Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"Persepsi mengenai keparahan dan keadilan hukuman fisik yang diberikan dalam rangka penerapan disiplin oleh orang tua merupakan faktor yang mempengaruhi sikap terhadap penggunaan hukuman fisik. Mengingat bahwa pemberi hukuman adalah orang tua, maka persepsi terhadap hukuman fisik juga dipengaruhi oleh attachment anak dengan orang tua. Terhadap 222 partisipan dewasa muda diukur sikap terhadap hukuman fisik dengan Discipline Questionnaire DQ, persepsi keparahan dan keadilan dengan Physical Punishment Questionnaire PPQ dan attacment dengan orang tua menggunakan Experience in Close Relationship-Relationship Structure ECR-RS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sikap terhadap penggunaan hukuman fisik. berkorelasi denganpersepsi keadilan r = 0,287.

---

Childrens perception of harshness and justness of corporal punishment administered by their parents as a way to uphold discipline are factors that predict attitude towards corporal punishment. Considering that corporal pusnishment are administered by parents, then perception of children to corporal punishment might be affected by their attachment with parents. Participants of 222 people were asked to report their attitude towards corporal punishment with Discipline Questionnaire DQ, perceived harshness and pereived justness with Physical Punishment Scale PPQ and parental attachment with Experience in Close Relationship Relationship Struture ECR RS. Result found that perceived justness r = 0,287."

"Mendisiplinkan anak merupakan salah satu tugas yang penting bagi orang tua. Namun sayangnya, banyak orang tua yang masih menggunakan disiplin yang tidak efektif, seperti corporal punishment. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui peran corporal punishment myth dan regulasi emosi (suppression, capitulation, escape) terhadap penggunaan corporal punishment pada orang tua yang mengasuh anak berusia 2-6 tahun. Penelitian dilakukan pada 125 orang tua yang berasal dari seluruh Indonesia dengan menggunakan alat ukur Corporal Punishment Myth Scale, Revised Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory, Vignettes Corporal Punishment Intention, dan dimensi corporal punishment dari alat ukur Conflict Tactic Scale-Parent Child Version. Data dianalisis menggunakan teknik zero-inflated count regression. Hasil menunjukkan bahwa corporal punishment myth, suppression, escape, dan capitulation tidak dapat memprediksi perilaku corporal punishment. Selain itu, corporal punishment myth dan suppression tidak dapat memprediksi intensi corporal punishment. Sedangkan, capitulation dan escape mampu memprediksi intensi corporal punishment pada count model, (IRR = 4.19, p < .05; IRR = 1.14, p < .05), tetapi tidak pada zero model, (OR = 1.26, p > .05 OR = 1.12, p > .05). Hasil penelitian mengimplikasikan bahwa masing-masing jenis regulasi emosi memiliki peranan yang berbeda dalam mempengaruhi frekuensi munculnya intensi corporal punishment.

---

Discipline is one of the most important tasks in parents’ life. Unfortunately, many parents still use ineffective discipline, such as corporal punishment. This study aimed to determine the role of corporal punishment myth and emotion regulation (suppression, capitulation, escape) on corporal punishment use in parents who had children aged 2-6 years. The study was conducted on 125 parents from all over Indonesia using Corporal Punishment Myth Scale, Revised Parental Emotion Regulation Inventory, Corporal Punishment Intention Vignettes, and corporal punishment dimension of Conflict Tactic Scale-Parent Child Version. The data were analyzed using zero-inflated count regression. The results showed that corporal punishment myth, suppression, escape, and capitulation could not predict corporal punishment behavior. Moreover, corporal punishment myth and suppression could not predict the intention of corporal punishment. Meanwhile, capitulation and escape were able to predict the intention of corporal punishment in the count model (IRR = 4.19, p < .05; IRR = 1.14, p < .05), but not in the zero model (OR = 1.26, p>.05; OR = 1.12, p > .05). The results implied that each type of emotion regulation has different role in influencing the use of corporal punishment."

"Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat hubungan antara gaya pengasuhan dengan intensi penggunaan hukuman fisik dan kepercayaan terhadap mitos hukuman fisik dengan intensi penggunaan hukuman fisik pada orang tua dengan anak usia early childhood. Gaya pengasuhan diukur menggunakan Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire milik Robinson dkk., 1995, kepercayaan terhadap mitos hukuman fisik diukur menggunakan Corporal Punishment Myth Scale (Kish & Newcombe, 2015), dan intensi penggunaan hukuman fisik diukur menggunakan vignettes dalam Corporal Punishment Myth Scale. Analisis statistika menggunakan Spearman correlation dengan arah pengujian 1-tailed. Terdapat 122 ayah dan ibu (M = 32.34, SD = 6.12) dengan anak usia 2-6 tahun (M = 3.66, SD = 1.33) yang berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang positif dan signifikan antara gaya pengasuhan authoritarian dengan intensi penggunaan hukuman fisik. Hasil yang sama juga ditemukan antara kepercayaan terhadap mitos hukuman fisik dengan intensi penggunaan hukuman fisik. Gaya pengasuhan permissive menunjukkan hubungan yang positif dan signifikan dengan intensi penggunaan hukuman fisik, tetapi dengan arah korelasi yang berkebalikan dengan hipotesis. Tidak ditemukan hubungan yang negatif dan signifikan antara gaya pengasuhan authoritative dengan intensi penggunaan hukuman fisik. Hasil penelitian dapat menjadi acuan bagi konselor untuk melaksanakan intervensi bagi orang tua dengan anak usia early childhood.

