Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"ABSTRACTLatar belakang: Selama ini pemeriksaan ileum kurang mendapatkan perhatian, padahal seringkali kelainan-kelainan gastrointestinal bawah berasal dari ileum dengan kolonoskopi normal. Oleh karena itu penelitian ini membahas tentang kesesuaian antara hasil pemeriksaan ileoskopi ileum terminal dengan hasil histopatologinya.Metode: Metode yang digunakan adalah studi potong lintang dan uji diagnostik antara kedua pemeriksaan tersebut, dengan pemeriksaan histopatologi sebagai standar baku emas.Hasil: Hasil penelitian memberikan kesesuaian antara kedua pemeriksaan tersebut sebesar 93,33 %. nilai sensitivitas pemeriksaan ileoskopi dibandingkan dengan histopatologi sebagai standar baku emas sebesar 94 %, spesifisitas 90 %, nilai prediksi positif 97,9 %, dan nilai prediksi negatif sebesar 75 %.Kesimpulan: Dapat disimpulkan bahwa pemeriksaan ileoskopi pada pasien dengan diare kronik dan kolonoskopi normal memberikan hasil yang serupa dengan pemeriksaan histopatologinya.

---

ABSTRACTBackground: Ileoscopy are still considered less important, whereas many lower gastrointestinal cases originated from this region. Therefore this study discusses the correlation between the results of the terminal ileum ileoscopy with histopathologic results.Method: The method used was a cross-sectional study and diagnostic test between the two examinations, with histopathologic examination as the gold standard.Result: The results give the correlation between the two examination is 93.33%. Moreover ileoscopy compared with histopathologic examination as the gold standard also give a sensitivityof 94%, specificity 90%, positive predictive value 97.9%, and negative predictive value of 75%.Conclusion: Therefore it can be concluded that ileoscopy examination in patients with chronic diarrhea and normal colonoscopy gave similar results with histopathologic examination."

"PURPOSE: To clarify the risk factors for complications after diverting ileostomy closure in patients who have undergone rectal cancer surgery.METHODS: The study group comprised 240 patients who underwent a diverting ileostomy at the time of lower anterior resection or internal anal sphincter resection, in our department, between 2004 and 2015. Univariate and multivariate analyses of 18 variables were performed to establish which of these are risk factors for postoperative complications.RESULTS: The most common complications were intestinal obstruction and wound infection. Univariate analysis showed that an age of 72 years or older (p = 0.0028), an interval between surgery and closure of 6 months or longer (p = 0.0049), and an operation time of 145 min or longer (p = 0.0293) were significant risk factors for postoperative complications. Multivariate analysis showed that age (odds ratio, 3.4236; p = 0.0025), the interval between surgery and closure (odds ratio, 3.4780; p = 0.0039), and operation time (odds 2.5179; p = 0.0260) were independent risk factors.CONCLUSIONS: Age, interval between surgery and closure, and operation time were independent risk factors for postoperative complications after diverting ileostomy closure. Thus, temporary ileostomy closure should be performed within 6 months after surgery for rectal cancer."