Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Penelitian ini membahas pelaksanaan Health Risk Assessment di PT X Area OperasiBagian Utara. Penelitian bertujuan mengkaji data hasil ukur dosis personal selama 1 periodepengukuran tahun 2015 – 2017 dan melakukan penilaian risiko kesehatan dengan metodeanalisis semi-kuantitatif dengan mengacu Risk Assessment Matrix IPIECA & OGP 2006.Hasil penelitian ini teridentifikasi 9 SEG, namun setelah dikaji secara kuantitatifterdapat SEG yang perlu diklasifikasikan menjadi beberapa sub-group dan health hazardhanya mengacu pada dokumen sekunder sebanyak 10 health hazard. Terdapat keragamanhasil ukur dosis personal dalam 1 SEG menunjukkan salah satu kelemahan pengklasifikasianSEG yang hanya mengacu jabatan pekerjaan saja. Residual Risk Level pada setiap SEGuntuk seluruh bahaya gas (Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, Xylene) berada pada tingkatanlow risk, kecuali untuk H2S yang masuk kategori medium risk. Sementara noisediklasifikasikan low risk pada SEG GS Operator, MWT Operator, Gas Operator, Welder,Company Representative dan noise masuk medium risk pada sebagian SEG Technician shopterutama pada saat pekerjaan metalizing.Risk level bahaya H2S tidak dapat diturunkan menjadi Low mengingat tingkatseverity berada pada tingkatan high (4). Penurunan risk level bahaya noise dapat dilakukandengan konsistensi implementasi HCP dan perlu dilakukan pengukuran efektifitas fungsiearmuff / earplugs untuk mengetahui dosis efektif yang diterima pekerja. Risiko kesehatanpada tingkatan Low Risk, tetap harus dikelola agar level risk tidak meningkat sehingga PT Xtetap melanjutkan penerapan existing control dan memastikan pelaksanaan kajian HRA lebihmendalam dengan melakukan observasi / wawancara untuk mengetahui efektifitasimplementasi existing control terhadap Potential Risk Level dan Residual Risk Level.......This Health Risk Assessment research that was implemented at PT X NorthOperations Area. The aims of this study was to review the data on personal dose exposuremeasurement results for 1 measurement period 2015 - 2017 and conduct a health riskassessment using a semi-quantitative analysis method with reference to the IPIECA & OGPRisk Assessment Matrix Year 2006.The results of this study identified 9 SEGs, but after being studied quantitativelythere were SEGs that needed to be classified into several sub-groups and health hazards onlyreferred to secondary documents as many as 10 health hazards. There is a variety of personaldose measurement results in 1 SEG showing one of the weaknesses in the classification ofSEG which only refers to job title. The Residual Risk Level in each SEG for all gas hazards(Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl Benzene, Xylene) is at a low risk level, except for H2S which is inthe medium risk category. Meanwhile, noise is classified as low risk in SEG GS Operators,MWT Operators, Gas Operators, Welder, Company Representatives and noise is a mediumrisk in several SEG Technician shops, especially during metalizing work.The H2S risk level cannot be lowered to low considering that the severity level is ata high level (4). Reducing the risk level of noise hazards can be implemented by consistentimplementation of HCP and it is necessary to measure the effectiveness of the earmuff /earplugs function to determine the effective dose received by workers. Health risks at theLow Risk level must still be managed so that the risk level does not increase so that PT Xcontinues to implement existing controls and ensure the implementation a comprehensiveHRA study by conducting observations / interviews to determine the effectiveness ofimplementing existing controls on the Potential Risk Level and Residual Risk Level"

