Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Not just another book on ASEAN, this volume reappraises the organization from the inside, through controversial or perplexing issues such as the "ASEAN Way", the accession of the new members, including Myanmar, the principle of "non-interference", regional security, regional economic integration, the haze and SARS, and ASEAN's future.Written by a key player, the former ASEAN Secretary-General, this book will illuminate the inner workings of the key Southeast Asian regional institution. It is a must-read for journalists, policy-makers, political scientists and others who need an insiders' view on how ASEAN has evolved, how it operates and whether it will remain relevant in the evolving Asia Pacific and global order."

"ABSTRAKBuzan dan Waever dalam Regions and Powers: The Structure of InternationalSecurity menjelaskan posisi Turki sebagai insulator bagi regional securitycomplex (RSC) Eropa, Middle Eastern dan Kaukasus. Insulator adalah sebuahkawasan yang berada di antara dua atau lebih RSC yang memiliki karakter pasifdan tidak dapat menyatukan dua RSC dalam satu arena strategis keamanan.Dinamika Turki masa AKP (2002-2011) ternyata tidak lagi relevan dengan statusinsulator. Perubahan orientasi dari Barat ke Timur merupakan salah satu indikasibagaimana Turki mencoba ?keluar? dari status tersebut. Perubahan orientasi initerkarakterisasi dengan agresivitas peran Turki di regional MERSC, khususnyadalam isu keamanan, dan perekonomian yang terus membaik.

---

AbstractIn Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security, Buzan andWaever explain that Turkey is an insulator between Europe, Middle Eastern, andCaucasus regional security complexes. Insulator is a term that used to describe aregional between two or more RSCs which has been occupied by one state. Thestate must be weak, passive and cannot bring those RSCs together in one strategicsecurity arena. According to Turkey?s internal and external dynamic by 2002-2001 or AKP?s period, insulator concept does not relevant anymore to figure outTurkey?s position and status. Changing in Turkey?s foreign policy which is beingturned to East poses a challenge to that status. Turkey?s trying to get out ofinsulator state. This changing is characterized by Turkey?s aggressivity role inMERSC, especially in security issue and emerging economic."

"The discussion on the importance of energy security policy for Indonesia merits special attention for a number of reasons. First, there has been an opinion that the recent decision by government to increase the price of fuel energy can be attributed to its short sighted view on energy security policy. Secondly, the idea of energy security has evolved from its original concept to the effect that the main concern is currently not merely over the question of h^w to secure sufficient supply of energy at affordable price but also over its future sustainability.Thirdly, there have been contending paradigms in designing policy to achieve energy security namely between those who consider energy as a market commodity and those who regard it as a strategic commodity. The paper primarily attempts to answer following questions: what is energy security policy and why should energy security policy be comprehensive? For the purpose of analysis, the paper is divided into three parts. The first part attempts to define what we mean by energy with special reference to heat energy including its various dimensions and categories. The second part aims at tracing the rationale behind the emergence of energy security including its envolvement as a concept. The third part intends to show policy options available for policy makers in designing energy security policy by locating and seeing them through the lenses of contending paradigms. Since the recent hike of fuel energy has strong tendency to take side with and seems to have been inspired by market paradigm, an attempt is also made in the last part of the paper to analyze deficiencies of Indonesian current energy security policy."

