Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Skripsi ini membahas tentang keberadaan unsur posisi dominan dan penyalahgunaannya dalam kasus pelayanan Taksi Bandar Udara Internasional Juanda Surabaya. Putusan yang dikeluarkan oleh Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha (KPPU) untuk kasus ini telah berkekuatan hukum tetap pada tahun 2011 dan telah dilaksanakan oleh PT Angkasa Pura I (AP I) dan Primer Koperasi Angkatan Laut (Primkopal) pada 1 Juli 2013. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian yang menggunakan studi dokumen yang bersifat yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian menyarankan bahwa seharusnya AP I dan Primkopal dapat diduga melakukan penyalahgunaan posisi dominan; mengizinkan operator taksi lain untuk menambah armada taksi argometer mereka apabila ada kelebihan permintaan dari calon penumpang terhadap taksi tersebut; dan memberlakukan sistem pembayaran menggunakan argometer pada semua Taksi Bandara tanpa terkecuali agar sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku dan sesuai dengan amar putusan KPPU untuk kasus ini yang telah berkekuatan hukum tetap.

---

The focus of this study is the existence of abuse of dominant position in the case of taxi services at Juanda International Airport Surabaya. Decision issued by the Commission for the supervision of Business Competition (Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha - KPPU) for this case is final and binding in 2011 and has been implemented by PT Angkasa Pura I (AP I) and Primer Koperasi Angkatan Laut (Primkopal) on July 1, 2013. This research is legal-normative. The results of the study suggest that AP I and Primkopal should be suspected of abusing their dominant position; allowing other taxi operators to increase their fleet of metered taxis if there is excess demand of the passengers for the taxi, and implementing payment system using a metered taxi service to all taxi fleet without exception in order to enforce the applicable regulations and in accordance with the ruling of the KPPU."

"ABSTRAKNotaris/Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah/Pejabat Lelang Kelas II seharusnyamemiliki peran yang penting dalam rangka membantu menurunkan tingkat tindakpidana pencucian uang di Indonesia. Tulisan ini membahas bagaimana peran dariNotaris/Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah/Pejabat Lelang Kelas II dalam melakukanpencegahan dan pemberantasan tindak pidana pencucian uang serta bagaimanakasus hukum yang terkait dengan peran dari masing-masing profesi tersebutdalam mencegah dan memberantas tindak pidana pencucian uang di Indonesia.Permasalahan tersebut dijawab dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridisnormatif yang meliputi studi kepustakaan dan wawancara dan kemudianmenghasilkan kesimpulan bahwa tindakan pencegahan dapat dilakukan denganmenerapkan prinsip Know Your Customer (KYC), Customer Due Diligence(CDD), dan Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD). Sedangkan tindakan pemberantasandapat dilakukan dengan melakukan kewajiban pelaporan kepada PPATK bagiprofesi yang telah menjadi Pihak Pelapor atau melaporkan adanya indikasi tindakpidana pencucian uang kepada instansi penegak hukum bagi profesi yang belummenjadi Pihak Pelapor, selain itu para Notaris/Pejabat Pembuat AktaTanah/Pejabat Lelang Kelas II juga dapat berperan dalam rangka memberantastindak pidana pencucian uang dengan bertindak secara kooperatif apabilaketerangan atau kesaksiannya diperlukan dalam suatu proses hukum.

---

ABSTRACTA Notary/Land Deed Official/Auctioneer Class II should have an important rolein the prevention and eradication of money laundering in Indonesia. This paperdiscusses about the role of Notary/Land Deed Official/Auctioneer Class II in theprevention and eradication of money laundering and various legal cases relating tothe role of each of these professions in preventing and combating moneylaundering in Indonesia. The problem is answered by using normative juridicalresearch method, which includes studies of literature and interviews. It leads tothe conclusion that the prevention measure which should be taken andimplemented by a Notary/Land Deed Official/Auctioneer Class II are Know YourCustomer (KYC) principle, Customer Due Diligence (CDD) principle andEnhanced Due Diligence (EDD) principle. A Notary/Land DeedOfficial/Auctioneer Class II should also help combat money laundering byreporting requirements to INTRAC to those who have become Reporting Partiesor reporting indication of money laundering to the law enforcing institutions forthose who have not become Reporting Parties, moreover Notary/Land DeedOfficial/Auctioneer Class II may also combat money laundering by actingcooperatively in the event of providing evidence and information in any relevantjudicial proceeding."