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai penilaian risiko kesehatan berdasarkan task analysis padaaktivitas well services industri pengeboran minyak bumi di PT X Tahun 2019. Penelitianini adalah penelitian semikuantitatif dengan desain deskriptif berdasarkan HRA modelPT Pertamina (2018) berdasarkan factor tingkat pajanan dan tingkat. Langkah awal yangdilakukan adalah dengan mengidentifikasi aktivitas well services berdasarkan task yangada pada SOP dan JSA, walkthrough survey dan menilai risiko. Berdasarkan penilaianrisiko kesehatan didapatkan tingkat risiko tinggi (high) untuk bahaya bising terhadap SEGfloorman, driller, derrickman, dan mechanic dan bahaya ergonomi terhadap SEGfloorman, driller, derrickman, dan operator dozer. PT AB dan PT CD perlu melakukanpengendalian tambahan terhadap bahaya bising dan bahaya ergonomi antara lain:Hearing Loss Prevention Program (HLPP), audit terhadap SOP & peralatan, melakukanpengukuran dosis personal bahaya bising, pembatasan jam kerja, pengukuran audiometri,melakukan supervisi dilapangan terhadap pengunaan earplug, pengunaan double earplug& earmuff, melakukan sosialisasi bahaya bising secara konsisten, menyediakan perancah(scafolding) pada aktivitas nipple up & nipple down horse head, melakukan pelatihanposisi tubuh yang ergonomi serta menambahkan Ergonomic Postur Assessment sebagaisalah satu item dalam pemeriksaan kesehatan berkala. Bahaya gas H2S terhadap SEGfloorman, driller dan derrickman dan bahaya gas CO terhadap SEG mechanicmendapatkan tingkat risiko medium, sehingga perlu dilakukan pemantauan implementasipengendalian yang sudah ada serta pengendalian tambahan secara konsisten. Selanjutnyabahaya getaran mendapatkan tingkat risiko low terhadap SEG mechanic dan bahaya gasO2 terhadap SEG floorman, driller, derrickman, mechanic dan operator Dozermendapatkan tingkat risiko very low, oleh karena itu PT AB dan PT CD melalui HESdepartemen perlu melakukan monitoring secara berkala dan konsisten terhadapimpelementasi pengendalian yang sudah ada. Selain itu hasil penelitian ini jugamenyarankan bahwa identifikasi potensi bahaya lainnya seperti pencahayan, radiasigamma, heat stress, welding fume, bahaya biologi dan bahaya psikososial pada pekerjaanwell services berdasarkan task analysis.......This thesis discusses the health risk assessment based on task analysis on the well servicesactivities of the petroleum drilling industry at PT X 2019. This research is asemiquantitative study with a descriptive design based on the HRA model of PTPertamina (2018) bases factor exposure level and hazard level. The first step is to identifyperformed the task well services based on SOP and JSA, walkthrough survey and riskassessment. Based on the health risk assessment, there is a high risk level for noisehazards to similar exposure group (SEG) floorman, driller, derrickman, and mechanicand ergonomic hazards to floorman, driller, derrickman, and dozer operators. PT ABand PT CD need to conduct additional controls for noise hazards and ergonomic hazards,including: Hearing Loss Prevention Program, auditing SOPs & equipment, measuringpersonal dose of noise hazards, limiting working hours, audiometric measurements,conducting field supervision of the use of earplugs, using double earplugs and earmuffs,disseminating noise hazards consistently, providing scaffolding for Nipple Up and NippleDown Horse Head activities, conducting ergonomic body position training, and addingErgonomic Posture Assessment as an item in periodic health checks. The hazard of H2Sgas to the SEG floorman, driller and derrickman and the danger of CO gas to the SEGmechanic has a medium level of risk, it is necessary to monitor the implementation ofexisting controls as well as additional controls consistently. Furthermore, the vibrationhazard gets a low risk level for the SEG mechanic and the danger of O2 gas against theSEG floorman, driller, derrickman, mechanic and Dozer operators get a very low risklevel, therefore PT AB and PT CD through the HES department need to monitor regularlyand consistently the implementation of existing controls. In addition, the results of thisstudy also suggest that the identification of other potential hazards such as lighting,gamma radiation, heat stress, welding fume, biological hazards and psychosocialhazards in well-service work based on task analysis"