Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 161 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
Pardede, Timbul
Depok: Universitas Indonesia, 1991
S25823
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Nina Maulina
Depok: Fakultas Teknik Universitas Indonesia, 1999
S47911
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Kenichi Ohmae
Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara, 1989
658 KEN d
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Kabel, Jan Jacob Cornelis.
Abstrak :
buku ini mengenai iklan komersial, bagaimana kebebasan berekspresi dalam iklan dan batas-batasnya,
Deventer: Kluwer, 1981
BLD 346.048 KAB u
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Prenter, P.M.
New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1975
515.623 PRE s
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Rio Tri Juli Putranto
Abstrak :
[ABSTRAK
Era reformasi telah membawa angin perubahan di segala bidang salah satunya di bidang pemerintahan daerah. Sejak dilaksankan otonomi daerah luas melalui Undang-undang Nomor 22 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah wilayah Indonesia telah mengalami banyak perubahan.Perubahan wilayah ini disebabkan adanya pemekaran daerah sebagai salah satu cara pembentukan daerah baru. Hal ini juga merupakan implementasi dari otonomi daerah sehingga masing-masing daerah berusaha untuk menjadi daerah otonom. Akibat dari kebijakan tersebut, muncullah daerah-daerah otonom baru (DOB). Tanpa disadari akibat pemekaran wilayah menyebabkan timbulnya konflik horizontal. Konflik horizontal ini memunculkan berbagai macam permasalahan baru dari persoalan pengelolaan sumber daya alam sampai dengan sengketa batas wilayah antar daerah otonom baru. Timbulnya sengketa batas wilayah antar daerah disebabkan masing-masing pihak yang bersengketa memiliki penafsiran yang berbeda terhadap wilayah yang dimilikinya.Terhadap permasalahan ini, Undang-undang Pemerintahan Daerah telah menyediakan mekanisme penyelesaiannya melalui Gubernur apabila terjadi sengketa batas wilayah antar daerah otonom baru dalam satu provinsi dan melalui Menteri Dalam Negeri apabila terjadi sengketa batas wilayah antar daerah kabupaten/kota lintas provinsi yang bersifat final. Akan tetapi dalam prakteknya, penyelesaian ini tidak memberikan rasa keadilan bagi pihak yang merasa dirugikan akibat mekanisme ini. Sehingga pihak yang merasa dirugikan akan membawa permasalahan ini ke ranah hukum yaitu melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi. Penyelesaian sengketa batas wilayah antar daerah melalui Mahkamah Konstitusi dilakukan dengan cara mengajukan permohonan pengujian undang-undang pembentukan daerah terhadap Undang-UndangDasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 yang bersifat final dan mengikat. Penelitian ini ingin menjelaskan praktek penyelesaian sengketa batas wilayah antar daerah otonom baru yang dilakukan menurut Undang-undang Pemerintahan dan melalui pengujian undang-undang di Mahkamah Konstitusi.
