Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"The analysis of means (ANOM) is a graphical procedure used to quantify differences among treatment groups in a variety of experimental design and observational study situations. The ANOM decision chart allows one to easily draw conclusions and interpret results with respect to both statistical and practical significance. It is an excellent choice for multiple comparisons of means, rates, or proportions and can be used with both balanced and unbalanced data. Key advances in ANOM procedures that have appeared only in technical journals during the last 20 years are included in this first comprehensive modern treatment of the ANOM containing all of the needed information for practitioners to understand and apply ANOM."

"Studi evaluasi ini menawarkan pendekatan baru dalam metode evaluasi dampak program CSR berbasis PROPER, dengan menggabungkan metode meansend analysis dengan SROI yang masih jarang dilakukan oleh evaluator CSR maupun perusahaan. Banyak dari studi sebelumnya hanya melihat analisis PROPER dengan gap analysis yang hanya bersifat administratif dan prosedural, sehingga belum sejalan dengan nilai PROPER. Selain itu, masih banyak program CSR yang implementasinya hanya bersifat charity, dan tidak menghasilkan impact berupa pengembangan kapasitas dari komunitas penerima program. Oleh karenanya, studi ini mengkombinasikan metode Gap Analysis untuk melihat kesesuaian program dengan pedoman PROPER, lalu metode means-end analysis untuk menangkap permasalahan yang muncul dalam pengelolaan dan proses implementasi, serta metode Social Return On Investment (SROI) untuk mengukur valuasi moneter dari dampak sosial yang diberikan oleh program. Hasil evaluasi memperlihatkan program telah sesuai dengan pedoman PROPER, tetapi masih ditemukan beberapa kekurangan yang menjadi celah. Pada capaian dampak, program juga berhasil memberikan dampak dengan perubahan yang signifikan, namun hanya parsial pada sebagian penerima manfaat. Adapun analisis nilai dampak menghasilkan besaran dampak moneter yaitu 1.86 kali lebih besar dari nilai investasi perusahaan, angka yang cenderung kecil tersebut disebabkan oleh dampak yang cenderung parsial, intangible, karena kapasitas masyarakat yang masih relatif terbatas. Secara keseluruhan, hasil memperlihatkan bahwa program perlu memperhatikan pemetaan dampak pada stakeholder, terutama pada aspek community development.

---

This evaluation study offers a new approach in evaluating the impact of PROPER-based CSR programs, by combining the Means-end Analysis method with SROI which is still rarely carried out by CSR evaluators and companies. Many of the previous studies only looked at the PROPER analysis with a Gap Analysis that was only administrative and procedural, so it was not in line with the PROPER value. In addition, there are still many CSR programs whose implementation is only charity, and does not produce an impact in the form of capacity building of the program recipient community. Therefore, this study combines the Gap Analysis method to see the suitability of the program with PROPER guidelines, then the Means-end Analysis method to capture problems that arise in the management and implementation process, and the Social Return On Investment (SROI) method to measure the monetary valuation of social impacts. provided by the program. The evaluation results show that the program has complied with the PROPER guidelines, but there are still some shortcomings that become gaps. In terms of impact, the program has also succeeded in having an impact with significant changes, but only partially for some beneficiaries. As for the impact value analysis, the magnitude of the monetary impact is 1.86 times greater than the value of the company's investment, the figure which tends to be small is caused by the impact which tends to be partial, intangible, due to the relatively limited capacity of the community. Overall, the results show that the program needs to pay attention to mapping impacts on stakeholders, especially in the community development aspect."

"Studi ini mengevaluasi keberlanjutan dari program pemberdayaan masyarakat Kampung Berseri Astra (KBA) dengan melihat keberhasilan program dalam meningkatkan kualitas hidup masyarakat Lengkong Kulon RW 03 BSD di bidang pendidikan, kesehatan, lingkungan, dan kewirausahaan. Studi sebelumnya menggunakan indikator indikator yang hanya berfokus pada isu kemiskinan, padahal tidak semua pemberdayaan masyarakat harus berangkat dari kondisi kemiskinan dan tidak semua program pemberdayaan masyarakat memiliki tujuan untuk mengentaskan kemiskinan. Oleh karenanya, dalam melakukan evaluasi program pengembangan masyarakat, dibutuhkan model dan dimensi evaluasi yang sesuai dengan tujuan dan objektif yang ingin dicapai program. Penelitian ini menggunakan alat analisis evaluasi means ends dan main anaytical untuk melihat ketercapaian tujuan program KBA dalam meningkatkan kualitas hidup masyarakat setempat dengan melihat proses implementasi program. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga menggunakan analisis terhadap tingkat partisipasi dan capacity building program. Penelitian ini juga memiliki refleksi kritis terhadap penyelenggaraan program KBA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa program KBA telah berhasil meningkatkan kualitas hidup masyarakat Lengkong Kulon di bidang pendidikan, kesehatan, lingkungan, dan kewirausahaan. Selain itu, hasil temuan juga menunjukkan bahwa masyarakat RW 03 Lengkong Kulon BSD memiliki tingkat partisipasi dan peningkatan kapasitas yang tinggi dalam tahapan pemetaan masalah, perencanaan program, implementasi, monitoring, dan evaluasi program. Meski demikian, pelaksanaan program KBA pun tetap memiliki permasalahan dan kendala internal dalam pelaksanaannya.

---

This study evaluates the sustainability of Kampung Berseri Astra (KBA) community development program by looking at the program's achievement in improving the quality of life of the people in Lengkong Kulon RW 03 BSD in the fields of education, health, environment, and entrepreneurship. Previous studies used indicators that are only focused on the issue of poverty, whereas not all community empowerment must start from poverty conditions and not all community empowerment programs have a goal of alleviating poverty. Therefore, in evaluating community development programs, another model and evaluation dimension is needed to measure the program’s goals and objectives. This study uses means-ends analysis and main analytical evaluation tool to see the achievement of the KBA program objectives in improving the quality of life of the local community by looking at the program implementation process. In addition, this study analyzes the program’s level of participation and capacity building. The results show that the KBA program has succeeded in improving the quality of life of the Lengkong Kulon community in the fields of education, health, environment, and entrepreneurship. In addition, the findings also show that the community of RW 03 Lengkong Kulon BSD has a high level of participation and capacity building in the stages of problem mapping, program planning, implementation, monitoring, and program evaluation. However, the implementation of the KBA program still has internal problems and obstacles in its implementation."