Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Abstrak :
Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta mengeluarkan kebijakan pembebasan pajak bumi dan bangunan perdesaan dan perkotaan (PBB-P2) atas rumah, rusunawa dan rusunami dengan NJOP s.d. Rp. 1 Miliar dalam rangka membantu beban masyarakat golongan ekonomi lemah sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Gubernur Nomor 259 Tahun 2015. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghitung dampak pelaksanaan kebijakan pembebasan PBB-P2 serta menghitung dan menganalisa besaran objek PBB-P2 yang mendapatkan fasilitas pembebasan atau pembebanan kembali atas PBB-P2 ditahun mendatang. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan pembebasan PBB-P2 berdampak pada penurunan jumlah SPPT terbit dan pokok ketetapan PBB-P2 tahun 2016 namun di sisi lain juga meningkatkan collection rate penerimaan PBB-P2. Selain itu terdapat masih banyaknya jumlah objek pajak yang diberikan fasilitas pembebasan PBB-P2 dibandingkan jumlah objek pajak yang dibebankan kembali PBB-P2 pada tahun mendatang dengan asumsi kenaikan NJOP BUMI per tahun sebesar 10% dan asumsi kenaikan NJOP BUMI per tahun berdasarkan kenaikan harga pasar rata-rata maksimum sebesar 20%.

---

Jakarta Provincial Government issued Land and Property Tax exemption policies for houses, rusunawa, and rusunami that valued up to IDR 1 Billion to help weak economy class society that regulated in Governor Regulation No. 259 Year 2015. The study aims to calculates the impact of Land and Property Tax exemption policies and calculates and analyze the PBB-P2 objects which have to be not imposed or to be imposed PBB-P2 in the coming years. This study using descriptive analysis method. The results showed that PBB-P2 exemption policies impact to decreased SPPT issued and the tax assessments of PBB-P2 on 2016, but the collection rate of PBB-P2 revenue has been increase. In addition there are still many objects that is granted PBB-P2 exemption compared to the objects that is charged with the PBB-P2 on the upcoming years with the assumptions NJOP rise by 10% per year and the assumptions NJOP based on average market price rise by 20% per year.

Abstrak :

Nilai kurs mata uang asing dan harga minyak dunia yang bersifat dinamis menyebabkan ketidakpastian kondisi pasar. Perusahaan yang mengandalkan barang impor dalam menjalankan kegiatan usahanya akan sangat terasa dampaknya. Kebijakan pembebasan pemungutan Pajak Dalam Rangka Impor menjadi salah satu fasiltas pajak yang bisa digunakan untuk meminimalisir distorsi pasar. Kebijakan tersebut akan menimbulkan Cost & Benefit yang dirasakan oleh perusahaan terutama perusahaan minyak dan dari pemerintah itu sendiri sebagai pihak yang menerbitkan peraturan tersebut. Secara Cost, Compliance cost menjadi konsep utama dalam mengetahui biaya apa saja yang harus ditanggung oleh sebuah perusahaan. Dimensi dari compliance cost adalah Fiscal Cost/Direct Money Cost, Time Cost, dan Psychological Cost. Sedangkan untuk melihat Benefit tingkat produktifitas akan sangat terlihat manfaat dari pemanfaatan kebijakan pembebasan pemungutan Pajak Dalam Rangka Impor dari perspektif supply-side tax policy. Maka dari itu tujuan  Penelitian adalah untuk menggambarkan Cost & Benefit benefit tersebut baik dari sisi wajib pajak dan pemerintah. Instrumen penelitan ini menggunakan paradigma Post-Positivism dan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan mengumpulkan data melalui wawancara terhadap unit analisis dan pihak yang berkompeten dibidang perpajakan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa manfaat dari adanya pembebesan pemungutan Pajak Dalam Rangka Impor pada perusahaan sangat signifikan. Mengingat kebijakan dari pembebasan pemunguntan PDRI ini juga sejalan dengan kaidah Pro-Corporate Cash Flow Tax. Dengan pengukuran biaya yang harus dikeluarkan dari 3 dimensi compliance cost yaitu  Fiscal Cost/Direct Money Cost, Time Cost, dan Psychological Cost tidak seberapa jika dibandingkan dengan manfaat yang akan dirasakan bagi wajib pajak dan juga pemerintah yang dapat meminimalisir Tax Expenditure. Sehingga tidak hanya pihak perusahaan saja yang dapat merasakan manfaatnya. Selain Tax Expenditure, potensi opportunity cost  juga dapat dihindarkan mengingat biaya dalam melakukan impor tidak hanya sebatas pembayaran Pajaknya saja dan dalam menjalankan usaha kegiatan investasi perusahaan memerlukan cadangan kas yang cukup besar.

