Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Latar belakang:  Seorang Prajurit Siswa yang menjalankan pendidikan pertama militer telah lulus dari proses rekrutmen diantaranya tes kesehatan jiwa. Namun pada saat menjalankan pendidikan pertama militer, beberapa kejadian pelanggaran dilakukan oleh Prajurit Siswa. Kejadian pelanggaran tersebut berpotensi menjadi pelanggaran berat. Penelitian ini menilai hubungan resiliensi pada Prajurit Siswa saat menjalankan pendidikan dihubungkan dengan kejadian pelanggaran. Metode: Subyek penelitian sebanyak 221 Prajurit Siswa Tamtama yang menjalankan pendidikan di Skadron Pendidikan 404 Pangkalan Udara Adi Sumarmo Solo. Penelitian dilakukan pada Februari 2019. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengukur resiliensi adalah CD-RISC dan kejadian pelanggaran didapatkan dari data yang dimiliki oleh Skaron Pendidikan 404. Seluruh data dianalisa dengan menggunakan SPSS. Hasil: Rata-rata resiliensi subyek penelitian adalah 77 (41-100). Adanya hubungan antara pendidikan subyek penelitian dan kejadian pelanggaran (p=0.007). Terdapat hubungan antara skala kontrol diri dan pendidikan pada subyek penelitian (p=0.02) dengan hasil kontrol diri subyek penelitian dengan pendidikan SMA lebih baik daripada STM. Kesimpulan: Tidak ada hubungan antara resiliensi dan kejadian pelanggaran pada Prajurit Siswa Tamtama.

---

Background: Military students who underwent early military education had passed recruitment process which included psychiatric assessment. However, some rule violations were still observed and these violations could potentially lead to severe rule violation. This study aims to determine the association between resilliency and the occurence of rule violation among basic stage military students in Indonesia Air Force. Methods: This study consisted of 221 basic stage military students that underwent education process in Skadron Pendidikan 404 Adi Sumarmo Airforce Base. It was performed in February 2019. The instruments used to measure resiliency were CD-RISC and the number of rule violations was obtained from the Skadron Pendidikan 404s database. All data was analyzed using SPSS. Results: The mean score of resiliency was 77 (41-100). There is a relationship between education level and the number of rule violations (p=0.007). There is a relationship between the scale of self control and education level (p=0.02). Self control in the studys subjects were better for those who finished senior high school than those who finished vocational high school. Conclusion: There is no association found between resilliency and the occurence of rule violation among basic stage military students."

"Profesional kesehatan mental memainkan peran mendasar dalam membantu pengadilan pada kasus-kasus pengampuan. Dibutuhkan kemampuan assessing psychiatrist yang dapat melakukan pemeriksaan sesuai peran yang diminta yaitu menghadirkan bukti objektif untuk kepentingan hukum. Dengan belum adanya modul pengajaran yang seragam dalam mempersiapkan psikiater umum untuk menghadapi permintaan penilaian kapasitas mental pada kasus pengampuan, maka studi ini berupaya mendapatkan dasar keilmuan untuk mengembangkan prosedur yang terstandar bagi psikiater. Dilakukan pencarian jurnal atau artikel menggunakan database elektronik Oxford Journal, Springer Link, EBSCO Host, ProQuest, PubMed, dan Cochrane Library. Studi literatur ini menggunakan format PICO framework dengan kriteria inklusi dan kriteria ekslusi untuk mendapatkan artikel yang sesuai dengan topik penelitian. Selain itu dilakukan pula pencarian referensi dan jurnal yang relevan secara manual (hand searching). The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal dan the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) digunakan dalam penilaian kualitas artikel. Jumlah artikel yang didapat berdasarkan uji kelayakan terhadap kriteria inklusi dan eksklusi sebanyak 14 artikel. Didapatkan penilaian yang dilakukan meliputi  perspektif individu yang akan diajukan untuk menjalani pengampuan maupun penilaian terhadap keluarga yang akan menjadi wali pengampu. Beberapa hal-hal yang harus menjadi perhatian bagi assessing psychiatrist terkait tahapan dan faktor-faktor penting juga harus diperhatikan untuk penilaian kapasitas mental dalam kasus pengampuan serta instrumen-instrumen yang menunjang penilaian secara obyektif pada kasus pengampuan. Penerapan prinsip-prinsip penilaian kapasitas mental pada kasus pengampuan diharapkan dapat membantu dalam penyusunan prosedur pelayanan medis yang obyektif dan akurat di fasilitas pelayanan kesehatan jiwa.

