Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

Hasil Pencarian

Ditemukan 117224 dokumen yang sesuai dengan query
cover
Isnaeni Fajar
"ABSTRAK
Pengambilan perspektif Tuhan terbukti dapat mempengaruhi evaluasi bias pada outgroup Ginges, Sheikh, Atran, Argo, 2016 . Penelitian eksperimen ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana efek moderasi representasi Tuhan pada pengaruh pengambilan perspektif Tuhan terhadap evaluasi bias pada tiga target outgroup yang berbeda yaitu Tionghoa, non-Muslim, dan Tionghoa-non Muslim N = 219 . Partisipan diberikan skenario pemberian hukuman orang ketiga dimana mereka dapat memberikan hukuman pada outgroup dari perspektif diri dan Tuhan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perspektif Tuhan meningkatkan evaluasi bias pada outgroup jika dibandingkan dengan perspektif diri. Kemudian, individu cenderung menunjukkan evaluasi bias dari perspektif Tuhan yang lebih tinggi kepada outgroup non-Muslim. Akan tetapi, individu akan cenderung untuk menunjukkan evaluasi bias dari perspektif Tuhan yang lebih tinggi kepada outgroup Tionghoa pada konteks adil. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa konteks memiliki peran penting untuk mempengaruhi evaluasi bias pada outgroup.

ABSTRACT
God rsquo s perspective can influence evaluation bias towards outgroup Ginges, Sheikh, Atran, Argo, 2016 . This experiment aims to explore the moderation effect of God rsquo s representation in using God rsquo s perspective on three different outgroups, Tionghoa, non Muslim, and Tionghoa non Muslim N 219 . Participant were presented with third party punishment scenario which they could punish the outgroup with both self and God rsquo s perspective. Results show that God rsquo s perspective increase evaluation bias towards outgroup when compared to self perspective. Moreover, people tend to show higher evaluation bias from God rsquo s perspective towards non Muslim compared to Tionghoa. However, people tend to show higher evaluation bias from God rsquo s perspective towards Tionghoa in a fair context. These results indicate that context has an important role to influence evaluation bias towards outgroup. "
2017
T49215
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Okky Arif Rachmanputra
"ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini melihat pengaruh sudut pandang pada individu terjadap pemikiran
bias dalam kelompok agama. Variabel sudut pandang individu terbagi atas dua
variasi yaitu sudut pandang diri dan sudut pandang Ketuhanan. Pada studi pertama,
penulis ingin melihat perbedaan antara individu yang menggunakan sudut pandang
diri dengan sudut pandang Ketuhanan terhadap bias dalam kelompok agama. Pada
studi kedua, penulis ingin melihat moderasi persepsi keterancaman terhadap
hubungan sudut pandang terhadap bias dalam kelompok. Pada studi pertama,
sebanyak 81 mahasiswa Muslim orang yang secara acak dikelompokkan
berdasarkan sudut pandang diri dan sudut pandang Ketuhanan, menentukan
kesediaannya membantu kepada panti asuhan kelompok agama ingroup atau
kelompok agama outgroup dalam sebuah skenario. Hasil studi pertama
menunjukkan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan pengaruh pada kelompok sudut
pandang diri dengan sudut pandang Ketuhanan terhadap pemikiran bias dalam
kelompok. Namun keaktifan organisasi berkorelasi positif dengan bias dalam
pemberian donasi kepada kelompok ingroup. Pada studi kedua, sebanyak 85
mahasiswa Muslim yang secara acak dikelompokkan berdasarkan kelompok sudut
pandang, menentukan kesediaannya membantu yayasan sosial dari kelompok agama
outgroup dalam sebuah skenario. Penulis juga mengukur persepsi keterancaman
partisipan. Hasil studi kedua menjelaskan bahwa tidak terdapat perbedaan antara
kelompok partisipan dengan sudut pandang diri dan Ketuhanan terhadap bias dalam
kelompok. Namun persepsi keterancaman memiliki korelasi yang positif terhadap
bias dalam pemberian donasi kepada kelompok outgroup. Perbedaan konteks
dimana keadaan kelompok tidak dalam keadaan berkonflik menjadi salah satu
alasan yang dapat menjelaskan hasil penelitian ini.

