Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKLatar Belakang: Umpan balik memiliki peran penting pada proses pembelajaranseseorang. Konsep mengenai perilaku mencari umpan balik telah banyak ditelititetapi masih terdapat gambaran yang belum lengkap mengenai berbagai aspekterkait perilaku mencari umpan balik tersebut. Penelitian ini bertujuan untukmengeksplorasi perilaku mencari umpan balik mahasiswa kedokteran di FakultasKedokteran Universitas Lampung (FK Unila) secara mendalam.Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatanfenomenologi. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui FGD (focus groupdiscussion) dengan mahasiswa FK Unila Angkatan 2012, 2013 dan 2014.Triangulasi data dilakukan melalui FGD dengan staf pengajar, wawancara denganketua tim Medical Education Unit dan studi dokumen yang dilakukan selamabulan April sampai dengan Mei 2015. Hasil FGD dan wawancara dituliskandalam bentuk transkrip verbatim lalu dilakukan analisis tematik dan koding.Selanjutnya dilakukan reduksi dan penyajian data.Hasil: Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pemahaman mahasiswa dan stafpengajar mengenai umpan balik masih belum tepat. Motivasi mahasiswa untukmencari umpan balik disebabkan oleh keinginan untuk mendapatkan informasiyang berguna bagi dirinya dan mengontrol kesan orang lain. Faktor penghambattersering mahasiswa dalam mencari umpan balik kepada staf pengajar adalah rasasegan dan takut untuk mendapatkan komentar negatif mengenai dirinya.Mahasiswa akan mencari umpan balik kepada orang yang memiliki hubungankedekatan dan kredibilitas yang baik dalam konteks lingkungan yang privat.Kesimpulan: Belum adanya pemahaman yang sama mengenai pengertian umpanbalik menyebabkan proses pencarian dan pemberian umpan balik di FK Unilabelum berjalan secara efektif. Sistem pendidikan kedokteran yang hirarkis, faktorbudaya dan kesibukan staf pengajar merupakan beberapa faktor penghambat.Institusi perlu membuat suatu kebijakan yang bertujuan untuk menumbuhkankesadaran dan menciptakan atmosfer bagi mahasiswa dan staf pengajar akan artipenting umpan balik.

---

ABSTRACTBackground: Feedback has many important roles in an individual learningprocess. The concept of feedback-seeking behaviour has been widely studied butthere is still lack of information on the aspects related to it. This study is aimed toexplore feedback-seeking behaviour of undergraduate medical students at Facultyof Medicine University of Lampung.Method: This study used qualitative research methods with phenomenologicalapproach. Data was collected through focus group discussion (FGD) with studentsin Faculty of Medicine University of Lampung class of 2012, 2013 and 2014.Similar method was used with faculty members to triangulate the data, and also anin-depth interview with the head of Medical Education Unit and documentanalysis. The result of FGD and interview were transcribed verbatim, analysedthematically and coded, to reduce and present the data.Result: The results obtained in this study indicate that the understanding ofstudents and lecturers of feedback is still incorrect. Students are motivated to seekfeedback because they want useful information and have the desire to control theimpressions of others. One of the biggest factors that inhibit students to seekfeedback from the lecturer is their fear in getting negative comments. Studentswill look for feedback from people who have close relationships with them andgood credibility in the context of a private environment.Conclusion: The absence of a common understanding of the meaning of feedbackcauses the feedback-seeking and feedback-giving process on FK Unila not runeffectively. Hierarchical system of medical education, cultural factors andlecturers? busy schedule are some factors that hinder feedback-seeking process.Institutions need to make a policy to raise awareness and create an atmosphere forstudents and faculty members on the importance of feedback, Background: Feedback has many important roles in an individual learningprocess. The concept of feedback-seeking behaviour has been widely studied butthere is still lack of information on the aspects related to it. This study is aimed toexplore feedback-seeking behaviour of undergraduate medical students at Facultyof Medicine University of Lampung.Method: This study used qualitative research methods with phenomenologicalapproach. Data was collected through focus group discussion (FGD) with studentsin Faculty of Medicine University of Lampung class of 2012, 2013 and 2014.Similar method was used with faculty members to triangulate the data, and also anin-depth interview with the head of Medical Education Unit and documentanalysis. The result of FGD and interview were transcribed verbatim, analysedthematically and coded, to reduce and present the data.Result: The results obtained in this study indicate that the understanding ofstudents and lecturers of feedback is still incorrect. Students are motivated to seekfeedback because they want useful information and have the desire to control theimpressions of others. One of the biggest factors that inhibit students to seekfeedback from the lecturer is their fear in getting negative comments. Studentswill look for feedback from people who have close relationships with them andgood credibility in the context of a private environment.Conclusion: The absence of a common understanding of the meaning of feedbackcauses the feedback-seeking and feedback-giving process on FK Unila not runeffectively. Hierarchical system of medical education, cultural factors andlecturers’ busy schedule are some factors that hinder feedback-seeking process.Institutions need to make a policy to raise awareness and create an atmosphere forstudents and faculty members on the importance of feedback]"

