Hasil Pencarian  ::  Simpan CSV :: Kembali

"

Pada periode 2012-2013, pemegang Hak Guna Bangunan (HGB) di atas Hak Pengelolaan PT X (Persero) bermaksud mengajukan perpanjangan Hak Guna Bangunan kepada Badan Pertanahan Nasional. Salah satu syarat yang harus dipenuhi oleh pemegang Hak Bangunan adalah memiliki rekomendasi/persetujuan dari pemegang Hak Pengelolaan yaitu PT X (Persero). Pemegang Hak Pengelolaan telah mengeluarkan SK Direksi tentang Tarif Perpanjangan Perjanjian Penggunaan Tanah Industri (PPTI) diatas Hak Pengelolaan (HPL) PT X (Persero) namun para pemegang HGB keberatan atas tarif yang ditentukan oleh Pemegang Hak Pengelolaan sehinga melakukan gugatan secara Tata Usaha Negara dan Perdata. Dalam penelitian ini permasalahan yang diangkat mengenai penguasaan terhadap tanah yang dilakukan oleh PT X (Persero) dikategorikan sebagai Hak Pengelolaan yang tidak termasuk perbuatan melawan hukum, dan peran notaris dalam proses pembuatan perjanjian penggunaan pemanfaatan tanah Hak Pengelolaan antara pihak ketiga dengan Badan Usaha Milik Negara. Penelitian ini untuk menganalisis Hak Menguasai Negara dalam hak Pengelolaan atas tanah PT X (Persero) dengan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif yang didukung dengan analisis data secara kualitatif. Adapun bentuk hasil penelitian berupa laporan yang berbentuk eksploratoris-fact finding. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan bahwa penguasaan tanah yang dilakukan oleh PT X (Persero) telah sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan. Dalam hal ini PT X (Persero) mendapatkan tanah Hak Pengelolaan dengan mengajukan hak kepada Negara melalui menteri yang membidangi urusan pertanahan. Peran Notaris juga sangat penting dalam pembuatan perjanjian pemanfataan tanah di atas Hak Pengelolaan yaitu memeriksa kebenaran data subjek dan objek perjanjian serta keterangan lainnya yang dapat membuktikan kesahihan data dalam perjanjian.

---

In 2012-2013 period, the holder right of building (HGB) over PT X (Persero) management right in land intend to extend the right theirs have. One of the requirement shall be met by the holder HGB is recommendation or approval from the holder of management right on the land is PT X (Persero). The holder of management right on the land has published regard to Tariff for Extension of Industrial Land Use Agreement over management right on the land through Board of Director Decision. But, the holder HGB has been protested regarding that decision and conducted lawsuit through state administrative and civil. In this research, the issues raised are the possession of the land by PT X (Persero) is categorized as the management right on the land does not include an act against the law, and the notary participant in making an Industrial Land Use Agreement between the third party with State-Owned Enterprises. In this research conducted to analyze the states right to control management right on the land over PT X (Persero) land using normative juridical methods and using qualitative data analysis. The form of research results in the form of reports in the form of exploratory-fact finding.  The results of this study indicate that the possesion of land conducted by PT X (Persero) is in accordance with the prevailing laws and regulations. PT X (Persero) to get the land management rights to apply rights to the State through the minister in charge of land affairs. The role of the Notary is also very important in making agreements in the use of land over management rights that are checking the truth of the subject data and object of the agreement as well as other information that can prove the validity of the data in the agreement.

"

"[ABSTRAKTesis ini membahas tentang jual beli hak atas tanah bersama yang dilakukan setelah perceraian oleh salah satu pihak didasarkan pada hukum pertanahan.Oleh karena merupakan harta bersama, analisa dalam tesis ini juga menggunakan berbagai sumber hukum lain seperti hokum perkawinan dan hokum perdata untuk menganalisa keabsahan transaksi jual beli tanah hak atastanahbersamatersebut. Jual beli hak atas tanah bersama oleh salah satu pihak setelahperceraian dalam prakteknya merupakan hal yang umum dilakukan oleh masyarakat dan sangat mudah dijumpa dalam kehidupan sehari-sehari. Akan tetapi masyarakat tidak mengetahui aturan-aturanhukum yang mengaturhal tersebut, sehingga banyak terjadi penyimpangan hukum yang tidak disengaja akibat kurangnya pengetahuan masyarakat awamakanhukum. Oleh karena itu kasus ini dapat memberikan penyuluhan hokum secara sederhana kepada masyarakat yang tidak mengerti atau tidak mengetahui adanya aturanhukum yang mengatur mengenai jual beli hak atas tanah bersama setelah perceraian tersebut.Tesis ini menggunakan penelitian yuridis normative karena menitikberatkan pada penelitian kepustakaan yang meneliti asas-asas hukum, sistematika hokum dan sinkronisasi hukum dengan cara menganalisanya.Tipe penelitian dalam tesis ini adalah tipe penelitian preskriptif yang memberikan saran atau opini hukumdalammenyelesaikans uatupermasalahan hukum.Permasalahan yang dibahas dalam Tesis ini adalah mengenai akibat hokum terhadap hak atas tanah bersamasetelah perceraian menurut hukum yang berlaku dan keabsahan transaksi jualbeli tanah sebagai hartabersama yang dilakukan oleh salah satu pihak setelah perceraian diputuskan.