ABSTRACT
This study wanted to know whether the influence of the perspective to
ingroup bias. Perspective was divided into two variations, namely selfperspective
and the God perspective. In the first study, I wanted to see the
difference between individuals who use self-perspective and God perspective
on bias in religious groups. In the second study, I wanted to see the
moderation of perceived threat to the relationship of perspective to ingroup
bias. In the first study, 81 Muslims college students had randomly grouped
according to the self-perspective and viewpoint of Godhead. They decided to
help orphanage from their ingroup or outgroup religious groups in a scenario.
The results showed, there were no differences between groups of selfperspective
with the God perspective on ingroup bias. But organization
attendance had a significant correlation with bias in donating ingroup. In the
second study, 85 Muslim college students randomly grouped according to
perspective groups, determined their willingness to help non-profit
organizations from outgroup religious groups in a scenario. I also measured
the perceived threat to participants. The results showed that there was no
difference between participants with self-perspective and God perspective
toward ingroup bias. Differences in the context where the situation of the
group is not in the conflict were one reason that explained the results of this
study.
"
2019
T53800
UI - Tesis Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Isnaeni Fajar
"Kasus penistaan agama pada pilkada DKI tahun 2016 memberikan gambaran bagaimana evaluasi bias dapat terjadi dalam relasi antar kelompok di Indonesia. Selain karena faktor agama, persepsi ketidakadilan dapat menjadi basis evaluasi bias antar kelompok. Kami menduga bahwa perbedaan konteks adil tidak adil memiliki peran terhadap evaluasi bias. Studi eksperimen ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana peran persepsi ketidakadilan (vs. adil) terhadap evaluasi bias berdasarkan perspektif diri dan Tuhan (N = 219; M age = 21,63; 49% perempuan). Studi eksperimen ini menggunakan desain 2 (pengambilan perspektif: diri dan Tuhan; within) x 2 (konteks: adil vs. tidak adil; between) mixed design. Evaluasi bias diukur dengan menggunakan skenario pemberian hukuman orang ketiga dimana partisipan memiliki peran sebagai orang ketiga yang dapat memberikan hukuman kepada target outgroup (pemain fiktif). Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa konteks tidak adil (vs. adil) memiliki perbedaan yang signifikan terhadap evaluasi bias outgroup berdasarkan perspektif diri dan Tuhan. Evaluasi bias akan cenderung untuk lebih tinggi pada konteks tidak adil daripada konteks adil. Hasil ini memiliki implikasi bahwa dalam relasi antar kelompok persepsi ketidakadilan dan penggunaan perspektif diri (vs Tuhan) memiliki pengaruh terhadap evaluasi bias outgroup."
Depok: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia dan Ikatan Psikologi Sosial-HIMPSI, 2017
150 JPS 15:2 (2017)
Artikel Jurnal  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Nida Lathifah
"The New York Times dan The Washington Post merupakan dua koran nasional Amerika yang diketahui memiliki bias liberal. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meneliti bias liberal kedua koran tersebut pada pemberitaan pemilihan presiden Indonesia tahun 2014. Jurnal ini menggunakan kerangkan Analisis Wacana Kritis dengan menerapkan metode tiga dimensi Norman Fairclough (analisis tekstual, praktik wacana, dan praktik sosial budaya.
Temuan dari penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa kedua koran tersebut bias terhadap Jokowi dan tim koalisinya yang cenderung mendukung kebebasan dan keberagaman. Temuan penelitian ini penting untuk mengkritik bias yang ada pada koran-koran Amerika, terutama dalam meliput berita dari negara-negara lain.