"[ABSTRAKLatar belakang dan tujuan: Keloid merupakan pertumbuhan berlebih dari kolagen dermis yang dapat menimbulkan masalah fisis dan psikis bagi penderitanya. Berbagai pilihan terapi telah digunakan untuk pengobatan keloid. Penelitian ini membandingkan efikasi dan efek samping antara kombinasi triamsinolon asetonid (TA) dan 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) dengan TA intralesi pada terapi keloid.Metode: Studi eksperimen dengan desain single blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) terhadap pasien keloid. Penelitian ini melibatkan 2 kelompok, yaitu: kelompok intervensi yang mendapat kombinasi 5-fluorourasil dan triamsinolon asetonid intralesi, dan kelompok kontrol yang mendapat terapi tunggal triamsinolon asetonid intralesi. Kedua kelompok diberi pengobatan 1 kali perminggu selama 8 minggu dan lesi keloid diukur tinggi dan volume.Hasil: Penurunan tinggi dan volume terjadi pada kedua kelompok. Pada penurunan tinggi, respons baik terjadi pada 75% kelompok intervensi dan 63,6% kelompok kontrol (p = 0,403). Sedangkan pada penurunan volume, respons baik terjadi pada 58,3% kelompok intervensi dan 63,6% kelompok kontrol (p = 0,713). Sebanyak 5 dari 24 SP pada kelompok intervensi mengalami efek samping berupa gatal, nyeri ringan, ulkus dangkal, dan telangiektasi. Sedangkan pada kelompok kontrol terdapat 7 dari 22 SP yang mengeluh gatal, nyeri ringan, dan telangiektasi.Kesimpulan: Secara umum, efikasi dan efek samping kombinasi TA dan 5-FU intralesi sebanding dengan TA saja.

---

ABSTRACTBackground and objectives: Keloid are benign growths of dermal collagen that can cause physical and psychological problems for patients. A variety of treatment regimens have been used for treatment of keloids. This study was conducted to compare efficacy and side effects intralesional combination triamcinolone acetonide (TA) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and TA alone for the treatment of keloid.Methods: Experimental study, single blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) for keloid patients. This study involved two groups: intervention group who received intralesional combination TA with 5-FU, and the control group who received intralesional TA alone. Both groups received treatment once a week for 8 weeks and lesions were assessed for height and volume.Results: Both groups showed improvement in height and volume. In height flattening, 75% patients in intervention group had good response, comparing to 63,6% control group (p = 0,403). While in volume reduction, 58,3% patients in intervention group had good response, comparing to 63,6% in control group (p = 0,713). Five out of 24 patients in intervention group had some side effects like itch, mild pain, superficial ulcer, and telangiectasis. While in control group, 7 out of 22 patients had itch, mild pain, and telangiectasis.Conclusions: The overall efficacy and side effects of combination triamcinolon acetonide with 5-fluorouracil was comparable with triamcinolone acetonide alone;Background and objectives: Keloid are benign growths of dermal collagen that can cause physical and psychological problems for patients. A variety of treatment regimens have been used for treatment of keloids. This study was conducted to compare efficacy and side effects intralesional combination triamcinolone acetonide (TA) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and TA alone for the treatment of keloid.Methods: Experimental study, single blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) for keloid patients. This study involved two groups: intervention group who received intralesional combination TA with 5-FU, and the control group who received intralesional TA alone. Both groups received treatment once a week for 8 weeks and lesions were assessed for height and volume.Results: Both groups showed improvement in height and volume. In height flattening, 75% patients in intervention group had good response, comparing to 63,6% control group (p = 0,403). While in volume reduction, 58,3% patients in intervention group had good response, comparing to 63,6% in control group (p = 0,713). Five out of 24 patients in intervention group had some side effects like itch, mild pain, superficial ulcer, and telangiectasis. While in control group, 7 out of 22 patients had itch, mild pain, and telangiectasis.Conclusions: The overall efficacy and side effects of combination triamcinolon acetonide with 5-fluorouracil was comparable with triamcinolone acetonide alone;Background and objectives: Keloid are benign growths of dermal collagen that can cause physical and psychological problems for patients. A variety of treatment regimens have been used for treatment of keloids. This study was conducted to compare efficacy and side effects intralesional combination triamcinolone acetonide (TA) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and TA alone for the treatment of keloid.Methods: Experimental study, single blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) for keloid patients. This study involved two groups: intervention group who received intralesional combination TA with 5-FU, and the control group who received intralesional TA alone. Both groups received treatment once a week for 8 weeks and lesions were assessed for height and volume.Results: Both groups showed improvement in height and volume. In height flattening, 75% patients in intervention group had good response, comparing to 63,6% control group (p = 0,403). While in volume reduction, 58,3% patients in intervention group had good response, comparing to 63,6% in control group (p = 0,713). Five out of 24 patients in intervention group had some side effects like itch, mild pain, superficial ulcer, and telangiectasis. While in control group, 7 out of 22 patients had itch, mild pain, and telangiectasis.Conclusions: The overall efficacy and side effects of combination triamcinolon acetonide with 5-fluorouracil was comparable with triamcinolone acetonide alone, Background and objectives: Keloid are benign growths of dermal collagen that can cause physical and psychological problems for patients. A variety of treatment regimens have been used for treatment of keloids. This study was conducted to compare efficacy and side effects intralesional combination triamcinolone acetonide (TA) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and TA alone for the treatment of keloid.Methods: Experimental study, single blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) for keloid patients. This study involved two groups: intervention group who received intralesional combination TA with 5-FU, and the control group who received intralesional TA alone. Both groups received treatment once a week for 8 weeks and lesions were assessed for height and volume.Results: Both groups showed improvement in height and volume. In height flattening, 75% patients in intervention group had good response, comparing to 63,6% control group (p = 0,403). While in volume reduction, 58,3% patients in intervention group had good response, comparing to 63,6% in control group (p = 0,713). Five out of 24 patients in intervention group had some side effects like itch, mild pain, superficial ulcer, and telangiectasis. While in control group, 7 out of 22 patients had itch, mild pain, and telangiectasis.Conclusions: The overall efficacy and side effects of combination triamcinolon acetonide with 5-fluorouracil was comparable with triamcinolone acetonide alone]"