ABSTRACT
The reform era has brought a wind of change in all areas including in the field of local governance. Since the autonomous region was implemented through Act No. 22 of 1999 on Local Government regions of Indonesia have undergone many changes. Changes in the area due to the expansion region as one way the formation of new areas. This is also the implementation of regional autonomy so that each region seeks to become an autonomous area. The result of these policies, came the new autonomous areas (DOB). Unnoticed due to the onset of the conflict led to the blossoming of horizontal.This horizontal conflicts gave rise to a variety of new problems of natural resource management issues to a dispute between the territorial boundaries of the region. The onset of the dispute between the borders area due to each party to the dispute has a different interpretation of its own territory. With respect to this issue, the Act Government has provided a mechanism for settlement through the Governor in the event of a dispute between the territorial boundaries in one province and through the Ministry of Home Affairs in the event of a dispute between the borders area of district/city cross the province are final. However, in practice, this settlement does not provide a sense of fairness to the parties who feel aggrieved by this mechanism. So those who feel aggrieved will bring this issue into the realm of law, namely through the Constitutional Court. The dispute between the territory through the boundary of the Constitutional Court is carried out by means of applying for a testing area of legislation against the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945 which are final and binding. This research would like to explain the dispute resolution practice of territorial boundaries between areas is conducted according to Government legislation and through the testing laws in the Constitutional Court. ;The reform era has brought a wind of change in all areas including in the field of local governance. Since the autonomous region was implemented through Act No. 22 of 1999 on Local Government regions of Indonesia have undergone many changes. Changes in the area due to the expansion region as one way the formation of new areas. This is also the implementation of regional autonomy so that each region seeks to become an autonomous area. The result of these policies, came the new autonomous areas (DOB). Unnoticed due to the onset of the conflict led to the blossoming of horizontal.This horizontal conflicts gave rise to a variety of new problems of natural resource management issues to a dispute between the territorial boundaries of the region. The onset of the dispute between the borders area due to each party to the dispute has a different interpretation of its own territory. With respect to this issue, the Act Government has provided a mechanism for settlement through the Governor in the event of a dispute between the territorial boundaries in one province and through the Ministry of Home Affairs in the event of a dispute between the borders area of district/city cross the province are final. However, in practice, this settlement does not provide a sense of fairness to the parties who feel aggrieved by this mechanism. So those who feel aggrieved will bring this issue into the realm of law, namely through the Constitutional Court. The dispute between the territory through the boundary of the Constitutional Court is carried out by means of applying for a testing area of legislation against the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945 which are final and binding. This research would like to explain the dispute resolution practice of territorial boundaries between areas is conducted according to Government legislation and through the testing laws in the Constitutional Court. ;The reform era has brought a wind of change in all areas including in the field of local governance. Since the autonomous region was implemented through Act No. 22 of 1999 on Local Government regions of Indonesia have undergone many changes. Changes in the area due to the expansion region as one way the formation of new areas. This is also the implementation of regional autonomy so that each region seeks to become an autonomous area. The result of these policies, came the new autonomous areas (DOB). Unnoticed due to the onset of the conflict led to the blossoming of horizontal.This horizontal conflicts gave rise to a variety of new problems of natural resource management issues to a dispute between the territorial boundaries of the region. The onset of the dispute between the borders area due to each party to the dispute has a different interpretation of its own territory. With respect to this issue, the Act Government has provided a mechanism for settlement through the Governor in the event of a dispute between the territorial boundaries in one province and through the Ministry of Home Affairs in the event of a dispute between the borders area of district/city cross the province are final. However, in practice, this settlement does not provide a sense of fairness to the parties