The New York Times and The Washington Post are two American national newspapers that are known to have a liberal bias. This research aims to explore the liberal bias of the newspapers in the 2014 Indonesian presidential election news. In order to do so, this research utilizes the Critical Discourse Analysis framework by applying Norman Fairclough's three dimensional methods (textual analysis, discourse practice, and sociocultural practice).
The findings show the newspapers have a bias toward Jokowi and his coalition team who tend to support liberality and plurality. The findings are significant to criticize the bias of these American newspapers, especially in covering news from other countries."
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia, 2015
MK-Pdf
UI - Makalah dan Kertas Kerja  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Muhammad Khalis Gagah Pratama
"Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk mencari tahu pengaruh financial bias terhadap financial planning behavior pada generasi muda yang berumur 17 hingga 35 tahun di area Jabodetabek. Financial bias yang dianalisis dalam penelitian ini adalah overconfidence bias, mental accounting bias, dan loss aversion bias dan financial planning behavior yang dianalisis adalah financial planning behavior dalam berinvestasi. Sampel terdiri dari 101 responden yang memenuhi kriteria dalam mengisi kuisoner. Metode penelitian yang digunakan merupakan regresi linear berganda. Ditemukan bahwa overconfidence bias dan loss aversion bias memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap financial planning behavior dimana overconfidence bias berpengaruh secara positif dan loss aversion bias berpengaruh negatif. Akan tetapi, mental accounting bias tidak memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap financial planning behavior.

This study aims to find out the effect of financial bias on financial planning behavior in young people aged 17 to 35 years in the Jabodetabek area. The financial bias analyzed in this study is overconfidence bias, mental accounting bias, and loss aversion bias and the financial planning behavior analyzed is financial planning behavior in investing. The sample consisted of 101 respondents who met the criteria for filling out the questionnaire. The research method used is multiple linear regression. It was found that overconfidence bias and loss aversion bias have a significant effect on financial planning behavior where overconfidence bias has a positive effect and loss aversion bias has a negative effect. However, mental accounting bias does not have a significant effect on financial planning behavior."
Depok: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Indonesia, 2023
S-pdf
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Azzadina Nurulain Ikhwan
"Meskipun partisipasi perempuan dalam politik Amerika Serikat telah mencapai angka tertinggi sepanjang masa dalam pemilu terakhir, keikutsertaan perempuan dalam politik Amerika Serikat bukannya tanpa kekurangan. Salah satu masalah yang masih terus terjadi hingga saat ini adalah bias media, yang sering kali muncul dalam pemberitaan. Artikel-artikel yang melaporkan suatu peristiwa atau subjek dengan cara yang sangat bias telah menyebabkan persepsi publik yang terdistorsi tentang peristiwa atau subjek tersebut, dan dapat membuat publik mempertanyakan integritas media sebagai sumber informasi yang objektif. Penelitian sebelumnya telah membuktikan adanya bias media dan juga kerugian yang ditimbulkannya terhadap politisi perempuan. Namun, masih kurangnya perhatian terhadap interseksionalitas antara aspek identitas seseorang dan efek gabungannya terhadap bias. Untuk memahami kompleksitas bias media dalam pemberitaan secara lebih komprehensif, penelitian ini melakukan analisis untuk melihat bagaimana bias termanifestasi dalam pemberitaan tentang Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, seorang politisi perempuan Amerika Serikat, dalam empat media massa yang berbeda, yaitu media massa Demokrat (kiri) dan Konservatif (kanan).

