Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"[ABSTRAKPenelitian ini ingin melihat bentuk keberpihakan yang dilakukan oleh Kompas.com, Detik.com, Republika.co.id dan Tempo.co terhadap pasangan calon presiden dan wakil presiden pada Pemilihan Presiden 2014. Keberpihakan dilihatmelalui dua dimensi yang terdapat dalam konsep imparsialitas yakni keberimbangan dan netralitas. Penelitian ini menemukan fakta bahwa pemberitaan yang dilakukan oleh media online yang diteliti cenderung tidak berimbang, dilihatndari tidak dimuatnya keterangan dua sisi dalam satu teks pemberitaan serta adanya pemfavoritan terhadap calon tertentu. Pemberitaan Kompas.com, Detik.com dan Tempo.co memfavoritkan pasangan Joko Widodo – Jusuf Kalla sementara pemberitaan Republika.co.id memfavoritkan pasangan Prabowo Subianto – Hatta Rajasa. Mengenai netralitas, mayoritas pemberitaan di Kompas.com, Detik.com, Republika.co.id dan Tempo.co tidak mencampurkan fakta dan opini. Namun, pemberitaan yang dilakukan oleh Kompas.com, Detik.com, Republika.co.id danTempo.co melakukan penyimpulan satu pihak.

---

ABSTRACTThe study will examine how online media like Kompas.com, Detik.com, Republika.co.id and Tempo.co partially support the candidates of Indonesian president and vice president on Presidential Election 2014. Online media in this study are those who does not have a direct affiliation to political interests. The concept of impartiality is used to identify the form of partiality. With following dimensions: balance and neutrality, this study found some facts. First, about balance, this study found a fact that online media which has been studied is not nbalance when reporting news. It proved by only a few news that give both sides opinion. This study also found that several media favoring certain candidates. Kompas.com, Detik.com and Tempo.co favoring Joko Widodo – Jusuf Kalla while Republika.co.id favoring Prabowo Subianto – Hatta Rajasa. Second, about nneutrality, this study found the majority of news in Kompas.com, Detik.com, Republika.co.id and Tempo.co did not mix the fact and opinion. However, these media made one side conclusion by giving limited fact while reporting news., The study will examine how online media like Kompas.com, Detik.com,Republika.co.id and Tempo.co partially support the candidates of Indonesiapresident and vice president on Presidential Election 2014. Online media in thisstudy are those who does not have a direct affiliation to political interests. Theconcept of impartiality is used to identify the form of partiality. With followingdimensions: balance and neutrality, this study found some facts. First, aboutbalance, this study found a fact that online media which has been studied is notbalance when reporting news. It proved by only a few news that give both sidesopinion. This study also found that several media favoring certain candidates.Kompas.com, Detik.com and Tempo.co favoring Joko Widodo – Jusuf Kallawhile Republika.co.id favoring Prabowo Subianto – Hatta Rajasa. Second, aboutneutrality, this study found the majority of news in Kompas.com, Detik.com,Republika.co.id and Tempo.co did not mix the fact and opinion. However, thesemedia made one side conclusion by giving limited fact while reporting news.]"

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan pengaruh terpaan kampanye capres dan cawapres di media sosial terhadap partisipasi pemilih pemula pada pemilihan presiden 2014. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kuantitatif (quantitative methods) dengan kuesioner sebagai instrumen penelitian. Sampel dari penelitian ini sebanyak 150 mahasiswa FISIP UI dari 8 departemen angkatan 2011-2014. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa bentuk kampanye di media sosial memiliki hubungan yang signifikan terhadap partisipasi pemilih pemula pada pemilihan presiden 2014.

---

This research is purposely made for describing the influence between campaign president and vice president in social media on beginner voter participation of presidential election in 2014. This research used quantitative methods, which is questionnaire being used as research instrument. Thus, 150 students of FISIP UI, from 8 departments (2011-2014) were being sample in this research. The result of this research explained if campaign president and vice president in social media shows strong relationship with beginner voter participation of presidential election in 2014."

