Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Tesis ini membahas tentang penanganan perkara tindak pidana Pemilu khususnya menyangkut koordinasi antara Panwaslu, Kepolisian dan Kejaksaan yang tergabung dalam Sentra Gakkumdu dengan titik beratnya adalah peran kejaksaan dalam penanganan perkara tindak pidana Pemilu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam tesis ini adalah yuridis normatif yang ditunjang dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konsep. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan dan selanjutnya diolah secara deduktif. Hasil penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa dalam penanganan perkara tindak pidana Pemilu Legislatif 2009 yang dilakukan oleh Panwaslu, Kepolisian dan Kejaksaan adalah membuat Kesepahaman Bersama tentang Pola Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Pemilu dan Pembentukan Sentra Penegakan Hukum Terpadu sebagai usaha untuk mengefektifkan penanganan perkara tindak pidana Pemilu. Dalam penanganan perkara tindak pidana Pemilu, Kejaksaan yang mempunyai peran sebagai bagian dari sistem peradilan pidana terpadu dan sebagai bagian Sentra Gakkumdu mempunyai berbagai permasalahan dalam melaksanakan fungsinya. Namun yang dapat digarisbawahi dalam penanganan perkara tindak pidana Pemilu Legislatif 2009 adalah adanya reposisi peran kejaksaan sebagai upaya untuk percepatan penanganan perkara pidana dan sebagai usaha rekonstruksi Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Pemilu.

---

The thesis discusses the administration of criminal offenses associated to the General Election specifically in aspects related to the coordination between coordination of the Election Supervision Committee (Panwaslu), the National Police and the District Attorney Office as part of the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Sentra Gakkumdu), wherein the emphasis is on the role of the district attorney office in managing election related offenses. The method used in this study is judicial normative augmented by laws and conceptual approaches. Data gathering is done through literature review then deductively processed.

This study reveals that for the purpose of managing criminal offenses committed during the 2009 Legislative Election, the Election Supervision Committee (Panwaslu), the National Police and the District Attorney Office have set up a Memorandum of Understanding on the Pattern for Managing Election Related Criminal Offenses as well as establishing the Integrated Law Enforcement Center (Sentra Gakkumdu) in the effort to effectively manage election related criminal offenses. In managing election related criminal offenses, the district attorney office in its role as part of the judiciary system and the Sentra Gakkumdu had to content with a number of obstacles to execute its function properly. Furthermore, throughout the management of election related criminal offenses committed during the 2009 Legislative Election, there was a repositioning of the district attorney office's in the effort to accelerate the management of criminal cases and in the attempt to reform the Criminal Court System."

"It is a must that the process of general election needs law enforcement in every step of electoral process and all the process of election should be done in democratic principles such as direct,free and fair,accountable and accesseble...."

"Tesis ini membahas tentang sistem pemilu yang berkembang saat ini termasuk di Indonesia. Pemilu merupakan pelaksanaan kehendak rakyat sebagai perwujudan dari demokrasi. Anggota legislatif yang terpilih adalah wakil rakyat yang diharapkan dapat mengemban amanat rakyat. Indonesia pada dasarnya menganut sistem pemilu proporsional dengan daftar calon yang disusun oleh partai pada daerah dengan perwakilan jamak. Pada awalnya sistem pemilu Indonesia menerapkan daftar tertutup (proporsional tertutup) tetapi sejak diberlakukannya UU Nomor 10 Tahun 2008, daftar calon bersifat terbuka (proporsional terbuka) sehingga calon yang memperoleh suara terbanyak ditetapkan menjadi calon terpilih. Penetapan calon yang terpilih ternyata tidak semudah yang dibayangkan karena terdapat sistem yang mengatur tentang penghitungan dan pembagian kursi legislatif bagi partai dan calon. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian Yuridis Normatif, pendekatan dilakukan dengan teori pemilu, teori aturan pemilu serta konsep tentang pemilihan sistem pemilu, perbandingan sistem pemilu, desain aturan pemilu, mekanisme pemilu, partisipasi pemilih, dan proporsionalitas. Untuk memperoleh kesimpulan dari tujuan penelitian, maka hal-hal yang disampaikan adalah meliputi sistem pemilu, perbandingan sistem penghitungan perolehan kursi DPR dalam UU pemilu, dan penerapan sistem penghitungan perolehan kursi dalam Pemilu Tahun 2009. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian diperoleh hasil bahwa sistem penghitungan perolehan kursi DPR pada Pemilu Tahun 2009 dan yang akan diterapkan dalam Pemilu Tahun 2014 ternyata sangat rumit dan tidak mudah untuk dipahami bagi penyelenggara pemilu, partai dan calon legislatif, apalagi rumusan yang dibuat oleh pembentuk UU ternyata tidak sederhana dan berbelit-belit. Akibatnya, terdapat berbagai penafsiran atas sistem penghitungan perolehan kursi DPR baik oleh KPU, partai maupun calon legislatif, sehingga pada Pemilu Tahun 2009, Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi mengeluarkan putusan judicial review dan pengujian undang-undang yang saling bertentangan tentang sistem penghitungan perolehan kursi DPR. Kerumitan rumusan sistem penghitungan perolehan kursi DPR tersebut dapat mengakibatkan disproporsionalitas pembagian kursi DPR yang pada akhirnya banyak suara pemilih yang terbuang sia-sia.