---

Mental health professionals play a fundamental role in assisting courts in guardianship cases. An assessing psychiatrist's ability is needed who can carry out examinations according to the requested role, namely presenting objective evidence for legal purposes. Becausse of there is no uniform teaching modules in preparing general psychiatrists to meet the demand for mental capacity assessments in guardianship cases, leads this study seeks to gain a scientific basis for developing standardized procedures for psychiatrists. Journal or article searches were conducted using the Oxford Journal, Springer Link, EBSCO Host, ProQuest, PubMed, and Cochrane Library electronic databases. This literature study uses the PICO framework format with inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria to obtain articles that are in accordance with the research topic. In addition, a manual search for references and relevant journals was also carried out (hand searching). The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal and the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA) were used in the article quality assessment. The number of articles obtained based on the feasibility test against the inclusion and exclusion criteria was 14 articles. It was found that the assessment carried out includes the perspective of the individual who will be proposed to undergo a guardianship as well as an assessment of the family who will become the guardian. This systematic review contains matters that should be a concern for assessing psychiatrists regarding the stages and important factors that must be considered for the assessment of mental capacity in the case of guardianship as well as the instruments that support objective assessment in the case of guardianship. The application of the principles of mental capacity assessment in guardianship cases is expected to assist in the preparation of objective and accurate medical service procedures in mental health care facilities."

"Latar Belakang: Evaluasi insanity defense merupakan pemeriksaan yang kompleks dan membutuhkan ketelitian. Evaluasi insanity defense sering dilakukan pada terdakwa kekerasan fisik dengan gangguan psikotik. Namun, rekomendasi evaluasi insanity defense pada terdakwa kekerasan fisik dengan gangguan psikotik masih terbatas. Tujuan: mengulas rekomendasi evaluasi insanity defense pada terdakwa pidana kekerasan fisik yang mengalami gangguan psikotik Metode: penelitian mencari artikel penelitian tanpa batasan waktu dari lima pangkalan data menggunakan kata kunci mencakup insanity defense, psychotic, dan evaluation. Peneliti kemudian menyaring hasil studi berdasarkan kriteria inklusi dan eksklusi Hasil: Dari 992 literatur, sembilan studi dilibatkan dalam analisis. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa masih terdapat berbagai tantangan dalam mengevaluasi insanity defense berdasarkan hukum yang berlaku serta alat maupun instrumen yang digunakan. Pemeriksaan yang tidak inadekuat akan memberikan dampak negatif bagi pemeriksa maupun terdakwa. Simpulan: beberapa aspek penting perlu diperhatikan dalam evaluasi insanity defense yang masih menjadi tantangan untuk menegakkan hukum dengan tepat.

---

Background: The evaluation of insanity defense is a complex examination that requires precision. Insanity defense evaluations are often performed on offenders with psychotic disorders who commit physical violence. However, recommendations for evaluating the insanity defense for offenders with psychotic disorders who commit physical violence remain limited Objective: To review recommendations for evaluating insanity defense for offenders with psychotic disorders who commit physical violence Methods: The study searched for research articles without time limits from five databases using keywords including insanity defense, psychotic, and evaluation. Researchers then filter the study results on the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria Results: Of 992 pieces of literature, nine studies were included in the analysis. The results of the analysis show that there are still various challenges in evaluating insanity defense based on applicable law and the tools and instruments used. Inadequate examination will have a negative impact on both the examiner and the defendant. Conclusions: Several important aspects need to be considered in evaluating insanity defense for offenders with psychotic disorders who commit physical violence, which is still a challenge to enforce the law appropriately."