Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"In order to improving awareness and compliance of taxpayers about their rights and obligations, the understanding about justice from a rule of law and regulation looked into to play an important part in improving awareness and taxpayer compliance. Comprehended level of justice of a rule is hence expected by a taxpayer earn more own awareness and compliance about their obligation of taxation. The target of this research is to analyze the level of justice from an imposition of Tax, which is Income Recognition of bank interest payable write-off, evaluated from principle of taxation justice. In this research, a descriptive analysis method was used by through study of bibliography comparing opinion among experts according to their definition, with rule of law and regulation about Recognition of Income for Bank Interest Payable Write-Off. The evaluation use Model System which assessing a policy by comparing input, Process, and Output of law and regulation policy.

From the analyze result, pulled conclusion that rule of legislation of Income Tax about Recognition of Income for Bank Interest Payable Write-Off Do Not reflect principle of justice either through Horizontal and also Vertical, because Income Recognition [of] according to rule of legislation do not in line with taxpayer ability, if compared to Income Recognition from business transaction besides Interest Payable Write-Off.

Revising rule Article 4 sentence (1) Law of Number 7 Year 1983 about Income Tax as have been altered last with Law of Number 17 Year 2000 related with Recognition of Income for Bank Interest Payable Write-Off would be able to bring constructive benefit, in the effort to improve level of its justice."

"Sesuai peraturan Bank Indonesia dan Pedoman Akuntansi Perbankan Indonesia, bank dapat melakukan hapus buku dan mengeluarkan piutang kategori macet dari neraca serta mencatatnya dalam rekening administratif. Namun, dalam perpajakan tidak dikenal istilah hapus buku dan hapus tagih. Perlakuan Pajak Penghasilan ketika bank menghapus buku piutang tak tertagih menimbulkan perbedaan pendapat antara Wajib Pajak dengan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak dan juga antara Majelis Hakim.Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa saat piutang tak tertagih dihapus buku, upaya penagihan masih terus dilakukan sehingga belum merupakan penagihan maksimal atau terakhir. Dengan belum memenuhi ketentuan fiskal, piutang tak tertagih tersebut masih berada dalam saldo akhir cadangan pada golongan kualitas macet karena belum terjadi pembebanan pada perkiraan cadangan dan juga tidak terjadi dua kali pembentukan cadangan. Pembentukan cadangan pada tahun dilakukannya hapus buku akan sama jumlahnya secara komersial dan fiskal.Mengingat persoalan penghapusan piutang hanya merupakan beda waktu, peraturan pajak perlu memperjelas kedudukan piutang yang nyatanyata tidak dapat ditagih, yaitu sama dengan hapus tagih. Selanjutnya, perlu dilakukan penyesuaian peraturan perpajakan mengenai saat pembebanan kerugian dari piutang tak tertagih dan pengertian penagihan maksimal atau terakhir. Dengan demikian, harmonisasi antara peraturan perpajakan dengan peraturan Bank Indonesia perlu dilakukan dalam rangka memberikan kepastian hukum bagi fiskus dan Wajib Pajak.

---

In accordance with Bank Indonesia regulation and Indonesian Banking Accounting Guidelines (PAPI), the bank can write off and remove loss category accounts of the issued also recorded it off balance sheet. However, in terms of taxation not recognized written off and charged off bad debts. Income tax treatment when a bank write off bad debts caused disagreement between the taxpayer by the Directorate General of Taxes and also among the judges.

The analysis results showed that when bad debts written off, collection efforts still continue to do so has not already made a maximum or last effort. Not fulfilled tax requirement, the accounts are still in ending balances of allowance of the loss collectibility because allowance accounts has not debited and also bad debts expense do not made twice. Bad debt expense in the year of write off will be the same amount of commercial and fiscal.