---

This thesis discusses the development of electoral system developed, including in Indonesia . Election is the implementation of the will of the people as the embodiment of democracy . Legislators are representatives of the people, who are expected to carry out the mandate of the Indonesian people, basically adhere to the proportional representatives system with a list of candidates drawn up by the party in the multi member district. At first, Indonesian electoral system implements a closed list but since the enactment of Act No. 10/2008, electoral system implements an open list so that the candidate who gets the ost votes is elected . Determination of the elected candidate was not as easy as one might imagine because there is a complex system for calculation and distribution of legislative seats for parties and candidates . By using normative juridical research methods, the approach made by the theory of elections, electoral rules theory and the concept of electoral system choice, comparative electoral systems, the design of electoral rules, electoral mechanisms, voter participation, and proportionality. To obtain the conclusion of the study objectives were presented with the electoral system, the comparative of the legislative distribution seats system in the Indonesia election law, and the application of the distribution seats system in the general election at the 2009.

Based on the results of the research is that the distribution seats system at the election in 2009 and which will be implemented in the 2014 election are complicated and not easy to understand for the organizers of the election, prty and the candidates, especially the formulation made by the law maker was not a simple and complicated. As a result, there are different interpretations of distribution seats system, either by the electoral Commission, parties and candidates, so that the election of 2009, the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court made an opposing judicial review about the distribution seats system. The complexity formula of distribution seats system could result in disproportionality distribution of legislative seats and at the end, many voters are wasted."

"Election system is a main factor which will influence women representation in legislative bodies. In relation with this, law No. 10/2008 on elections of DPR, DPD, DPRD members has stipulated 30 % quota for women representatives in its various chapters, which made it more comprehensive compared to law No. 12/2003....."

"Skripsi ini mengkaji dan membahas topik fenomena peran fraksi DPR RI, sebagai isu yang tengah mengemuka, yaitu adanya upaya pembubaran fraksi oleh Gerakan Nasional Pemberantasan Korupsi (GNPK) karena fraksi dinilai banyak berperan di dalam pelaksanaan fungsi, tugas dan wewenang DPR dan dinilai bertentangan dengan UUD 1945. Sehubungan dengan itu, maka penelitian ini difokuskan pada salah satu pelaksanaan fungsi DPR, yaitu fungsi legislasi dalam penentuan ambang batas parlemen dalam pembahasan RUU tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 10 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilu Anggota DPR, DPD, dan DPRD. Hal ini diangkat karena dalam penentuan ambang batas parlemen terjadi perdebatan alot di antara fraksi-fraksi DPR. Di satu pihak, fraksi kecil (FPPP) yang khawatir gagal meraih suara signifikan, bersikeras mempertahankan besaran ambang batas parlemen 2,5%, sedangkan fraksi menengah (FPKS) menginginkan besaran ambang batas parlemen 3%-5%. Di pihak lain, fraksi besar (FPG), dengan hasrat meraih kursi lebih banyak, bersikukuh menaikkan besaran ambang batas parlemen 5%. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif dengan desain deskriptif analitis. Data diperoleh melalui tinjauan pustaka dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peran fraksi DPR kuat dan mendominasi dalam pelaksanaan fungsi legislasi DPR, yaitu dalam penentuan ambang batas parlemen dalam pembahasan RUU tentang Perubahan atas UU No. 10 Tahun 2008 tentang Pemilu Anggota DPR, DPD, dan DPRD. Hal ini sebagaimana terlihat, baik dari aspek pengorganisasian anggota fraksi, aspek substansi kebijakan fraksi maupun aspek sistem pengawasan fraksi. Sementara, jika ditinjau dari teori perwakilan politik maka termasuk dalam teori kebebasan dengan tipe hubungan yang partisan.

