Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
ABSTRACT
Construction industry influence most, if not all of the national economic sectors. It builds and provides infrastructure for other economic sectors such as, agriculture, energy, tourism, manufacturing, trades etc. As for the urban and regional development, the Construction industry involvement by providing housings and infrastructure, i.e. public utilities, public works and transport sectors, is very important. In the industrial countries such as USA, UK and Australia, construction is the biggest industry. It contributes more than 9% of the Gross National Product. The construction industry uses more than 60% of the fixed capital expenditures, and it absorb significant amount of manpower because this industry is relatively labor-intensive. In the developing countries the contribution of the construction industry to the GDP varies from 3% to 8%. In Indonesia in particular the contribution of the industry increases from 3.86% in 1973 to 6.60% in 1993. These number are low compare to the numbers in the developed countries. Sector contribution to the GDP is measured from the value added of each sector compared to cumulative value added of all economic sectors. In construction, the value added is the difference between the contract value and project cost. The cost of the project is affected by the quality planning of the project. Lack of good quality planning will have an impact on completion time and final project execution cost. This research investigate the correlation between construction planning and value added of the project in the Jabotabek area. From 30 questionnaires sent to various construction projects and a selected number of face communications, 23 responses were received to be viable for in depth analysis. The result of the analysis shows clearly that value added is positively correlated in a non-linear manner to eight of the key construction planning variables of the projects. The eight key variables influencing productivity on value added are the preparation of Standard Operation Procedures (SOP) and network planning, the level of involvement of Site Manager, Contractor's Head Office, Owner and Sub-Contractor, the frequency of updating the planning and schedule, and the level of planning input to the projects. These results provided the basis for researching into the relation between the growths of construction industry contribution, representing overall productivity of the sector to the rise in the skilled personnel human resources, representing the quality potential construction planning input of the sector as a whole. The combined findings at the macro output and micro project level of construction provided some basic evidence of the potential role and function in training high quality planning to construction in a developing economy such as Indonesia.

Abstrak :
Berbagai masalah yang berasal dari permukiman kumuh tidak hanya menghasilkan lingkungan yang tidak sehat, tetapi juga memberikan dampak pada wilayah sekitarnya dan jaringan infrastruktur perkotaan secara keseluruhan. Dalam rangka mewujudkan Visi Indonesia 2045, yaitu "Pembangunan Infrastruktur yang Merata dan Terintegrasi", program Zero Slum merupakan komponen penting dari visi Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. Adanya kesenjangan dalam penanganan permukiman kumuh di Kalimantan Barat menghambat pencapaian tujuan tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi pemangku kepentingan dan faktor-faktor prioritas dalam penentuan prioritas penanganan kawasan kumuh di Kalimantan Barat. Metode yang digunakan adalah wawancara semi-terstruktur untuk mengidentifikasi dan memetakan pemangku kepentingan yang terlibat dalam penentuan prioritas, dan Geometric Mean untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh yang kemudian akan dianalisis dengan Interpretative Structural Modeling. Hasilnya adalah terdapat 24 stakeholder yang terlibat. Stakeholder Kuadran D (Manage Closely) dan stakeholder utama adalah anggota Tim Pembina, yaitu Kepala Dinas Perumahan dan Kawasan Permukiman (DPRKP), dan Kepala Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah (BAPPEDA). Namun, tingkat pengaruh tertinggi dipegang oleh tim pengarah dan tingkat kepentingan tertinggi dipegang oleh DPRKP. Terdapat sepuluh kategori dengan 22 faktor yang teridentifikasi dengan sembilan tingkat peringkat. Faktor yang paling berpengaruh adalah adanya perbedaan pengetahuan dan pengalaman dari anggota tim yang baru dengan anggota tim yang lama. ......The array of problems originating from slum settlements not only results in unwholesome environment, unlawful land utilization, and various internal challenges within the vicinity but also impacts the surrounding regions and the overall urban infrastructure network. In pursuit of Indonesia's 2045 Vision, which emphasizes on "equitable and integrated infrastructure development”, the zero slums constitute a pivotal component of the Ministry of Public Works and Public Housing's overarching vision. Nonetheless, a disparity has been identified in addressing slum settlements in West Kalimantan, hindering the achievement of this objective. This research aims to identify the stakeholders and the priority factors in determining the priority setting for slum area management in West Kalimantan. The method used in this research is semi-structured interview to identify and map stakeholders involved in priority setting, and geometric mean to identify influential factors which will then be analyzed using Interpretative Structural Modeling. The results found are that there are 24 stakeholders who are considered to be involved. Quadrant D (Manage Closely) stakeholders and primary stakeholders are members of the supervisory team, namely the Head of the Housing and Settlement Area Office, and the Head of the Regional Development Planning Agency. However, the highest level of influence is held by the steering committee while the highest level of interest is held by Housing and Settlement Area Office. In addition, ten categories with 22 factors are identified with nine ranking levels found to influence the decision to prioritize slum upgrading. The most influential factor is the difference in knowledge and experience between the new and the former team members.