Dengan metode Critical Discourse Analisis, temuan penelitian ini menyoroti adanya bias media dengan memeriksa penggunaan pilihan kata, semantik, dan topik yang berulang untuk mengindikasikan bias terkait jenis kelamin, usia, kelas sosial ekonomi, dan ideologi politik Ocasio-Cortez.Despite the number reaching an all-time high in the most recent election, female participation in U.S. politics is not without its drawbacks. One longstanding issue that continues to occur to this day is media bias, which often manifests in news coverage. Articles that report an event or subject in a highly biased manner have led to a distorted public perception of said event or subject and they may lead the public to question the integrity of the news outlet as an objective source of information. Previous studies had proven the existence of media bias as well as the disadvantage it gave female politicians. However, there is a lack of attention to the intersectionality between one’s identity aspects and their compounding effects on bias. In order to understand the nuance in media bias within news outlets more comprehensively, this study conducted an analysis to see how bias manifested in the news coverages of Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez, an American female politician, written by four different American democratic (left-wing) and conservative (right-wing) news outlets. With the method of critical discourse analysis, the findings of this study highlighted the presence of media bias by examining the use of word choices, semantics, and recurring topics to indicate bias regarding Ocasio-Cortez’s gender, age, socioeconomic class, and political ideology."
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Pengetahuan Budaya Universitas Indonesia, 2024
TA-pdf
UI - Tugas Akhir  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Bertha Tri Sumartini
"Penelitian ini bertujuan melihat pengaruh panduan coaching kepala ruang terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis dan pengambilan keputusan perawat primer. Penelitian dengan desain quasi experiment with control group posttest only. Populasi penelitian adalah perawat primer di ruang rawat inap PKSC, Jakarta. Jumlah sampel 77 orang pada kelompok intervensi dan 77 orang pada kelompok kontrol.
Hasil penelitian karakteristik individu tidak ada pengaruh terhadap berpikir kritis dan pengambilan keputusan. Analisis regresi logistik ganda ditemukan adanya pengaruh coaching terhadap berpikir kritis ( p value 0,04) dan pengambilan keputusan (p value 0,036), Coaching dapat dikembangkan penggunaannya bagi staf, perawat baru dan pembimbingan mahasiswa untuk pengembangan keperawatan profesional.

The aim of this study was to examine the effect of coaching guide of charge nurse to critical thinking and decision making primary nurse .This study with quasi experiment with control group posttest only design. The study population was the primary nurse at the inpatient ward in PKSC, Jakarta. The number of samples of 77 people in the intervention group and 77 people in the control group.
The individual characteristic did not reveal any contribution.Multiple logistic regression analysis found that the significant influences on coaching toward critical thinking (p value 0,044) and decision making (p value 0,036). Coaching can be developed for personal use, nurses orientee and nurses student for professional nursing development.
"
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Keperawatan Universitas Indonesia, 2010
T33228
UI - Tesis Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Rusmegawati
"Perawat perlu keterampilan berpikir kritis dalam melaksanakan asuhan keperawatan yang dapat ditingkatkan melalui supervisi model reflektif interaktif. Penelitian quasi experiment pre-post test with control group ini bertujuan membuktikan pengaruh supervisi model reflektif interaktif terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis 61 perawat pada kelompok intervensi di RS.Dr.H.M. Ansari Saleh Banjarmasin dan didukung oleh 61 perawat pada kelompok kontrol. Penelitian ini menggunakan instrumen uji keterampilan berpikir kritis dengan validitas 0,160-0,488 (r 0,250) dan Cronbach's Alpha 0,745. Hasil membuktikan ada pengaruh supervisi terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis perawat dalam melaksanakan asuhan keperawatan (p 0,0001; α 0,05). Supervisi model reflektif interaktif dapat menjadi salah satu model supervisi dalam manajemen keperawatan ruang rawat.

Nurses need critical thinking skills in performing nursing care that can be improved through an interactively reflective supervision model. Quasi experiment research with pre-post test control group aimed to prove the influence of interactively reflective supervision model of critical thinking skills of 61 nurses in the intervention group at inpatient unit Dr. H. M. Ansari Saleh Hospital and supported by 61 nurses in the control group. This study used critical thinking skills test instrument and validity was .160 to .488 (r 0,250) and Cronbach's Alpha 0.745. The results proved there was the influence of supervision on critical thinking skills of nurses in implementing nursing care (p 0.0001; α 0.05). Reflectively interactive of supervision model can be one model of supervision in the management of ward nursing."
Depok: Fakultas Ilmu Keperawatan Universitas Indonesia, 2011
T-Pdf
UI - Tesis Open  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Obedrey Willys
"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh ego depletion terhadap perilaku prososial. Perilaku prososial diukur melalui jumlah donasi yang diberikan oleh para partisipan untuk kegiatan sosial. Sebanyak 80 mahasiswa Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Partisipan dibagi ke dalam dua kelompok variasi ego depletion, yaitu partisipan yang
mengalami manipulasi ego depletion (full depletion) dan partisipan yang tidak mengalami manipulasi ego depletion (non-depletion). Dalam penelitian ini juga dilihat efek moderasi objective self-awareness pada pengaruh ego depletion terhadap perilaku prososial. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tidak adanya perbedaan jumlah donasi yang diberikan antara partisipan pada kondisi full depletion dan partisipan pada kondisi non-depletion. Selain itu, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa objective self-awareness tidak memoderasi pengaruh ego depletion pada perilaku prososial.

