Dugaan pelanggaran pasal 5 undang-undang nomor 5 tahun 1999 tentang larangan praktek monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat studi kasus putusan kppu nomor 04/KPPU-I/2016 = Alleged violation of article 5 of law number 5 of the year 1999 on prohibition of monopoly practices and unfair business competition and conformity of the decision of unfair business competition commission number 04/KPPU-I/2016

Analisis mengenai e-mail dan analisa ekonomi yang digunakan oleh KPPU dalam memutus perkara penetapan harga (studi putusan KPPU Nomor: 04/KPPU-I/2016 dan putusan KPPU nomor: 17/KPPU-I/2010 = Analysis of e mail and economic analysis used by commission for the supervision of bussiness competition republic of Indonesia KPPU RI in terminating price fixing case verdict study of kppu ri decision number 04 KPPU-I/2016 dan KPPU RI decision number 17

Dugaan pelanggaran pasal 5 undang-undang nomor 5 tahun 1999 tentang larangan praktek monopoli dan persaingan usaha tidak sehat studi kasus putusan KPPU Nomor 04/KPPU-I/2016 = Possible violation of article 5 law number 5 of 1999 concerning prohibition of monopoly practice and uncomplete competition case study KPPU Number 04/ KPPU/I/2016

Analisis dugaan penetapan harga dan kartel yang menimbulkan persaingan usaha yang tidak sehat : studi kasus kartel semen putusan KPPU No. 01/KPPU-I/2010 dan Peraturan Komisi No. 4 Tahun 2010 = Analysis of presumption price fixing and cartel practices that evoke unfair business competition : case study of cemen cartel on commission for the supervision of business competition Republic of Indonesia-KPPU RI decision number 01/KPPU-I/2010 and commission regulation number 4 year 2010

Penggunaan bukti ekonomi dalam pembuktian perkara-perkara kartel studi terhadap putusan KPPU Nomor 08/KPP-I/2014, putusan KPPU nomor 02/KPPU-I/2016, dan putusan KPPU nomor 04/KPPU-I/2016 = Use of economic evidence in proof of cartel cases for case study verdict kppu number 08/KPPU-I/2014 verdict KPPU number 02/KPPU/I/2016 and verdict KPPU number 04/KPPU/I/2016