Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKLatar belakang: Salah satu bagian dalam menentukan diagnosis dan rencana perawatan ortodonti adalah analisis profil jaringan lunak pasien. E-line & Profil wajah merupakan metode yang dapat dipakai dalam menentukan profil jaringan lunak. Pengukuran E-line dan Profil Wajah dinyatakan dapat dilakukan antara Sefalogram dan foto Ekstra Oral. Tujuan: Mengetahui perbedaan posisi Ls, Li dari E-line dan Profil Wajah pada Sefalogram dan foto Ekstra Oral. Metode Penelitian: Didapatkan 55 sampel penelitian berupa Sefalogram lateral dan foto Ekstra Oral lateral. Dilakukan tabulasi data dan diuji komparatif sederhana dengan Chi-square untuk membandingkan posisi Ls, Li dari E-line dan Profil Wajah pada sefalogram dan foto ekstra oral. Hasil: Terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna untuk posisi Ls terhadap garis E-line antara Sefalogram dan foto Ekstra Oral (p< 0,05), terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna untuk posisi Li terhadap garis E-line antara Sefalogram dan foto Ekstra Oral (p<0,05). Terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna untuk Profil Wajah antara Sefalogram dan foto Ekstra Oral (p<0,05). Kesimpulan: Posisi Ls, Li dari E-line dan Profil Wajah pada Sefalogram dan foto Ekstra Oral adalah berbeda.ABSTRACTBackground: Factors in determining the diagnosis and orthodontic treatment plan is the analysis of soft tissue profile of the patient. E-line measurement and profile can be done in the face of otherwise sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Purpose: To determine differences in position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Methods: There were 55 samples of research in the form of sefalogram lateral and lateral extra-oral photos. Conducted a comparative tabulation of the data and then tested with Chi-square to compare the position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Results: There were significant differences Ls position to the line E-line at sefalogram and extra-oral photograph (p <0.05), there were significant differences Li position to the line E-line at sefalogram and extra-oral photograph (p <0.05 ), there were significant differences in the facial profile and photo sefalogram extra-oral (p <0.05). Conclusion: The position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photograph is different.;Background: Factors in determining the diagnosis and orthodontic treatment plan is the analysis of soft tissue profile of the patient. E-line measurement and profile can be done in the face of otherwise sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Purpose: To determine differences in position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Methods: There were 55 samples of research in the form of sefalogram lateral and lateral extra-oral photos. Conducted a comparative tabulation of the data and then tested with Chi-square to compare the position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Results: There were significant differences Ls position to the line E-line at sefalogram and extra-oral photograph (p <0.05), there were significant differences Li position to the line E-line at sefalogram and extra-oral photograph (p <0.05 ), there were significant differences in the facial profile and photo sefalogram extra-oral (p <0.05). Conclusion: The position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photograph is different., Background: Factors in determining the diagnosis and orthodontic treatment plan is the analysis of soft tissue profile of the patient. E-line measurement and profile can be done in the face of otherwise sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Purpose: To determine differences in position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Methods: There were 55 samples of research in the form of sefalogram lateral and lateral extra-oral photos. Conducted a comparative tabulation of the data and then tested with Chi-square to compare the position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photos. Results: There were significant differences Ls position to the line E-line at sefalogram and extra-oral photograph (p <0.05), there were significant differences Li position to the line E-line at sefalogram and extra-oral photograph (p <0.05 ), there were significant differences in the facial profile and photo sefalogram extra-oral (p <0.05). Conclusion: The position Ls, Li from E-line and soft tissue profile on sefalogram and extra-oral photograph is different.]"