---

This study examined and discussed the phenomenon topic on the role of the House of Representatives’ factions, as the central issue raised during the discussion, namely the dissolution of factions by the National Anti-Corruption Movement (GNPK) since factions were being assessed as playing a significant role in the execution of the functions, duties, and powers of the House of Representatives which were against the 1945 Constitution. Accordingly, this study focused on the exercise of one of the functions of the House, that is the legislation function in deciding parliamentary threshold during discussion on Bill on the Amendments to Law No. 10 of 2008 on the Election of Members of DPR, DPD and DPRD. The issue was raised because there were tough discussions among factions before the floor made any decisions on parliamentary threshold. On the one hand, faction with small number of MPs (PPP Faction) that was concerned on the failure to reach significant number of vote insisted on maintaining massive parliamentary threshold of 2.5%, while faction with not to large number of MPs (PKS Faction) wanted a massive parliamentary threshold of 3%-5%. On the other hand, faction with larger number of MPs (PG Faction), with an enthusiasm of getting more seats on the next election, insisted in raising thkeye percentage to 5% of parliamentary threshold. This study used a qualitative research design with descriptive analysis. Data were obtained through literature reviews and interviews.

The results showed that the ruling faction played significant role and dominated the legislation functions of the House, especially during the discussion on parliamentary threshold decision on Bill on the Amendments to Law No. 10 of 2008 on Election of Members DPR, DPD and DPRD. That conclusion was clearly manifested both in organizational aspect of faction members, faction's policy substance aspect as well as faction’s supervision system aspect. While, based on the review of the theory of political representation, it can be concluded that there was a theory of freedom with a partisan type of relationship that worked within."

"Salah satu aturan main yang harus dirumuskan didalam proses pelaksanaan pemilu yang demokratis adalah perumusan terkait mekanisme sistem pemilu beserta instrument- instrumen kepemiluannya. Sistem pemilu adalah instrument teknis pelaksanaan pemilu yang digunakan untuk menentukan keterpilihan suatu partai politik atau calon anggota legislatif didalam proses transisi kekuasaan. Di Indonesia, dari masa ke-masa terkait mekanisme sistem pemilu menjadi perdebatan didalam proses perumusan Undang- Undang Pemilu. Peristiwa ini-pun terjadi didalam proses pembahasan UU No 8 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pemilu Anggota DPR, DPD dan DPRD terkait empat isu krusial yani sistem pemilu, ambang batas parlemen (parliamentary treshold), alokasi kursi ke dapil dan metode konversi suara menjadi kursi. Sikap PDI Perjuangan mengenai pembahasan sistem pemilu merupakan kepentingan dari keberadaan partai politik sebagai peserta pemilu didalam proses perebutan kekuasaan secara konstitusional dan berdasar atas pengalaman dan sejarah kepesertaannya didalam proses pemilu di Indonesia.Teori yang digunakan didalam penelitian ini adalah teori sistem pemilu Arend Lijphart, teori model kebijakan partai politik Hans Deiter Klingeman, teori ideologi Terrence Ball, teori elit dan teori konsensus dan konflik Maswadi Rauf dan Maurice Duverger. Penelitian in menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif. Penelitian ini akan menggunakan dua teknik pengumpulan data, yakni data yang diperoleh dari wawancara yang akan digunakan sebagai sumber data primer dan studi kepustakaan (literature review) yang digunakan sebagai sumber data sekunder.Kesimpulan penelitian bahwa sebagai sebuah proses politik, Fraksi PDI Perjuangan memiliki alasan atas kepentingan politik terkait empat isu krusial didalam pembahasan UU No 8/2012 Tentang Pemilu. Kepentingan politik yang dioperasionalkan dari pemahaman ideologis partai dalam proses tarik menarik kepentingan politik (political-interplay) didalam proses pembuatan undang-undang Pemilu No 8 Tahun 2012. Akan tetapi, keputusan yang diambil berdasarkan kompromi merupakan keputusan yang moderat untuk diambil diantara banyaknya perbedaan di antara fraksi-fraksi.Implikasi teoritis menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan model kebijakan partai politik didalam prosedur negara demokratis, pendekatan elit dan konsensus politik telah memberikan implikasi positif terhadap proses pengambilan keputusan pembahasan Undang-Undang No 8 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pemilu DPR, DPD dan DPRD.