"Pemisahan waktu pemungutan suara dalam pemilihan umum presiden dengan pemilihan legislatif sering menghasilkan pemerintahan yang terbelah pada pemerintahan dalam sistem presidensial. Kondisi tersebut dikarenakan hasil yang tidak kongruen antara hasil dari pemilihan presiden dengan hasil dari pemilihan legislatif. Komposisi yang terbentuk memunculkan presiden seringkali tidak didukung oleh kekuatan suara mayoritas di parlemen dan hal tersebut dapat menyebabkan pemerintahan yang tidak stabil dan efektif. Ditambah kondisi multipartai yang tumbuh seiring jalannya pemerintahan presidensialisme diIndonesia. Maka dari itu ide desain pemilihan umum serentak memungkinkan akan menghasilkan efek ekor jas bagi partai politik yang terpilih di dalam pemiihan umum legislatif. Efek ekor jas tersebut merupakan suatu kondisi pemilih yang cenderung memiliki kesamaan dalam memilih partai politik yang mengusung calon presiden yang didukungnya, sehingga komposisi partai politik yang lolos di parlemen akan kongruen dan Presiden terpilih memiliki dukungan mayoritas. Penerapan ambang batas presiden dalam konteks pemilihan umum serentak bertujuan untuk membatasi jumlah kandidat calon presiden sehingga nantinya fragmentasi partai politik di parlemen tidak semakin banyak dengan demikian pemilihan umum serentak dapat berlangsung secara efektif dan dapat menghasilkan stabilitaspemerintahan.

---

Separation of the time of voting in presidential elections with legislative elections often results in a divided government in a presidential system. This condition is due to the incongruent results between the results of the presidential election and the results of the legislative elections. The composition formed to bring up a president is often not supported by the power of the majority vote in parliament and this can lead to an unstable and effective government. Coupled with multiparty conditions that have grown along with the presidential government in Indonesia. Therefore, the idea of a simultaneous general election design that will produce coattail effects for the political parties elected in the legislative election. The coattail effect is a condition of voters who tend to have similarities in choosing political parties that carry the presidential candidates they support,so that the composition of political parties that qualify in parliament will be congruent and the elected President has majority support. The application of presidential threshold in the context of simultaneous general elections aims to limit the number of candidates for presidential candidates, later the fragmentation of political parties in the parliament does not increase, so that simultaneous general elections can take place effectively and can produce governmentstability."

"ABSTRAKSkripsi ini adalah membahas pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden secara langsung oleh rakyat pasca perubahan UUD 1945 yang telah dilaksanakan sejak Pemilihan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Tahun 2004. Pemilihan Umum secara langsung merupakan pelaksanaan demokrasi oleh masyarakat, memungkinkan timbulnya perselisihan dalam pelaksanaan dan perhitungan suara dalam penentuan pemenang pada pemilihan tersebut, untuk itu skripsi ini menguraikan tata cara penyelesaian sengketa Pemilu Presiden dan Wakil Presiden oleh lembaga peradilan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai pemegang kekuasaan untuk mengadili sengketa Pemilu

---

ABSTRACTThis paper isto discussthe implementation of the General Election of President and Vice President directly by the people after the 1945 changes that have been implemented since the election of President and Vice President in 2004. Election directly in the exercise of democracy by the people, allowing the emergence of disputes in the implementation and counting in determining the winner in the elections, for this thesis outlines the procedures for dispute resolution election of President and Vice President of the Constitutional Courtas ajudicial institution authority to adjudicate disputes elections"

"Skripsi ini adalah membahas pelaksanaan Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden secara langsung oleh rakyat pasca perubahan UUD 1945 yang telah dilaksanakan sejak Pemilihan Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden Tahun 2004. Pemilihan Umum secara langsung merupakan pelaksanaan demokrasi oleh masyarakat, memungkinkan timbulnya perselisihan dalam pelaksanaan dan perhitungan suara dalam penentuan pemenang pada pemilihan tersebut, untuk itu skripsi ini menguraikan tata cara penyelesaian sengketa Pemilu Presiden dan Wakil Presiden oleh lembaga peradilan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai pemegang kekuasaan untuk mengadili sengketa Pemilu

---

This paper isto discussthe implementation of the General Election of President and Vice President directly by the people after the 1945 changes that have been implemented since the election of President and Vice President in 2004. Election directly in the exercise of democracy by the people, allowing the emergence of disputes in the implementation and counting in determining the winner in the elections, for this thesis outlines the procedures for dispute resolution election of President and Vice President of the Constitutional Courtas ajudicial institution authority to adjudicate disputes elections."

