Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 225894 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query

Zenita Soraya

Penerapan prinsip transparansi dan akuntabilitas pada prosedur hukum pemberhentian anggota dewan komisaris dalam PT terbuka menurut Undang-Undang nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang perseroan terbatas (studi putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan No.: 103/PDT.G/2011/PN.JKT.SEL) = Application of transparency and accountability principles on dismissal procedures of board of commissioners in public company based on law number 40 of 2007 on limited liability company (case study of state court decision in South Jakarta No.: 103/PDT.G/2011/PN.JKT.SEL)

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai penerapan prinsip transparansi dan akuntabilitas pada suatu Perseroan Terbuka menurut Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Adapun fokus penelitian yaitu bagaimana suatu PT TBK menerapkan prinsip transparansi dan akuntabilitas menurut UUPT dan menganalisis apakah prosedur hukum pemberhentian anggota Dewan Komisaris pada PT. Megapolitan Development Tbk dalam Putusan No.103/PDT.G/2011/PN.JKT.SEL. telah memenuhi pinsip transparansi dan akuntabilitas sebagaimana diatur dalam UUPT. Hasil penelitian yang menggunakan metode yuridis normatif menunjukkan bahwa prinsip transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam proses pemberhentian anggota Dewan Komisaris harus dilakukan dengan mekanisme Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham. Yang kemudian kesepakatan tersebut harus dituangkan dalam Akta Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham dan pertanggungjawabannya dituangkan dalam laporan dari Direksi dan Dewan Komisaris atas pengurusan dan pengawasan PT.

This thesis discusses about the principles of transparency and accountability in the public company under the Law Number 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Company. The focus of the research is how a public company apply the principles of transparency and accountability by the Company Law and legal procedures to analyze whether the dismissal of members of the Board of Commissioners of PT. Megapolitan Development Tbk in State Court Decision No.103/PDT.G/2011/PN.JKT.SEL. has met the principles of transparency and accountability as stipulated in the Company Law. Results of studies using normative methods shows that the principles of transparency and accountability in the discharge of the members of the Board of Commissioners has to do with the mechanism of the General Meeting of Shareholders. Then the agreement must be set forth in the General Meeting of Shareholders Deed and accountability outlined in the report of the Board of Directors and Board of Commissioners for the management and supervision of the company."

2014

S54159

UI - Skripsi Membership Universitas Indonesia Library

Debora R. Tjandrakusuma

Penerapan tanggung jawab sosial dan lingkungan menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas, studi kasus pada PT Nestlé Indonesia = The implementation of social and environmental responsibilities according to the law number 40 year 2007 on limited liability company, a case study at PT Nestlé Indonesia

"Perseroan merupakan salah satu bentuk badan usaha, yang dibentuk untuk melakukan usaha semata-mata guna mencari keuntungan yang nantinya akan dibagikan dalam bentuk dividen kepada para pemegang saham yang telah sebelumnya menyisihkan sebagian harta mereka, untuk menjadi harta milik perseroan. Sebagai badan hukum, perseroan mempunyai hak dan kewajiban dalam masyarakat, dan dalam hal perseroan tidak melaksanakan tanggung jawabnya seusai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku, baik yang berhubungan dengan lingkungan hidup, masyarakat dan lingkungan sekitarnya maka akan terjadi benturan-benturan kepentingan dengan para pemangku kepentingan perseroan seperti pemerintah, komunitas sekitar, lembaga swadaya masyarakat dan masyarakat luas, dan terjadinya masalah sosial dan kerusakan lingkungan hidup, yang pada gilirannya menimbulkan berbagai masalah bagi pemerintah, masyarakat, lingkungan dan yang pasti bagi perseroan itu sendiri. Sebenarnya tidak ada perseroan yang dapat mempunyai usaha yang berkesinambungan ditengah-tengah masyarakat yang miskin, serta lingkungan hidup yang rusak, karena perseroan hanya dapat berkembang dengan baik dan memperoleh keuntungan yang memadai apabila masyarakat di mana perseroan itu berada juga berkembang, dan untuk berkembangnya masyarakat diperlukan adanya lingkungan hidup dan keadaan ekonomi yang baik dan berkembang. Undang-Undang nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas mengatur mengenai tanggung jawab sosial dan lingkungan dalam pasal 74, yang mengatur bahwa perseroan yang menjalankan kegiatan usahanya di bidang dan/atau berkaitan dengan sumber daya alam wajib melaksanakan tanggung jawab sosial dan lingkungan, merupakan peraturan pertama didunia yang mewajibkan tanggung jawab sosial dan lingkungan, yang mungkin dimaksudkan oleh pembentuk undang-undang sebagai kepatuhan terhadap peraturan peraturan perundangan-undangan yang ada. Pengertian tanggung jawab sosial yang dimengerti di negara lain adalah melakukan hal yang baik bagi masyarakat melebihi kepatuhan terhadap peraturan yang berlaku yang berkaitan dengan aspek lingkungan, ekonomi dan sosial masyarakat. Penulis membahas "Creating Shared Value" suatu konsep yang berbeda dengan tanggung jawab sosial perseroan atau "Corporate Social Responsibility" dan pelaksanaannya oleh PT Nestlé Indonesia.