who feel aggrieved by this mechanism. So those who feel aggrieved will bring this issue into the realm of law, namely through the Constitutional Court. The dispute between the territory through the boundary of the Constitutional Court is carried out by means of applying for a testing area of legislation against the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945 which are final and binding. This research would like to explain the dispute resolution practice of territorial boundaries between areas is conducted according to Government legislation and through the testing laws in the Constitutional Court. , The reform era has brought a wind of change in all areas including in the field of local governance. Since the autonomous region was implemented through Act No. 22 of 1999 on Local Government regions of Indonesia have undergone many changes. Changes in the area due to the expansion region as one way the formation of new areas. This is also the implementation of regional autonomy so that each region seeks to become an autonomous area. The result of these policies, came the new autonomous areas (DOB). Unnoticed due to the onset of the conflict led to the blossoming of horizontal.This horizontal conflicts gave rise to a variety of new problems of natural resource management issues to a dispute between the territorial boundaries of the region. The onset of the dispute between the borders area due to each party to the dispute has a different interpretation of its own territory. With respect to this issue, the Act Government has provided a mechanism for settlement through the Governor in the event of a dispute between the territorial boundaries in one province and through the Ministry of Home Affairs in the event of a dispute between the borders area of district/city cross the province are final. However, in practice, this settlement does not provide a sense of fairness to the parties who feel aggrieved by this mechanism. So those who feel aggrieved will bring this issue into the realm of law, namely through the Constitutional Court. The dispute between the territory through the boundary of the Constitutional Court is carried out by means of applying for a testing area of legislation against the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia in 1945 which are final and binding. This research would like to explain the dispute resolution practice of territorial boundaries between areas is conducted according to Government legislation and through the testing laws in the Constitutional Court. ]
2015
T42883
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Syarif Hidayat
Abstrak :
Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh terjadinya dinamika politik pasca penandatangan perjanjian antara Republik Indonesia dan Republik Singapura pada tanggal 10 maret 2009 tentang penetapan garis batas laut wilayah kedua negara di bagian barat tahun 2009. Hal ini menjadi menarik diteliti untuk mengetahui dinamika politik di DPR-RI dalam proses ratifikasi penetapan perjanjian kedua negara tersebut dan juga untuk melihat kepentingan masing-masing negara akan terbentuknya Undang-Undang No. 4 Tahun 2010. Penelitian ini fokus kepada dinamika politik yang terjadi di DPR dalam proses ratifikasi mengenai perjanjian batas wilayah Laut RI-Singapura di bagian barat tahun 2009. Dan juga untuk memberi gambaran akan kepentingan kedua belah pihak dalam pegesahan perjanjian tersebut. Dimana dasar dari pengesahan Ratifikasi oleh DPR-RI ini menjadi acuan mulai berlakunya perjanjian tersebut dengan bentuk Undang-undang No. 4 Tahun 2010. Sebagai pijakan teoritis, penelitian ini menggunakan Teori Kebijakan Publik dari William Dunn, James E. Anderson, Thomas R. Dye dan Robert Eyestone, Teori Kepentingan Nasional dari Donald E. Neuchterlein, teori 'Two Level Game' dari Robert D. Putnam, dan Teori Ekonomi Politik Internasional dari Robert Gilpin. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif, dengan jenis penelitian eksplanasi, dan menggunakan teknik pengumpulan data yang terdiri dari data primer dan data sekunder. Data primer berasal dari wawancara mendalam (in-depth interview) dimana wawancara yang digunakan adalah wawancara tidak berstruktur. Sedangkan data sekunder meliputi buku-buku, jurnal, peraturan perundang-undangan, dokumen-dokumen DPR-RI, dokumen risalah rapat, dan dokumen lainnya. Setelah dilakukan analisis, Dinamika politik di DPR. Terbagi pro-kontra antara pihak yang mendesak perjanjian ini diratifikasi dan pihak yang berpendapat perjanjian ini tidak perlu segera diratifikasi. Pada tanggal 24 Mei 2010, Pemerintah bersama DPR akhirnya menyepakati pembahasan RUU Ratifikasi Perjanjian Indonesia-Singapura tentang batas wilayah menjadi UU No. 4 Tahun 2010 tentang Pengesahan Perjanjian antara Republik Indonesia dan Republik Singapura tentang penetapan garis Batas Laut Wilayah Kedua Negara di Bagian Selat Singapura 2009. Faktor yang mendasari DPR meratifikasi perjanjian ini antara lain berdasarkan UNCLOS 1982 dimana kegiatan reklamasi pantai yang dilakukan Singapura tidak akan mempengaruhi luas wilayah laut Indonesia, dan menyusutnya luas Pulau Nipa juga