---

Among the rules that must be formulated in the process of a democratic election is one involving the mechanisms of an electoral system and its associated instruments. The electoral system is implemented as a technical instrument to determine the desirability of a political party or legislative candidate in the process of their transition to power. In the Republic of Indonesia, from time to time there has been considerable debate over the mechanisms of an electoral system during the process of formulating its Election Laws. Such a debate had then ensued during the discussion of Law No. 8 of 2012 on the Election of Members of DPR, DPD and DPRD, involving four crucial issues: the election system, parliamentary threshold, the allocation of seats to the constituencies and conversion methods of votes into seats. On that, the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle made a political stance that had been within the interest of political parties in their constitutional struggle for power, based on contesting history and experience in the election process of Indonesia.

The fundamental theories used in this study include Arend Lijphart's theory on the electoral system, Hans Deiter Klingeman's theory on the policy models of political parties, Terrence Ball's theory on ideology and Maswadi Rauf & Maurice Duverger's theories on the elite, consensus and conflicts. This study utilized qualitiative methods of research in its two techniques of data collection. Data obtained from interviews were used as the primary source, while literature references were used as the secondary source.

This study concluded that as a political process, factions in the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle had reasons within their political interest involving the four crucial issues in the discusssion of Law No 8/2012 on Elections. In the political process, Indonesia Democratic Party of Struggle implied the ideological platform. Although a decision was ultimately reached based on compromise, it had been moderacy taken from the various differences between factions of the political parties.

Theoretical implications show that in the procedures of a democratic country, the approaches of policy models of political parties, elite and political consensus gave positive implications for the decision making process in the discussion of Law No. 8 of 2012 on DPR, DPD and DPRD Elections."

"Skripsi ini membahas tentang Hak Anggota DPR dalam Mengusulkan dan Memperjuangkan Program Pembangunan Daerah Pemilihan atau yang biasa disebut Hak UP2DP. Hak UP2DP merupakan suatu hak yang memberikan kesempatan kepada setiap Anggota DPR untuk mengusulkan program pembangunan daerah pemilihannya di dalam Rencana Kerja Pemerintah. Skripsi ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan proses kemunculan Hak UP2DP serta menganalisis keterkaitan Hak UP2DP tersebut dengan Fungsi yang dimiliki oleh DPR. Penulis mempergunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan studi kepustakaan yang mengacu kepada teori pemisahan kekuasaan dan prinsip checks and balances. Proses kemunculan Hak UP2DP merupakan bentuk pengejawantahan Fungsi Representasi DPR dan sarana untuk merealisasikan Sumpah/Janji yang diucapkan oleh Anggota DPR. Selain itu, skripsi ini menyimpulkan bahwa Hak UP2DP yang dimiliki Anggota DPR sejalan dengan Fungsi Pengawasan DPR dan juga dapat menjadi formula baru dalam pengelolaan aspirasi rakyat yang selama ini belum maksimal dilakukan oleh DPR.

---

The thesis is about The Rights of Member of DPR RI to propose and to struggle for Electoral District Development Program (UP2DP Rights). UP2DP Rights is a kind of rights of member of DPR RI that give an opportunity for every member of DPR RI to propose and to struggle a development program for their Electoral District through Government Action Plan. The purpose of this thesis is to explain the process of the emergence of and also to analyze the relationship between UP2DP rights and the functions of DPR. The writer uses the juridical-normative research method alongside bibliographic study refers to separation of power theory and the principle of checks and balances. From this study it can be concluded that the emergence of rights UP2DP as a form of manifestation of Representative Function of DPR and Oath / Promise Member of Parliament (DPR). In addition, it can also be concluded that the UP2DP Rights is in line with the Control Function of DPR and also can be a new formula in the management of the aspirations of the people that had not maximized by the Parliament. "