"Penelitian ini berintikan pembahasan mengenai arti penting dari kehadiran ASEAN Regional Forum sebagai Forum dialog keamanan satu-satunya di kawasan Asia Pasifik yang diikuti oleh 24 negara yang terdiri atas 10 (sepuluh) negara anggota ASEAN, negara besar seperti Amerika Serikat, Perwakilan Uni Eropa, Australia, Rusia, China, Jepang dan India maupun negara-negara di kawasan Asia Pasifik yang memiliki kepentingan terhadap keamanan kawasan Asia Pasifik seperti Korea Selatan, Korea Utara, Mongolia, Pakistan, Selandia Baru dan juga perwakilan dari Sekretariat ASEAN. Arti Penting ASEAN Regional Forum kemudian akan dianalisis kontribusinya terhadap Ketahanan Nasional Indonesia khususnya di bidang pertahanan dan keamanan sepanjang periode 1994-2006 untuk menemukan jawaban sejauh mana ASEAN Regional Forum telah memberikan kontribusi bagi kebutuhan peningkatan ketahanan nasional Indonesia di bidang pertahanan dan keamanan.Dalam upaya menganalisis kontribusi ASEAN Regional Forum terhadap ketahanan nasional Indonesia di bidang pertahanan dan keamanan, Penelitian ini menggunakan tiga teori utama yaitu keamanan kooperatif (cooperative security), ketahanan regional (regional resilience) dan ketahanan nasional (national resillience). Penelitian bersifat Studi Dokumen yang dilengkapi dengan Hasil Wawancara pihak-pihak yang terlibat dalam kegiatan ASEAN Regional Forum baik dari jalur pertama maupun jalur kedua maupun pihak-pihak yang memahami kebutuhan ketahanan nasional di bidang pertahanan dan keamanan.Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kontribusi yang signifikan walaupun belum maksimal dari ASEAN Regional Forum terhadap kebutuhan ketahanan nasional Indonesia di bidang pertahanan dan keamanan. Hal ini dikarenakan dengan adanya ASEAN Regional Forum, Indonesia memiliki wadah untuk melakukan interaksi dengan negara-negara tetangga maupun negara besar dalam upaya memenuhi kebutuhan pertahanan dan keamanannya baik yang bersifat pembangunan rasa saling percaya maupun peningkatan kerjasama di bidang pertahanan dan keamanan. Sebaliknya kehadiran ASEAN Regional Forum telah memberikan kontribusi terhadap terciptanya stabilitas keamanan dan perdamaian di kawasan Asia Pasifik dan juga peningkatan rasa saling percaya serta perumusan sejumlah langkah-langkah kerjasama dalam pengelolaan bersama keamanan kawasan, yang ikut mendukung upaya Indonesia untuk meningkatkan ketahanan nasionalnya khususnya di bidang pertahanan dan keamanan.

---

This Research focused on the explanation about the important meaning of ASEAN Regional Forum formation as the one and only forum for multilateral security dialogue in Asia Pacific Region. ASEAN Regional Forum that had been built on 1994 was followed by 24 countries include 10 members of ASEAN, major powers such as United States, China, Australia, representative from European Commision, Japan, India and also another middle power states that have security interest in Asia Paciic Region such as South Korea, North Korea, Mongolia, Pakistan and the representative from ASEAN Secretariat. The important thing of the development of ASEAN Regional Forum since 1994 until 2006 then will be analyzed toward the need of Indonesian National Resilience on defense and security fields to find the answer how far the development ASEAN Regional Forum had gave several contributions to increase the Indonesian National Resilience.In effort to analyze the relation between ASEAN Regional Forum and Indonesian National Resilience, this research using three theoritical frameworks about cooperative security, regional resilience and national resilience. This Research is based on library study and also using the interview process with three important persons whose involving on ASEAN Regional Forum activities as first track and second track. That Three persons also have deeply understanding about the needs of Indonesian National Resilience on defense and security fields.The conclusion of this research pointed out that there were a significant contributions from ASEAN Regional Forum toward Indonesian National Resilience on defense and security field since 1994 until 2006. Through the participation on ASEAN Regional Forum, Indonesian Government could has opportunities to discuss with neighboured countries or major power countries to improve the multilateral and bilateral dialogue and also to make cooperation for Indonesia National Resilience?s need. In the other hand, the successfully of ASEAN Regional Forum that had already creating a security stability and also short term peace in Asia Pacific Region could brought a neceessary support for Indonesia?s need to improve and strenghten her National Resilience on defense and security field."