"Latar Belakang: Perlu dilakukan penelitian untuk melihat perbedaan gambaran jaringan lunak wajah pria dan wanita khususnya ras Deutro-Melayu. Profil wajah lurus dipilih karena profil wajah lurus tidak mengindikasikan adanya disproporsi dental dan fasial sehingga individu dengan profil wajah lurus diindikasikan memiliki oklusi normal serta penampilan wajah dan dental yang dapat diterima. Tujuan: Mengetahui gambaran jaringan lunak wajah pasien pria dan wanita ras Deutro-Melayu dengan profil wajah lurus di RSKGM FKG UI beserta perbedaannya. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan 56 rekam medis dan sefalogram lateral pasien pria dan wanita berusia 18-25 tahun ras Deutro-Melayu sebelum perawatan ortodonsia. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan uji T tidak berpasangan dan uji Mann-Whitney. Hasil: 8 parameter pengukuran menunjukkan perbedaan bermakna antara pria dan wanita (p<0,05) yakni pada kecembungan fasial, kecembungan fasial total, sudut nasofrontal, sudut mentolabial, sudut servikomental, posisi hidung terhadap bidang fasial, posisi bibir atas terhadap bidang fasial, dan posisi bibir bawah terhadap bidang fasial. Pria menunjukkan hasil pengukuran yang lebih besar dibandingkan dengan wanita, kecuali pada sudut nasofrontal yang secara statistik menunjukkan nilai rerata wanita lebih besar dibandingkan pria. Kesimpulan: Terdapat perbedaan bermakna antara gambaran jaringan lunak wajah pria dan wanita ras Deutro-Melayu dengan profil wajah lurus.

---

Background: It is necessary to conduct research to see the difference of facial soft tissue profile in male and female especially Deutro-Malay race. Straight face profile is selected because it does not indicate any dental and facial disproportions, so that individuals with straight facial profiles are indicated to have normal occlusion and acceptable facial and dental appearance. Objective: To compare the difference of facial soft tissue image in Deutro-Malay male and female with straight facial profile. Method: This study used medical records and lateral cephalograms of 56 male and female patients aged 18-25 with Deutro-Malay race before orthodontic treatment. Measurement performed with independent sample T-test and Mann-Whitney test. Result: 8 measurement parameters showed significant difference (p<0,05) those are facial convexity, total facial convexity, nasofrontal angle, mentolabial angle, cervicomental angle, position of nose to facial plane, position of upper lip to facial plane, and position of lower lip to facial plane. Male showed larger measurements than female, except in nasofrontal angle that statistically showed that female's mean score was greater than male. Conclusion: There is a significant difference between facial soft tissue image in Deutro-Malay male and female with straight facial profile."

"Latar Belakang: Penelitian persepsi Ortodontis dan masyarakat awam tentang profil wajah biasanya dilakukan untuk mengevaluasi kesepakatan di antara kelompok tersebut. Namun, masih sedikit penelitian yang menghubungkan persepsi dengan parameter jaringan lunak profil wajah. Tujuan: Mengetahui perbedaan persepsi ortodontis dan masyarakat awam dan korelasinya terhadap parameter jaringan lunak profil wajah menurut Arnett, Schwarz, dan Rickett. Metode: Penelitian ini adalah analitik korelatif dengan desain potong lintang. Foto profil 52 orang dinilai estetikanya oleh 17 ortodontis dan 17 masyarakat awam pada kuesioner. Uji korelasi Spearman dilakukan antara nilai modus persepsi VAS oleh Ortodontis dan masyarakat awam dengan selisih pengukuran parameter jaringan lunak Arnett, Schwarz, Rickett pada foto terhadap nilai normal. Hasil: Terdapat perbedaan bermakna antara persepsi ortodontis dan masyarakat awam tentang profil wajah (p=0,001). Uji kappa menunjukkan kesepakatan antara Ortodontis dan masyarakat awam yang rendah (p=0,035 untuk persepsi estetika, p=0,112 untuk persepsi kecembungan). Terdapat korelasi linier negatif sedang yang bermakna secara statistik antara persepsi estetika Ortodontis dan parameter jaringan lunak profil wajah menurut Rickett (Ls/bibir atas) (r=-0,287, p=0,039), tetapi tidak terdapat korelasi linier yang bermakna secara statistik antara persepsi Ortodontis dan masyarakat awam dengan parameter jaringan lunak profil wajah menurut Arnett, Schwarz, dan Rickett (Li/bibir bawah). Kesimpulan: Terdapat korelasi antara persepsi Ortodontis dengan parameter jaringan lunak profil wajah menurut Rickett (Ls/bibir atas).