---

ABSTRACTThis thesis is discussing about the rights of selling and buying land which came after a divorce by one side and it is based on the law of the land. Because of a joint, this thesis is also using the analysis of many other laws like the marriage of civil law and legitimacy to analyze the purchase of land and rights of the land. The rights of selling and buying the land by purchase rights of either party after a divorce is common in practice, carried out by community and is easily be found in daily life. But society might not know the rules of law to regulate this case, so that unintentional violation of a law community easily happened due to a lack of common law education. Thus, this case can provide simple explanation to the society who doesn't understand the rule of law that regulates about the rights of selling and buying land after a divorce. This thesis is using the juridical normative because it emphasize research literature that focusing on research that examines theories of the law, systematic law and law synchronization with analyze it .Type of research in this thesis is prescriptive research that gives legal advice or opinion to resolve a legal issue .The problems that is discussed in this thesis is about the impact of laws against the rights of the land after divorce. According to applicable laws and the validity of the transactions purchase of the land as a sharing- property-together that is be done by one party after a divorce.;This thesis is discussing about the rights of selling and buying land which came after a divorce by one side and it is based on the law of the land. Because of a joint, this thesis is also using the analysis of many other laws like the marriage of civil law and legitimacy to analyze the purchase of land and rights of the land. The rights of selling and buying the land by purchase rights of either party after a divorce is common in practice, carried out by community and is easily be found in daily life. But society might not know the rules of law to regulate this case, so that unintentional violation of a law community easily happened due to a lack of common law education. Thus, this case can provide simple explanation to the society who doesn't understand the rule of law that regulates about the rights of selling and buying land after a divorce. This thesis is using the juridical normative because it emphasize research literature that focusing on research that examines theories of the law, systematic law and law synchronization with analyze it .Type of research in this thesis is prescriptive research that gives legal advice or opinion to resolve a legal issue .The problems that is discussed in this thesis is about the impact of laws against the rights of the land after divorce. According to applicable laws and the validity of the transactions purchase of the land as a sharing- property-together that is be done by one party after a divorce.;This thesis is discussing about the rights of selling and buying land which came after a divorce by one side and it is based on the law of the land. Because of a joint, this thesis is also using the analysis of many other laws like the marriage of civil law and legitimacy to analyze the purchase of land and rights of the land. The rights of selling and buying the land by purchase rights of either party after a divorce is common in practice, carried out by community and is easily be found in daily life. But society might not know the rules of law to regulate this case, so that unintentional violation of a law community easily happened due to a lack of common law education. Thus, this case can provide simple explanation to the society who doesn't understand the rule of law that regulates about the rights of selling and buying land after a divorce. This thesis is using the juridical normative because it emphasize research literature that focusing on research that examines theories of the law, systematic law and law synchronization with analyze it .Type of research in this thesis is prescriptive research that gives legal advice or opinion to resolve a legal issue .The problems that is discussed in this thesis is about the impact of laws against the rights of the land after divorce. According to applicable laws and the validity of the transactions purchase of the land as a sharing- property-together that is be done by one party after a divorce.;This thesis is discussing about the rights of selling and buying land which came after a divorce by one side and it is based on the law of the land. Because of a joint, this thesis is also using the analysis of many other laws like the marriage of civil law and legitimacy to analyze the purchase of land and rights of the land. The rights of selling and buying the land by purchase rights of either party after a divorce is common in practice, carried out by community and is easily be found in daily life. But society might not know the rules of law to regulate this case, so that unintentional violation of a law community easily happened due to a lack of common law education. Thus, this case can provide simple explanation to the society who doesn't understand the rule of law that regulates about the rights of selling and buying land after a divorce. This thesis is using the juridical normative because it emphasize research literature that focusing on research that examines theories of the law, systematic law and law synchronization with analyze it .Type of research in this thesis is prescriptive research that gives legal advice or opinion to resolve a legal issue .The problems that is discussed in this thesis is about the impact of laws against the rights of the land after divorce. According to applicable laws and the validity of the transactions purchase of the land as a sharing- property-together that is be done by one party after a divorce.;This thesis is discussing about the rights of selling and buying land which came after a divorce by one side and it is based on the law of the land. Because of a joint, this thesis is also using the analysis of many other laws like the marriage of civil law and legitimacy to analyze the purchase of land and rights of the land. The rights of selling and buying the land by purchase rights of either party after a divorce is common in practice, carried out by community and is easily be found in daily life. But society might not know the rules of law to regulate this case, so that unintentional violation of a law community easily happened due to a lack of common law education. Thus, this case can provide simple explanation to the society who doesn't understand the rule of law that regulates about the rights of selling and buying land after a divorce. This thesis is using the juridical normative because it emphasize research literature that focusing on research that examines theories of the law, systematic law and law synchronization with analyze it .Type of research in this thesis is prescriptive research that gives legal advice or opinion to resolve a legal issue .The problems that is discussed in this thesis is about the impact of laws against the rights of the land after divorce. According to applicable laws and the validity of the transactions purchase of the land as a sharing- property-together that is be done by one party after a divorce.;This thesis is discussing about the rights of selling and buying land which came after a divorce by one side and it is based on the law of the land. Because of a joint, this thesis is also using the analysis of many other laws like the marriage of civil law and legitimacy to analyze the purchase of land and rights of the land. The rights of selling and buying the land by purchase rights of either party after a divorce is common in practice, carried out by community and is easily be found in daily life. But society might not know the rules of law to regulate this case, so that unintentional violation of a law community easily happened due to a lack of common law education. Thus, this case can provide simple explanation to the society who doesn't understand the rule of law that regulates about the rights of selling and buying land after a divorce. This thesis is using the juridical normative because it emphasize research literature that focusing on research that examines theories of the law, systematic law and law synchronization with analyze it .Type of research in this thesis is prescriptive research that gives legal advice or opinion to resolve a legal issue .The problems that is discussed in this thesis is about the impact of laws against the rights of the land after divorce. According to applicable laws and the validity of the transactions purchase of the land as a sharing- property-together that is be done by one party after a divorce.;This thesis is discussing about the rights of selling and buying land which came after a divorce by one side and it is based on the law of the land. Because of a joint, this thesis is also using the analysis of many other laws like the marriage of civil law and legitimacy to analyze the purchase of land and rights of the land. The rights of selling and buying the land by purchase rights of either party after a divorce is common in practice, carried out by community and is easily be found in daily life. But society might not know the rules of law to regulate this case, so that unintentional violation of a law community easily happened due to a lack of common law education. Thus, this case can provide simple explanation to the society who doesn't understand the rule of law that regulates about the rights of selling and buying land after a divorce. This thesis is using the juridical normative because it emphasize research literature that focusing on research that examines theories of the law, systematic law and law synchronization with analyze it .Type of research in this thesis is prescriptive research that gives legal advice or opinion to resolve a legal issue .The problems that is discussed in this thesis is about the impact of laws against the rights of the land after divorce. According to applicable laws and the validity of the transactions purchase of the land as a sharing- property-together that is be done by one party after a divorce., This thesis is discussing about the rights of selling and buying land which came after a divorce by one side and it is based on the law of the land. Because of a joint, this thesis is also using the analysis of many other laws like the marriage of civil law and legitimacy to analyze the purchase of land and rights of the land. The rights of selling and buying the land by purchase rights of either party after a divorce is common in practice, carried out by community and is easily be found in daily life. But society might not know the rules of law to regulate this case, so that unintentional violation of a law community easily happened due to a lack of common law education. Thus, this case can provide simple explanation to the society who doesn't understand the rule of law that regulates about the rights of selling and buying land after a divorce. This thesis is using the juridical normative because it emphasize research literature that focusing on research that examines theories of the law, systematic law and law synchronization with analyze it .Type of research in this thesis is prescriptive research that gives legal advice or opinion to resolve a legal issue .The problems that is discussed in this thesis is about the impact of laws against the rights of the land after divorce. According to applicable laws and the validity of the transactions purchase of the land as a sharing- property-together that is be done by one party after a divorce.]"

