Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRAKPenelitian ini melihat pengaruh sudut pandang pada individu terjadap pemikiranbias dalam kelompok agama. Variabel sudut pandang individu terbagi atas duavariasi yaitu sudut pandang diri dan sudut pandang Ketuhanan. Pada studi pertama,penulis ingin melihat perbedaan antara individu yang menggunakan sudut pandangdiri dengan sudut pandang Ketuhanan terhadap bias dalam kelompok agama. Padastudi kedua, penulis ingin melihat moderasi persepsi keterancaman terhadaphubungan sudut pandang terhadap bias dalam kelompok. Pada studi pertama,sebanyak 81 mahasiswa Muslim orang yang secara acak dikelompokkanberdasarkan sudut pandang diri dan sudut pandang Ketuhanan, menentukankesediaannya membantu kepada panti asuhan kelompok agama ingroup ataukelompok agama outgroup dalam sebuah skenario. Hasil studi pertamamenunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan pengaruh pada kelompok sudutpandang diri dengan sudut pandang Ketuhanan terhadap pemikiran bias dalamkelompok. Namun keaktifan organisasi berkorelasi positif dengan bias dalampemberian donasi kepada kelompok ingroup. Pada studi kedua, sebanyak 85mahasiswa Muslim yang secara acak dikelompokkan berdasarkan kelompok sudutpandang, menentukan kesediaannya membantu yayasan sosial dari kelompok agamaoutgroup dalam sebuah skenario. Penulis juga mengukur persepsi keterancamanpartisipan. Hasil studi kedua menjelaskan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan antarakelompok partisipan dengan sudut pandang diri dan Ketuhanan terhadap bias dalamkelompok. Namun persepsi keterancaman memiliki korelasi yang positif terhadapbias dalam pemberian donasi kepada kelompok outgroup. Perbedaan konteksdimana keadaan kelompok tidak dalam keadaan berkonflik menjadi salah satualasan yang dapat menjelaskan hasil penelitian ini.

---

ABSTRACTThis study wanted to know whether the influence of the perspective toingroup bias. Perspective was divided into two variations, namely selfperspectiveand the God perspective. In the first study, I wanted to see thedifference between individuals who use self-perspective and God perspectiveon bias in religious groups. In the second study, I wanted to see themoderation of perceived threat to the relationship of perspective to ingroupbias. In the first study, 81 Muslims college students had randomly groupedaccording to the self-perspective and viewpoint of Godhead. They decided tohelp orphanage from their ingroup or outgroup religious groups in a scenario.The results showed, there were no differences between groups of selfperspectivewith the God perspective on ingroup bias. But organizationattendance had a significant correlation with bias in donating ingroup. In thesecond study, 85 Muslim college students randomly grouped according toperspective groups, determined their willingness to help non-profitorganizations from outgroup religious groups in a scenario. I also measuredthe perceived threat to participants. The results showed that there was nodifference between participants with self-perspective and God perspectivetoward ingroup bias. Differences in the context where the situation of thegroup is not in the conflict were one reason that explained the results of thisstudy."

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat hubungan antara gaya pengambilan keputusan karier dengan adaptabilitas karier di dunia kerja. Keputusan karier yang dimaksud dalam penelitian ini pun berfokus pada keputusan individu saat memilih pekerjaan. Penelitian ini juga ingin melihat di antara lima gaya pengambilan keputusan, yakni rational, intuitive, dependent, avoidant, dan spontaneous yang mendukung keterampilan adaptabilitas karier. Pengukuran gaya pengambilan keputusan karier menggunakan alat ukur General Decision Making Scale (GDMS). Selain itu pengukuran adaptabilitas karier menggunakan Career Adapt-Abilities Scale. Sebanyak 170 lulusan sarjana Universitas Indonesia yang sedang bekerja berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Hasil analisa memperlihatkan semua gaya pengambilan keputusan berkorelasi secara signifikan dengan adaptabilitas karier. Lalu, hanya gaya pengambilan keputusan rational yang berkorelasi positif dan mendukung adaptabilitas karier di dunia kerja.ABSTRACTThe purpose of this study aimed to find the correlation between career decisionmaking style and career adaptability in workplace. The focus of career decision inthis research is a decision when individuals choose a job. This research wants tofind between five career decision making style, that is rational, intuitive,dependent, avoidant, and spontaneous which support career adaptability. Themeasurement of career decision making style uses General Decision Making Scale(GDMS). Besides that, the measurement of career adaptability uses Career Adapt-Abilities Scale. 170 fresh graduates from University of Indonesia in workparticipate in this research. The result shows that five career decision making stylehave a significant correlation with career adaptability. Then, only rational careerdecision making that have positive correlation and support career adaptability., The purpose of this study aimed to find the correlation between career decisionmaking style and career adaptability in workplace. The focus of career decision inthis research is a decision when individuals choose a job. This research wants tofind between five career decision making style, that is rational, intuitive,dependent, avoidant, and spontaneous which support career adaptability. Themeasurement of career decision making style uses General Decision Making Scale(GDMS). Besides that, the measurement of career adaptability uses Career Adapt-Abilities Scale. 170 fresh graduates from University of Indonesia in workparticipate in this research. The result shows that five career decision making stylehave a significant correlation with career adaptability. Then, only rational careerdecision making that have positive correlation and support career adaptability.]"