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II (HPLP-II) dan ACE-Questionnaire (ACE-Q). Hasil penelitian menyatakan bahwa tidak ada hubungan antara total keseluruhan skor perilaku promosi kesehatan dan ACE (r (170) = -,055, > 0,05, two tails). Lebih lanjut, terdapat hubungan negatif yang signifikan pada dua dimensi perilaku promosi kesehatan yaitu hubungan interpersonal (r (170) = -0,181, p < 0,05, two tails) dan pertumbuhan spiritual (r(170) = -0,167, p < 0,05, two tails) dengan tipe ACE pengabaian.

---

This study examines the relationship between adverse childhood experiences (ACE) and health promoting behavior in Jabodetabek university students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Health promoting behavior is various actions that are consciously taken by individuals to improve physical and mental conditions and avoid disease. This behavior consists of 6 dimensions, namely physical activity, nutrition, health responsibilities, interpersonal relationships, stress management, and spiritual growth. Adverse childhood experiences (ACE) is a potentially traumatic childhood experiences under the age of 18. ACE consists of 3 types, namely abuse, neglect, and household challenges. This research is a quantitative research with correlational method. Health promoting behavior and ACE in Jabodetabek students (N = 170) were measured using the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile-II (HPLP-II) and ACE-Questionnaire (ACE-Q). The results of the study generally stated that there was no relationship between the total overall health promoting behavior score and ACE (r (170) = -0.055, > 0.05, two tails). Furthermore, there is a significant negative relationship on two dimensions of health promoting behavior, namely interpersonal relationships (r (170) = -0.181, p < 0.05, two tails) and spiritual growth (r(170) = -0.167, p < 0 .05, two tails) with type ACE neglect."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat hubungan antara stres dan perilaku merokok dengan efek moderasi perceived susceptibility di masa pandemi COVID-19. Desain penelitian yang digunakan adalah non-eksperimental dan cross-sectional dengan partisipan penelitian sebanyak 176 partisipan yang merupakan perokok aktif berusia 19- 40 tahun. Variabel pada penelitian ini diukur dengan menggunakan alat ukur COVID-19 Stressor Scale, Perceived Susceptibility in the Smoking Context, dan Heaviness of Smoking Index (HIS). Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa stres memiliki korelasi positif dan tidak signifikan dengan perilaku merokok di masa pandemi COVID-19 (r = 0,113, p > 0,05). Selain itu, penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa terdapat peran perceived susceptibility pada hubungan stres dan perilaku merokok (b = -0,006, t = - 2,263, p < 0,05).

---

This research aims to examine the relationship between stress and smoking behavior with the moderating effect of perceived susceptibility during the COVID-19 pandemic. The research design used was non-experimental and cross-sectional with 176 participants who were active smokers aged 19-40 years. The variables in this research were measured using the COVID-19 Stressor Scale, Perceived Susceptibility in the Smoking Context, and Heaviness of Smoking Index (HIS). The results of this research indicate that stress has a positive and insignificant correlation with smoking behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic (r = 0.113, p > 0.05). In addition, this research also shows that there is a role for perceived susceptibility in the relationship between stress and smoking behavior (b = -0.006, t = -2.263, p <0.05)."

"Dewasa muda adalah kelompok usia dengan penggunaan tertinggi aplikasi seluler. Penelitian sebelumnya menunjukkan bahwa aplikasi seluler mengurangi kesejahteraan psikologis orang dewasa muda. Penelitian ini ingin melihat pengaruh dukungan sosial orangtua terhadap anak muda yang kesejahteraan psikologisnya menurun karena aplikasi seluler. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dan kuesioner kepada 99 responden.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun orang dewasa muda yang stres karena aplikasi mobile telah menerima dukungan sosial dari orang tua mereka, tingkat kesejahteraan psikologis mereka tetap rendah. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada korelasi antar variabel.

---

Young adults are the age group with the highest usage of mobile app. Previous studies have shown that mobile apps are decreasing the psychological wellbeing of young adults. This study wanted to see the effect of parent rsquo s social support on young adults whose psychological wellbeing has decreased because of the mobile app. This study uses a quantitative approach and questionnaires to 99 respondents.

The results showed that although young adults who were stressed because the mobile app have received social supports from their parents, their level of psychological well being remained low. The results of the analysis shows that there were no correlation among variables."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji pengaruh health belief model (persepsi kerentanan, persepsi keparahan, persepsi keuntungan, persepsi halangan, self-efficacy, dan cues to action) dan perceived social support (keluarga, teman, dan significant others) terhadap perilaku pencegahan Covid-19 (perilaku mempromosikan kebersihan dan perilaku menghindari kontak sosial) pada populasi usia produktif di Jabodetabek. Sebanyak 192 partisipan mengisi tiga kuesioner self-report pada bulan April 2021. Hasil analisis regresi linear berganda menunjukkan bahwa dua komponen dari variabel health belief model, yaitu persepsi halangan dan self-efficacy, memengaruhi perilaku pencegahan Covid-19 berupa perilaku mempromosikan kebersihan, F(9,182) = 6,075, p < 0,05. Selanjutnya, tiga komponen dari variabel health belief model, yaitu persepsi keuntungan, persepsi halangan, dan self-efficacy, dan dua sumber perceived social support, yaitu keluarga dan teman, memengaruhi perilaku pencegahan Covid-19 berupa perilaku menghindari kontak sosial, F(9,182) = 8,958, p < 0,05. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, kebijakan pemerintah perlu difokuskan pada eliminasi halangan perilaku pencegahan Covid-19 dan kampanye berupa ajakan interaksi sosial secara daring, terutama pada perempuan dan usia muda, supaya kebutuhan dukungan sosial tetap terpenuhi dan di saat yang sama tetap melindungi keluarga dan orang terdekat yang berisiko terinfeksi virus Covid-19.

---

This research examined the effect of health belief model (perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, perceived benefit, perceived barrier, self-efficacy, and cues to action) and perceived social support (family, friends, and significant others) on Covid-19 preventive behavior (promoting hygiene and cleaning and avoiding social closeness) in the working age population in Jabodetabek. A total of 192 participants completed the self-report questionnaire in April 2021. The analysis result of multiple linear regression showed two components of health belief model, that is perceived barrier and self-efficacy, predicted Covid-19 preventive behavior in the form of promoting hygiene and cleaning, F(9,182) = 6,075, p < 0,05. In addition, three components of health belief model, that is perceived benefit, perceived barrier, and self-efficacy, and perceived social support from family and friends predicted Covid-19 preventive behavior in the form of avoiding social closeness, F(9,182) = 8,958, p < 0,05. Based on these results, government policy should aim on the elimination of Covid-19 preventive behavior’s barriers and campaign about online social interaction, especially for women and young adults, so they can fulfill their need of social support while also protecting family and significant others who have high risk of being infected by Covid-19 virus.

"

"Pandemi Covid-19 dapat menyebabkan trauma pada masyarakat yang terdampak, baik akibat dari karantina, masalah finansial, kematian massal, ketakutan akan menularkan kepada orang lain, hingga terpapar virus Covid-19 itu sendiri. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat apakah terdapat perbedaan tingkat trauma dan posttraumatic growth yang signifikan di antara masyarakat dewasa muda yang memiliki jumlah stresor terkait pandemi Covid-19 yang berbeda. Partisipan dalam penelitian ini adalah 138 individu dewasa muda dengan rentang umur 20–40 tahun (M = 24.47, SD = 4.52). Trauma diukur dengan alat ukur Impact of Event Scale Revised (IES-R) dan posttraumatic growth diukur dengan alat ukur Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). Hasil pengujian one-way ANOVA menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan tingkat trauma yang signifikan (F(3, 134) = 3.028, p = 0.032) dan tidak terdapat perbedaan tingkat posttraumatic growth (F(3,134) = 1.256, p = 0.292) antar partisipan dengan jumlah stresor terkait pandemi Covid-19 yang berbeda.

---

The Covid-19 pandemic can cause trauma to the people who are affected, be it because of the quarantine, financial problems, mass death, the fear of transmitting the virus to others, up to close encounter with the Covid-19 virus itself. This study aimed to see if there is any significant difference in the level of trauma and posttraumatic growth among young adults who had different amounts of Covid-19 related stressors. The participants in this study are 138 young adults aged 20–40 years old (M = 24.47, SD = 4.52). Trauma was measured with Impact of Event Scale Revised (IES-R) and posttraumatic growth was measured with Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). One-way ANOVA analysis revealed that there is a significant difference in the level of trauma (F(3, 134) = 3.028, p = 0.032) and there is no significant difference in the level of posttraumatic growth (F(3,134) = 1.256, p = 0.292) between participants with different amounts of Covid-19 pandemic related stressors."