---

The present study aims to search whether there is a relationship between parenting styles, belief in corporal punishment myth, and corporal punishment use intention. Parenting styles were measured with Parenting Styles and Dimensions Questionnaire, constructed by Robinson et al., 1995; belief in corporal punishment myth was measured with Corporal Punishment Myth Scale, constructed by Kish and Newcombe (2015); and corporal punishment use intentions was measured with vignettes inside the Corporal Punishment Myth Scale. Spearman correlation with 1-tailed tests was used for hypothesis testing. There are 122 parents consist of mother and father (M = 32.34, SD = 6.12) with their 2-6 years old children (M = 3.66, SD = 1.33) participating in this study. The results showed that there is a positive and significant correlation between authoritarian parenting style with corporal punishment use intention. A positive and significant correlation between belief in corporal punishment myth with corporal punishment use intention is also found. While in permissive parenting style, there is a positive and significant correlation with corporal punishment use intention, but the direction is contradictive with the hypothesis. Lastly, there is no negative and significant correlation between authoritative parenting style and corporal punishment use intention. Research implications are discussed."

"Bentuk pendisiplinan anak dengan menggunakan hukuman fisik memiliki pro-kontra sendiri dalam pelaksanaannya. Menurut data yang dikeluarkan Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia pada tahun 2020, hampir setengah populasi orang tua di Indonesia mengaku menggunakan hukuman fisik pada anaknya di rumah yaitu sebanyak 48,4%. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hubungan antara faktor-faktor yang dapat mempengaruhi penggunaan hukuman fisik yaitu corporal punishment myths dan parenting self-efficacy dengan intensi menggunakan hukuman fisik itu sendiri pada ibu yang bekerja. Penelitian dilakukan pada 142 ibu yang bekerja dengan anak berusia 5-6 tahun. Metode yang digunakan adalah analisis korelasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat hubungan yang signifikan antara corporal punishment myths dengan intensi untuk menggunakan hukuman fisik serta terdapat hubungan yang signifikan juga antara parenting self-efficacy dengan intensi untuk menggunakan hukuman fisik.

---

Child discipline using corporal punishment has its own pros and cons in its implementation. According to research conducted by Badan Pusat Statistik Indonesia in 2020, almost half of the parents population still using corporal punishment to their child at home which is 48,4% of the population. Therefore, this study aims to determine the relationship between factors that can influence the intention to use corporal punishment, between corporal punishment myths and parenting self-efficacy among working mothers. The study was conducted on 142 working mothers with children aged 5-6 years. The method used is correlation analysis. The results showed that there was a significant relationship between corporal punishment myths with the intention to use corporal punishment and there was also a significant relationship between parenting self-efficacy and the intention to use corporal punishment."

"Penelitian ini akan melihat sejauh mana pengaruh keterikatan kontrol sosial terhadap tingkat intensitas perialaku delinkuensi. Serta penelitian ini juga menggunakan corporal punishment sebagai moderatornya. Dengan menggunakan teori social bonding oleh Hirschi (1969) penelitian ini menemukan bahwa semakin terikatnya anak dengan agen sosialnya maka perilaku delinkuensinya cenderung rendah. Namun, pada keterikatan dengan teman justru memunculkan hubungan yang positif. Dimana anak yang semkain terikat dengan temannya justru membuat anak semakin berperilaku delinkuen. Dengan menggunakan motode kuantitatif dan dengan melakukan analisa univariat, bivariat, uji korelasional, uji residual dan uji regresi ditemukan bahwa corporal punishment memiliki pengaruh terhadap hubungan antara keterikatan sosial dengan perilaku delinkuensi. Penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan bahwa adanya corporal punishment di rumah membuat hubungan orang tua dengan anak menjadi lemah sehingga anak menjadi berperilaku delinkuen. Lemahnya hubungan anak dengan orang tua membuat anak lebih memiliki ikatan dengan temannya yang berperilaku delinkuen.