"Ada berbagai macam alas hak atas tanah. Dalam karya tulis ini penulis hanya akan membahas kasus yang terkait dengan alas hak yang berlaku di kalangan masyarakat di Bali yaitu Pipil. Pipil adalah Surat Tanda Pembayaran Pajak sebelum Tahun 1960 yang oleh masyarakat di Bali di kenal sebagai alat bukti kepemilikan hak atas tanah. Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Mahkamah Agung Nomor 700 PK/PDT/2011 adalah mengenai salah satu sengketa pertanahan di provinsi Bali, dimana terdapat lebih dari satu pipil pada objek tanah yang sama, dan masing masing pihak pemegang pipil mengklaim bahwa tanah adalah milik pemegang pipil tersebut. Selain itu kantor Wilayah pertanahan Provinsi Bali pada tahun 1991 telah mengeluarkan Surat Keputusan dengan nomor SK.87/HP/BPN/1/Pd/1991 yang isinya menunjuk kantor Wilayah pertanahan Provinsi Bali sendiri sebagai pemegang hak pakai pada tanah sengketa. Adapun pokok permasalahan pada karya tulis ini adalah Bagaimanakah kekuatan pipil sebagai alas kepemilikan hak atas tanah hak milik adat di Bali dan Apakah Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Mahkamah Agung No. 700 PK/Pdt/2011 Tahun 2011 penyelesaian hukumnya telah sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku. Pendekatan dalam penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, dengan problem solution atas pokok permasalahan. Pendekatan yuridis normatif digunakan dengan maksud untuk mengadakan pendekatan terhadap masalah dengan cara melihat dari segi peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Jenis data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder yang diperoleh dari studi dokumen di perpustakaan yang berupa bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah, alas hak atas tanah hak milik adat yang termasuk adalah pipil, dapat dijadikan sebagai dasar penerbitan sertipikat atas tanah dan memiliki kekuatan pembuktian sepanjang data yang diterangkan di dalamnya mengandung kebenaran. Sehingga alas hak atas tanah merupakan salah satu dasar bagi seseorang untuk dapat memiliki hak atas tanah. Terhadap pokok permasalahan kedua, penulis berpendapat bahwa Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Mahkamah Agung No. 700 PK/Pdt/2011 Tahun 2011 penyelesaian hukumnya telah sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku, sehingga memberikan kepastian serta perlindungan hukum kepada Penggugat atas kepemilikan hak atas tanah hak milik.

