Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

""

"ABSTRAKPerjanjian simulasi atau perjanjian pura-pura atau perjanjian persekongkolan diartikan sebagai perjanjian dimana keadaan yuridis dari suatu perbuatan hukum tersebut disembunyikan dari pihak ketiga. Perjanjian simulasi terjadi bilamana ada dua persetujuan yaitu persetujuan lanjutan (akta lanjutan) dibuat berbeda dengan persetujuan semula (akta aslinya) dan keadaan yuridis dari perbuatan hukum lanjutan disembunyikan dari pihak ketiga. Persetujuan lanjutan jika memuat kausa yang terlarang disebut perjanjian simulasi absolut dan jika kausanya tidak terlarang disebut perjanjian semulasi relatif. Perjanjian simulasi secara teknis yuridis terjadi jika ada pertentangan antara kehendak dan pernyataan yang tidak diketahui oleh pihak ketiga atau suatu perjanjian yang dibuat dengan kausa yang palsu. Akibat Hukum dari perjanjian simulasi yang keadaan yuridis dari perbuatan hukum yang disembunyikan dari pihak ketiga tidak berlaku bagi pihak ketiga yang beritikad baik. Dalam praktek notaris di Kabupaten Bandung Barat didapat ada bentuk-bentuk perjanjian smulasi dengan berbagai variasi, ada yang kausanya palsu dan ada yang kausanya terlarang.

---

Abstract

Simulation agreement or pretense agreement or conspiracy agreement is taken to mean an agreement in which the judicial situation of a legal act is hidden from the third party. A simulation agreement occurs when there are two agreements, namely a subsequent agreement is made different from the first agreement (its original deed) and the legal act of the subsequent agreement is hidden from the third party. If the subsequent agreement contains a forbidden cause, it is called absolute simulation agreement and if it contains a non-forbidden cause, it is called relative simulation agreement. Technically and judicially, a simulation agreement occurs if there is contradiction between the will and the statement that is not known by the third party or an agreement made with a false cause. The legal consequence of a simulation agreement in which the judicial situation of a legal act is hidden from the third party does not apply to the third party who has good will. In the practice of notaries in Bandung barat Regency are found varied forms of simulation agreements, the causes of some are false and causes of some others are forbidden."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai perbuatan melawan hukum dalam bidang keperdataan karena pencemaran nama baik. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis-normatif normative legal research dengan studi kepustakaan. Metode penelitian tersebut digunakan untuk menjawab permasalahan: pertama, teori dan pengaturan perbuatan melawan hukum dalam bidang keperdataan serta teori dan pengaturan tentang pencemaran nama baik. Perbuatan melawan hukum diatur di dalam Pasal 1365 sampai 1380 KUH Perdata, sedangkan pencemaran nama baik diatur di dalam Pasal 1372 sampai 1380 KUH Perdata dan Pasal 27 ayat 3 UU ITE jo Pasal 310 sampai 320 KUH Pidana. Kedua, perlu atau tidaknya putusan pidana untuk mengajukan gugatan perdata karena pencemaran nama baik. Tidak adanya pengaturan mengenai kewajiban tersebut menimbulkan perbedaan pendapat di putusan Hakim. Ketiga, analisis terhadap pertimbangan hakim di dalam Putusan No. 134/Pdt. G/2010/PN.Jkt.Ut. Hasil penelitian ini menyarankan bahwa: i Definisi “penghinaan” dalam bidang Hukum Perdata perlu dibuat, sehingga tidak menimbulkan ambiguitas dengan menggunakan terminologi Hukum Pidana; ii Pengaturan mengenai tidak perlunya putusan pidana dalam mengajukan gugatan pencemaran nama baik perlu diatur sehingga menimbulkan kepastian hukum dan tidak terjadi perbedaan pendapat diantara hakim; iii Penggugat seharusnya meminta kepada hakim untuk rehabilitasi nama baik dan kehormatan dengan cara penempelan putusan di muka umum dan agar Tergugat membuat pernyataan bahwa perbuatan yang dilakukannya adalah fitnah.

---

This thesis discusses the unlawful act in the field of civil cases for defamation. This research is a juridical-normative legal normative research with a literature study. The research methods used to answer the problems: first, the theory of unlawful act and its regulation as well as the theory and the regularion of defamation. Unlawful act is regulated in Article 1365 until 1380 Civil Code, while defamation is regulated in Article 1372 to the 1380 Civil Code and Article 27 paragraph 3 ITE Law in conjunction with Article 310 to 320 of Penal Code. Second, is criminal verdict necessary or not to file a civil lawsuit for defamation. This lack of regulation caused diifferent opinion in the Judge's decision. Third, analysis of the judges' considerations in the Verdict No. 134/Pdt. G/2010/PN.Jkt.Ut.