---

......The dynamic foreign exchange rates and world oil prices cause uncertainty in market conditions. Companies that rely on imported goods in carrying out their business activities will feel the impact. The tax exemption policy in the framework of import is one of the tax facilities that can be used to minimize market distortion. The policy will lead to Cost & Benefit felt by companies, especially oil companies and from the government itself as the party that issued the regulation. In Cost, Compliance cost becomes the main concept in knowing what costs must be borne by a company. The dimensions of compliance costs are Fiscal Cost / Direct Money Cost, Time Cost, and Psychological Cost. Meanwhile, to see the benefits of productivity levels, it will be very apparent the benefits of utilizing the tax exemption policy in the framework of import from the perspective of supply-side tax policy. Therefore the purpose of this research is to describe the Cost & Benefit benefits both in terms of taxpayers and the government. This research instrument uses the Post-Positivism paradigm and a quantitative approach by collecting data through interviews with the analysis unit and those competent in the taxation field. The results showed that the benefits of the exemption from tax collection in the framework of imports at the company are very significant. Considering the policy of exemption from collecting PDRI is also in line with the rules of Pro-Corporate Cash Flow Tax. By measuring the costs that must be removed from the 3 dimensions of compliance costs, namely Fiscal Cost / Direct Money Cost, Time Cost, and Psychological Cost are nothing compared to the benefits that will be felt for taxpayers and also the government that can minimize Tax Expenditure. So that not only the company can feel the benefits. In addition to Tax Expenditure, the potential opportunity cost can also be avoided considering the cost of importing is not only limited to tax payments and in carrying out business investment activities the company requires substantial cash reserves.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini membahas tentang Analisis Dampak Omnibus Law Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Klaster Perpajakan terhadap Pengelolaan Dana Haji di Indonesia oleh Badan Pengelolaan Keuangan Haji-BPKH. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan mempelajari literatur khususnya peraturan perundang-undangan tentang pengelolaan keuangan haji dan perpajakan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembebasan pajak dalam Omnibus Law Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Klaster Perpajakan dapat memberikan peningkatan alokasi nilai manfaat kepada jemaah haji tunggu. Selain itu, pembebasan pajak juga berpotensi meningkatkan perekonomian Indonesia melalui peningkatan jumlah Dana Haji yang dapat diinvestasikan dan / atau ditempatkan. ......This research is about the analysis impact of the Omnibus Law Job Creation Taxation Cluster on the management of Hajj fund in Indonesia by the Hajj Financial Management Agency (Badan Pengelolaan Keuangan Haji-BPKH). This research was conducted by studying the literature, especially the laws and regulations regarding hajj financial management and taxation. The results show that the tax exemptions in the Omnibus Law of the Taxation Cluster Job Creation Act can provide an increase in the allocation of benefit values to waiting hajj pilgrims. In addition, the tax exemption also has the potential for increasing the economy of Indonesia through increasing the amount of Hajj Fund that can be invested and/or placed.