---

.Background: Facial profile perception of Orthodontists and Laypeople was usually studied to assess the agreement between them. However, there is still lack of study that correlates the facial profile perception with soft tissue parameters. Objectives: This study was aimed to evaluate the perception of Orthodontists and Laypeople about the facial profile and its possible correlation with soft tissue facial profile parameters according to Arnett, Schwarz, and Rickett. Methods: This study was correlative analytical study with cross-sectional design. The facial profile photographs of 52 people were rated by 17 Orthodontists and 17 Laypeople on the questionnaire. The correlation between the mode value of VAS perception score by Orthodontists and Laypeople with the difference of soft tissue facial profile parameters at photographs from the normal value according to Arnett, Schwarz, and Rickett was tested using Spearman's correlation. Results: Regarding the perception of Orthodontists and Laypeople on facial profile, statistically significant difference was detected (p=0.001). The Kappa statistic test showed poor agreement between Orthodontists and Laypeople in facial profile perception (p=0.035 for pleasantness, p=0.112 for convexity). The correlation test showed that there was statistically significant difference (moderate negative linear correlation) between Orthodontists’ perception with soft tissue facial profile parameters according to Rickett (Ls/upper lip) (r=-0.287, p=0.039), but there was no statistically significant difference (linear correlation) between Orthodontists’ and Laypeople’ perceptions with the soft tissue facial profile parameters according to Arnett, Schwarz, and Rickett (Li/lower lip). Conclusion: It was concluded that there was correlation between Orthodontists’ perception with soft tissue facial profile parameters according to Rickett (Ls/upper lip.

"

"Latar Belakang: Profil wajah lurus merupakan profil wajah yang dianggap ideal dan menarik secara estetika. Perlu diketahui gambaran skeletal wajah pria dan wanita yang memiliki profil wajah lurus sebagai acuan dalam perawatan ortodonti. Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui gambaran skeletal wajah antara pria dan wanita ras Deutro-Melayu yang memiliki profil wajah lurus beserta perbedaanya. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian analitik observasional dengan desain potong lintang. Penelitian ini menggunakan 58 sefalogram lateral dari rekam medik pasien berusia 18-25 tahun, sebelum dilakukan perawatan ortodontik di RSKGM FKG UI. Dilakukan uji T tidak berpasangan dan uji Mann-Whitney Hasil: Pria menunjukan nilai rerata sudut Y-axis, FMIA, IMPA, dan sudut interinsisal lebih besar daripada wanita. Nilai rerata sudut SNA, SNB, ANB, sudut fasial, sudut kecembungan, FMA, dan I-SN pada pria lebih kecil daripada wanita. Kesimpulan: Tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna antara gambaran skeletal wajah pria dan wanita ras Deutro-Melayu dengan profil wajah lurus.

---

Background: Straight facial profile is considered as a profile that ideal and aesthetically attractive. The facial skeletal image of male and female with straight facial profile is used as a reference in orthodontic treatment. Objective: This research’s aim is to understand the facial skeletal image of Deutro-Malay male and female with straight facial profile and its difference. Method: This research is an analytic observational research with cross sectional design. This research used 58 lateral cephalograms from medical records of patients within 18-25 years old, before the orthodontic treatment is applied in RSKGM FKG UI. Independent T test and Mann-Whitney test are conducted. Result: Male’s facial skeletal image shows the average point of Y-axis, FMIA, IMPA dan interincisal angle is bigger than female’s. The angle’s average point of SNA, SNB, ANB, facial angle and convexity angle, FMA and I-SN angle of male’s facial skeletal image are smaller than found in female. Conclusion: There is no significant differences between facial skeletal image of Deutro-Malay male and female race with straight facial profile."