A limited liability company is one of the forms of business entities, established solely to make profit which will be paid as dividend to its shareholders who have put aside part of their assets to become the asset of the formed limited liability company. As a legal body, a limited liability company has its rights and obligation in the society, and in the event that a limited liability company does not perform its responsibility in line with the prevailing laws and regulations relating to the environment, society and surrounding communities, conflicts of interest will occur with its stakeholders such as the government, surrounding community, non government organizations and the society at large. The occurrence of social problem and environmental destruction will cause problems to the government, society, community and for sure to the limited liability company itself. In fact, no limited liability company can have a sustained business in a poor society and damaged environment, since a limited liability company can only develop and gain sufficient profit if the society in which it exists has also developed well, and for the society to develop well it requires sustained environmental and good economic conditions. Law number 40 year 2007 on Limited Liability Company has introduced the concept of social and environmental responsibilities in its article 74, which stipulates that any limited liability company having its business undertakings in and/or relating to natural resources, is obliged to implement social and environmental responsibilities. This is the first law in the world that obliges social and environmental responsibilities, which might be intended by the law makers for limited liability companies to be in compliance with the prevailing laws and regulations. The understanding of corporate social responsibility as understood in other country is to do good for the society relating to the environment, economic and social aspects beyond compliance to prevailing regulations. The writer discusses "Creating Shared Value" a concept which is different from the "Corporate Social Responsibility" and its implementation by PT Nestlé Indonesia."

Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2011

T30020

UI - Tesis Open Universitas Indonesia Library

Dennis Fernando Leonardi

Implementasi prinsip transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam mencegah penipuan pasar modal oleh perusahaan publik (studi kasus PT Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk) = Implementation of transparency and accountability principles in preventing capital market fraud by public companies (case study of PT Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk)

"Perkembangan prinsip transparansi dan akuntabilitas sebagai bagian dari good corporate governance ditujukan untuk mencegah terjadinya tindakan yang dapat merugikan perusahaan dan para pemangku kepentingan. Tulisan ini membahas mengenai implementasi transparansi dan akuntabilitas dalam mencegah penipuan seperti yang terdapat dalam kasus window dressing PT Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif yang dilakukan dengan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa tindak pidana window dressing yang dilakukan oleh eks direksi perusahaan adalah penipuan dilihat dari tindakan menyajikan informasi yang misleading. Walaupun sudah dilakukan upaya oleh RUPS dan Dewan Komisaris untuk mencegah terjadinya tindak pidana dengan menolak laporan keuangan dan menurunkan kedua eks direksi yang melakukan tindak pidana, hal tersebut tetap memberikan dampak negatif berupa capital loss, kehilangan kepercayaan, dan dampak psikis yang traumatik kepada para pemegang saham. Seharusnya, prinsip transparansi dan akuntabilitas harus dilaksanakan dengan komitmen antar pengurus perusahaan dengan adanya pengawasan yang baik oleh seluruh pihak yang bersangkutan

The development of the principles of transparency and accountability as part of good corporate governance is aimed at preventing actions that can harm the company and its stakeholders. This paper discusses the implementation of transparency and accountability in preventing fraud such as in the window dressing case of PT Tiga Pilar Sejahtera Food Tbk. This research is normative juridical research conducted by literature study. The results of this study indicate that the window dressing crime committed by former directors of the company is fraud, seen from the act of presenting misleading information. Even though efforts have been made by the GMS and the Board of Commissioners to prevent the occurrence of criminal acts by refusing financial statements and removing the two former directors who committed criminal acts, this still has a negative impact in the form of capital loss, loss of trust, and traumatic psychological effects on shareholders. Supposedly, the principles of transparency and accountability must be implemented with a commitment between company management with good supervision by all parties concerned."

Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2022

S-pdf

UI - Skripsi Membership Universitas Indonesia Library

Amrul Khair Rusin

Pertanggungjawaban induk perusahaan atas perbuatan hukum anak perusahaan dalam perusahaan grup berdasarkan undang undang republik indonesia nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang perseroan terbatas = The parent company liability for legal actions undertaken by the subsidiary within the group companies based on the law of the republic of indonesia number 40 of 2007 on limited liability company

"Tesis ini mengkaji hubungan hukum dalam perusahaan grup, terutama antara induk perusahaan dan anak perusahaan, dan pertanggungjawaban induk perusahaan atas perbuatan hukum anak perusahaan menurut hukum perseroan yang berlaku di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode preskriptif yuridis, dengan mengacu pada norma-norma hukum yang terdapat dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, maupun putusan pengadilan ataupun pendapat para ahli, sehingga didapatkan satu temuan yang akan bermanfaat dalam praktek. Berdasarkan pengakuan yuridis atas kemandirian badan hukum perusahaan maka tiap-tiap perusahaan dalam perusahaan grup merupakan badan hukum mandiri (separate legal entity) yang menimbulkan konsekuensi hukum dalam hal terjadi perbuatan hukum maka pertanggungjawaban hanya melekat pada perusahaan yang melakukan perbuatan hukum tersebut (limited liability). Namun keterkaitan antara induk perusahaan dengan anak perusahaan dalam grup perusahaan mengakibatkan induk perusahaan dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawabannya sebagai akibat adanya kesatuan entitas perusahaan (corporate entity). Sebagai suatu badan hukum yang mandiri, maka sifat pertanggungjawaban terbatas merupakan prinsip fundamental keberadaan artificial person perseroan. Sifat pertanggungjawaban ini tidak bersifat mutlak. Pengadilan bisa mengesampingkan sifat pertanggungjawaban terbatas ini, dan memberlakukan pertanggungjawaban pribadi induk perusahaan. Prinsip limited liability dari induk perusahaan dapat ditembus dengan doktrin piercing the corporate veil, sehingga induk perusahaan dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawabannya atas pengurusan anak perusahaan. Pengaturan eksistensi perusahaan grup terutama dalam hubungan antara induk perusahaan dan anak perusahaan, tidak sekedar realitas bisnis melainkan juga realitas hukum, karenanya merupakan suatu keniscayaan diadakan pembaharuan hukum; adalah tidak logis, pengaturan perseroan dalam bentuk tunggal diterapkan pada perseroan dalam bentuk jamak namun senyatanya satu kesatuan.

This thesis examine the legal relationship in group companies, especially between parent companies and subsidiaries, and examines the parent company liability for the legal actions undertaken by the subsidiary. This study uses a prescriptive jurisdiction, by reference to legal norms contained in laws and regulations, and court decisions or opinions of the experts, and the findings hopefully will be useful in practice. Based on the judicial recognition of the independence of the legal entity of the company, each company within the group companies are separate legal entity. This raises the legal consequences in the event of legal action then the liability attached only to companies that perform the legal actions (limited liability). However, the relationship between the parent company with subsidiaries in the group resulted in the parent company can be held accountable for the company as a result of a corporate entity. As an independent legal entity, limited liability is a fundamental principle of the existence of an artificial person company. The nature of this liability is not absolute. The court could rule out this limited liability, and impose personal liability to holding company. The principle of limited liability of a parent company can be penetrated by the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil, so the parent company can be held accountable for the management of subsidiaries. The existence of the group companies, especially in legal relationship between parent company and subsidiary, not just a business reality but also the reality of the law, therefore it was necessary to reform the law. It is not logical, setting the singular company applied to the company in the plural but in fact one entity."

Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2014

T41870

UI - Tesis Membership Universitas Indonesia Library

Setiawan Dwi Atmojo

Analisa prinsip acquit et de charge direksi atas tanggung jawab perdata dan pidana dari perspektif undang-undang nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang perseroan terbatas (studi kasus 3g PT Indosat Mega Media = Board of directors civil and criminal liability due to acquit et de charge principle analysis by perspective of act no 40 of 2007 concerning limited liability company (case study 3g PT Indosat Mega Media)

"[ABSTRAK

Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas menetapkan 3 (tiga) organ perseroan yaitu Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham, Direksi, dan Dewan Komisaris. Direksi berfungsi pada pokoknya untuk bertanggung jawab penuh atas pengurusan perseroan untuk kepentingan perseroan sedangkan Dewan Komisaris berfungsi melakukan pengawasan umum dan/atau khusus sesuai dengan Anggaran Dasar serta memberi nasihat kepada Direksi. Pada setiap masa akhir jabatannya, Direksi mempertanggung jawabkan pengurusan perseroan dalam Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham, yang memiliki kewenangan yang tidak diberikan kepada Direksi atau Dewan Komisaris dalam batas yang ditentukan Undang-Undang dan/atau Anggaran Dasar perseroan. Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham kemudian memberikan pelunasan dan pembebasan tanggung jawab (acquit et de charge) kepada Direksi jika tindakan kepengurusan perseroan telah tercermin dalam laporan keuangan.

Pada tahun 2006, PT Indosat Mega Media sebagai perseroan yang menyediakan jasa internet (Internet Service Provider) menyelenggarakan jasanya melalui jaringan bergerak seluler milik PT Indosat Tbk melalui perjanjian kerjasama broadband. Kerjasama ini telah dipertanggung jawabkan dalam Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham pada tahun 2011 dan telah mendapatkan acquit et de charge kepada Direksi yang diwakili oleh Indar Atmanto selaku Direktur Utama. Kejaksaan Agung sebagai aparat penegak hukum mendakwa Indar Atmanto telah menggunakan frekuensi 2.1 GHz (3G) untuk menyelenggarakan jasa internetnya sehingga mengakibatkan kerugian negara sedangkan telah diketahui Direksi telah mendapatkan acquit et de charge dari Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham. Permasalahan hukum timbul atas pertanyaan sejauh mana acquit et de charge melindungi Direksi secara perdata dan pidana.

ABSTRACT

Act No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Company establishes three (3) organs of the company i.e. General Meeting of Shareholders, the Board of Directors, and the Board of Commissioners. Board of Directors take full responsibility for the management of the company for the benefit of the company, while the Board of Commissioners for performing general supervision and/or in accordance with the Articles of Association as well as giving advice to the Board of Directors. At the end of their period, the Board of Directors accountable to the shareholder or management in General Meeting of Shareholders, which has special authority which is not granted to the Board of Directors or Board of Commissioners within construed to the Act and/or the Articles of Association of the company. Afterward, General Meeting of Shareholders grant release and discharge of responsibility (acquit et de charge) to the company's Board of Directors if the duty has been reflected in the financial statements.

In 2006, PT Indosat Mega Media as an Internet Service Provider company, provide services through mobile cellular network owned by PT Indosat Tbk through broadband cooperation agreements. This cooperation has been accountable to the General Meeting of Shareholders in 2011 and the Board of Directors, represented by Indar Atmanto as CEO, has gained acquit et de charge. Attorney General as law enforcement officers indicted Indar Atmanto has been using 2.1 GHz frequency (3G) to provide internet services, therefore, resulting state loss while it is known that the Board of Directors has been obtained acquit et de charge from the General Meeting of Shareholders. Legal problem arisen is how acquit et de charge could protect the Board of Directors from the liability of civil lawsuit and the criminal indicment.;Act No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Company establishes three (3) organs of the company i.e. General Meeting of Shareholders, the Board of Directors, and the Board of Commissioners. Board of Directors take full responsibility for the management of the company for the benefit of the company, while the Board of Commissioners for performing general supervision and/or in accordance with the Articles of Association as well as giving advice to the Board of Directors. At the end of their period, the Board of Directors accountable to the shareholder or management in General Meeting of Shareholders, which has special authority which is not granted to the Board of Directors or Board of Commissioners within construed to the Act and/or the Articles of Association of the company. Afterward, General Meeting of Shareholders grant release and discharge of responsibility (acquit et de charge) to the company's Board of Directors if the duty has been reflected in the financial statements.

