Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Terorisme merupakan issue keamanan yang mencuat sejak peristiwa 11 September 2001. Namun, Indonesia baru menyadari ancaman terorrisme terhadap keamanan setelah peristiwa bom Bali I pada 12 oktober 2002. Dalam kebijakan pemerintah yang pertama terkait dengan terorisme , kerjasama yang dibangun lebih difokuskan pada Kepolisian dan Intelejen. Hal ini seolah mengkuak konsep yang salah kaprah tentang keamanan. Artikel ini menjelaskan posisi pertahanan dalam pemberantasan issue terorisme dan kebijakan pertahanan yang seharusnya dibentuk oleh Pemerintah Indonesia. Artikel ini menggunakan teori sekuratisasi sebagai pisau analisis. Melalui teori ini, konsep keamanan dan proses pengamanan suatu objek dari ancaman yang tidak hanya dilakukan oleh aparat kepolisian dan intelejen, tetapi juga pertahanan, digambarkan dengan jelas. Selain itu, artikel ini juga menjelaskan bahwa pertahanan inmiliter mempunyai peranan yang sangat besar dalam upaya pemeberantasan terorisme. Hal ini disebabkan oleh permasalahan utama dalam pemberantasan terorisme adalah manipulasi ajaran agama yang mampu menarik perhatian generasi muda hingga bergabung dalam jaringan teroris."

"[Perang Dingin yang berakhir pada tahun 1990 telah mengubah konstelasi politik dan keamanan dunia. Kemunculan banyak negara baru yang dulu tidak terlalu dominan dalam politik dunia, kini menjadi pemain yang cukup diperhitungkan seperti Jepang. Setelah mengalami kekalahan pada Perang Dunia Ke-II, Jepang menjadi negara yang tidak normal karena tidak memiliki kekuatan militer.Sejak saat itu pula, Jepang menggantungkan keamanan nasionalnya di bawah perlindungan payung keamanan Amerika Serikat. Seiring berjalannya waktu, struktur keamanan global maupun regional telah berubah. Kemunculan China sebagai kekuatan regional baru, pengembangan senjata nuklir Korea Utara, modernisasi militer Korea Selatan, serta banyaknya masalah baik teritorial maupun sejarah di Asia Timur telah mempengaruhi Jepang untuk mengubah kebijakan Pertahanannya. Perubahan kebijakan ini diwujudkan dalam dua usaha yaitu usaha internal melalui peningkatan kekuatan pertahanan Jepang dan usaha eksternal melalui peningkatan diplomasi pertahanan Jepang dengan negara-negara di kawasan Asia Pasifik.......The end of Cold War in 1990 changed global political constellation and security. The emergence of new global power that were not determined in the past, now have a very significant role in global politics such as Japan. After losing to U.S allies in the World War II, Japan became abnormal state because she did not have military power. Since then, Japan has been depended her national security on U.S security umbrella. After Cold War, the situation surroundings Japan has changed. China rose as a new global power, nuclear weapon possession by North Korea, South Korea's military modernization, and territorial disputes among them give impacts on Japan?s Defense Policy. The change of Japan's Defense Policy is indicated by two attempts, which are internal efforts and external efforts. Internal efforts are executed by increasing military power and external efforts are executed by developing defense diplomacy through security arrangements with the Asia Pacific countries. The end of Cold War in 1990 changed global political constellation and security. The emergence of new global power that were not determined in the past, now have a very significant role in global politics such as Japan. After losing to U.S allies in the World War II, Japan became abnormal state because she did not have military power. Since then, Japan has been depended her national security on U.S security umbrella. After Cold War, the situation surroundings Japan has changed. China rose as a new global power, nuclear weapon possession by North Korea, South Korea’s military modernization, and territorial disputes among them give impacts on Japan’s Defense Policy. The change of Japan’s Defense Policy is indicated by two attempts, which are internal efforts and external efforts. Internal efforts are executed by increasing military power and external efforts are executed by developing defense diplomacy through security arrangements with the Asia Pacific countries., The end of Cold War in 1990 changed global political constellation and security. The emergence of new global power that were not determined in the past, now have a very significant role in global politics such as Japan. After losing to U.S allies in the World War II, Japan became abnormal state because she did not have military power. Since then, Japan has been depended her national security on U.S security umbrella. After Cold War, the situation surroundings Japan has changed. China rose as a new global power, nuclear weapon possession by North Korea, South Korea’s military modernization, and territorial disputes among them give impacts on Japan’s Defense Policy. The change of Japan’s Defense Policy is indicated by two attempts, which are internal efforts and external efforts. Internal efforts are executed by increasing military power; and external efforts are executed by developing defense diplomacy through security arrangements with the Asia Pacific countries.]"

"Tesis ini menganalisa penyebab dan proses modernisasi alutsista pertahanan laut melalui kebijakan Minimum Essential Force (MEF) tidak mencapai target pada tahap II tahun 2015-2019. Penelitian ini menggunakan teori implementasi kebijakan oleh Grindle. Teknik pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan wawancara mendalam kepada narasumber penelitian, serta melakukan pengumpulan data sekunder berupa dokumen-dokumen terkait. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat empat permasalahan yang menjadi penyebab tidak tercapainya target pemenuhan modernisasi alutsista pertahanan laut melalui kebijakan MEF tahap II tahun 2015-2019. Pertama, realisasi anggaran pertahanan. Kedua, perbedaan pandangan antara aktor-aktor kebijakan terhadap MEF. Ketiga, pengawasan dan pengendalian tidak terlaksana. Keempat, kemandirian industri pertahanan dalam negeri tidak tercapai. Dengan menggunakan teori implementasi kebijakan Grindle, penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa keempat permasalahan yang menjadi penyebab tidak tercapainya target tidak hanya dipengaruhi oleh keterbatasan sumber daya, namun juga oleh komitmen (political will) aktor-aktor kebijakan. Political will yang dimaksud Grindle dijelaskan melalui variabel konteks implementasi kebijakan meliputi kepentingan aktor-aktor kebijakan, karakteristik rezim dan tingkat kepatuhan stakeholders. Hasil analisis juga menunjukkan bahwa tidak terpenuhinya setiap aspek dalam variabel konten dan variabel konteks implementasi kebijakan menjadi faktor yang menyebabkan implementasi kebijakan modernisasi alutsista TNI dalam MEF tahap II tahun 2015-2019 tidak memenuhi target yang telah ditetapkan.......This thesis analyzes the causes and process of modernizing maritime defense equipment through the Minimum Essential Force (MEF) policy which did not reach the target in phase II 2015-2019. This research uses Grindle's theory of policy implementation. Data collection techniques were carried out using in-depth interviews with research sources, as well as collecting secondary data in the form of related documents. The results of this research show that there are four problems that are the cause of not achieving the target of fulfilling the modernization of maritime defense equipment through the MEF phase II policy for 2015-2019. First, realization of the defense budget. Second, differences in views between policy actors towards MEF. Third, supervision and control does not work. Fourth, the independence of the domestic defense industry has not been achieved. By using Grindle's theory of policy implementation, this research explains that these four problems are not only influenced by limited resources, but also by the commitment (political will) of policy actors. The political will referred to by Grindle is explained through policy implementation context variables including the interests of policy actors, regime characteristics and the level of stakeholder compliance. The results of the analysis also show that the failure to fulfill every aspect in the content variables and policy implementation context variables is a factor that causes the implementation of the TNI defense equipment modernization policy in MEF phase II 2015-2019 to not meet the targets that have been set."