---

There are different kind of Indigeneous Land Rights. The author in this study focuses on issues partaining to Indigeneous Land Rights that is common in Baliand called Pipil. Pipil is a form of Farm Produce Tax Receipt (Surat Pajak Hasil Bumi)or commonly known as "petuk pajak", prior to the year of 1960. and has been widely recognized and accepted by people in Balias proof of land ownership. Judicial review of the Supreme Court decision No. 700 PK/PDT/2011 is about one land disputes in the province of Bali, where there is more than one object pipil on the same ground, and each party pipil holders claim that the land is owned by the pipil holder.

Besides Bali provincial office of the land area in 1991 had issued a decree in which it pointed SK.87/HP/BPN/1/Pd/1991 number office land area of ​​Bali itself as the holder of the right to use the disputed land. The principal issue in this paper is How the power pipil as the base land rights of indigenous property rights in Bali and Is judicial review the Supreme Court verdict No.. 700 PK/Pdt/2011 Year 2011 legal settlement in accordance with the applicable regulations.

The approach in this study by using a normative approach, the solution to the problem at issue. Normative approach is used with the intent to hold the approach to the problem by looking at the terms of the legislation in force. Type of data used is secondary data obtained from the study of the documents in the library in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials.

Based on Government Regulation No. 24 Year 1997 on Land Registration, pedestal land rights, including customary property rights is pipil, can be used as the basis for the issuance of certificates of land and has a strength of evidence throughout the data described in it contains the truth. So the title to land is one of the bases for a person to be able to have rights to the land. Subject to the second permasalaha, enulis found Reconsideration Decision Supreme Court. 700 PK/Pdt/2011 In 2011 legal settlement in accordance with applicable regulations, so as to provide certainty and legal protection to the Plaintiff on the ownership rights of land ownership.Based on Government Regulation No. 24 Year 1997 on Land Registration, Indigeneous Land Rights(Alas Hak Atas Tanah) supported by true and well founded data, could become the basis for the issuance of Land Certificate and considered strong evidence of land ownership in court."

"Sita jaminan adalah tindakan menempatkan obyek sengketa ke dalam penguasaan pengadilan. Hal ini guna menjaga agar gugatan penggugat tidak menjadi kabur dan sia-sia. Sita jaminan harus dinyatakan sah dan berharga agar dapat mengikat dengan sempurna. Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Mahkamah Agung Nomor 278 PK/PDT/2010 menganalisa mengenai jual beli tanah sita jaminan yang belum dinyatakan sah dan berharga dari Tuan Hengkie Soediono kepada PT. Excelcomindo Pratama, Tbk.Tesis ini membahas kekuatan sita jaminan yang belum dinyatakan sah dan berharga, keabsahan jual belinya, serta penerapan putusan tersebut terhadap hukum yang berlaku. Tesis ini menggunakan penelitian kualitatif dengan analisa preskriptif. Hasil penelitian menyarankan agar pembeli lebih berhati-hati dalam melakukan jual beli, kantor pertanahan lebih teliti dalam menerbitkan sertipikat dan majelis hakim lebih seksama dalam memeriksa perkara.

---

Collateral forclosure is a legal action to put the object of dispute under the court custody. It is meant to maintain the plaintiff?s lawsuit from being vain and vague. A collateral forclosure should be declared valid and valuable in order to bind legally and properly. The Supreme Court Decision Number 278 PK/PDT/2010 analyze about the transfer of collateral forclosure that has not been declared as valid and valuable, based on sales and purchase from Mr. Hengkie Soediono to PT. Excelcomindo Pratama.This thesis analyze about the power of collateral forclosure that has not been declared as valid and valuable, the validity of sales and purchase of the transfer and how the court decision complies with the regulation. This thesis is based on a qualitative research with a prescriptive design. The results suggest that buyer should be a more cautious, the land office should be more thorough in publisihing a land sertificate, and judges should be more accurate in reviewing a legal case."

"Para pemegang sertipikat hak guna bangunan atas hak pengelolaan milik PT. KBN (Persero) mengajukan gugatan ke pengadilan tata usaha negara. Objek sengketa berupa surat keputusan direksi tentang tarif perpanjangan hak dan sikap diam terhadap permohonan rekomendasi perpanjangan hak yang telah diajukan. Putusan No. 171 PK/TUN/2016 yang berkekuatan hukum tetap memenangkan pihak KBN tetapi perlindungan hukum tetap harus diberikan para pemegang hak guna bangunan atas hak pengelolaan. Pokok permasalahan yang dibahas adalah mengenai implementasi pemberian dan perpanjangan hak guna bangunan serta perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang sertipikat hak guna bangunan dalam Putusan No. 171 PK/TUN/2016. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan memanfaatkan data sekunder untuk membahas pokok permasalahan dari sudut pandang hukum dan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa implementasi pemberian hak guna bangunan yang dilakukan KBN pada tahun 1988 hingga 1990 telah sesuai dengan perundang-undangan yang berlaku yaitu Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 1 Tahun 1977. Sedangkan, implementasi perpanjangan hak guna bangunan yang sebagian besar berakhir pada 2013 hingga 2014 menghadapi problematika yang berujung penyelesaian di pengadilan. Pengenaan tarif pemanfaatan tanah oleh KBN merupakan salah satu kewenangan yang dimiliki oleh pemegang hak pengelolaan. Oleh karena itu, pemegang sertipikat hak guna bangunan tetap harus membayar tarif yang disyaratkan untuk dapat memperpanjang haknya. Namun perlindungan hukum terhadap pemegang hak guna bangunan tetap harus diberikan berupa perlindungan terhadap hak prioritas perpanjangan hak dan perlindungan hukum terhadap operasional bisnis, bangunan, serta benda milik pemegang hak guna bangunan. Beberapa perjanjian penggunaan tanah industri terdahulu telah menjanjikan hak prioritas perpanjangan hak guna bangunan sehingga KBN terikat untuk memenuhi hak itu apabila pemegang hak guna bangunan yang telah memenuhi persyaratan. Tidak diperpanjangnya hak guna bangunan juga dapat berimbas pada terhambatnya operasional bisnis, resiko kehilangan bangunan, dan bertambahnya pengeluaran bagi pemegang hak guna bangunan. Sehingga diperlukan perlindungan hukum dan mekanisme penyelesaian yang dapat meringankan beban kerugian pemegang hak guna bangunan. Selain itu, kekosongan hukum yang terjadi pasca dicabutnya Peraturan Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 1 Tahun 1977 juga kurang memberikan jaminan kepastian hukum bagi pemegang hak guna bangunan di atas tanah hak pengelolaan.