In 2006, PT Indosat Mega Media as an Internet Service Provider company, provide services through mobile cellular network owned by PT Indosat Tbk through broadband cooperation agreements. This cooperation has been accountable to the General Meeting of Shareholders in 2011 and the Board of Directors, represented by Indar Atmanto as CEO, has gained acquit et de charge. Attorney General as law enforcement officers indicted Indar Atmanto has been using 2.1 GHz frequency (3G) to provide internet services, therefore, resulting state loss while it is known that the Board of Directors has been obtained acquit et de charge from the General Meeting of Shareholders. Legal problem arisen is how acquit et de charge could protect the Board of Directors from the liability of civil lawsuit and the criminal indicment., Act No. 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Company establishes three (3) organs of the company i.e. General Meeting of Shareholders, the Board of Directors, and the Board of Commissioners. Board of Directors take full responsibility for the management of the company for the benefit of the company, while the Board of Commissioners for performing general supervision and/or in accordance with the Articles of Association as well as giving advice to the Board of Directors. At the end of their period, the Board of Directors accountable to the shareholder or management in General Meeting of Shareholders, which has special authority which is not granted to the Board of Directors or Board of Commissioners within construed to the Act and/or the Articles of Association of the company. Afterward, General Meeting of Shareholders grant release and discharge of responsibility (acquit et de charge) to the company's Board of Directors if the duty has been reflected in the financial statements.

2015

T42888

UI - Tesis Membership Universitas Indonesia Library

Hisbullah Ashidiqi, auhtor

Pertanggungjawaban direksi terkait pelaksanaan pasal 50 dan pasal 51 Undang-Undang nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang perseroan terbatas, berdasarkan prinsip-prinsip hukum bisnis = The official responsibility by the board of director in regards with the application of article 50 and article 51 of the Government Regulation number 40 the year of 2007 regarding the private limited company based on the principal of business law / Hisbullah Ashidiqi

"ABSTRAK

Kewajiban mencatatkan saham dalam Daftar Pemegang Saham (DPS) dan Daftar Khusus Pemegang Saham (DKPS) merupakan kewajiban Direksi Perseroan, demikian dinyatakan dalam Pasal 50 Jo. Pasal 101 Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Satu hal yang harus diperhatikan dalam pembuatan akta Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham (RUPS) adalah adanya Daftar Pemegang Saham (DPS) Perseroan Terbatas yang bersangkutan. Karena salah satu fungsi dari keberadaan DPS adalah untuk mengetahui jumlah suara yang legal dalam menentukan kuorum rapat dalam pelaksanaan RUPS. Selain itu pentingnya DPS dalam setiap transaksi bisnis suatu perseroan adalah untuk mencegah atau menghindari suatu transaksi yang mencurigakan yang dapat merugikan perseroan, seperti transaski afiliasi, monopoli, insider trading, dll. Namun, selama ini pelaksanaan ketentuan tersebut tidaklah seperti apa yang diharapkan oleh undang-undang. Pada prakteknya terdapat sejumlah kendala yang harus dihadapi terkait pelaksanaan pengadaan DPS dan DKPS, banyak masyarakat yang masih menganggap hal tersebut bukanlah sesuatu yang urgent atau prinsipil dalam menjalankan suatu perusahaan, sehingga banyak pihak yang mengesampingkan pelaksanaannya, meskipun pada dasarnya sebagaian besar telah memahami arti penting pelaksanaan ketentuan tersebut sebagai suatu kewajiban hukum, maupun dalam konteks bagian dari penerapan teori Good Corporate Governance dan teori fiduciary duty, akan tetapi kesadaran hukum tersebut tidak selalu diikuti dengan kepatuhan hukum, dimana masyarakat banyak yang memandang ketentuan tersebut bukanlah sebagai ketentuan hukum yang berdaulat.