The issue of deductible write off is a time different only, tax laws need to clarify the position of debts which are actually uncollectible, which is equal to charged off bad debts. Furthermore, adjustments need to be done as well as the imposition of tax laws regarding loss of bad debts and the maximum or last effort interpretation. Thus, harmonization of tax laws with Bank Indonesia regulations need to be done in order to provide legal certainty for tax officer and taxpayer."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis perbedaan dasar argumentasi Direktorat Jenderal Pajak bahwa piutang tak tertagih pada PT BNI, Tbk tidak dapat dikurangkan dari penghasilan bruto serta mengetahui upayaupaya yang dilakukan PT BNI, Tbk dalam menghadapi perbedaan pendapat dengan pihak DJP mengenai perlakuan perpajakan atas piutang tak tertagih.Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian analisis deskriptif. Data diperoleh dengan wawancara secara mendalam. Berdasarkan peraturanperaturan perpajakan yang berlaku saat ini dapat ditarik kesimpulan bahwa piutang yang nyata-nyata tidak dapat ditagih atau yang telah dihapus bukukan oleh PT BNI, Tbk dapat dibiayakan sepanjang piutang tersebut berasal dari transaksi bisnis wajar sesuai dengan usaha perbankan dan Bank telah melakukan upaya penagihan yang maksimal atau terakhir.

---

This thesis aims to identify and analyze difference arguments of Directorate General of Taxesthat the non-performing loans at PT BNI,Tbkcan not be expensed from gross incomeand to determine the efforts that will be undertaken by PT BNI,Tbk in the face of disagreements with the Directorate General of Taxes regarding the tax treatment of non-performing loans.

This research method is descriptive interpretive. The data are collected by means of deep interview. In conclusion, according to the applicable regulations of taxation, uncollectible loans or non-performing loans write off by PT BNI,Tbk can be recognized as long as the receivable are from fair transactions in accordance with banking business and Bank has made maximum and final efforts to collect the receivable."

"ABSTRAKLaporan magang ini membahas mengenai analisis proses audit laporan keuanganBank Bravo yang dilakukan oleh KAP TOP pada periode yang berakhir tanggal31 Desember 2015, khususnya terhadap akun pendapatan bunga dari kredit yangdiberikan kepada nasabah. Proses audit yang dibahas terbatas pada tahappengujian dan pengumpulan bukti, yang terdiri dari pengujian pengendalian danprosedur substantif. Perlakuan akuntansi yang diterapkan oleh Bank Bravoterhadap pendapatan bunga dari kredit yang diberikan kepada nasabah mengacupada Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) 23 mengenai Pendapatan.KAP TOP tidak menemukan adanya temuan atau salah saji material dari hasilpengujian. Berdasarkan hasil analisis, dapat disimpulkan bahwa proses audit yangdilakukan KAP TOP telah sesuai dengan standar yang berlaku.

---

ABSTRACTThis internship report discusses the analysis of the audit process of Bank Bravo’sfinancial statements conducted by KAP TOP for the period ended in 31 December2015, in particular on interest income from loans to customer. The audit processdiscussed is limited to testing and evidence collection phase, comprising test ofcontrols and substantive procedures. The accounting treatment applied by BankBravo to interest income from loans to customers refers to Pernyataan StandarAkuntansi Keuangan (PSAK) 23 on Income. KAP TOP did not find any materialmisstatements or any findings from the test results. Based on the analysis, it wasconcluded that audit process is in accordance with the applicable standards."

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji aspek keadilan, kepastian hukum, dan penerimaan negara dalam penerapan pajak penghasilan final atas penghasilan dari transaksi pengalihan harta berupa tanah dan/atau bangunan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif, yaitu melalui studi literatur dengan mempelajari buku-buku dan literatur yang berkaitan dengan topik penelitian, serta melakukan wawancara dengan praktisi dan akademisi perpajakan juga pejabat dan auditor pajak. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, penerapan PPh final ini lebih mengutamakan ease of administration, dengan mengabaikan asas equality, baik horizontal equity maupun vertical equity. Dari aspek kepastian hukum, terjadi perbedaan persepsi diantara Wajib Pajak terkait dengan kewenangan peraturan pemerintah, objek pajak, dan saat terutangnya pajak. Terakhir dari aspek penerimaan negara, dengan penerapan PPh final ini maka penerimaan negara menjadi lebih pasti dan predictable.