---

The holders of the certificate of right to build on the right of management belonging to PT KBN (Persero) filed a lawsuit to the state administrative court. There are two objects of dispute, namely director letters concerning the cost of extending the right and silence/rejection on the application for a recommendation for the extension of the right that has been submitted. Supreme Court Decision No. 171 PK/TUN/2016, which has been inkracht won KBN, must still give legal protection to the holders of the right to build on the right of management. The main issues discussed are the implementation of the granting and extension of the right to build and the legal protection for the holders of the certificate of the right to build in the Supreme Court Decision No. 171 PK/TUN/2016. The research method used is normative legal research by utilizing secondary data to discuss the subject matter from the applicable laws and regulations. This study indicates that the implementation of the granting of the right to build carried out by KBN from 1988 to 1990 was following the applicable legislation, namely the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 1 of 1977. Meanwhile, the implementation of the extension of right to build, which mostly ended in 2013 to 2014, faced problems that led to a settlement in court. The imposition of fees for land use by KBN is one of the powers possessed by the holder of the right of management. Therefore, the holders of the certificate of right to build still has to pay the required fee to extend their right. However, it must still give legal protection for the holders of the right to build in the form of protection of the priority right of the extension of the right and legal protection of business operations, buildings, and objects belonging to the holders of the right to build. Several previous industrial land use agreements have promised priority rights to extend the right to build so that KBN is bound to fulfill these rights if the holders of the right to build have fulfilled the requirements. The non-extension of the right to build can also impact the delay of business operations, the risk of losing the building, and increasing expenses for the holders of the right to build. So that legal protection and settlement mechanisms are needed can ease the burden of losses for the holders of the right to build. In addition, the legal vacuum that occurred after the revocation of the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation Number 1 of 1977 also did not guarantee legal certainty for holders of the right to build on the right of management."

"Pelepasan hak atas tanah seringkali menimbulkan persengketaan baik antara pemilik ataupun orang yang mengaku sebagai pemilik atas tanah tanpa adanya alat bukti yang sah. Kepemilikan tanah berdasarkan alat bukti berupa pengikatan jual beli yang dibuat oleh notaris bukanlah merupakan alat bukti kepemilikan atas tanah, tetapi hanya baru terjadi pengikatan semata-mata antara pemilik tanah dan pembeli tanah. Dalam hal ini jelaslah bahwa ketika terjadinya pengikatan jual beli bukanlah terjadi peralihan hak atas tanah, tetapi hal ini merupakan proses untuk ditindak lanjutinya peristiwa hukum lainnya yaitu jual beli tanah yang dituangkandalam Akta Jual beli yang dibuat oleh Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT). Dalam studi kasus ini yang dipermasalahkan yaitu tentang mengenai keperdataan status dan kedudukan para penghuni atas kepemilikan tanah yang berada di bagian wilayah Yayasan Rumah Sakit Islam Faisal Makasar yang telah ditempati lebih dari 14 tahun. Upaya hukum apa saja yang dilakukan oleh para penghuni yang keberadaan tanahnya berada di bagian wilayah Yayasan Rumah Sakit Islam Faisal Makasar .Serta status kepemilikan hak atas tanah yang telah dikeluarkan gambar situasi dari tanah tersebut dan telah diterbitkan sertifikat Hak Guna Bangunan di Kantor Pertanahan Makasar. Penelitian ini didasarkan pada analisis terhadap norma hukum dan putusan dari pengadilan mengenai kepemilikan hak atas tanah yang menjadi sengketa. Adapun sifat penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini merupakan penelitian yang bersifat deskriptif evaluatif, dimana penulis ingin memberikan gambaran sekaligus memberikan penilaian dan saran mengenai sengketa kepemilikan hak atas tanah berdasarkan pembuktian yang dimiliki untuk dapat dimanfaatkan sebagai dasar hukum yang sah dan akurat. Berdasarkan jenis dan bentuknya, data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah data sekunder. Adapun data sekunder diperoleh dari penelitian kepustakaan atau penelitian terhadap bahan pustaka seperti literatur-literatur yang bersumber dari bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Hasil Penelitian ini adalah bahwa kepemilikan atas tanah berupa surat pengikatan jual beli yang dibuat oleh Notaris tidak dapat dijadikan sebagai alas hak untuk dapat memiliki hak atas tanah. bukti-bukti lainnya yang merupakan bukti kepemilikan atas tanah yang dibuat setelah terjadinya pelepasan hak bukanlah merupakan alat bukti yang sah.