ABSTRACT

The obligation of listing the company share into registration of Shareholders List and The Special Shareholders List to be the responsibility of the executive director, it is clearly stipulated in Article Number 50 Jo. The Article Number 101 the Government Regulation Number 40 The Year of 2007 in regard with the private company. One thing which is to be considered in writing the minute of General Shareholders Meeting, that is availability of the Shareholders List of the mentioned private limited company. By means to conform to the one of the function of Shareholders List is to know the number of legal votings to decide the acceptable condition in executing of the General Shareholders Meeting. Beside, the important of Shareholders List in any business transaction of the Private Limited Company is to prevent or avoid any suspecting transaction which will make the company suffering lost, among others the transaction of affiliation, monopoly, inside trading, etc. But, in the application of that regulation so far it could not meet as determine by the Government Regulation. In working out the terms and condition of it has always founds some constraints which must be faced accordingly in working out to prepare Shareholders List and The Special Shareholders List. Commonly the society look upon and consider it as not urgent or principly in operating the company, therefore many people does not pay attention so much on its terms application. Although as a matter of fact most of the society are quite aware of its importance as the law obligation, in which also in context with apart of Good Corporate Governance and the theory of fiduciary duty, but this awareness of it, is not always follow by the law enforcement, in which most society look upon that terms and condition considered as unofficial legal law."

2013

T38967

UI - Tesis Membership Universitas Indonesia Library

Nur Sakina

Status Hukum Komite X sebagai Pemegang Saham PT. Y Menurut Anggaran Dasar PT. Y dan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (Studi Kasus: Akta Perjanjian Nomor 09 Tanggal 14 Agustus 2009, dibuat di hadapan N, Notaris di Banda Aceh). = Law Status of Komite X as Shareholder of PT. Y Based on Article of Association of PT. Y and Law Number 40 Year 2007 concerning Limited of Liability Company (Case Study: Deed of Agreement Number 09 dated 14 August 2009, made before N, Notary in Banda Aceh)

"Perjanjian yang dibuat oleh para pihak harus memenuhi syarat sahnya perjanjian. Tidak terdapatnya kausa yang halal dalam suatu perjanjian mengakibatkan perjanjian tersebut batal demi hukum. Perjanjian ini terkait dengan kepemilikan saham oleh komite. Di mana berdasarkan UUPT, komite bukan termasuk dalam subjek hukum yang boleh menjadi pemegang saham dalam perseroan. Meskipun perjanjian tersebut dibuat di hadapan Notaris, namun selama perjanjian melanggar persyaratan objektif dalam syarat sahnya perjanjian, maka perjanjian tersebut adalah batal demi hukum. Hal ini juga membuat Notaris tersebut dapat dikenakan sanksi jabatan berdasarkan UUJN.

Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Data yang diperoleh dianalisis dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif yang menghasilkan data deskriptif analitis.

Simpulan penelitian menyatakan bahwa perjanjian yang dibuat dengan melanggar ketentuan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan menyebabkan perjanjian tersebut batal demi hukum dan karenanya Komite X tidak dapat menjadi pemegang saham dalam PT. Y. Notaris yang membuat akta perjanjian tersebut dapat dikenakan sanksi berdasarkan UUJN.

An agreement which made by parties has to comply with the terms of validation of agreement. Due to the absence of permitted cause to an agreement causing the agreement is void by law. The agreement is related to share ownership by committee. Referring to Law Number 40 Year 2007 concerning Limited of Liability Company, committee is not subject of law which can be shareholder in company. The agreement was made before Notary, but as long as the agreement contravene the objective requirements of validation agreement terms, thus the agreement is void by law. The situation makes the Notary subject to sanction of office.
The research uses juridical normatif research method. The Data is analyzed by using qualitative method which conduce to descriptive analytical data.
The conclusion of this research is the agreement which made was contravene regulations causing the agreement is void by law, therefor Commite X can not be a shareholder of PT. Y. The Notary who made that agreement can be subject to sanction based on UUJN."

Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2014

T42159

UI - Tesis Membership Universitas Indonesia Library

Asri Anindita

Tinjauan yuridis terhadap kewajiban direksi dalam pengurusan perseroan terbatas berdasarkan undang-undang No 40 Tahun 2007 tentang perseroan terbatas : Studi kasus PT Binangun Intiaditya Grafisindo) = Legal analysis on the obligations of directors In managing the limited liability company based on law number 40 year 2007 (case study Pt Binangun Intiaditya Grafisindo)