---

ABSTRACTThis research aims to assess aspects of justice, rule of law, and state revenues in the implementation of the final income tax on income from transfer of property transactions in the form of land and/or buildings. This research uses descriptive qualitative methode, study of books and literature that conducted by studying literature related to the topic of research, and interviews with practitioners and academics, tax officials and tax auditors. Based on the results of the evaluation, the main priority of the implementation of this final income tax is ease of administration by ignoring the principle of equality, both horizontal equity and vertical equities. From the aspect of legal certainty, there is a difference of perception between the taxpayers associated with the authority of government regulations, tax objects, and the time of tax payable. State revenue aspect shows that tax revenues become more defined and predictable by the implementing of the final income tax revenues, although it has not been able to achieve maximum results. , This research aims to assess aspects of justice, rule of law, and state revenues in the implementation of the final income tax on income from transfer of property transactions in the form of land and/or buildings. This research uses descriptive qualitative methode, study of books and literature that conducted by studying literature related to the topic of research, and interviews with practitioners and academics, tax officials and tax auditors. Based on the results of the evaluation, the main priority of the implementation of this final income tax is ease of administration by ignoring the principle of equality, both horizontal equity and vertical equities. From the aspect of legal certainty, there is a difference of perception between the taxpayers associated with the authority of government regulations, tax objects, and the time of tax payable. State revenue aspect shows that tax revenues become more defined and predictable by the implementing of the final income tax revenues, although it has not been able to achieve maximum results. ]"

"Perlakuan akuntansi atas penyisihan pencadangan piutang tak tertagih mengalami perubahan cukup signifikan, sejak diterapkan Pernyataan Standar Akuntansi Keuangan 71 yang berlaku efektif pada tanggal 1 Januari 2020, terutama pada metode perhitungan atas Cadangan Kerugian Penurunan Nilai (CKPN). Metode perhitungan atas CKPN pada PSAK 71, menggunakan expected loss dengan sifat forward-looking. Atas perubahan ketentuan akuntansi tersebut, belum diiringi dengan perubahan Peraturan Menteri Keuangan (PMK) No. 81 tahun 2009 dan PMK No. 219 tahun 2012. Hal ini menimbulkan permasalahan untuk ditinjau secara lebih lanjut. Salah satu perusahaan yang terdampak dengan perubahan ini adalah PT XYZ. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis implikasi yang ditimbulkan atas perbedaan perlakuan secara akuntansi dan pajak atas penyisihan piutang tak tertagih pada PT XYZ tahun 2022. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Teknik analisis dalam pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif. Pada penelitian ini, data diperoleh melalui studi literatur dan wawancara mendalam terhadap beberapa narasumber yang relevan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa penerapan PSAK 71 cenderung menaikkan CKPN yang dimiliki perusahaan. Selanjutnya, dikarenakan PT XYZ merupakan industri yang diperbolehkan untuk melakukan pembebanan atas pencadangan piutang secara pajak, maka perbedaan yang terjadi terdapat pada selisih besar CKPN menurut akuntansi dan pajak. Dengan demikian, atas penerapan PSAK 71, akan berpengaruh terhadap koreksi fiskal pada CKPN yang menjadi lebih besar, dibandingkan saat penerapan PSAK 55.

---

The accounting treatment for the provision for allowance for doubtful accounts has changed significantly, since the implementation of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 71 ​​which became effective on January 1, 2020, especially in calculating Allowance for Impairment Losses (CKPN). The calculation method for CKPN in PSAK 71 uses expected loss with forward-looking characteristics. The change in accounting provisions has not been followed by a change in Minister of Finance Regulation (PMK) No. 81 of 2009 and PMK No. 219 of 2012. This raises issues for further review. One of the companies affected by this change is PT XYZ. This study aims to analyze the implications arising from differences in accounting and tax treatment of allowance for doubtful accounts at PT XYZ in 2022. This research uses a qualitative approach. The analysis technique used in data collection is the descriptive method. This study obtained data from literature studies and in-depth interviews with several relevant sources. This study's results indicate that applying PSAK 71 tends to increase the company's CKPN. Furthermore, because PT XYZ is an industry that is allowed to charge for provisioning receivables taxably, the difference that occurs is in the large difference in CKPN according to accounting and tax. Thus, the implementation of PSAK 71 will affect the fiscal correction in the CKPN which becomes larger, compared to the implementation of PSAK 55."