---

The release of land rights often leads to disputes between the owner or person claiming to be owners of land in the absence of valid evidence. Land ownership is based on evidence in the form of binding sale and purchase made by a notary is not an evidence of ownership of land, but only just happened binding solelybetween landowners and land buyers. In this case it is clear that when the binding sale and purchase is not a shift of land rights, but this is a process for follow the next other legal events that buying and selling land as outlined in the Deed of Sale and purchase made by the Acting Land Deed Author.

In this case study in question is about the civil status and position of occupants of land located on the territory of Islam Faisal Hospital Foundation Napier who have occupied more than 14 years. Remedy what is being done by the occupants of the existence of land located on the territory of Islam Faisal Hospital Foundation Napier. As well as the ownership status of land rights that have been issued a picture of the situation and has issued land certificates Right of Building on Land Office Napier.

The study was based on an analysis of legal norms and decisions of the courts regarding the ownership rights to the land in dispute. The nature of research used in this study is descriptive evaluative research, which the authors want to give as well as providing assessment and advice regarding disputes over land ownership rights based on the evidence held to be utilized as a valid legal basis and accurate.

Based on the type and shape, the data used in this research is secondary data. The secondary data obtained from research literature or research on library materials such as literature sourced from the primary legal materials, legal materials secondary, and tertiary legal materials.

The results of this study is that ownership of land in the form of a letter binding sale and purchase made by the Notary can not be used as a base a right to be able to have land rights. other evidence which is evidence of ownership of land made after the waiver is not a valid evidence."

"Pewarisan merupakan suatu peristiwa hukum yang dapat menyebabkan peralihan hak atas tanah. Pasal 19 UUPA mewajibkan setiap pemegang hak atas tanah untuk mendaftarkan haknya, dengan tujuan untuk menjamin kepastian hak dan kepastian hukum, juga untuk menyediakan informasi kepada pihak-pihak yang berkepentingan, termasuk Pemerintah. Pendaftaran Tanah diatur secara khusus dalam Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997, yang menyempurnakan aturan sebelumnya, yaitu Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 10 Tahun 1961. Pemegang Hak Atas Tanah yang mendaftarkan tanahnya akan diberikan suatu sertifikat, yang di dalamnya tercantum nama pemegang hak bersangkutan. Sertifikat merupakan tanda bukti hak yang kuat, artinya selama tidak dapat dibuktikan sebaliknya, data fisik dan data yuridis yang tercantum di dalamnya harus dianggap benar. Setiap peralihan hak atas tanah akan dicatat dalam sertifikat. Begitu pentingnya pendaftaran hak atas tanah, terutama untuk tanah bekas Hak Barat, harus didaftarkan dan dikonversi menjadi hak yang dikenal dalam UUPA. Salah satu hak atas tanah yang dapat diberikan kepada pemegang tanah bekas Hak Barat adalah Hak Guna Bangunan. Hak Guna Bangunan diberikan untuk jangka waktu 30 tahun, jika tidak diperpanjang maka tanah kembali menjadi Tanah Negara. Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 3640/K/PDT/2016, Penggugat merupakan penghuni tanah warisan, namun tidak pernah mendaftarkan haknya. Sedangkan Tergugat merupakan pihak yang namanya tercantum dalam sertifikat. Dalam penulisan ini akan dibahas analisa mengenai siapa yang merupakan ahli waris yang berhak atas Tanah Sengketa dan bagaimana status hukum dan kepemilkan hak atas tanah tanah Sengketa. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, jenis data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder dan metode analisis menggunakan metode kualitatif. Dari hasil analisa terhadap Putusan dapat disimpulkan bahwa Putusan dan pertimbangan telah sesuai dengan Hukum Waris yang berlaku, UUPA dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang pendaftaran tanah, bahwa Penggugat bukan merupakan ahli waris yang berhak atas tanah dan tanah dilekati Hak Guna Bangunan atas nama Penggugat.

---

Inheritance is an affair that can caused transfer Land Rights. Article 19 UUPA emphasizes that it is compulsory to every Land Rights holder to register their right, in order to guarantee the right certainty and the legal certainty, also to provide information for the party in needs, including the Government. Land Registration regulated specifically on Government Regulation Number 24 the Year 1997, that complement the previous regulation, Government Regulation Number 10 the Year 1961. Land Rights holder who register their land will be given a certificate, which consists the name of the person holds the land right. Certificate is an absolute evidence, meaning as long as it cannot be proved otherwise, physical and legal data written on it shall be considered true. Every transition of land rights will be noted on the certificate. Land registration is so important, especially for the former Colonial Land Rights, that is has to be registered and converted to the rights that recognized by UUPA. One of the rights that can be given to the holder of former Colonial Land Rights is Building Rights. Building Rights can be given for as long as 30 years, and if it is not extended then the land status is returned to the State and consider as States`s Land. In a case which is written in Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republic Indonesia Number 3640 K PDT 2016, a dispute occurs because Plaintiff`s, whom lived on an Inheritance Land, does not asked for approval from Defendant when the Defendant is going to sell the land. Defendant feels they have the rights to sell the land since his her name is written on the land certificate. Research method used in this Thesis is juridical normative, data type used is secondary data and method of analysis used is qualitative method. The results of the analysis concluded that the verdict has been in accordance with Indonesia Inheritance Law, UUPA and Government Regulation Number 24 the Year 1997 about Land Registration, that Plaintiff is not the rightful heir of the land and the Inheritance Land status is under Building Rights on behalf of Defendant."