"[ABSTRAKPemerintah Kota Surabaya mempunyai pengaturan tanah yang unik dan tidak dijumpai di kota manapun di Indonesia dengan memberikan Surat Izin Pemakaian Tanah atau sering dikenal dengan ldquo Surat Hijau rdquo yang mendasari penarikan retribusi kepada masyarakat Pengaturan tanah tersebut di atas tanah negara dan sebagian lagi memang di sebagian tanah Aset Daerah Kota Surabaya sendiri Penelitian Kebijakan Penyelesaian Konflik Pertanahan di atas ldquo Surat Hijau rdquo di Kota Surabaya ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti data sekunder atau bahan pustaka Dalam perkembangannya masalah ldquo Surat Hijau rdquo telah menimbulkan berbagai macam konflik antara pemegang ldquo Surat Hijau rdquo dengan Pemerintah Kota Surabaya Konflik ini timbul karena terdapat perbedaan persepsi antara masyarakat dan Pemerintah Kota Surabaya dalam merujuk peraturan mengenai masalah penguasaan tanah Untuk itu diperlukan solusi yang saling menguntungkan antara pemegang ldquo Surat Hijau rdquo dengan Pemerintah Kota Surabaya.

---

ABSTRACTThe Municipal City of Surabaya has a unique arrangement on land which are not found in any other city in Indonesia Land Usage Permit or commonly known as the Surat Hijau that underlie the withdrawal of levy to the public is managed and issued to the local population of Surabaya by the Municipal City of Surabaya This regulation is implemented upon the State Land and some upon the land that are part of Regional Asset of Surabaya itself The research about land conflict resolution policy of The Use of Land Permit uses Normative Juridical Research Method which focuses on the data collection tool and the study of literature After sometime the issues surrounding Surat Hijau has given rise to various sorts of conflicts between holders of Surat Hijau with the Municipal City of Surabaya This conflict arises because there is a difference in perception between the public and the city officials of Surabaya in reference to the regulation on land tenure This currently heated conflict required a solution that is mutually beneficial between the holders of Surat Hijau with the Municipal City of Surabaya ;The Municipal City of Surabaya has a unique arrangement on land which are not found in any other city in Indonesia Land Usage Permit or commonly known as the Surat Hijau that underlie the withdrawal of levy to the public is managed and issued to the local population of Surabaya by the Municipal City of Surabaya This regulation is implemented upon the State Land and some upon the land that are part of Regional Asset of Surabaya itself The research about land conflict resolution policy of The Use of Land Permit uses Normative Juridical Research Method which focuses on the data collection tool and the study of literature After sometime the issues surrounding Surat Hijau has given rise to various sorts of conflicts between holders of Surat Hijau with the Municipal City of Surabaya This conflict arises because there is a difference in perception between the public and the city officials of Surabaya in reference to the regulation on land tenure This currently heated conflict required a solution that is mutually beneficial between the holders of Surat Hijau with the Municipal City of Surabaya ;The Municipal City of Surabaya has a unique arrangement on land which are not found in any other city in Indonesia Land Usage Permit or commonly known as the Surat Hijau that underlie the withdrawal of levy to the public is managed and issued to the local population of Surabaya by the Municipal City of Surabaya This regulation is implemented upon the State Land and some upon the land that are part of Regional Asset of Surabaya itself The research about land conflict resolution policy of The Use of Land Permit uses Normative Juridical Research Method which focuses on the data collection tool and the study of literature After sometime the issues surrounding Surat Hijau has given rise to various sorts of conflicts between holders of Surat Hijau with the Municipal City of Surabaya This conflict arises because there is a difference in perception between the public and the city officials of Surabaya in reference to the regulation on land tenure This currently heated conflict required a solution that is mutually beneficial between the holders of Surat Hijau with the Municipal City of Surabaya , The Municipal City of Surabaya has a unique arrangement on land which are not found in any other city in Indonesia Land Usage Permit or commonly known as the Surat Hijau that underlie the withdrawal of levy to the public is managed and issued to the local population of Surabaya by the Municipal City of Surabaya This regulation is implemented upon the State Land and some upon the land that are part of Regional Asset of Surabaya itself The research about land conflict resolution policy of The Use of Land Permit uses Normative Juridical Research Method which focuses on the data collection tool and the study of literature After sometime the issues surrounding Surat Hijau has given rise to various sorts of conflicts between holders of Surat Hijau with the Municipal City of Surabaya This conflict arises because there is a difference in perception between the public and the city officials of Surabaya in reference to the regulation on land tenure This currently heated conflict required a solution that is mutually beneficial between the holders of Surat Hijau with the Municipal City of Surabaya ]"