"Pembentukan Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Lembaga Peradilan pasca reformasi nyatanya memberikan angin segar bagi para pihak yang ingin berperkara. Salah satu kewenangan yang dimiliki oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi yang diberikan pada Pasal 24C ayat (1) yaitu memutus perselisihan tentang hasil pemilihan umum. Melalui kewenangan tersebut banyak gugatan perselisihan hasil pemilu diajukan ke Mahkamah Konstitusi. Dalil-dalil yang disampaikan beragam yaitu gugatan secara kualitatif atau gugatan kuantitatif namun, timbul perdebatan bahwa sejauh mana Mahkamah Konstitusi dapat mengadili perkara PHPU berdasarkan 2 (dua) pendekatan tersebut. Tesis ini hendak menjawab permasalahan yaitu mengenai macam-macam putusan MK dalam menangani perkara PHPU dan desain yang ideal agar tercapai nilai keadilan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode yuridis normatif. Hasil Penelitian menunjukkan bahwa melihat beberapa putusan PHPU, Mahkamah Konstitusi memutus suatu perkara berbeda-beda dengan amar putusan yang melampaui dari ketentuan jenis putusan di UU Nomor 24 Tahun 2009 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi. Formulasi desain yang ditawarkan adalah alat kelengkapan penyelesaian PHP Kada hendaknya juga terdapat di PHPU Presiden dan Wakil Presiden. Pertimbangan estimasi waktu penyelesaian agar dapat diselaraskan mengingat kesamaan urgensi kekosongan Pemerintahan.

---

The establishment of the Constitutional Court as a judicial institution after the reformation has in fact provided fresh air for parties who wish to litigate. One of the powers that the Constitutional Court has granted in Article 24C paragraph (1) is to decide on disputes over the results of general elections. Through this authority, many disputes over election results are submitted to the Constitutional Court. The arguments presented are various, namely qualitative or quantitative claims, however, there is a debate as to the extent to which the Constitutional Court can judge PHPU cases based on these 2 (two) approaches. This thesis intends to answer the problem, namely regarding the kinds of Constitutional Court decisions in handling PHPU cases and the ideal design to achieve the value of justice. The method used in this research is normative juridical method. The results showed that looking at several PHPU decisions, the Constitutional Court decided a case that was different from the verdict that exceeded the provisions of the type of decision in Law Number 24 of 2009 concerning the Constitutional Court. The design formulation offered is that the completion tool for PHPUD should also be available at the PHPU President and Vice President. Consideration of the estimated completion time so that it can be harmonized given the similarity of urgency for the absence of Government."

"[ABSTRAKKedaulatan rakyat, demokrasi, dan pemilihan umum (pemilu) merupakan hal yang terkait satu dengan yang lain. Pemilu menjadi cara yang dipilih untuk menciptakan wakil-wakil rakyat yang dapat merepresentasikan keinginan dan kebutuhan rakyat. Di Indonesia, pemilu dilangsungkan untuk memilih anggota legislatif dan untuk memilih Presiden dan Wakil Presiden. Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden di Indonesia harus memenuhi persyaratan untuk terpilih menjadi Presiden dan Wakil Presiden di Indonesia. Persyaratan tersebut adalah syarat suara mayoritas mutlak dan syarat persebaran suara. Kedua syarat tersebut diatur dalam Pasal 6A ayat (3) UUD 1945. Pada pemilu Presiden dan Wakil Presiden tahun 2014, syarat persebaran suara tidak diberlakukan. Hal ini karena hanya terdapat dua pasangan calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden. Padahal, kehadiran syarat persebaran suara adalah untuk mengakomodasi keberagaman antar daerah di Indonesia. Keberagaman atau perbedaan tersebut terutama dalam hal jumlah penduduk. Hadirnya syarat persebaran suara juga menjadikan daerah sebagai objek sehingga kelak daerah dapat memberikan legitimasinya kepada pasangan calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden tersebut. Ketidakberlakuan syarat persebaran suara akan membawa berbagai dampak baik dari sisi pasangan calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden maupun dari sisi daerah. Dampak yang mungkin timbul diantaranya adalah perolehan suara yang terpusat di daerah-daerah tertentu, muncul konsep minority of directors vs. majority of directed, kampanye yang berfokus pada daerah tertentu, dan pengesampingan makna demokrasi.

