Analisis yuridis terhadap persekongkolan tender dan penerapan pembuktian tidak langsung (indirect evidence) : studi kasus terhadap putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha dan Badan Peradilan di Indonesia = Juridical analysis in terms of both tender conspiracy and application of indirect evidence : case study on award of business competition commission supervisory and judicature institution in Indonesia / Ibnu Abas Ali

Penggunaan Indirect Evidence (Bukti Tidak Langsung) Dalam Perkara Kartel dan Persekongkolan Tender Menurut Hukum Persaingan Usaha di Indonesia = The Use of Indirect Evidence in the Case of Cartel and Tender Conspiracy According to Competition Law in Indonesia.

Penerapan Pembuktian Tidak Langsung (Indirect Evidence) Dalam Penanganan Perkara Kartel Pada Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) = Application of Indirect Evidence in the Process of Cartel case at the Commission for the Supervision of Business Competition (KPPU)

Tinjauan yuridis persekongkolan tender menurut hukum persaingan usaha (studi kasus putusan KPPU 03/KPPU-L/2012) = Juridical studies of tender conspiracy according to the competition law (case study commission s decision No 03/KPPU-L/ 2012)

Pembuktian persekongkolan tender yang dilakukan melalui perjanjian tidak tertulis (implied agreement) berdasarkan Pasal 22 Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang larangan praktek monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat dalam hukum persaingan usaha (studi kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor 01/KPPU-1/2015) = Rules of evidence in related with bid rigging by implied agreement based on article 22 Indonesian anti monopoly and unfair competition in Indonesian competition law perspective (case study of Putusan Perkara Nomor 01/KPPU-1/2015)