This study aims to analyze the effect of ego depletion on the prosocial behavior. Prosocial behavior measured by the amount of donation that participant gave to the social charity. Variations of ego depletion are divided into full depletion condition and non-depletion condition. There are 80 students of Faculty of Psychology Universitas Indonesia that participated in this study. Participants are divided into two groups of ego depletion variations, which participants who experienced the manipulation of ego depletion (full depletion) and participants who didn't experienced the manipulation (non-depletion). This study also examines the moderation effect of objective self-awareness on the influence of ego depletion on prosocial behavior. The result showed that there is no significant difference in amount of donation between participants in full depletion condition and participants in non-depletion condition. Also, the result of the study showed that objective self-awareness do not moderate the effect of ego depletion on prosocial behavior."
Depok: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia, 2016
S62542
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
cover
Mohammad Himawan Teguh A
"[ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini dilakukan untuk melihat pengaruh dari gaya berpikir dan system justification terhadap kepercayaan pada Tuhan dengan populasi mahasiswa Universitas Indonesia. Kepercayaan pada Tuhan didefinisikan sebagai sebuah pengetahuan dan perasaan individu yang subjektif dan didasari oleh sebuah pengalaman mengenai hal terkait Tuhan, dan seringkali implisit. Gaya berpikir didefinisikan sebagai sebuah konfigurasi dari sebuah kemampuan umum untuk mengarahkan atensi, penilaian, dan motivasi yang menghasilkan sebuah tingkah laku yang terlihat dan penting dalam penyelesaian tugas-tugas seorang individu.. System justification didefinisikan sebagai proses psikologis dimana kondisi yang sudah ada, baik itu berupa sosial, politik, ekonomi, seksual, atau hukum, diterima, dijelaskan, dan dijustifikasi hanya karena mereka tercipta. Pengukuran kepercayaan terhadap Tuhan dilakukan dengan menggunakan alat ukur Belief in God Scale (BiGS) yang disusun oleh Norenzayan dan Willard (2012). Pengukuran gaya berpikir dilakukan dengan menggunakan alat ukur Cognitive Reflection Test (CRT) yang disusun oleh Frederick (2005). Pengukuran system justification dilakukan dengan menggunakan dua alat, yaitu General System Justification Scale (GSJS) yang diciptakan oleh Kay dan Jost (2003) dan Religious System Justification Scale (RSJS) yang merupakan adaptasi dari GSJS yang diberikan konteks keagamaan. Partisipan penelitian berjumlah 277 mahasiswa di Universitas Indonesia. Melalui teknik Multiple Regression, diketahui bahwa terdapat pengaruh system justification terhadap kepercayaan pada Tuhan yang signifikan, namun tidak terdapat pengaruh gaya berpikir terhadap kepercayaan pada Tuhan yang signifikan.