---

ABSTRACTPeople’s sovereignty, democracy, and election are connected to each other. Election happens to be the method that is chosen to generate people’s representatives who can represent people’s wishes and needs. In Indonesia, election is held to choose the member of legislature and President and Vice President. The presidential candidates must fulfill the requirements to be elected as President and Vice President of Indonesia. The requirements are the majority requirements votes absolute and distribution requirement votes. Both of these requirements are regulated in Article 6A of the Act of 1945. On the presidential election in 2014, the distribution requirement was not implemented, because there were two pairs of President and Vice President Candidates. As a matter of fact, the existence of the distribution requirement votes is beneficial to accommodate the diversity among regions in Indonesia, particularly in terms of population. The existence of distribution requirement votes also makes the region becomes the object. As a result, the region can provide the legitimacy to the Presidential Candidates. Non-enforcement of distribution requirement votes will impact the Presidential candidates and the region itself. The possible impacts that will come out because of the non-enforcement of absolute distribution requirement are the ballot will be focused in certain regions, the concept of minority if directors vs. majority of directed will be appear, the campaign will be focused on certain regions, and the meaning of democracy will be neglected., People’s sovereignty, democracy, and election are connected to each other. Election happens to be the method that is chosen to generate people’s representatives who can represent people’s wishes and needs. In Indonesia, election is held to choose the member of legislature and President and Vice President. The presidential candidates must fulfill the requirements to be elected as President and Vice President of Indonesia. The requirements are the majority requirements votes absolute and distribution requirement votes. Both of these requirements are regulated in Article 6A of the Act of 1945. On the presidential election in 2014, the distribution requirement was not implemented, because there were two pairs of President and Vice President Candidates. As a matter of fact, the existence of the distribution requirement votes is beneficial to accommodate the diversity among regions in Indonesia, particularly in terms of population. The existence of distribution requirement votes also makes the region becomes the object. As a result, the region can provide the legitimacy to the Presidential Candidates. Non-enforcement of distribution requirement votes will impact the Presidential candidates and the region itself. The possible impacts that will come out because of the non-enforcement of absolute distribution requirement are the ballot will be focused in certain regions, the concept of minority if directors vs. majority of directed will be appear, the campaign will be focused on certain regions, and the meaning of democracy will be neglected.]"

"ABSTRAKMenjelang Pemilihan Umum Presiden Indonesia tahun 2014 ramai pemberitaan dengan isu kejahatan, pelanggaran hukum, kecurangan, atau bentuk tindakan lain yang tidak sesuai dengan nilai-nilai moral masyarakat yang dilakukan oleh kandidat calon Presiden, calon Wakil Presiden, atau pendukungnya. Dari sejumlah pemberitaan media massa dengan isu tersebut, peneliti menetapkan pemberitaan Metro TV dan TV One sebagai subjek dalam penelitian ini. Adapun metode yang digunakan adalah analisis framing. Metode tersebut digunakan untuk mengetahui makna dibalik tayangan berita Metro TV dan TV One pada periode 1 Mei 2014 sampai dengan 6 Mei 2014, 1 Juni 2014 sampai dengan 4 Juni 2014, dan 1 Juli 2014 sampai dengan 8 Juli 2014. Hasilnya, peneliti melihat fenomena ini sebagai suatu bentuk kejahatan tersembunyi. Terdapat hubungan yang tidak setara dan konstruksi yang bersifat merugikan yang terkandung dalam makna pemberitan Metro TV dan TV One. Disisi lain juga terdapat pemaksaan makna dan simbol yang mengganggu otonomi pihak lain.

---

ABSTRACTAhead of 2014 Indonesian‟s Presidential Election news are crowded with the issue of crime, lawlessness, fraud, or any other action that is incompatible with the moral values of society by Presidential candidates, candidate for Vice President, or their enthusiasts. Based from a number of news on mass media regarding these issue, researcher establishes Metro TV and TV One news as a subject in this study. The method used is framing analysis. This method used to determine the meaning behind the news shows on Metro TV and TV One between the period of May 1st, 2014 until May 6th, 2014, June 1st, 2014 until June 4th, 2014, and July 1st, 2014 until July 8th, 2014. As a result, the researcher sees this phenomenon as a form of hidden crime. There are unequal relations and constructions that are detrimentals within the meaning of Metro TV and TV One news. On the other hand there is also an imposition of meanings and symbols that interfere with the autonomy of others.;"