Abstrak :
Pemerintah dalam upaya meningkatkan investasi mengeluarkan kebijakan pengecualian pajak penghasilan atas dividen yang diterima wajib pajak dalam negeri dengan mengubah ketentuan Pasal 4 ayat (3) huruf f UU Nomor 36 Tahun 2008. Atas perubahan tersebut, dividen yang diterima wajib pajak dapat dikecualikan dari pajak sepanjang diinvestasikan kembali ke Indonesia dalam jangka waktu tertentu. Kebijakan pengecualian pajak dividen mengubah sistem pemajakan dividen Indonesia dari classical system menjadi dividend exemption system. Dividend exemption system dikatakan dapat meningkatkan netralitas, kesederhanaan dan efisiensi pajak dalam penerapannya. Oleh karena itu penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kebijakan pengecualian pajak dividen ditinjau dari asas perpajakan yang baik (netralitas, kesederhanaan dan efisiensi). Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan paradigma post-positivist dengan teknik pengumpulan data kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan pengecualian pajak dividen yang diterima wajib pajak orang pribadi telah memenuhi asas netralitas dan efisiensi (biaya kepatuhan), tetapi belum memenuhi asas kesederhanaan. Kebijakan telah memenuhi asas netralitas karena keputusan investasi wajib pajak lebih berdasarkan pertimbangan ekonomi ketimbang pertimbangan pajak. Asas efisiensi (biaya kepatuhan) dapat dipenuhi karena biaya yang dikeluarkan untuk kewajiban perpajakan tidak signifikan dan sepadan dengan manfaat yang didapat. Sedangkan tidak terpenuhinya asas kesederhanaan dikarenakan masih terdapat kesalahpahaman atas persyaratan pelaporan hasil investasi, serta masih rumitnya prosedur pelaksanaan pelaporan hasil investasi. Maka dari itu terdapat rekomendasi untuk meningkatkan sosialisasi di platform media sosial serta bekerja sama dengan manajer investasi, mempertimbangkan prosedur pelaporan investasi hanya pada instrumen SPT Tahunan dan mengeluarkan ketentuan tambahan untuk menunjang pelaksanaan kebijakan ......In an effort to increase investment, the government issued an income tax exemption policy on dividends received by domestic taxpayers by amending the provisions of Article 4 paragraph (3) letter f of Law Number 36 of 2008. For these changes, dividends received by taxpayers can be exempt from tax as long as they are reinvested to Indonesia within a certain period of time. The tax dividend policy changed Indonesia's dividend taxation system from a classical system to a dividend exemption system. The dividend exemption system is said to increase neutrality, simplicity and tax efficiency in its application. Therefore, this study aims to analyze dividend tax exemption policies in terms of good tax principles (neutrality, simplicity and efficiency). The research was conducted using a quantitative approach with a post-positivist paradigm and qualitative data collection techniques. The results of the study show that the dividend tax exemption policy received by individual taxpayers has met the principles of neutrality and efficiency (compliance costs), but has not fulfilled the principle of simplicity. The policy meets the neutrality principle because the taxpayer's investment decision is based more on economic considerations than tax considerations. The principle of efficiency (compliance costs) can be met because the costs incurred for tax obligations are insignificant and commensurate with the benefits obtained. While the principle of simplicity is not fulfilled because there are still misunderstandings regarding the requirements for reporting investment results, as well as the complexity of the procedures for implementing investment return reporting. Therefore there are recommendations to increase outreach on social media platforms and work closely with investment managers, considering investment reporting procedures only on the Annual SPT instrument and issuing additional provisions to support policy implementation.

Abstrak :
[ABSTRAK
Tarif pajak tetap telah menjadi salah satu reformasi pajak yang popular di banyak negara. Kesederhanaan dan tarif pajak tetap yang rendah dapat mengurangi biaya kepatuhan, mengurangi penggelapan pajak, mengurangi disintesif, dan memberikan rasa keadilan. Namun tarif pajak tetap juga diyakini dapat meningkatkan ketimpangan pendapatan di masyarakat. Penelitian ini menguji efek dari tarif tetap pajak penghasilan pribadi terhadap ketimpangan pendapatan di Indonesia dengan menggunakan Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional (Susenas) tahun 2012. Dengan menggunakan teknik simulasi mikro, diketahui bahwa efek dari tarif tetap pajak penghasilan pribadi bisa mengakibatkan peningkatan atau penurunan tingkat ketimpangan pendapatan. Penerapan tarif pajak tetap di bawah 9% akan menghasilkan peningkatan ketimpangan pendapatan; Sebaliknya, jika tarif pajak rata lebih dari 10% diterapkan, ketimpangan pendapatan akan berkurang. Dua hasil yang berbeda ini disebabkan lebih dari 53% populasi rumah tangga memiliki penghasilan di bawah penghasilan tidak kena pajak karena beberapa pengurangan dan pengecualian penghasilan yang dikenakan pajak.