"The author describes concerning Indonesian judge's condition that specificly in lesser competence. The qualified judge is necessitated to decided through any case in their desk's. More over the qualified judge can face against legal premise's that "law is always left behind to the society dinamic's " and it?s resulted legal bareness. Most relevant reality in Indonesia situation at post reformation where many disputes aroused needs accomplishment. The judge ideally ought has knowledges and brilliant thinking method's which should decide the best decisions and coloring through legal development."

"Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 disamping menjadi hukum dasar di bidang politik, juga menjadi hukum dasar bagi kehidupan sosial, ekonomi, dan kebudayaan. Hal ini berbeda dengan tradisi penulisan konstitusi negara-negara Eropa Barat dan Amerika yang hanya memuat mater-materi bersifat politik dalam konstitusinya. Perbedaan ini disebabkan pengaruh corak penulisan konstitusi negara-negara sosialis terhadap UUD 1945. Kedudukan dan peranan Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara dalam pembangunan Indonesia dapat dilihat dari berbagai konteks: perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan, pendidikan dan struktur kehidupan kemasyarakatan."

"This article does analyse under historical approaches regarding bankruptcy law revision in Indonesia. The author's scrutinizes two approaches concerning how the basic revision conducted and what are the government considerations to carry out the revision aim's. Many reasons elaborated here from the common that embark on the practical needs and to also under the fast IMF's pressure after the significant's case such as "Manulife" and wider affects at post monetary crisis in 1997. The common portrait was happened in many cases also considered is on many corporations case which solvent and have mach more assets than their debt's were got bancruptcy suit's."

"Skripsi ini membahas mengenai pengaturan dan penerapan prinsip iktikad baik dalam sengketa merek khususnya pembatalan merek di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis-normatif dengan meninjau aturan iktikad baik dalam Undang-Undang No 15 Tahun 2001 dan Undang-Undang No 20 Tahun 2016, Putusan-Putusan Hakim di Indonesia dikomparasikan dan diulas dengan pendapat para ahli hukum dan Putusan US Supreme Court dan European Union Supreme Court. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan dibutuhkan aturan atau panduan yang lebih detail mengenai penentuan ada atau tidaknya iktikad baik dalam sengketa merek di Indoneisa.

---

This thesis discusses the regulation and implementation of the principle of good faith in trademark disputes that focus on cancellation of the trademark in Indonesia. This study uses the juridical normative by reviewing good faith principles in the Law No. 15 of 2001 and Law No. 20 of 2016, Judge Decisions in Indonesia that compared and reviewed with the opinion of legal experts and Decision of US Supreme Court and the European Union Supreme Court. The research concludes rules or guidelines necessary details regarding the determination of whether there is any good faith in trademark disputes in Indonesia."