Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini melihat pengaruh sudut pandang pada individu terjadap pemikiran bias dalam kelompok agama. Variabel sudut pandang individu terbagi atas dua variasi yaitu sudut pandang diri dan sudut pandang Ketuhanan. Pada studi pertama, penulis ingin melihat perbedaan antara individu yang menggunakan sudut pandang diri dengan sudut pandang Ketuhanan terhadap bias dalam kelompok agama. Pada studi kedua, penulis ingin melihat moderasi persepsi keterancaman terhadap hubungan sudut pandang terhadap bias dalam kelompok. Pada studi pertama, sebanyak 81 mahasiswa Muslim orang yang secara acak dikelompokkan berdasarkan sudut pandang diri dan sudut pandang Ketuhanan, menentukan kesediaannya membantu kepada panti asuhan kelompok agama ingroup atau kelompok agama outgroup dalam sebuah skenario. Hasil studi pertama menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan pengaruh pada kelompok sudut pandang diri dengan sudut pandang Ketuhanan terhadap pemikiran bias dalam kelompok. Namun keaktifan organisasi berkorelasi positif dengan bias dalam pemberian donasi kepada kelompok ingroup. Pada studi kedua, sebanyak 85 mahasiswa Muslim yang secara acak dikelompokkan berdasarkan kelompok sudut pandang, menentukan kesediaannya membantu yayasan sosial dari kelompok agama outgroup dalam sebuah skenario. Penulis juga mengukur persepsi keterancaman partisipan. Hasil studi kedua menjelaskan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan antara kelompok partisipan dengan sudut pandang diri dan Ketuhanan terhadap bias dalam kelompok. Namun persepsi keterancaman memiliki korelasi yang positif terhadap bias dalam pemberian donasi kepada kelompok outgroup. Perbedaan konteks dimana keadaan kelompok tidak dalam keadaan berkonflik menjadi salah satu alasan yang dapat menjelaskan hasil penelitian ini.

---

ABSTRACT
This study wanted to know whether the influence of the perspective to ingroup bias. Perspective was divided into two variations, namely selfperspective and the God perspective. In the first study, I wanted to see the difference between individuals who use self-perspective and God perspective on bias in religious groups. In the second study, I wanted to see the moderation of perceived threat to the relationship of perspective to ingroup bias. In the first study, 81 Muslims college students had randomly grouped according to the self-perspective and viewpoint of Godhead. They decided to help orphanage from their ingroup or outgroup religious groups in a scenario. The results showed, there were no differences between groups of selfperspective with the God perspective on ingroup bias. But organization attendance had a significant correlation with bias in donating ingroup. In the second study, 85 Muslim college students randomly grouped according to perspective groups, determined their willingness to help non-profit organizations from outgroup religious groups in a scenario. I also measured the perceived threat to participants. The results showed that there was no difference between participants with self-perspective and God perspective toward ingroup bias. Differences in the context where the situation of the group is not in the conflict were one reason that explained the results of this study.

Abstrak :
[ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat hubungan antara gaya pengambilan keputusan karier dengan adaptabilitas karier di dunia kerja. Keputusan karier yang dimaksud dalam penelitian ini pun berfokus pada keputusan individu saat memilih pekerjaan. Penelitian ini juga ingin melihat di antara lima gaya pengambilan keputusan, yakni rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant, dan spontaneous yang mendukung keterampilan adaptabilitas karier. Pengukuran gaya pengambilan keputusan karier menggunakan alat ukur General Decision Making Scale (GDMS). Selain itu pengukuran adaptabilitas karier menggunakan Career Adapt-Abilities Scale. Sebanyak 170 lulusan sarjana Universitas Indonesia yang sedang bekerja berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Hasil analisa memperlihatkan semua gaya pengambilan keputusan berkorelasi secara signifikan dengan adaptabilitas karier. Lalu, hanya gaya pengambilan keputusan rational yang berkorelasi positif dan mendukung adaptabilitas karier di dunia kerja. ABSTRACT
The purpose of this study aimed to find the correlation between career decision making style and career adaptability in workplace. The focus of career decision in this research is a decision when individuals choose a job. This research wants to find between five career decision making style, that is rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant, and spontaneous which support career adaptability. The measurement of career decision making style uses General Decision Making Scale (GDMS). Besides that, the measurement of career adaptability uses Career Adapt- Abilities Scale. 170 fresh graduates from University of Indonesia in work participate in this research. The result shows that five career decision making style have a significant correlation with career adaptability. Then, only rational career decision making that have positive correlation and support career adaptability., The purpose of this study aimed to find the correlation between career decision making style and career adaptability in workplace. The focus of career decision in this research is a decision when individuals choose a job. This research wants to find between five career decision making style, that is rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant, and spontaneous which support career adaptability. The measurement of career decision making style uses General Decision Making Scale (GDMS). Besides that, the measurement of career adaptability uses Career Adapt- Abilities Scale. 170 fresh graduates from University of Indonesia in work participate in this research. The result shows that five career decision making style have a significant correlation with career adaptability. Then, only rational career decision making that have positive correlation and support career adaptability.]