Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
PT. X berperan untuk distribusi BBM ke Kalimantan dan Sulawesi. Unit ini menjadi salah satu roda perekonomian Indonesia dengan kapasitas 260 MBSD (metric barrels per stream day). Hal ini setara dengan 25% kapasitas intake nasional bahan bakar minyak (BBM) nasional per akhir 2017. Objek penelitian ini ditekankan pada studi di salah satu Kilang minyak terbesar di Indonesia, dengan data tahun 2018 dan 2019. Saat ini Publikasi LCA untuk Emisi di PT. Kilang Balikpapan belum pernah dipublikasi/ditemukan. Kebaruan dalam penelitian ini adalah membuat basis data (database) emisi per produk berharga dari setiap Unit seperti Crude Distillation Unit (CDU), HydroCracking Unit (HCU), Hydro Vacuum Unit (HVU), Naphta Hydrotreating Unit (NHT) dan Platforming Unit di Indonesia dengan memperhatikan dua variabel yaitu Global Warming Potential dan Acidification Potential, selain itu akan dilakukan perbandingan emisi dari tahun 2018 dan 2019 agar dari penelitian ini dapat diketahui kondisi Unit di PT. X dan juga dilakukan perbandingan dari nilai LCIA (Life Cycle Impact Assesment) dan beberapa parameter lingkungan. Dari hasil penelitian ini dUnit CDU-IV mengeluarkan Emisi CO2 yang paling besar pada tahun 2019 sebesar 314.077.190,17 Kg.CO2.eq/Unit dan Unit NHT mengeluarkan Emisi SOx yang paling besar di tahun 2018 dan 2019 sebesar 91.852,48 Kg.SO2.eq/Unit. Hasil penelitian ini juga menunjukkan bahwa nilai emisi semua unit di PT. X tidak melebihi Nilai Ambang Batas Parameter Lingkungan yang dijadikan acuan penelitian ini. ......PT. X plays a role in the distribution of fuel to Kalimantan and Sulawesi. the company is one of the wheels of the Indonesian economy with a capacity of 260 MBSD (metric barrels per stream day). This is equivalent to 25% of the national intake of national fuel oil (BBM) as of the end of 2017. The object of this research focused on the study in one of the largest Oil refinery in Indonesia, with the data in 2018 and 2019. Presently Publications about LCA Emission PT Balikpapan refinery has not been published/found. The novelty in this research is to create a database of emissions per valuable product from each Unit such as the Crude Distillation Unit (CDU), HydroCracking Unit (HCU), Hydro Vacuum Unit (HVU), Naphta Hydrotreating Unit (NHT) and Platforming Unit in Indonesia with two variables: Global Warming Potential and Potential Acidification, and the, in this research will do a comparison of emissions from 2018 and 2019 to find the condition of the Unit at PT. X and also carried out a comparison of the value of the LCIA with some environmental parameters. From the results of this study the CDU-IV Unit issued the largest CO2 emissions in 2019 amounting to 314,077,190.17 Kg.CO2.eq/Unit and the NHT Unit issued the largest SOx Emissions in 2018 and 2019 amounting to 91,852.48 kg. SO2.eq/Unit. The results of this study also indicate that the emission value of all units in PT X does not exceed the Threshold Value of Environmental Parameters used as a reference for this study.

Abstrak :
In this research, based on actual data gathered from an industrial scale vacuum gas oil (VGO) hydrocracker and artificial neural network (ANN) method, a model is proposed to simulate yields of products including light gases, liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), light naphtha, heavy naphtha, kerosene, diesel and unconverted oil (off-test). The input layer of the ANN model consists of the catalyst, feed and recycle flow rates, and bed temperatures, while the output neurons are yields of those products. The results showed that the AAD% (average absolute deviation) of the developed ANN model for training, testing, and validating data are 0.445%, 1.131% and 0.755%, respectively. Then, by considering all operational constraints, the results confirmed that the decision variables (i.e., recycle rate and bed temperatures) generated by the optimization approach can enhance the gross profit of the hydrocracking process to more than $0.81 million annually, which is significant for the economy of the target refinery.