"Transaksi derivatif merupakan instrument penting dalam dunia usaha untuk lindung nilai resiko, dan juga dapat digunakan untuk tujuan spekulasi. Kontrak berjangka adalah jenis yang paling umum dari transaksi derivatif. Perdagangan berjangka merupakan salah satu komponen penting bagi pembangunan ekonomi. Di Indonesia saat ini, penghasilan dari transaksi perdagangan berjangka dianggap sebagai pendapatan usaha, sehingga perhitungan pajaknya harus ditambah dengan penghasilan lainnya dan dikenakan pajak dengan tarif PPh Badan sebesar 25%. Penghasilan yang diperoleh dari transaksi derivatif yang diperdagangkan di bursa seharusnya dikenakan pajak final berdasarkan UU PPh Indonesia. Penelitian ini membahas ketentuan pajak penghasilan atas penghasilan dari transaksi derivatif berupa kontrak berjangka di bursa. Tujuan dari penelitian yaitu menentukan ketentuan manakah yang paling tepat untuk diberlakukan, apakah final atau tidak final dan menganalisis ketentuan pajak yang berlaku saat ini berdasarkan asas ease of administration, dengan pertimbangan teoritis dan implementasinya. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif. Data kualitatif yang diperoleh melalui studi literatur dan wawancara mendalam. Peneliti menyimpulkan bahwa ketentuan PPh Final lebih tepat untuk diberlakukan.

---

Derivatives are essential instruments in business to hedge risk, but can also be used for speculative purposes. Futures contracts are the most common types of derivatives. Futures trading is one of important components for economic development. In Indonesia nowadays, income from futures trading is considered as a business income, so this will have to be added with other income and taxed at the 25% corporate income tax rate. Income derived from derivative transaction which traded on the exchange should be subject to final income tax based on Indonesian Income Tax Law. This study examines the income tax consequences of income derived from futures trading through the exchange.

The purpose of this study is to compare which the right tax regulation that should be applied to income from derivative transaction, final or non final and to analyze the current taxation rule about derivatives transaction against the principles of a good tax system (ease of administration), with theoritical considerations and implementations. This research is qualitative descriptive interpretive. The data were collected by means of depth interview and study some of literatures. The researcher concludes that final tax is applicable to income earned from derivative transaction."

"Penelitian skripsi ini memiliki dua tujuan. Tujuan pertama adalah untuk menganalisis perlakuan PPh badan atas pembayaran sewa sebagai allowable deduction dari sisi penyewa setelah pemberlakuan PSAK 73 berdasarkan asas ease of administration. Tujuan kedua adalah untuk menganalisis perlakuan withholding tax atas pembayaran imbalan sewa dari sisi penyewa setelah pemberlakuan PSAK 73 berdasarkan asas ease of administration. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan post-positivist yang pengumpulan datanya dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan dan wawancara mendalam. Berdasarkan analisis atas data yang telah dikumpulkan tersebut, diperoleh dua kesimpulan sebagai jawaban atas dua pertanyaan penelitian. Pertama, perlakuan PPh badan atas pembayaran sewa sebagai allowable deduction dari sisi penyewa setelah pemberlakuan PSAK 73 tidak memenuhi asas ease of administration karena asas clarity dan economy tidak terpenuhi. Sementara itu, untuk kesimpulan kedua, perlakuan withholding tax atas pembayaran imbalan sewa dari sisi penyewa setelah pemberlakuan PSAK 73 tidak sepenuhnya memenuhi asas ease of administration karena asas clarity tidak terpenuhi. Atas dua kesimpulan tersebut, dihasilkan dua saran. Untuk saran pertama, diperbaruinya KMK No. 1169/KMK.01/1991 atau diperkenalkannya suatu ketentuan pajak baru yang mengatur perlakuan transaksi sewa, yang sebaiknya dapat menjelaskan konsekuensi dari adanya perbedaan pengakuan dan pengukuran antara akuntansi dan pajak. Sedangkan, untuk saran kedua, pengaturan konsep utang dalam Pasal 4 ayat (2) PP 34/2017 sebaiknya diperjelas agar tidak menimbulkan ketidakpastian