tidak berdampak pada pengukuran garis dasar. Dan menegaskan titik dasar Pulau Nipa sebagai pulau terdepan Indonesia dijadikan sebagai dasar pengukuran garis dasar terhadap batas maritim Indonesia. Dengan diratifikasinya UU No. 4 Tahun 2010 ini menandakan bahwa ekspor pasir yang sempat ditutup oleh Menperindag Rini Suwandi tahun 2003 akhirnya dibuka kembali. Implikasi Teoritis menunjukan bahwa Teori Kepentingan Nasional, Teori Kebijakan Publik, Teori 'two level game' dan Teori Ekonomi Politik Internasional dapat menjelaskan mengapa undang-undang batas wilayah laut ini lahir. ......The political dynamics after the ratification agreement between Indonesia and Singapore in 10 March 2009 became the background of this research. The agreement regulates the western sea boundary between the two countries in 2009. This dynamic is interesting to research on to know the political dynamics after this ratification and the national interests of each of these countries that lead to the introduction of Regulation No. 4 in 2010. For its theoretical framework, this research used public policy theories from various scientists, such as William Dunn, James E. Anderson, Thomas R. Dye and Robert Eyestone, theories on national interest from Donald E. Neuchterlein, the 'Two Level Game' theory from Robert D. Putnam and International Political Economy Theory from Robert Gilpin. This research uses qualitative methods with explanatory research and uses data collection technique for primary and secondary data. Primary data comes from indepth unstructured interview. Secondary data are gathered from books, journals, regulations, DPR-RI legal documents, meeting minutes and other documents. After data was analysed, it shows there were pros and cons between members of the DPR towards the ratification. On 24 May 2010, the government with DPR finally agreed on discussing the draft of regulation on the ratification. The influencing factor of DPR finally agreeing of this ratification is the UNCLOS 1982 where the shore reclamation done by Singapore would not decrease Indonesia territorial boundary and the decreasing width of Nipa island did not influence Indonesia's boundaries as the island remains the boundary point island in Indonesia's maritime territory. By ratifying the Regulation No. 4 in 2010, the export of sand that once was banned by the then Minister of Industry and Trading Rini Suwandi in 2003 has been allowed to continue. Theoretical implication shows that all theories used (the National Interest, Public Policy, 'Two Level Game' and International Political Economy Theories) can explain the introduction of this regulation on maritime boundaries.
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Indonesia, 2011
T 28717
UI - Tesis Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Maria Lestari Olivia
Abstrak :
ABSTRAK
Gated Community adalah area yang dikelilingi oleh penghalang fisik berupa dinding, pagar atau lanskap pada area tempat tinggal pribadi, jalan, trotoar, dan fasilitas di dalamnya. Batasan tersebut berperan dalam menjaga keamanan dan membatasi akses umum untuk masuk. Sehingga mencegah non-penghuni dapat menembus dan membuat intervensi di dalamnya. Setiap gated community mempunyai karakteristik berbeda-beda yang dilatarbelakangi oleh kebudayaan dan keadaan sosial masyarakat di daerah tersebut. Kota Wisata merupakan bentuk gated community yang berkonsep wisata. Pengaruh konsep ini menyebabkan batasan yang dimiliki perumahan Kota Wisata menjadi gagal dalam membatasi dan melarang akses publik untuk masuk. Hal ini juga berpengaruh pada pembentukan fasilitas publik yang dapat digunakan secara umum oleh masyarakat luar Kota Wisata. Tujuan skripsi ini adalah untuk menelusuri implikasi spasial dan sosial dari penerapan gated community pada perumahan dengan konsep berwisata pada Perumahan Kota Wisata.
ABSTRACT
Gated community is an area surrounded by physical boundaries such as walls, fence or landscape in private housing area, street, sidewalk and other facilities. The boundaries are used for keeping security and limiting entrance for public access to prevent from non-residents or stranger come through that causes intervention. Each gated community has various characterisctics whose backgrounds are from culture and social environment. Kota Wisata is gated community with tourism concept. This concept causes the boundaries inside Kota Wisata fail to work which are limiting and prohibiting public access to come. This concept also influences the forming of public facilities that are accessible for people who do not dwell in Kota Wisata. The purpose of this thesis is to figure out spatial and social implication from gated community implementation in private housing with tourism concept in Kota Wisata residence.
Universitas Indonesia,. Fakultas Teknik, 2019
S-Pdf
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Churchill, Ruel V., 1899-1987
Auckland: McGraw-Hill, 1978
515.243 CHU f
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Jakarta: Pengayoman, 2000
346.04 IND a
Buku Teks  Universitas Indonesia Library
<<   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   >>