Berdasarkan hasil analisis univariat, cakupan IMD di NTB sebesar 78,9% dan di Sumatera Utara sebesar 34,5%. Dari hasil analisis bivariat, didapatkan bahwa IMD memiliki hubungan dengan metode persalinan (p-value 0,000 dan OR 7,4), komplikasi kehamilan (p-value 0,031 dan OR 5,7), dan skin-to-skin contact (p-value 0,000 dan OR 6,6) di Provinsi NTB. Sementara di Sumatera Utara, didapatkan bahwa IMD memiliki hubungan dengan tempat persalinan (p-value 0,032 dan OR 0,55) dan metode persalinan (p-value 0,000 dan OR 7,2). Hasil analisis multivariat, didapatkan bahwa metode persalinan menjadi faktor dominan yang berhubungan dengan IMD di Provinsi NTB (p-value 0,002 dan AOR 5,6) dan Sumatera Utara (p-value 0,000 dan AOR 8,1).
.....This study discusses the factors related to the implementation of EIBF in the Provinces of West Nusa Tenggara (NTB) and North Sumatra which are the provinces with the highest and lowest prevalence of EIBF in the Indonesia Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) Analysis 2017. This study uses secondary data from the 2017 Indonesian DHS with a cross sectional research design. The number of samples used were 161 mothers in NTB and 261 mothers in North Sumatra. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors associated with IMD in the two provinces and the dominant factors, so that they can be taken into consideration in making policies by the local government.Based on the results of univariate analysis, the prevalence of IMD in NTB was 78.9% and in North Sumatra was 34.5%. From the results of bivariate analysis, it was found that EIBF had a relationship with delivery method (p-value 0.000 and OR 7.4), pregnancy complications (p-value 0.031 and OR 5.7), and skin-to-skin contact (p-value 0.000 and OR 6.6) in NTB Province. Meanwhile in North Sumatra, it was found that EIBF had a relationship with the place of delivery (p-value 0.032 and OR 0.55) and method of delivery (p-value 0.000 and OR 7.2). The results of multivariate analysis showed that the method of delivery was the dominant factor associated with EIBF in the Provinces of NTB (p-value 0.002 and AOR 5.6) and North Sumatra (p-value 0.000 and AOR 8.1)."
Pendahuluan: Rendahnya angka ASI eksklusif merupakan salah satu masalah kesehatan masyarakat. Di Indonesia, angka cakupan ASI Eksklusif adalah 52,5%. Angka tersebut masih dibawah target renstra Kemenkes 2020-2024 untuk cakupan ASI Eksklusif yaitu 69%.
Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan desain studi cross sectional dengan sumber data SDKI 2017. Sampel penelitian ini adalah ibu yang memiliki anak terakhir kurang dari 6 bulan, memiliki data lengkap dan tidak memiliki data inkonsisten berjumlah 1.494 responden. Data dianalisis menggunakan cox regresi untuk mengetahui prevalen rasio penggunaan botol susu dengan dot dan status ASI Eksklusif. Crude dan adjusted prevalen rasio akan dinilai pada penelitian ini. Signifikansi dinilai dengan melihat rentang kepercayaan 95%.
Hasil: Dari 1.494 bayi kurang dari 6 bulan, ada 48,9% yang tidak ASI Eksklusif dan 28,7% yang menggunakan botol susu dengan dot. Besar asosiasi antara penggunaan botol susu dengan dot dan status ASI Eksklusif adalah 2,753 (95%CI: 2,364-3,205), setelah dikontrol variabel status sosial ekonomi, status IMD, usia ibu, pemilihan tempat persalinan, pekerjaan, kunjungan ANC, paritas, tempat tinggal, dan pendidikan.
Kesimpulan: Penelitian ini mendapatkan hasil bahwa penggunaan botol susu dengan dot meningkatkan resiko untuk tidak ASI Eksklusif. Berdasarkan hal tersebut, perlu dilakukan edukasi kepada masyarakat mengenai bahaya penggunaan dot agar bayi yang tidak mendapatkan ASI Eksklusif dapat ditekan.
Introduction: The low rate of exclusive breastfeeding is a public health problem in Indonesia. The rate of exclusive breastfeeding coverage in Indonesia is 52.5%. This rate is below the Ministry of Healths target at 2020-2024 aims for the exclusive breastfeeding rate as much as 69%.
Methodology: The sample comes from the "Survei Demografi dan Kesehatan Indonesia (SDKI)" in 2017, including mothers of infants less than six months whose data was complete and consistent. The sample was 1,494 respondents. Data were analyzed using Cox regression to determine the prevalence of bottle-feeding and exclusive breastfeeding status. The author analyzed the crude and adjusted prevalence ratios. The analysis of significance is using confidence range at 95%.
Results: The proportion of infants who did not receive exclusive breastfeeding was 48.9%. The multivariate analysis results showed that infants who used a bottle-feeding had a risk of 2.753 (95% CI: 2.364 3.205) times greater for not exclusively breastfed than those who did not use a bottle-feeding. This result came after we ruled out the biases from those variables: socioeconomic status, breastfeeding initiation, maternal age, place of delivery, occupation, antenatal lactation counseling, parity, residence, and education.
Conclusion: This study found that using bottle-feeding increases the risk of not exclusively breastfed among infants aged less than six months in Indonesia
"