Abstrak :
[ABSTRAK
Jakarta adalah kota terbesar di Indonesia. Sebagai kota terbesar di Indonesia, Jakarta juga memiliki populasi yang sangat besar, yang diimbangi oleh majunya ekonomi Jakarta. Sebagai imbas populasi dan pertumbuhan ekonomi, permasalahan pengelolaan limbah padat adalah salah satu permasalahan dasar kota Jakarta. Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk menganalisis keberlanjutan pengelolaan limbah padat di Jakarta dengan mengukur ekoefisiensinya, serta menganalisis keberlanjutan metode hydrocracking sebagai cara pengolahan limbah padat perkotaan, khususnya di Jakarta. Pada sistem pengelolaan terkini, ditemukan bahwa pengelolaan limbah padat di Jakarta tidak berlanjut (Ekoefisiensi pada tahun 2013, sebesar 0,52 lebih kecil dari 1). Oleh sebab itu diperlukan intervensi berupa proses hydrocracking (Ekoefisiensi proses sebesar 1,775) agar pengelolaan limbah padat di Jakarta berlanjut. Skenario intervensi hydrocracking baru akan berlanjut apabila limbah padat di Jakarta telah dipilah sebesar 50% dan limbah padat organik diproses melalui hydrocracking sebesar 30%.

---

ABSTRACT Jakarta is the biggest city in Indonesia. As such, it is densely populated, and has a major economic activity. These two factors contribute towards the current solid waste management issues in Jakarta. This paper aims to analyze the sustainability of existing municipal solid waste by measuring its ecoefficiency, and to analyze the sustainability of hydrocracking method as a means of municipal solid waste treatment. In the existing condition, We find that Jakarta?s municipal solid waste management system is not sustainable (In 2013, the ecoefficiency was measured at 0,52 which is less than 1). Therefore, based on this finding we find it to be necessary to do an intervention. In this paper, the intervention was introduced in the form of hydrocracking process. As a process we find hydrocracking to be a sustainable process (ecoefficiency of the process is measured at 1,775). However, the intervention scenario will only be sustainable, once 50% of the solid waste of sorted, and if hydrocracking method treats 30% of this fraction;Jakarta is the biggest city in Indonesia. As such, it is densely populated, and has a major economic activity. These two factors contribute towards the current solid waste management issues in Jakarta. This paper aims to analyze the sustainability of existing municipal solid waste by measuring its ecoefficiency, and to analyze the sustainability of hydrocracking method as a means of municipal solid waste treatment. In the existing condition, We find that Jakarta?s municipal solid waste management system is not sustainable (In 2013, the ecoefficiency was measured at 0,52 which is less than 1). Therefore, based on this finding we find it to be necessary to do an intervention. In this paper, the intervention was introduced in the form of hydrocracking process. As a process we find hydrocracking to be a sustainable process (ecoefficiency of the process is measured at 1,775). However, the intervention scenario will only be sustainable, once 50% of the solid waste of sorted, and if hydrocracking method treats 30% of this fraction, Jakarta is the biggest city in Indonesia. As such, it is densely populated, and has a major economic activity. These two factors contribute towards the current solid waste management issues in Jakarta. This paper aims to analyze the sustainability of existing municipal solid waste by measuring its ecoefficiency, and to analyze the sustainability of hydrocracking method as a means of municipal solid waste treatment. In the existing condition, We find that Jakarta’s municipal solid waste management system is not sustainable (In 2013, the ecoefficiency was measured at 0,52 which is less than 1). Therefore, based on this finding we find it to be necessary to do an intervention. In this paper, the intervention was introduced in the form of hydrocracking process. As a process we find hydrocracking to be a sustainable process (ecoefficiency of the process is measured at 1,775). However, the intervention scenario will only be sustainable, once 50% of the solid waste of sorted, and if hydrocracking method treats 30% of this fraction]