Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Memutuskan hal-hal yang benar atau salah adalah langkah paling penting dalam menentukan apakah seseorang akan terlibat dan melakukan sesuatu yang etis atau tidak etis. Ketika membuat penilaian moral, orang sering menggunakan standar sosial untuk mengurangi ambiguitas yang mereka hadapi dalam satu situasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki hubungan antara konsensus sosial dan penilaian moral pada sampel karyawan di negara berkembang dan kolektif. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian cross-sectional dan menggunakan kuesioner yang berisi skenario dan instrumen konsensus sosial dan penilaian moral. Menggunakan survei online, ada 324 karyawan yang terlibat dalam penelitian ini, dan hasil analisis korelasi menunjukkan bahwa ada hubungan antara konsensus sosial dan penilaian moral. Temuan ini menggambarkan bahwa ketika karyawan membuat keputusan etis, mereka juga mempertimbangkan perspektif sosial dalam situasi dilematis. Selain itu, perspektif sosial dalam budaya kolektivis lebih cenderung lebih kuat karena individu membuat penilaian berdasarkan kesejahteraan dan minat kelompok daripada individu itu sendiri.

---

Deciding what is right or wrong is the most important step in determining whether someone will be involved and do something ethical or unethical. When making moral judgments, people often use social standards to reduce the ambiguity they face in one situation. This study aims to investigate the relationship between social consensus and moral judgment on a sample of employees in developing and collective countries. This research is a cross-sectional study and uses a questionnaire containing scenarios and instruments of social consensus and moral judgment. Using an online survey, there were 324 employees involved in this study, and the results of the correlation analysis showed that there was a relationship between social consensus and moral judgment. These findings illustrate that when employees make ethical decisions, they also consider social perspectives in dilemmatic situations. In addition, social perspectives in collectivist cultures are more likely to be stronger because individuals make judgments based on the welfare and interests of the group than the individual itself."

"Getting teams and groups to function productively is a challenge. For years The Facilitator's Fieldbook has been giving group leaders what they need to make everything run more smoothly. Now fully updated, the Second Edition is truly jam-packed with step-by-step procedures, checklists and guidelines, samples and templates, and more. Perfect for rookies and seasoned facilitators alike, the book covers key areas including: * establishing ground rules for groups * planning meetings and agendas * brainstorming * making decisions * conflict resolution * making the most of electronic meetings * using groups to drive change * helping groups hit sales targets * and much more For managers, trainers, and group leaders in any industry, The Facilitator's Fieldbook is a practical, powerful book that will keep teams and groups humming along and getting results."

"Bioconsensus is a rapidly evolving scientific field in which consensus methods, often developed for use in social choice theory, are adapted for such areas of the biological sciences as taxonomy, systematics, and evolutionary and molecular biology. Typically, after several alternatives are produced using different data sets, methods or algorithms, one needs to find a consensus solution. The axiomatic approach of this book explores the existence or nonexistence of consensus rules that satisfy particular sets of desirable well-defined properties. The axiomatic research reviewed here focuses first on the area of group choice, then in areas of biomathematics where the objects of interest represent partitions of a set, hierarchical structures, phylogenetic trees, or molecular sequences. Axiomatic Consensus Theory in Group Choice and Biomathematics provides a unique comprehensive review of axiomatic consensus theory in biomathematics as it has developed over the past 30 years. Established here are the theory's basic results using standard terminology and notation and with uniform attention to rigor and detail. This book cites both traditional and current literature and poses open problems that remain to be solved. The bibliographic notes in each chapter place the described work within a general context while providing useful pointers to relevant research. The bibliographic references are a valuable resource for both students and experts in the field."

"Perubahan distribusi kekuatan antara kekuatan baru (emerging powers) seperti Tiongkok, India, dan Brazil tengah menggeser sistem internasional menjauhi nilai-nilai liberal. Dalam ranah ekonomi politik internasional, pembahasan mengenai Beijing Consensus muncul sebagai tantangan terhadap nilai-nilai neoliberal Washington Consensus. Tulisan ini melihat perdebatan mengenai karakteristik Beijing Consensus sebagai model pembangunan—prinsip dan praktik kebijakan apa saja yang direkomendasikan untuk mencapai pertumbuhan ekonomi yang tinggi. Tulisan ini juga menganalisis pendapat dalam 19 tulisan akademis mengenai signifikansi dan legitimasi Beijing Consensus sebagai sebuah konsep. Tulisan ini menemukan konsensus mengenai karakteristik Beijing Consensus yang menyarankan pembangunan melalui liberalisasi ekonomi secara bertahap dan peran pemerintahan terpusat yang pragmatis dan tidak terikat ideologi dalam mengambil kebijakan. Sementara itu, tulisan ini menemukan perdebatan mengenai legitimasi konsep Beijing Consensus, terutama saat disandingkan dengan konsep Washington Consensus yang rekomendasi kebijakannya lebih jelas dan terperinci. Perdebatan ini berakar pada perdebatan mengenai definisi model pembangunan itu sendiri

---

.Changes in the distribution of power among emerging powers such as China, India and Brazil are shifting the international system away from liberal values. In International Political Economy, the concept of Beijing Consensus emerged as a challenge to the neoliberal values ​​of Washington Consensus. This paper examines the debate surrounding characteristics of the Beijing Consensus as a development model—what policy principles and practices are recommended for achieving high economic growth. This paper also analyzes opinions in 19 academic literatures regarding the significance and legitimacy of the Beijing Consensus as a concept. This paper finds consensus that Beijing Consensus suggests achieving development through gradual economic liberalization and the significant role of a centralized and pragmatic government, unrestrained by ideological constraints in deciding policies. Meanwhile, this paper also finds a debate on the legitimacy of the Beijing Consensus as a concept, especially when juxtaposed with the Washington Consensus which policy recommendations are clearer-cut and more detailed. This debate has its roots in the debate about what is the definition of a ‘development model’.

"

"The Facilitator’s Fieldbook has long been the go-to resource for novice and experienced facilitators alike. The book gives managers, trainers, and group leaders in any industry the step-by-step procedures, checklists, guidelines, samples, and templates they need to make any group work like a well-oiled machine. Comprehensive and practical, The Facilitator’s Fieldbook covers all the key areas including establishing ground rules; planning meetings and agendas; brain storming; resolving conflict; making decisions; and helping groups optimize their time. The completely revised third edition also provides new team-building exercises, as well as updated information on virtual meetings, mediation, strategic planning, and much more. Readers will find tips on maintaining the tone and flow of meetings, and guidelines for determining when to delegate projects to individuals rather than assembling a group. Getting people to function together productively can be a challenge. With The Facilitator’s Fieldbook, readers have the tools and knowledge they need to rise to the occasion."