---

This undergraduate thesis aims to accomplish two objectives. The first objective is to analyze the treatment of corporate income tax on lease payments as an allowable deduction from the lessee's perspective after the implementation of PSAK 73 based on the principle of ease of administration. The second objective is to analyze the treatment of withholding tax on lease payments from the lessee's perspective after the implementation of PSAK 73 based on the principle of ease of administration. This research utilizes a post-positivist approach, with data collection conducted through literature review and in-depth interviews. Based on the analysis of the collected data, two conclusions are drawn in response to the research questions. First, the treatment of corporate income tax on lease payments as an allowable deduction from the lessee's perspective after the implementation of PSAK 73 does not meet the principle of ease of administration because the principles of clarity and economy are not fulfilled. Meanwhile, for the second conclusion, the treatment of withholding tax on lease payments from the lessee's perspective after the implementation of PSAK 73 does not fully meet the principle of ease of administration because the principle of clarity is not fulfilled. Based on these two conclusions, two recommendations are proposed. The first recommendation is to update KMK No. 1169/KMK.01/1991 or introduce a new tax regulation that governs the treatment of lease transactions. This new regulation should clarify the consequences of the differences in recognition and measurement between accounting and taxation. As for the second recommendation, the concept of debt in Article 4, paragraph (2) of Government Regulation No. 34/2017 should be clarified to avoid causing uncertainty."

"ABSTRACTPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan implementasi kebijakan Pajak Penghasilan (PPh) atas bunga deposito dari Devisa Hasil Ekspor dan menganalisis hambatan dan solusi dalam penerapan kebijakan Pajak Penghasilan atas bunga deposito dari Devisa Hasil Ekspor. Kebijakan Pajak Penghasilan atas bunga deposito dari Devisa Hasil Ekspor yang dibahas dalam penelitian ini adalah tarif khusus bagi bunga deposito dari Devisa Hasil Ekspor yang diatur dalam PP No. 123 Tahun 2015 tentang Pajak Penghasilan atas Bunga Deposito dan Tabungan serta Sertifikat Bank Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah kualitatif dengan teknik pengumpulan data wawancara mendalam (indepth interview). Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa dalam implementasi kebijakan pajak terdapat empat faktor yang menentukan keberhasilan dari kebijakan sebagaimana konsepsi implementasi kebijakan menurut Edwards III yaitu meliputi komunikasi, sumberdaya, disposisi, dan struktur birokrasi dalam mencapai tujuan dari kebijakan ini dan terdapat hambatan berupa kurang menariknya kebijakan dan kurang intensifnya sosialiasi yang diberikan oleh pihak implementor.

---

ABSTRACTThis study aims to describe the implementation of income tax policy on interest on deposits from foreign exchange proceeds from exports and identify obstacles and solutions in the application of income tax policies on interest on deposits from foreign exchange proceeds from exports. The Income Tax Policy on interest on deposits from Foreign Exchange Export Results discussed in this study is a special rate for interest on deposits from Foreign Exchange Export Results as regulated in PP No. 123 of 2015 concerning Income Tax on Interest on Deposits and Savings and Bank Indonesia CertificatesThe research method used is qualitative in-depth interview data collection techniques. The results of this study are that in the implementation of tax policy there are four factors that determine the success of the policy as Edwards III's conception of policy implementation includes communication, resources, disposition, and bureaucratic structure in achieving the objectives of this policy and there are obstacles in the form of less attractive policies and less intensive socialization provided by the implementor."