Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Fokus penelitian ini adalah mengenai penyelesaian masalah pelanggaran HAM di Indonesia (2001-2005) dan Argentina (1983-2007) melalui KKR serta Pengadilan HAM pada masa transisi. Permasalahan penelitian ini adalah perbandingan penerapan keadilan transisi antara Indonesia dan Argentina melalui KKR serta Pengadilan HAM. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan studi literatur dan wawancara dengan narasumber yang terkait. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori keadilan transisi untuk menjelaskan bahwa penyelesaian masalah HAM di masa lalu dapat dilaksanakan pada masa transisi demokrasi salah satunya melalui KKR dan Pengadilan HAM. Penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa demokrasi yang belum stabil di masa transisi di Indonesia dan Argentina mempengaruhi proses penyelesaian pelanggaran HAM masa lalu. ......This thesis focuses to settlement of violation of human rights in Indonesia (2001-2005) and Argentine (1983-2007) by commision of truth and reconciliation and human rights trial. The problem is comparison of transitional justice assembling between Indonesia and Argentine through commision of truth and reconciliation and human rights trial. The data was collected by study of literature and in-depth interview with the related informants. This thesis uses transitional justice theory to explain that settlement past human rights violation could be excecute in transition of democracy that ones of its methods are commision of truth and reconciliation and human rights trial. This study concludes that unstable democracy in transition time either in Indonesia or Argentine affects to settlement of past human rights violation process.

Abstrak :
What explains the failure of transitional justice and reconciliation measures in post-authoritarian Indonesia? One explanation is that domestic political elites have effectively stymied the efforts of civil society to implement global norms of transitional justice. However as Indonesia has embraced a democratic and decentralized system of government, even the most corrupt and entrenched elites cannot merely veto or reject calls for justice. Instead, opponents have used a variety of strategies including legislative, religious, and cultural strategies to undermine justice initiatives. Examining the recent experiences in Indonesia, this paper shows the effects that a limited transition has had on the justice agenda.

Abstrak :
The peace agreement for Aceh included standard post-conflict measures, such as a human rights court and a truth and reconciliation commission. Why were they neglected? If they were going to be neglected, why did the negotiators initially agree on them instead of choosing amnesty or nothing? I argue that their nature as preemptive policies is key to understanding why they were introduced but not implemented. Preemptive transitional justice policies are adopted when reluctant policymakers attempt to trump tougher options with more acceptable alternatives, such as the following preemption in reformasi Indonesia.

Abstrak :
Dalam konteks konflik atau pasca konflik, perempuan mengalami kekerasan berlapis: baik sehari-hari maupun struktural. Dua pendekatan utama yang biasa digunakan dalam studi dan program dalam kedua konteks tersebut adalah perdamaian dan keadilan transisional. Keduanya memberikan fokus pada kekerasan yang dialami perempuan, namun tidak cukup memberikan analisis dan solusi atas terjadinya ketidakadilan struktural yang dialami perempuan. Tulisan ini merupakan refleksi dari perjalanan panjang keterlibatan penulis dalam kedua pendekatan tersebut. Pertanyaan utama makalah ini adalah: bagaimana perdamaian dan keadilan transisional dapat memberikan solusi untuk mentransformasi ketidakadilan struktural yang dialami perempuan di wilayah konflik dan pasca konflik? Mulai dari mana?

Abstrak :
Illustrates the dilemma faced by the human rights community during peace negotiations, both in finding a place at the table and ensuring accountability for human rights violations. Those undertaking peace talks often argue that peace should come before justice. The many case studies in this book, from Sierra Leone to Colombia, not only confront this notion, but also challenge human rights advocates to recognize the difficulties in negotiating justice and protecting the rights of victims. the final chapter on the Colombian peace process in particular offers hope, showing the importance of including victims and civil society in these discussions.

Abstrak :
This detailed evaluation of the relationship between trials and truth commissions challenges their assumed compatibility through an analysis of their operational features at national, inter-state and international levels. Alison Bisset conducts case-study analyses of national practice in South Africa, East Timor and Sierra Leone, evaluates the problems posed by the International Criminal Court and considers the challenges presented by the possibility of bystander state prosecutions. At each level, she highlights potential operational conflicts and formulates targeted proposals to enable effective coexistence.

Abstrak :
What role do transitional justice processes play in determining the gender outcomes of transitions from conflict and authoritarianism? What is the impact of transitional justice processes on the human rights of women in states emerging from political violence? Gender Politics in Transitional Justice argues that human rights outcomes for women are determined in the space between international law and local gender politics. The book draws on feminist political science to reveal the key gender dynamics that shape the strategies of local women's movements in their engagement with transitional justice, and the ultimate success of those strategies, termed 'the local fit'. Also drawing on feminist doctrinal scholarship in international law, 'the international frame' examines the role of international law in defining harms against women in transitional justice and in determining the 'from' and 'to' of transitions from conflict and authoritarianism. This book locates evolving state practice in gender and transitional justice over the past two decades within the context of the enhanced protection of women's human rights under international law.

Abstrak :
At the end of world war II the allies faced a threefold challenge: how to punish perpetrators of appalling crimes for which the categories of genocide and crimes against humanity had to be coined; how to explain that these had been committed by Germany, of all nations; and how to reform Germans. The answer to this triple conundrum was the application of historical reasoning to legal procedure. In the Nuremberg trials held between 1945 and 1949, a concerted effort was made to punish key perpetrators while at the same time analysing the Nazi state and recounting German history. Building on a long debate about Germanys divergence from a presumed Western path of development, Allied prosecutors sketched out how Germany had betrayed the Western model. The prosecutors laid out how private enterprise, academic science, the military, and the civil service, which looked ostensibly similar to their opposite numbers in the Allied nations, had been corrupted in Germany even before Hitlers rise to power. While the argument, depending on individual protagonists, subject matters, and contexts, met with uneven success in court, it offered a final twist against the backdrop of the Cold War: although Germany had lost its way, it could still be brought back into the Western fold. The first comprehensive study of the Nuremberg trials, The Betrayal explores this process and sheds light on how history underpins transitional trials as we encounter them in todays courtrooms from Arusha to The Hague.