Abstrak :
ABSTRACT
There were some problems in the handover of housing Infrastructure, Facilities, and Utilities (PSU (Prasarana, Sarana dan Utilitas)) by developers to local governments. Since the issuance of Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 9 of 2009, only small numbers of housing PSU have been handed over by the housing developers to the local government. The objective of this study was to explore some problems related to the handover of the housing PSU which located in Greater Bandung Area, both from the developers and the local governments sides. This study used a descriptive-qualitative approach. The primary data collection was conducted with an in-depth interview method to the fourteen developers experienced in housing development in the Greater Bandung Area and three local government officials. The secondary data was collected through the online news along with the regional regulations related to the handover of housing PSU in the districts/cities level of the Greater Bandung Area. The primary and secondary data were analyzed by Qualitative Content Analysis. The study showed that problems came from both developers and local governments sides. The developers believed that the bureaucracy for the housing handover was complicated, while the local governments stated there were inconsistencies between the approved site plan and the built PSU. The local governments also have not had mature planning for the housing PSUs operation and maintenance after the handover. Thus, as the organizer of housing affairs, the governments need to immediately reform the PSU planning and management in terms of its provision, financing, and maintenance.

Abstrak :
Dengan adanya pertambahan jumlah penduduk di Indonesia membuat kebutuhan terhadap tempat tinggal yang layak terus meningkat. Tempat tinggal yang layak harus ditunjang dengan infrastruktur permukiman agar menjadikan permukiman tersebut menjadi permukiman yang berkelanjutan. Indikator-indikator permukiman berkelanjutan yaitu indikator sosial, indikator lingkungan dan indikator ekonomi. Salah satu indikator sosial adalah interaksi sosial yang terjadi di permukiman tersebut. Dalam penelitian ini akan melihat hubungan antara ldquo;dengan dibangunnya infrastruktur permukiman dapat membuat permukiman tersebut menjadi berkelanjutan dan membuat penghuninya lebih sejahtera rdquo;, dan ldquo;apakah dengan dibangunnya fasilitasi-fasililitas penunjang interaksi sosial akan membuat membuat masyarakat di permukiman tersebut berinteraksi rdquo; dan ldquo;dengan terbentuknya permukiman yang berkelanjutan dari segi sosial dapat membuat masyarakat permukiman tersebut menjadi sejatera rdquo;. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode deskriptif korelasional dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian yang telah didapatkan menunjukan semua nilai korelasi yang dihitung melebihi dari nilai korelasi tabel yaitu 0,1147 berarti hubungan diantara kedua variabel memiliki korelasi atau memiliki hubungan satu sama lain, berarti semua hipotesis dapat diterima, sehingga pertanyaan-pertanyaan penelitian yang ada dapat terjawab dengan diterimanya hipotesis-hipotesis penelitian. Kemudian dapat disimpulkan masyarakat yang tinggal di suatu permukiman dapat lebih sejahtera jika kebutuhan infrastruktur disekitar permukiman tercukupi serta interaksi sosial yang terjalin antar masyarakat sekitar permukiman tersebut. ......Given the number of people in Indonesia, making the need for decent housing continues to rise. Adequate housing must be supported by the infrastructure of housing in order to make such housing into sustainable housing. Indicators of sustainable housing social indicators, environmental indicators and economic indicators. One indicator of the social is social interactions that occur in the housing. In this study will look at the relationship between with the construction of housing infrastructure can make such housing would be sustainable , and whether with the construction of supporting facilities social interaction will make make public through the neighborhood interact and the establishment of housing sustainable in terms of social can make these settlements into prosperous society. This research uses a correlational descriptive method with quantitative approach. The results of the research have shown that all correlation values calculated exceeds the value of the correlation table is 0.1147 means the relationship between the two variables have a correlation or have a relationship with each other, it means that all hypotheses can be accepted, so that the existing research questions can be answered with The acceptance of research hypotheses. Then it can be concluded that people living in a settlement can be more prosperous if the infrastructure needs around the settlements are fulfilled and social interactions that exist between communities around the settlement.