---

ABSTRACT
A flat tax rate has become a popular tax reform in many countries. Simplicity and a lower flat tax rate could reduce compliance costs, reduce evasion, reduce disincentives, and provide fairness. However, it is strongly believed that a flat tax rate could increase inequality in a society. This study examines the effect of a personal income flat tax rate on inequality in Indonesia by using National Socioeconomic Survey (Susenas, Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional) 2012. Using a microsimulation technique, the effect of a flat tax rate on personal income could result in an increase or decrease on inequality. Applying a flat tax rate below 9% will result in an increase in inequality; in contrast, if a flat tax rate of more than 10% is applied, inequality will decrease. These two different results take place because more than 53% of households in the population have an income below the taxable tax due to the some deductions and exemptions.;A flat tax rate has become a popular tax reform in many countries. Simplicity and a lower flat tax rate could reduce compliance costs, reduce evasion, reduce disincentives, and provide fairness. However, it is strongly believed that a flat tax rate could increase inequality in a society. This study examines the effect of a personal income flat tax rate on inequality in Indonesia by using National Socioeconomic Survey (Susenas, Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional) 2012. Using a microsimulation technique, the effect of a flat tax rate on personal income could result in an increase or decrease on inequality. Applying a flat tax rate below 9% will result in an increase in inequality; in contrast, if a flat tax rate of more than 10% is applied, inequality will decrease. These two different results take place because more than 53% of households in the population have an income below the taxable tax due to the some deductions and exemptions., A flat tax rate has become a popular tax reform in many countries. Simplicity and a lower flat tax rate could reduce compliance costs, reduce evasion, reduce disincentives, and provide fairness. However, it is strongly believed that a flat tax rate could increase inequality in a society. This study examines the effect of a personal income flat tax rate on inequality in Indonesia by using National Socioeconomic Survey (Susenas, Survei Sosial Ekonomi Nasional) 2012. Using a microsimulation technique, the effect of a flat tax rate on personal income could result in an increase or decrease on inequality. Applying a flat tax rate below 9% will result in an increase in inequality; in contrast, if a flat tax rate of more than 10% is applied, inequality will decrease. These two different results take place because more than 53% of households in the population have an income below the taxable tax due to the some deductions and exemptions.]

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini membahas mengenai kelebihan dan kekurangan pada kebijakan pembebasan pengenaan PBB atas rumah, rusunawa dan rusunami dengan nilai jual objek pajak sampai dengan satu miliar rupiah. Wacana pembebasan pengenaan PBB yang disampaikan oleh Menteri Agraria dan Tata Ruang, direspon oleh Pemerintah Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu mendeskripsikan kelebihan dan kekurangan pada kebijakan pembebasan PBB atas rumah, rusunawa dan rusunami dengan NJOP sampai dengan satu miliar rupiah di wilayah DKI Jakarta dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini pertama, manfaat kebijakan ini adalah Pemda DKI meringankan beban masyarakat khususnya golongan ekonomi lemah, selain itu pelayanan publik terutama pelayanan terkait PBB dapat lebih maksimal kemudian biaya pemungutan juga semakin rendah. Kedua, biaya penerapan kebijakan tersebut yaitu masih adanya potensi penghindaran pajak yang sangat mudah dilakukan oleh masyarakat, kemudian adanya masyarakat yang tidak berhak dapat menikmati pembebasan PBB, selain itu potensi kecemburuan sosial dikalangan masyarakat juga dapat timbul serta terjadinya kehilangan pendapatan yang harus ditanggung oleh Pemda DKI. ...... This study discusses cost and benefit to the policy of tax exemption on land and building on the house , rental flat and owned flat the taxable value of up to one billion rupiah. Idea which initiated by the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning, responded by Jakarta Provincial Government. The purpose of this study is to describe the advantages and disadvantages tax exemption policies for property tax on the house, rental flat and owned flat with taxable value up to one billion rupiah in Jakarta using qualitative descriptive method. The results of this research first, the advantages of this policy is the government of Jakarta to ease the burden on the community, especially the poor society, besides public services, especially services related to the property tax can maximize then the cost of collection also lower. Second, the weakness of these policies is still the potential for tax avoidance is very easily done by the people, then the people who are not entitled (free rider) can enjoy exemption tax on land and building Rural Cities, in addition to the potential social jealousy among the community may also arise as well the loss of revenue that must be borne by the government of Jakarta.

Abstrak :
Penghasilan Tidak Kena Pajak (PTKP) dapat mempengaruhi pilihan fertilitas dengan mengubah biaya atau manfaat melahirkan anak dan menambah disposable income keluarga. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh dari Penghasilan Tidak Kena Pajak terhadap penambahan anak di Indonesia. Dengan menggunakan data IFLS gelombang 4 dan 5 serta metode Linear Probability Model, penelitian ini menunjukkan hubungan berbentuk U terbalik antara penambahan anak dan PTKP, yang mengindikasikan bahwa efek marginal dari PTKP menurun seiring dengan bertambahnya nilai dari PTKP. Di samping itu, probabilitas menambah anak juga dipengaruhi oleh karakteristik ibu (usia dan status bekerja), anggota keluarga perempuan dewasa lainnya dalam rumah tangga, dan total anak. ......Personal tax exemption can influence fertility choices through policies by changing costs or benefits of childbearing and increase the family's disposable income. This study aims to analyze the effect of personal tax exemption on the addition of children in Indonesia. Using IFLS data waves 4 and 5 and the Linear Probability Model method, this study shows an inverse U-shaped relationship between the addition of children and personal tax exemption, which indicates that the marginal effect of personal tax exemption decreases as the value of personal tax exemption increases. In addition, the probability of adding children is also influenced by the characteristics of the mother (age and working status), other adult female family members in the household, and the total number of children.