ABSTRACT
This research is conducted to see the influence of cognitive styles and system justification towards belief in God with college students of Universitas Indonesia as the population. Belief in God is defined as the subjective, experience-based, often implicit knowledge and emotions on the matter of God. Cognitive style is defined as a configuration of domain-general abilities of directing attention, valuation, and motivation that produces a particular salience landscape within which one undertakes one?s tasks. System Justification is defined as the psychological process whereby prevailing conditions, be they social, political, economic, sexual, or legal, are accepted, explained, and justified simply because they exist. Belief in God is measured with Belief in God Scale which was created by Norenzayan and Willard (2012). Cognitive style is measured with Cognitive Reflective Test (CRT) which was created by Frederick (2005). System justification is measured with to measurement, General System Justification Scale (GSJS) which was created by Kay and Jost (2003) and Religious System Justification Scale (RSJS) as an adaptation version of GSJS which was imbued with religiousity context. Participants of this study consist of 277 college students of Universitas Indonesia. Using Multiple Regression as statistical analysis, there result point out that system justification influences belief in God significantly, while there are no influence given by cognitive style towards belief in God.;This research is conducted to see the influence of cognitive styles and system
justification towards belief in God with college students of Universitas Indonesia as
the population. Belief in God is defined as the subjective, experience-based, often
implicit knowledge and emotions on the matter of God. Cognitive style is defined as
a configuration of domain-general abilities of directing attention, valuation, and
motivation that produces a particular salience landscape within which one undertakes
one?s tasks. System Justification is defined as the psychological process whereby
prevailing conditions, be they social, political, economic, sexual, or legal, are
accepted, explained, and justified simply because they exist. Belief in God is
measured with Belief in God Scale which was created by Norenzayan and Willard
(2012). Cognitive style is measured with Cognitive Reflective Test (CRT) which was
created by Frederick (2005). System justification is measured with to measurement,
General System Justification Scale (GSJS) which was created by Kay and Jost (2003)
and Religious System Justification Scale (RSJS) as an adaptation version of GSJS
which was imbued with religiousity context. Participants of this study consist of 277
college students of Universitas Indonesia. Using Multiple Regression as statistical
analysis, there result point out that system justification influences belief in God
significantly, while there are no influence given by cognitive style towards belief in
God.;This research is conducted to see the influence of cognitive styles and system
justification towards belief in God with college students of Universitas Indonesia as
the population. Belief in God is defined as the subjective, experience-based, often
implicit knowledge and emotions on the matter of God. Cognitive style is defined as
a configuration of domain-general abilities of directing attention, valuation, and
motivation that produces a particular salience landscape within which one undertakes
one?s tasks. System Justification is defined as the psychological process whereby
prevailing conditions, be they social, political, economic, sexual, or legal, are
accepted, explained, and justified simply because they exist. Belief in God is
measured with Belief in God Scale which was created by Norenzayan and Willard
(2012). Cognitive style is measured with Cognitive Reflective Test (CRT) which was
created by Frederick (2005). System justification is measured with to measurement,
General System Justification Scale (GSJS) which was created by Kay and Jost (2003)
and Religious System Justification Scale (RSJS) as an adaptation version of GSJS
which was imbued with religiousity context. Participants of this study consist of 277
college students of Universitas Indonesia. Using Multiple Regression as statistical
analysis, there result point out that system justification influences belief in God
significantly, while there are no influence given by cognitive style towards belief in
God., This research is conducted to see the influence of cognitive styles and system
justification towards belief in God with college students of Universitas Indonesia as
the population. Belief in God is defined as the subjective, experience-based, often
implicit knowledge and emotions on the matter of God. Cognitive style is defined as
a configuration of domain-general abilities of directing attention, valuation, and
motivation that produces a particular salience landscape within which one undertakes
one’s tasks. System Justification is defined as the psychological process whereby
prevailing conditions, be they social, political, economic, sexual, or legal, are
accepted, explained, and justified simply because they exist. Belief in God is
measured with Belief in God Scale which was created by Norenzayan and Willard
(2012). Cognitive style is measured with Cognitive Reflective Test (CRT) which was
created by Frederick (2005). System justification is measured with to measurement,
General System Justification Scale (GSJS) which was created by Kay and Jost (2003)
and Religious System Justification Scale (RSJS) as an adaptation version of GSJS
which was imbued with religiousity context. Participants of this study consist of 277
college students of Universitas Indonesia. Using Multiple Regression as statistical
analysis, there result point out that system justification influences belief in God
significantly, while there are no influence given by cognitive style towards belief in
God.]"
Depok: Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia, 2015
S58743
UI - Skripsi Membership  Universitas Indonesia Library
<<   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10   >>