"Latar belakang: Tujuan utama perawatan ortodonti bukan hanya untuk mendapatkan oklusi yang ideal tetapi juga meningkatkan estetika wajah. Profil wajah merupakan salah satu indikator untuk melihat estetika wajah. Persepsi Ortodontis, Dokter Gigi, dan masyarakat awam mengenai profil wajah perlu diketahui untuk mencapai tujuan perawatan ortodontik. Tujuan: Mengetahui perbedaan persepsi antara Ortodontis, Dokter Gigi, dan masyarakat awam tentang profil wajah berdasarkan analisis Arnett dan Bregman. Metode: Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian analitik komparatif dengan desain potong lintang. Penilaian profil wajah dengan sudut 50,80 ,110, 140 ,170 menurut analisis Arnett dan Bregman dilakukan oleh Ortodontis, Dokter Gigi, dan masyarakat awam yang masing-masing berjumlah 35 orang menggunakan VAS. Data diuji menggunakan Kruskal-Wallis dan Mann Whitney. Hasil: Terdapat perbedaan yang bermakna antara persepsi Ortodontis, Dokter Gigi, dan masyarakat awam terhadap profil wajah (p<0,05). Tidak terdapat perbedaan bermakna menurut statistik antara persepsi Ortodontis, Dokter Gigi, dan masyarakat awam terhadap profil wajah dengan sudut kecembungan 50,80, dan 110 pada laki-laki (p> 0,05) dan 50,110,140, dan 170 pada perempuan (p> 0,05). Ortodontis dan Dokter Gigi memiliki preferensi pada profil wajah lurus dan masyarakat awam memiliki perferensi pada profil wajah cekung. Kesesuaian paling tinggi terhadap analisis jaringan lunak menurut Arnett dan Bregman yaitu Ortodontis, diikuti oleh Dokter Gigi, dan kemudian masyarakat awam. Kesimpulan: Tidak terdapat perbedaan persepsi antara Ortodontis, Dokter Gigi, dan masyarakat awam tentang profil wajah, namun terdapat perbedaan persepsi masing-masing Ortodontis, Dokter Gigi, dan masyarakat awam terhadap variasi sudut kecembungan wajah (50,80 ,110, 140 ,170) menurut Arnett dan Bregman.

---

Background: The main purpose of orthodontics treatment is not only to achieve ideal occlusion but also to improve facial aesthetics. Facial profile is one of the indicators to show facial aesthetics. The facial profile perception of Orthodontists, Dentists, and Laypeople sometimes need to be assessed to meet the purpose of orthodontics treatment. Objectives: To compare facial profile perception between Orthodontists, Dentists, and Laypeople according to Arnett and Bregman facial profile analysis. Methods: This study was a comparative analytic with cross-sectional design. Facial profile convexity of 50, 80,110,140,170 in male and female were assessed using VAS by 35 Orthodontists, Dentists, and Laypeople respectively. Data were tested using the Kruskal-Wallis and the Mann Whitney test. Result: There was a significant difference of facial profile perception between Orthodontists, Dentists, and Laypeople (p< 0.05) There was no significant difference of facial profile perception with facial profile convexity of 50, 80,110 in male (p> 0.05) and 50,110,140,170 in female (p> 0.05) between Orthodontists, Dentists, and Laypeople. Orthodontists and Dentists preference was a straight facial profile and the Laypeople preference was a concave facial profile. The group that met the highest agreement with Arnett and Bregman facial profile analysis was the Orthodontists, followed by the Dentists, and Laypeople. Conclusion: There was no significant difference of facial profile perception between Orthodontists, Dentists, and Laypeople. However, there was significant difference of facial profile perception between Orthodontists, Dentists, and Laypeople with variation facial convexity (50, 80,110,140,170) according to Arnett and Bregman."