"ABSTRAKSistem pendaftaran tanah yang dianut Indonesia adalah sistem pendaftaranhak dengan sistem publikasi negatif yang mengandung unsur positif,apabila ada pihak yang merasa dirugikan atas diterbitkannya sertipikat atastanah, dapat mengajukan pembatalan. Permasalahannya adalahbagaimanakah tata cara atau mekanisme pembatalan penguasaan tanahyang telah terdaftar dalam sertipikat HGB dan HPL? Kemudian apakahKepala Kantor Pertanahan Kotamadya Jakarta Selatan sudahmembereskan hak atas tanah milik Susuna Dewi sebelum diterbitkannyasertipikat HPL No. 1/Kuningan Barat kepada PD. Pembangunan SaranaJaya DKI Jakarta, sertipikat HGB No. B119/Kuningan Barat kepada PT.Bimantara Sarana Perkasa, dan sertipikat HGB No. 198/Kuningan Baratkepada PT. Fajar Surya Shakti (Studi Kasus Putusan Peninjauan KembaliMahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia No. 89/PK/TUN/2008 jo. PutusanKasasi Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia No. 75K/TUN/2008 jo.Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara DKI Jakarta No.178/B/2007/PT.TUN.JKT jo. Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha NegaraJakarta No. 14/G/2007/PTUN.JKT)? Metode penelitian yang digunakanadalah tipe penelitian yuridis normatif dari data sekunder yang dianalisissecara kualitatif dalam bentuk preskriptif.

---

ABSTRACTLand registration system applied by Indonesia is land registration systemwith a negative publicity which is contain positive elements, if any partiesfeel harmed by the issuance of land certificate, can file cancellation. Theproblem is how the procedures or mechanism cancellation of land tenurethat has been registered in HGB dan HPL? Then, if Head of the MunicipalLand Office of South Jakarta has settled the right of land belongs toSusuna Dewi before the issuance of the Certificate of HPL Number1/Kuningan Barat to PD. Pembangunan Sarana Jaya DKI Jakarta,Certificate of HGB Number B119/Kuningan Barat to PT. BimantaraSarana Perkasa, and Certificate of HGB Number 198/Kuningan Barat toPT. Fajar Surya Shakti (Study Case of the Decision of Judicial Review bythe Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number89/PK/TUN/2008 as amended to the Decision of Cassation by theSupreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 75K/TUN/2008 asamended to the Decision of State Administrative High Court of the SpecialCapital City Region of Jakarta Number 178/B/2007/PT.TUN.JKT asamended to the Decision of Jakarta State Administrative Court Number14/G/2007/PTUN.JKT)? The Research method that is used is a judicialnormative research type from secondary data that is analyzed qualitativelyin the form of prescriptive. The case of such cancellation is submitted toPTUN and is proceed through regular procedure examination."

"Pemberian Hak Pengelolaan pada hakekatnya memberikan kewenangan kepada pemegang hak nya untuk dapat mengusahakan tanah tersebut sesuai dengan kebutuhannya. Namun tujuan sebenarnya diberikannya Hak Pengelolaan tersebut sebenarnya merupakan sebuah usaha untuk menyediakan tanah-tanah tersebut untuk pihak-pihak yang membutuhkan. Oleh karena itu diatas tanah Hak Pengelolaan dapat diterbitkan hak-hak atas tanah yang lain yang sesuai dengan yang diatur oleh peraturan perundang undangan. Hak pengelolaan merupakan gempilan dari Hak Menguasai Negara yang termasuk ke dalam bidang hukum publik, namun pada prakteknya sifat dan hakekat dari Hak Pengelolaan mulai mengalami pergeseran dan masuk ke area hukum privat. Dalam kasus perpanjangan HGB No.26/Gelora dan HGB No.27/Gelora sebagaimana diputus dalam Putusan Peninjauan Kembali Nomor 276 PK/Pdt/2011, muncul Hak Pengelolaan diatas tanah yang telah dihaki oleh HGB tersebut terlebih dahulu yang menimbulkan permasalahan ketika HGB tersebut akan diperpanjang dan tidak diletakkan diatas HPL No.1/Gelora tersebut. Munculnya HPL bersyarat tidak pernah diatur dalam peraturan perundang undangan dan menimbulkan permasalahan hukum yaitu tidak adanya kepastian dan perlindungan hukum atas pemegang Hak Atas Tanah lainnya. Melalui penulisan hukum ini, Penulis berharap dapat memberikan sumbangsih dan solusi mengenai Hak Pengelolaan yang dalam praktek masih sering menimbulkan permasalahan yang tidak jarang berujung pada pengadilan.