Abstrak :
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji unintended consequences kebijakan pembebasan Pajak Bumi Bangunan (PBB) untuk Nilai Jual Objek Pajak (NJOP) dibawah Rp. 1 miliar terhadap nilai properti dibawah Rp. 1 miliar. Dengan menggunakan Ordinary Least Square (OLS), penelitian ini menganalisis data PBB dan Bea Perolehan Hak Tanah dan Bangunan (BPHTB) untuk jenis transaksi hak baru (sertifikasi) dan transaksi jual beli (transaksi properti) selama periode 2012 s.d 2019 di 267 kelurahan di DKI Jakarta. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa setelah diberlakukannya kebijakan pembebasan PBB untuk NJOP dibawah Rp. 1 miliar pada tahun 2016, semakin besar jumlah objek pajak yang mendapatkan pembebasan PBB dalam satu kelurahan secara signifikan berkorelasi positif dengan semakin besar jumlah objek pajak yang melakukan transaksi sertifikasi dan jual beli properti dibawah Rp. 1 miliar. Hal ini ditemukan konsisten pada kelurahan-kelurahan yang masuk dalam kategori tidak rawan banjir, namun pada kelurahan yang rawan banjir korelasi tersebut hanya signifikan untuk transaksi sertifikasi. Temuan ini mendukung dugaan adanya unintended consequences kebijakan pembebasan PBB terhadap sertifikasi dan transaksi properti bernilai dibawah Rp. 1 miliar di DKI Jakarta. ......This study aims to examine the unintended consequences of the Land and Building Tax (PBB) exemption policy for the Tax Object Selling Value (NJOP) below Rp. 1 billion against the property value below Rp. 1 billion. By using Ordinary Least Square (OLS), this study analyzes PBB data and Land and Building Rights Acquisition Fee (BPHTB) for types of new rights transactions (certification) and sale and purchase transactions (property transactions) during the period 2012 to 2019 in 267 villages in DKI Jakarta. This research found that after the implementation of PBB exemption policy for NJOP under Rp. 1 billion in 2016, the greater the number of tax objects that receive PBB exemption in one kelurahan, which is significantly positively correlated with the greater the number of tax objects conducting certification transactions and buying and selling property under Rp. 1 billion. This was found to be consistent in sub-districts that were not prone to flooding, but in sub-districts that were prone to flooding, the correlation was only significant for certification transactions. This finding supports the alleged unintended consequences of the PBB exemption policy on property certificates and transactions worth less than Rp. 1 billion in DKI Jakarta

Abstrak :
Kebijakan pembebasan Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Perdesaan dan Perkotaan yang dinilai belum tepat sararan karena Nilai Jual Objek Pajak di Provinsi DKI Jakarta yang terlalu tinggi, membuat Gubernur ingin merevisi Peraturan Gubernur Nomor 259 Tahun 2015. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengevaluasi kebijakan pembebasan Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Perdesaan dan Perkotaan di Provinsi DKI Jakarta. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dan teknik analisis data kualitatif. Hasil penelitian ini adalah kebijakan pembebasan Pajak Bumi dan Bangunan Perdesaan dan Perkotaan telah sesuai dengan enam kriteria evaluasi kebijakan yaitu efisiensi, efektivitas, kecukupan, perataan, responsivitas dan ketepatan. Namun terdapat kekurangan pada database objek pajak serta diperlukan kajian lebih lanjut mengenai objek pajak yang dibebaskan dan sasaran kebijakan agar Peraturan Gubernur ini dapat bersifat berkelanjutan.

---

Due to high rate tax object sales value in DKI Jakarta Province, rural and urban property tax exemption policy becomes inappropriate thus the Governor demand to revise the Governor Regulation Number 259 Year 2015.The purpose of the research is to evaluate rural and urban property tax exemption policy in DKI Jakarta Province. This research uses quantitative approach and qualitative data analysis technique. The result of this research is rural and urban property tax exemption policy suitable with six criteria of evaluation policy, there are effectiveness, efficiency, adequacy, equity, responsiveness and appropriateness. However, there are some inadequacies in the database of tax object and further study about object of exempt taxes and target policy is necessary for the Governor Regulation rsquo's sustainability.