---

This research will explain the effect of the level of social control bonds to level of children delinquency intensity level with corporal punishment as a variable of moderator. By using the social cohesion theory or social bonding by Hirschi (1969), this research explain the correlation between children and social agents towards delinquency behaviors. Where the relationship is negative, where the children are bound to the social agents, will lower the delinquency behaviours. This research also seeks the strength of the relationship of both social agents and children if involving corporal punishment as a moderator. This research which involved 469 respondents is using quantitative approach with questionnare as a instrument of research. By using cross tabulation, relational tests, and regretion test as well as with residual test, this research indicates that negative relationship between social control bonds (parents and teachers) towards delinquency behaviours. However, this research also shows that a positive relationship between peer bonds towards delinquency behaviour of children. Meanwhile, the correlation between social control bonds with the intensity of children's delinquency behaviour even more powerful if corporal punishment is involved as a moderator. The conclusion of this research is that children who have a corporal punishment experience by both of his or her parents at home tend to make children will become more delinquent than before. This happens because corporal punishment weakens the relationship between parents and children so that children tends to create a bond with his or her friends who commit delinquent behaviors."

"Hukuman mati merupakan salah satu bentuk penghukuman yang masih dipertahankan di Indonesia. Latar belakang historis menunjukkan bahwa hukuman mati di Indonesia merupakan warisan kolonial Pemerintah Belanda. Sejak Indonesia merdeka hingga sekarang, hukuman mati tetap ada bahkan tersebar dalam berbagai peraturan perundang-undangan dan tetap dipertahankan dalam KUHP Baru. Diskursus dan praktik hukuman mati dirasionalisasi bahwa hukuman mati mampu menimbulkan efek penggentarjeraan di masyarakat. Eksistensi hukuman mati ini sesungguhnya menimbulkan polemik di kalangan ilmuwan hukum Indonesia. Ada kalangan yang menyetujui dan ada yang menolak eksistensi hukuman mati tersebut. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini mengkaji diskursus normatif tentang hukuman mati dari kalangan ilmuwan hukum di Indonesia. Selanjutnya, penelitian ini juga mengkaji arah politik hukuman mati di Indonesia. Setelah menganalisis diskursus normatif dan politik kriminal hukuman mati, penelitian ini juga menganalisis hasil-hasil penelitian kriminologis hukuman mati untuk melihat apakah hukuman mati benar-benar menimbulkan efek penggentarjeraan. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan analisis diskursus Foucault untuk melihat adanya diskursus dominan dari hukuman mati. Perspektif kriminologi konstitutif dan counter-colonial criminology digunakan dalam tulisan ini untuk mengkaji bagaimana pengaruh teori penghukuman Barat terhadap diskursus normatif hukuman mati tersebut. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat kondisi diskrepansi antara diskursus hukuman mati dengan rasionalitas yang mendasarinya. Hal ini membuat hukuman mati menjadi paradoks. Solusi atas kondisi paradoks hukuman mati tersebut dibutuhkan diskursus pengganti. Perspektif peacemaking criminology digunakan untuk menunjukkan bahwa hukuman mati yang tidak menyelesaikan masalah kejahatan perlu diganti dengan perspektif perdamaian sebagai respon alternatif terhadap kejahatan. 

---

The capital punishment is a form of punishment that is still maintained in Indonesia. The historical background shows that the capital punishment in Indonesia is a legacy of Dutch colonialism. Since Indonesia's independence until now, the capital punishment has persisted and is even spread out in various laws and regulations and is maintained in the New Criminal Code. The discourse and practice of the capital punishment rationalizes that the capital punishment can create a deterrent effect in society. The existence of the capital punishment has actually caused polemics among Indonesian legal scientists. There are people who agree and there are those who reject the existence of the capital punishment. Therefore, this study examines the normative discourse on the capital punishment among legal scientists in Indonesia. Furthermore, this research also examines the political direction of capital punishment in Indonesia. After analyzing the normative discourse and criminal politics of the capital punishment, this study also analyzes the results of criminological research on the capital punishment to see whether the capital punishment actually creates a deterrent effect. This research method uses Foucault discourse analysis to see the existence of a dominant discourse on the capital punishment. The perspectives of constitutive criminology and counter-colonial criminology are used in this paper to examine how the influence of Western punishment theory has on the normative discourse on capital punishment. The results of this study indicate that there is a condition of discrepancy between the capital punishment discourse and its rationality. This makes the capital punishment a paradox. A solution to the paradoxical condition of the capital punishment requires a replacement discourse. The perspective of peacemaking criminology is used to show that the capital punishment which does not solve the problem of crime needs to be replaced with a perspective of peace as an alternative response to crime."

"Dunia masih mengenal hukuman mati. berdasarkan data Amnesty International (AI), tercatat 128 negara yang telah menghapuskan hukuman mati tetapi masih banyak negara yang menerapkan hukuman mati seperti Amerika Serikat, Cina, Singapura dan Indonesia. Kontroversi hukuman mati dilatarbelakangi oleh pro dan kontra tentang alasan dan legitimasi dijatuhkannya hukuman mati tersebut."