"Perseroan Terbatas sebagai badan hukum dalam melakukan perbuatan hukum harus melalui pengurusnya. Ketergantungan antara badan hukum dan pengurus lahir hubungan fidusia (fiduciary duties) di mana Direksi selalu menjadi pihak yang dipercaya bertindak dan menggunakan wewenangnya hanya untuk kepentingan Perseroan Terbatas semata. Tesis ini membahas permasalahan mengenai kewajiban-kewajiban Direksi dalam pengurusan Perseroan Terbatas berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas dan pelaksanaan kewajiban-kewajiban. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian kepustakaan yang bersifat yuridis normatif, yaitu dengan mempergunakan data sekunder yang berupa bahan pustaka. Dalam Undang- Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas diatur mengenai kewajiban-kewajiban Direksi Perseroan Terbatas.

Kepengurusan Perseroan Terbatas sehari-hari dilakukan oleh Direksi. Keberadaan Direksi dalam Perseroan Terbatas merupakan suatu keharusan, dengan kata lain Perseroan Terbatas wajib memiliki Direksi. Hal ini dikarenakan Perseroan Terbatas sebagai artificial person, di mana Perseroan Terbatas tidak dapat berbuat apa-apa tanpa adanya bantuan anggota Direksi sebagai natural person. Berdasarkan prinsip fiduciary duty, yang diatur di dalam Pasal 97 ayat (2) UUPT, Direksi suatu Perseroan Terbatas harus melakukan pengurusan dengan itikad baik dan penuh tanggung jawab. Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Depok Nomor 03/Pdt.G/2007/PN.Dpk, Direktur Utama dan Direktur Perseroan Terbatas telah melaksanakan pengurusan dengan itikad tidak baik sehingga merugikan Perseroan, oleh sebab itu kedua anggota Direksi tersebut harus mempertanggungjawabkan secara pribadi segala kerugian Perseroan yang disebabkan oleh pengurusannya tersebut.

Limited Liability Company as a legal entity in performing a legal act has to go through managers. Dependence between the legal and fiduciary relationships born caretaker (fiduciary duties) in which the Board of Directors has always been a trusted party to act and use its authority only for the sake of mere Limited Company. This thesis discusses the issues concerning the obligations of Directors in the management of limited-liability company under Law Number 40 year 2007 regarding the implementation of obligations. The research method used is the method of research literature that is juridical normative, ie using secondary data in the form of library materials. In the Law Number 40 year 2007 on Limited Liability Company organized on the obligations of the Board of Directors of Limited Liability Company.
The Leadership Company Limited carried out daily by the Board of Directors. The existence of Directors of the Limited Company is a must, in other words Limited Liability Company shall have Directors. This is because the Limited Company as an artificial person, in which the Limited Liability Company can not do anything without the help of members of the Board of Directors as a natural person. Based on the principle of fiduciary duty, set out in Article 97 paragraph (2) of Law Number 40 year 2007 regarding the Limited Liability Company, the Board of Directors of a Limited Liability Company must make arrangements in good faith and responsibly. In Depok District Court Decision No. 03/Pdt.G/2007/PN.Dpk, President Director and Director of Limited Liability Company has been carrying out maintenance in bad faith to the detriment of the Company, therefore, both of the member of the Board of Directors shall be personally accountable for any such losses caused by the Company by its management."

Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2011

T28993

UI - Tesis Open Universitas Indonesia Library

Ariesta Wibisono Anditya

Analisis terhadap putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia nomor 1607/K/PDT/2013 mengenai keabsahan akta hibah saham yang tidak memenuhi ketentuan dalam undang-undang nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang perseroan terbatas = Analysis over judgement of supreme court of Republic of Indonesia number 1607/K/PDT/2013 concerning accusation to share grant deed made without having regard to Indonesian law number 40 year 2007 regulation of limited liability company

"Selain mengikuti ketentuan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 yang diperbarui dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014 tentang Jabatan Notaris, dalam pembuatan akta perseroan, Notaris harus memperhatikan Undang-Undang yang lain, khususnya Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Dalam hal ini, Notaris harus cermat, teliti, dan seksama dalam memahami dan mematuhi ketentuan dalam sebuah Perseroan atas pembuatan akta berkaitan dengan Perseroan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kepustakaan dan analisis kasus dengan mengumpulkan data sekunder dan hasil wawancara guna menunjang penulisan. Analisis kasus dilakukan terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1607 K/Pdt/2013, dimana pembuatan akta hibah atas saham dilakukan tanpa mematuhi ketentuan dalam Perseroan yang menyebabkan pengalihan hak atas saham tersebut tidak sah dan dapat dibatalkan. Pembuatan akta dibuat secara Notariil yang kemudian mengalami degradasi karena terdapat cacat pada akta tersebut. Tidak dipenuhinya syarat subjektif dalam sebuah akta menjadikan cacat pada akta dan menyebabkan akta tersebut menjadi dapat dibatalkan.