"

Teka-teki stabilitas dan keamanan Asia Timur sebagian besar ditimbulkan oleh keengganan Korea Utara untuk membongkar persenjataan nuklirnya walaupun telah mendapat tekanan dunia internasional. Meski demikian, perkembangan terakhir menunjukkan bahwa sikap Pemimpin Tertinggi Korea Utara Kim Jong Un mulai melunak, terbukti dengan ditandatanganinya Deklarasi Panmunjom pada tanggal 27 April 2018. Dengan menggunakan kerangka kerja analisis Regional Security Complex Theory (RSCT) sebagaimana dituliskan oleh Buzan dan Waver (2003), artikel ini berargumentasi bahwa perubahan kebijakan tersebut merupakan bagian dari respon Korea Utara terhadap dinamika keamanan kawasan Asia Timur. Tulisan ini menganalisis empat variabel esensial di security complex Asia Timur, yaitu batas geografis, struktur anarki, polaritas, dan konstruksi sosial. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa terjadi perubahan persepsi Korea Utara terhadap pola amity-enmity, yakni konstruksi sosial di kawasan. Dengan tingginya kompleksitas keamanan yang terjadi di kawasan Asia Timur, Korea Utara memilih untuk terus melakukan pengembangan nuklirnya dan uji coba rudal balistik. Korea Utara mengeluarkan kebijakan tersebut sebagai strategic equalizer. Dengan demikian, keamanan Korea Utara dapat terus terjamin dari ancaman eksternal seperti Amerika Serikat dan sekutunya.

---

The East Asian stability and security conundrum is partially caused by the unwillingness of North Korea to dismantle its nuclear armaments despite international pressure. However, recent development shows that North Korean Supreme Leader Kim Jong Un has adopted a milder stance as he signed Panmunjom Declaration on 27 April 2018. Using Regional Security Complex Theory (RSCT) prescribed by Buzan and Waver (2003) as the framework of analysis, this paper argues that the unprecedented change of policy is a part of North Korean response towards the dynamics of regional security in East Asia. In this paper, the four essential variables of East Asia security complex are being analyzed, namely geographical boundary, anarchic structure, polarity and social construction. It is found that there has been a change in North Koreas perception of the amity-enmity pattern, that is, the social construction of the region. With the high complexity of security in East Asia, North Korea chose to continue developing its nuclear and ballistic missile tests. North Korea issued that policy as a strategic equalizer. Thus, North Korea can be guaranteed to secure their security from external threats such as the United States and its allies.

"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kontroversi khususnya hubungan bilateral antara Prancis dan Australia terkait peresmian Pakta Pertahanan AUKUS yang terdiri dari tiga negara, yaitu: Australia, Inggris dan, Amerika Serikat. Adapun beberapa pertanyan yang akan diajukan dalam penelitian ini adalah Mengapa negara - negara Eropa memberi respon terkait pembentukkan pakta pertahanan AUKUS, mengapa terjadi pro dan kontra dalam respon negara - negara Eropa terkait pembentukkan pakta pertahanan AUKUS, mengapa Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) menganalisis respon negara - negara Eropa terkait pembentukkan pakta pertahanan AUKUS, dan bagaimana operasionalisasi CDA, yaitu menurut analisis sosial dan menurut kognisi sosial terkait narasi pro dan kontra pembentukkan pakta pertahanan AUKUS. Teori yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini Analisis Wacana oleh Teun A. Van Dijk dan Regional Security Complex oleh Barry Buzan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif yang menggunakan data sekunder yaitu diambil dari berita di media massa Inggris, Uni Eropa, dan Eropa terkait AUKUS. Hasil temuan dalam penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa sikap kontra prancis muncul dari sikap domestik. Sementara itu sikap Uni Eropa, negara – negara di Uni Eropa dan Eropa bersikap netral terhadap pembentukkan AUKUS berdasarkan yang tercermin dari sumber media massa negara – negara di Uni Eropa, Eropa, dan jurnal penelitian dari Uni Eropa.

---

This research aims to analyze the controversy, especially the bilateral relationship between France and Australia, regarding the inauguration of the AUKUS Defense Pact which consists of three countries, namely: Australia, the United Kingdom and the United States. The questions that will be raised in this study are why European countries respond to the formation of the AUKUS defense pact, why there are pros and cons in the responses of European countries related to the formation of the AUKUS defense pact, why Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) analyzes the responses of European countries related to the formation of the AUKUS defense pact, and how to operationalize CDA, namely according to social analysis and according to social cognition related to the narrative of the pros and cons of the formation of the AUKUS defense pact. The theories used in this research are Discourse Analysis by Teun A. Van Dijk and Regional Security Complex by Barry Buzan. This research uses a qualitative method that uses secondary data, which is taken from news in the UK, EU, and European mass media related to AUKUS. The findings in this study show that the counter-French attitude arises from domestic attitudes. Meanwhile, the attitude of the European Union, countries in the European Union and Europe are neutral towards the formation of AUKUS based on what is reflected in the mass media sources of countries in the European Union, Europe, and research journals from the European Union"

" ABSTRAK Hubungan Rusia dan Tiongkok di kawasan Asia Tengah merupakan contoh kasus unik yang memiliki implikasi tidak hanya pada keamanan regional tetapi juga keamanan global. Latar belakang penelitian ini adalah ldquo;jika sebuah kerja sama yang kuat terbentuk antara Rusia dan Tiongkok di kawasan Asia Tengah, maka dapat membatasi kemampuan aktor eksternal kawasan, termasuk Amerika Serikat, untuk mempengaruhi negara-negara Asia Tengah. rdquo; Oleh karena itu penelitian ini mengajukan pertanyaan bagaimana hubungan Rusia dan Tiongkok di kawasan Asia Tengah dari tahun 2007 hingga tahun 2016? Melalui pertanyaan tersebut penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui posisi hubungan Rusia dan Tiongkok di kawasan Asia Tengah serta dampak dari hubungan tersebut terhadap sistem keamanan global. Signifkansi penelitian ini bagi literatur adalah untuk mengembangkan kajian sistem keamanan internasional pada tingkat global maupun regional dan mengembangkan kajian kawasan Asia Tengah. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi kasus melalui pengujian terhadap model hubungan kausal antara keterlibatan negara kuat, konflik regional, dan keamanan internasional yang ditulis oleh Benjamin Miller dan Korina Kagan. Dengan menggunakan model tersebut penelitian ini menemukan bahwa 1 hubungan Rusia dan Tiongkok di kawasan Asia Tengah dalam periode 2007-2016 sesuai dengan jalur kausalitas kerja sama; 2 Rusia dan Tiongkok di kawasan Asia Tengah memiliki kapabilitas seimbang dan kepentingan ldquo;tinggi, simetris; berkonflik; rdquo; 3 Ketergantungan kerja sama Rusia dan Tiongkok di kawasan Asia Tengah terhadap derajat rivalitas kedua negara. Berdasarkan temuan-temuan tersebut penelitian ini berkontribusi dalam badan ilmu bagi kajian hubungan bilateral Rusia dan Tiongkok.

---

ABSTRACT Russian and Chinese bilateral relations in Central Asia is an unique case that have implication not only to regional security but also to global security. This study rsquo s background is ldquo if a strong cooperation is formed between Russia and China in Central Asia, it may limit the ability of external actors, including United States, to influence Central Asian countries. rdquo Therefore, the research question asks how is the bilateral relation between Russia and China in Central Asia from 2007 to 2016 This study use ldquo case study rdquo method to test the model of causal relations between great power involvement, regional conflicts and international security by Benjamin Miller and Korina Kagan. By using this model, this research finds that 1 the bilateral relations of Russia and China in Central Asia within 2007 2016 period is in accordance to the line of causality of cooperation. 2 Rusia and China have equal capabilites and ldquo high symetrical conflicting rdquo interest in Central Asia. 3 the cooperation of Russia and China in Central Asia depends on both countries rsquo degree of rivality. With this respect, this study has contributed to the study of bilateral relation of Russia and China."