The result of this study suggest that: i Definition of "defamation" in the field of civil law needs to be made, because to avoid ambiguity by using the terminology of the Penal Code, ii There is need the regulation that criminal verdict is not necessary to file a civil lawsuit for defamation, in order to certainty of law and no different of opinion among the judges; iii Plaintiff's should request for rehabilitation of the reputation and honor by way of settlement decisions in public and that defendant made a statement that his act of doing is defamation."

""No matter your goals, Atomic habits offers a proven framework for getting 1% better every day. James Clear, one of the world's leading experts on habit formation, reveals practical strategies that will teach you exactly how to master the tiny behaviors that lead to remarkable results. If you're having trouble changing your habits, the problem isn't you. The problem is your system. Bad habits repeat themselves not because you don't want to change, but because you have the wrong system for change. You do not rise to the level of your goals. You fall to the level of your systems. In Atomic habits, you'll get a plan that can take you to new heights. Clear is known for his ability to distill complex topics into simple behaviors that can be readily applied to daily life and work. Here, he draws on ideas from biology, psychology, and neuroscience to create an easy-to-understand guide for making good habits inevitable and bad habits impossible. Along the way, readers will be inspired and entertained with true stories from Olympic gold medalists, award-winning artists, business leaders, life-saving physicians, and star comedians who have used the science of small habits to vault to the top of their fields. Atomic Habits will reshape the way you think about progress and give you the tools and strategies you need to transform your habits--whether you are an athlete looking to win a championship, an leader hoping to optimize and organization, or an individual who wishes to quit smoking, lose weight, reduce stress, and achieve success that lasts."--Container."

"ABSTRAKLembaga Lelang adalah suatu bentuk penjualan di muka umum yang pelaksanaannya telah diatur oleh Vendu Reglement 1908 (Peraturan Lelang 1908) dan dilaksanakan oleh Pejabat Lelang. Pada lelang dihasilkan produk hukum yang otentik yaitu suatu Risalah Lelang yang mempunyai kekuatan pembuktian yang sempuma khususnya bagi pembeli lelang. Pada kasus pembatalan Risalah Lelang oleh pengadilan saat ini yang terjadi khususnya yang berkaitan dengan lelang benda tidak bcrgerak seperti tanah dan pemenang lelang yang beritikad baik dirugikan karena kehilangan hak mereka atas tanah yang dibelinya melalui Lelang. Demikian Tesis ini membahas mengenai tidak adanya perlindungan hukum terhadap pembeli lelang yang beritikad baik pada perolehan hak atas tanah melalui lelang dalam suatu kasus agar lelang dapat berlaku efektif.

---

ABSTRAKAuction is a public sale which ruled by the Vendu Reglement 1908 (Auction Law 1908) and held by the Auctioneer. In the Auction there were an authentic law product called The Auction Minute that gave a certainty of law especially for the buyer in the auction. ln the case of the Auction Minute cancelled by the court decision concerning legal dispute relating to immoceable goods auction and the good faith buyer has been suffered losing their rights of land that they already bought from the auction. Therefore this thesys talking about the absence of legal protection towards the auction buyer who purchase rights on land in good faith through an auction in one case to make the auction can works effectively."

"Korupsi, dewasa ini, merupakan masalah yang serius dan akut yang di hadapi oleh Bangsa Indonesia dalam rangka untuk mewujudlan tata pemerintahan yang baik...."

"Pembahasan dalam penelitian ini terkait dengan kendala dalam Undang-Undang Yayasan khususnya terhadap pengaturan itikad baik dalam kewenangan organ yayasan dan perbandingan ketentuan hukum yang terdapat dalam kasus Yayasan Teungku Fakinah. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisa kendala dalam Undang-Undang Yayasan yang dapat menyebabkan adanya pelanggaran itikad baik oleh organ yayasan . Metode dari penelitian ini adalah Doktrinal (yuridis-normatif) dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach). Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah Undang-Undang Yayasan masih memiliki kendala khususnya yang berkaitan dengan ketentuan mengenai itikad baik dibuktikan dengan adanya kasus Yayasan Teungku Fakinah yang menyebabkan adanya perbedaan pendapat hakim dalam memutus perkara dikarekan tidak adanya pemahaman yang utuh mengenai makna itikad baik.

---

The discussion in this study is related to the obstacles in the Foundation Law; especially, regards to the regulation of good faith within the authority of foundation organs and a comparison of the legal provisions contained in the case of the Teungku Fakinah Foundation. Furthermore, the aim of this study is that to analyze the obstacles in the Foundation Law which can cause violations of good faith by foundation organs. The method of this study was doctrinal (juridical-normative) with a statute and case approach. The conclusion is that the Foundation Law still has obstacles; especially, those relating to provisions regarding good faith. It was proved by the Teungku Fakinah Foundation case which caused differences of opinion among judges in deciding cases due to the lack of a complete understanding of the meaning of good faith."