---

Granting Rights Management is essentially gave his authority to the holder of the right to cultivate the land in accordance with their needs . But the real goal is actually rendered Rights Management is an attempt to provide the land for those who need . Therefore, the above ground can be issued for the Management of the rights of other land in accordance with the laws and regulations governed by . Rights management is a part of State Mastering of Rights which belong to the field of public law , but in practice the nature and essence of the Management started to experience a shift and get into the area of private law . In case of extension of the Building Right No.26/Gelora and No.27/Gelora as can be seen in the Judicial Review Decision No. 276 PK/Pdt/2011, appeared on the Management of land that has been occupied by Building Right advance that cause problems when these rights will extended and not placed on the HPL No.1/Gelora. The emergence of HPL conditional is never set in the laws and regulations and cause problems is the lack of legal certainty and legal protection of shareholders other Land Rights . Through this thesis, the author hopes to contribute and give some solutions regarding to the Rights Management which in practice still often creates problems and frequently lead to court cases."

"Tesis ini membahas mengenai Pembuatan Akta Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB)dengan penyalahgunaan keadaan dan kuasa mutlak yang mengakibatkan berpindahnyakepemilikan hak atas tanah tanpa diketahui oleh pihak penjual. Adapun rumusan masalahdalam tesis ini adalah pembuatan akta PPJB 01/2010 dengan penyalahgunaan keadaanserta Akta Kuasa Mutlak 02/2010 yang berakibat pada peralihan hak atas tanahberdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 197 PK/Pdt/2019 dantanggung jawab PPAT yang membuat Akta Jual Beli Nomor 02/2011 berdasarkan AktaKuasa Mutlak. Bentuk penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dan tipe penelitian iniproblem identification. Hasil analisa dari permasalahan tesis ini adalah batal demi hukumkarena PPJB 01/2010 dan Akta Kuasa melanggar Pasal 1320 KUH Perdata yaitu syaratsubyektif dan objektif. Sehingga AJB 02/2011 batal demi hukum, PPAT yang membuatAJB 02/2011 yg berdasarkan kuasa mutlak dapat dikenakan pertanggung jawaban secaraperdata, karena menimbulkan kerugian dan melanggar hak pihak lain. Bagi pemerintahharus segera membuat Undang-undang mengenai penggunaan kuasa mutlak untukpemindahan hak atas tanah, sehingga di kemudian hari tidak terjadi lagi permasalahanyang merugikan pihak pembeli maupun penjual, dan bagi masyarakat yang inginmelakukan perbuatan hukum harus lebih memperhatikan lagi klausul-klausul yangterdapat dalam akta, agar tidak ada sengketa di kemudian hari. PPAT sebagai pejabatumum pembuat akta autentik harus lebih berhati-hati dan teliti dalam membuat aktaautentik, agar tidak dijadikan turut tergugat. PPAT wajib menolak untuk membuat AJB,apabila terdapat kuasa mutlak yang bertentangan dengan Instruksi Mendagri Nomor 14Tahun 1982 dan Pasal 39 ayat 1 huruf d Peraturan pemerintah nomor 24 Tahun 1997tentang pendaftaran tanah, terkait larangan PPAT untuk membuatkan akta atas dasarkuasa mutlak.

---

This thesis discuss about drawing up a Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement with abuseof circumstances and utilization of the Irrevocable Power of Attorney on Attorney forConveyancing Land Rights Deed would causing those deed void by law. That because ofdrafting a Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement should be based on the conformity andconsensus between parties while the use of Irrevocable Power of Attorney on acquittalsale and purchase for legal protection of the buyer. The issue in this thesis is the drawingup of Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement Number 01/2010 with the abuse ofcircumstances and the Irrevocable Power of Attorney Number 02/2010 which results inthe conveyance of land rights based on the Supreme Court of Republic of IndonesiaDecision Number 197 Pk/Pdt/2019 and the responsibility of Land Deed Official relatedto its jurisdiction to drafting the Sale and Purchase Deed Number 02/2011 based on theIrrevocable Power of Attorney. This research uses normative judicial research andproblem identification type of research. The result of this research is The Sale andPurchase Binding Agreement Number 01/2010 as well as the Irrevocable Power ofAttorney Number 02/2010 caused to void by law because they contravene Article 1320of Civil Code which ruled about subjective and objective requirements. Because of theSale and Purchase Binding Agreement Number 01/2010 is void by law, the Land DeedOfficial that draft the Sale and Purchase Deed Number 02/2011 with Irrevocable Powerof Attorney could be subject to civil accountability for causing losses to other parties. Thegovernment must immediately make a law regarding the use of absolute power to transferland rights, so that in the future there will be no more problems that harm buyers andsellers, and for people who want to take legal actions, they must pay more attention to theclauses contained. in the deed, so that there are no disputes in the future. PPAT as ageneral official who makes authentic deeds must be more careful and thorough in makingauthentic deeds, so that they are not made a defendant. PPAT is obliged to refuse to makeAJB, if there is absolute power that contradicts the Instruction of the Minister of HomeAffairs Number 14 of 1982 and Article 39 paragraph 1 letter d Government RegulationNumber 24 of 1997 concerning land registration, related to the prohibition of PPAT frommaking deeds on the basis of absolute power."