Instead of regarding the rules in Indonesian Law Number 2 Year 2014 amendment of Indonesian Law Number 30 Year 2004 concerning Regulation of Notary Office, Notary, on making limited liability company-related deed, should be aware of relevant regulations, in this case, Indonesian Law Number 40 Year 2007, concerning Law of Limited Liability Company. It is very important to Notary to be precise and careful when making the deed related to limited liability company. This research is done using literature method and an analysis over a case which is completed by collecting primary and secondary data to support the reference of this thesis. The case to be analysed in this thesis, conducted from Judgement of Supreme Court of Republic of Indonesia Decree Number 1607 K/Pdt/2013, in which, the Notary, who made the share grant deed did not obey the regulations concerning limited liability company causing the deed annulable and not valid, therefore resulted deed nullification of such grant share deed. When a party could not carry out subjective condition of an agreement, therefore the agreement is voidable."

Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2015

T43062

UI - Tesis Membership Universitas Indonesia Library

Miranda

Tinjauan yuridis keberlakuan kitab undang-undang hukum perdata dan undang-undang nomor 40 tahun 2007 tentang perseroan terbatas dalam eksekusi gadai saham melalui penjualan secara tertutup (studi kasus: putusan MA RI No. 2875/K/PDT/2008) = Analysis on enforceability of Indonesian civil code and law number 40 of 2007 concerning limited liability companies in the execution of pledge of shares through private selling (case study: supreme court decision No. 2875 K/PDT/2008)

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai eksekusi gadai saham melalui penjualan secara tertutup. Pada skripsi ini akan dibahas mengenai tiga hal. Pertama, pembahasan mengenai keberlakuan KUH Perdata dalam eksekusi gadai saham melalui penjualan secara tertutup. Kedua, pembahasan mengenai kendala-kendala yang dihadapi dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi gadai berdasarkan KUH Perdata. Dan ketiga, pembahasan mengenai keberlakuan Undang-Undang No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas khususnya mengenai ketentuan pemindahan hak atas saham dalam eksekusi gadai saham melalui penjualan secara tertutup. Ketiga pembahasan tersebut dilakukan berdasarkan kasus eksekusi gadai saham PT Panganmas Inti Persada oleh Langdale Profits Ltd. yang terdapat dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung RI No. 2875 K/PDT/2008. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundangundangan, pendekatan perbandingan, dan pendekatan kasus.

Penilitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa eksekusi gadai saham melalui penjualan secara tertutup dapat dilakukan dengan penerapan KUH Perdata khususnya Pasal 1156. Eksekusi gadai saham melalui penjualan secara tertutup juga tetap harus memperhatikan ketentuan pemindahan hak atas saham dalam UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 yaitu memperhatikan Anggaran Dasar perusahaan.

This thesis discusses the execution of pledge of shares through private selling. This thesis focuses mainly on three issues. First, a discussion of the applicability of the Civil Code in the execution of pledge of shares through private selling. Second, the explanation about constraints faced in the implementation of the pledge execution based on the Civil Code. And third, a discussion of the validity of Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies, in particular concerningthe transfer of shares in the execution of pledge of shares in private. All discussions are done based on an execution case of pledge of shares of PT Inti Persada Panganmas by Langdale Profits Ltd. contained in Supreme Court Decision No. 2875 K/PDT/2008. This research is a normative juridical approach to legislation, comparative approach, and case study.
This research concludes that the execution of pledge of shares in private can be done with the application of Article 1156 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Execution of pledge of shares through private selling also should consider the provision of transfer of shares in the Law No. 40 of 2007, which requires attention to the Articles of Association of the company."

Depok: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2014

S54494

UI - Skripsi Membership Universitas Indonesia Library

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >>

Hasil Pencarian :: Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian